Susan E. Swedo, M.D. Chair, DSM-5 Neurodevelopmental Disorders - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

susan e swedo m d
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Susan E. Swedo, M.D. Chair, DSM-5 Neurodevelopmental Disorders - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Susan E. Swedo, M.D. Chair, DSM-5 Neurodevelopmental Disorders Workgroup Senior Investigator & Chief Pediatrics & Developmental Neuroscience Branch National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program Bethesda, Maryland


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Susan E. Swedo, M.D.

Chair, DSM-5 Neurodevelopmental Disorders Workgroup

Senior Investigator & Chief Pediatrics & Developmental Neuroscience Branch National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program Bethesda, Maryland

slide-2
SLIDE 2

 Myth: The DSM-IV criteria clearly differentiate

Autism, Asperger Disorder and PDD-NOS

 Myth(?): “Autism affects 1 in 110 children and

1 in 70 boys” (Statistic from US CDC in 2009)

 Rumor: The ND Workgroup is ignoring science

in favor of public opinion

 Rumor: The ND Workgroup is being created by

a “bunch of scientists” without regard for public opinion.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

MEMBERS

 Gillian Baird  Ed Cook  Francesca Happe  James Harris  Walter Kaufmann  Bryan King  Catherine Lord  Joseph Piven  Rosemary Tannock  Sally Rogers  Sarah Spence  Susan Swedo  Amy Wetherby  Harry Wright

ADVISORS

Jim Bodfish

Martha Denckla

Ann Kummer

Maureen Lefton-Grief

Sally Ozonoff

Diane Paul

Eva Petkova

Daniel Pine

Alya Reeve

Mabel Rice

Joseph Sergeant

Bennett & Sally Shaywitz

Audrey Thurm

Keith Widaman

Warren Zigman

slide-4
SLIDE 4

 Multidisciplinary group with expertise in:

  • Child psychiatry
  • Child neurology
  • Child psychology (clinical and experimental)
  • Early development
  • Speech & language pathology
  • Pediatrics

 Advisors from a variety of related disciplines are

appointed to work on specific issues (e.g. reading disorders or communication disorders).

slide-5
SLIDE 5

 Work Process

  • Bi-monthly calls
  • Twice yearly face to face meetings

▪ Subcommittee work in-between

  • Ongoing input from other stakeholders

▪ CNS, AAP, International Rett Foundation, AACAP, American Psychological Association, American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. ▪ Outreach by committee members and APA ▪ Posting of criteria and request for feedback from lay public and professionals

slide-6
SLIDE 6

 Subcommittees:

  • Intellectual disabilities
  • Learning disabilities
  • Core domains of autism
  • Co-morbid medical and genetic conditions
  • Asperger’s disorder
  • Childhood disintegrative disorder (and regression

in autism)

  • Effects of age and gender.
slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Name Change

▪ DSM-IV = mental retardation and global developmental delays ▪ Concerns raised by AAIDD and others about pejorative nature of “mental retardation” ▪ Parent group (Voices of the Retarded) asked for retention of MR

  • New Criteria – Equal weighting between:

▪ Intellectual limitations ▪ Adaptive limitations

slide-8
SLIDE 8

DSM-IV DIAGNOSES

 Expressive language

disorder

 Mixed receptive-

expressive language disorder

 Phonological disorder

(formerly Developmental Articulation Disorder)

 Stuttering  Communication Disorder-

NOS

DSM-5 RECOMMENDATIONS

Language impairment Specific Learning impairment Late language emergence Social communication impairment Speech sound disorder Voice disorder Stuttering

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • A. Social Communication Impairment (SCI) is an

impairment of pragmatics and is diagnosed based

  • n difficulty in the social uses of verbal and

nonverbal communication in naturalistic contexts, which affects the development of social relationships and discourse comprehension and cannot be explained by low abilities in the domains

  • f word structure and grammar.
  • B. The low social communication abilities result in

functional limitations in effective communication, social participation, academic achievement, or

  • ccupational success, alone or in any combination.
slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • C. Rule out Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Autism spectrum disorder by encompasses pragmatic communication problems as part of the spectrum and therefore, ASD needs to be ruled out for SCI to be diagnosed.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

 1980’s

  • Autism is rare, affecting 6 per

10,000 individuals

 2006

  • Autism affects 1 in 166

 2007

  • Autism rates rise to 1 in 150

 October 2009

  • Autism reaches epidemic

proportions: 1 in 58 boys and 1 in 91 children are affected.

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

 There are more cases – the prevalence is

increasing at epidemic rates

 The definition has changed (broadened)

so that the spectrum includes more children

 Diagnostic assessments have improved  An autism diagnosis increases services

provided by school systems

 The studies use different methodologies

and analytic techniques

slide-15
SLIDE 15

 DSM-III

  • Strict criteria

 DSM-IIIR

  • Change in PDD-NOS description

 DSM-IV

  • Autism requires only “qualitative impairments”

in communication and social skills

slide-16
SLIDE 16

 The Autism Spectrum

  • Behavioral syndromes are hard to define with

sensitivity and specificity (clinical practice vs. community)

  • Broader phenotype may be included
  • PDD-NOS is supposed to be the least used

category, but accounts for more than 50% of cases

slide-17
SLIDE 17

 Mental retardation was primary diagnosis,

with “autistic features” if social- communication deficits were observed

 Presence of repetitive behaviors is common

in Developmental Disabilities (DD) and Intellectual Disabilities (ID)

 Question of diagnostic “substitution” has

been raised and answered with contradictory results

slide-18
SLIDE 18

 Improved screening tools in toddlers and

preschoolers has increased detection – has also increased number of children who receive early diagnosis and “move off the spectrum” by grade school

 Increased recognition has provided diagnoses

to less severely impaired individuals

 Diagnosis of PDD-NOS or Asperger disorder

given to adolescents without developmental history

slide-19
SLIDE 19

 1992 – The Start of the Epidemic?

  • Dept. of Education changes guidelines for

autism services to allow children to qualify for services with autism diagnosis only.

  • States that expanded “autism” to include PDD-

NOS and Asperger syndrome have different rates of diagnoses than those that don’t (e.g. California)

  • Regional increases in autism rates within school

districts – related to services delivered?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

 The CDC Studies

  • Retrospective review of medical records and

school records for “key words” based on DSM diagnostic criteria

  • No in-person confirmation of “caseness”
  • Rates differed 2-fold to 4-fold by location

▪ CDC’s concerned that certain locales “under-diagnosed” (e.g. West Virginia – no change in rates) ▪ However, since highest rates were in most affluent states/school districts, could some locales have “over- diagnosed”?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

 The NCHS Study (Pediatrics, October 2009)

  • “Shocking” and “Staggering” rates of 1 in 58

boys and 1 in 91 children ages 3 – 17 years

  • Telephone survey
  • 40% of children who “ever” had diagnosis did not

currently have an ASD

  • Limitations?
  • Conclusions?
slide-22
SLIDE 22

 Report of the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey

2007

  • National Centre for Social Research and
  • National Health Services Information Center

 Using a threshold of 10 or more on the Autism

Diagnostic Observation Schedule, 1.0% of the adult population had ASD.

 The ASD prevalence rate was higher in men (1.8 per

cent) than women (0.2 per cent). This fits with the gender profile found in childhood population studies.

 Childhood population studies showed rate of 1.0%.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Where are we with Dx?

  • Worldwide standard criteria

(DSM IV/ICD-10)

  • With combined history/informant

report and direct observation, excellent sensitivity and specificity for prototypic autism in preschool and school age children

  • Diagnoses of ASD are generally

stable.

  • Within a research program,

clinical best estimates add to stability of a diagnosis.

Implications of Dx:

  • Etiology*
  • Course**
  • Appropriate

treatments**

  • Prognosis**
  • Risk or association with
  • ther difficulties not

identified as core symptoms**

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Social Impairment Repetitive Behaviors & Restricted Interests Speech/ Communication Deficits

Autism

Language Disorders Intellectual Disabilities

slide-25
SLIDE 25

More referrals of: Toddlers and 2 year-olds Older children without intellectual disabilities Adolescents and adults often with psychiatric comorbidities Early intervention (and positive effects) Less association with intellectual disability. Children without significant language or cognitive delay present different pictures

slide-26
SLIDE 26

 1. One spectrum of autistic disorders called

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) defined purely by behaviors

 No differentiation among autism, PDD-NOS,

Asperger Syndrome, Childhood Disintegrative Disorder

 No differentiation within ASD among disorders

by etiology (Rett Syndrome, Fragile X, other known genetic disorders)

slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

A Powerful Identity, a Vanishing Diagnosis

By CLAUDIA WALLIS (November 3, 2009) It is one of the most intriguing labels in psychiatry. Children with Asperger’s syndrome, a mild form of autism, are socially awkward and often physically clumsy, but many are verbal prodigies, speaking in complex sentences at early ages, reading newspapers fluently by age 5 or 6 and acquiring expertise in some preferred topic — stegosaurs, clipper ships, Interstate highways — that will astonish adults and bore their playmates to tears. In recent years, this once obscure diagnosis, given to more than four times as many boys as girls, has become increasingly common. .. But no sooner has Asperger consciousness awakened than the disorder seems headed for psychiatric obsolescence. Though it became an official part of the medical lexicon

  • nly in 1994, the experts who are revising psychiatry’s diagnostic manual have proposed

to eliminate it from the new edition, due out in 2012. If these experts have their way, Asperger’s syndrome and another mild form of autism, pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (P.D.D.-N.O.S. for short), will be folded into a single broad diagnosis, autism spectrum disorder — a category that encompasses autism’s entire range, or spectrum, from high-functioning to profoundly disabling.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

 Scientific validity

  • Questioning the importance of very early

language milestones vs. fluent speech in

  • lder years
  • Overlap in research when VIQ controlled

 Concern about access to services

slide-30
SLIDE 30

 Over 2200 validated singletons with ASD;  8500 family members (two biological parents

and, in most cases, at least one unaffected sibling) with DNA and intensive behavioral and neuropsychological phenotyping

 Recruited from 12 sites in the US and Canada  Cell lines and phenotyping data are available

through www.sfari.org for interested scientists

slide-31
SLIDE 31

ADI-R RRB Domain Scores

slide-32
SLIDE 32

ADOS Social Affect

slide-33
SLIDE 33

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent aa ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak am Site Autism PDD-NOS Aspergers N=32 F=6.3% N=28 F=17.9% N=59 F=11.9% N=61 F=11.5% N=62 F=12.9% N=52 F=9.6% N=22 F=27.3% N=24 F=16.7% N=30 F=13.3% N=24 F=8.3% N=29 F=17.2%

N = sample size F = % Females A = Mean Age

ASDDistribution of Probands

Total Probands = 423

slide-34
SLIDE 34

 That people with diagnoses of Asperger

Syndrome or PDD-NOS do not lose services because of being included in ASD

 That people who prefer the term Asperger

Syndrome as ways to refer to themselves can use it

 That the ranges of skill levels and abilities within

the spectrum of ASD is not underestimated

slide-35
SLIDE 35
  • Social communication
  • Restricted interests and repetitive behaviors

(RRBs) WHY?

 Social-communication skills group are highly correlated

and group together

 When they do not, differences are primarily accounted

for by language level

slide-36
SLIDE 36
  • Deficits in social-emotional reciprocity
  • Deficits in nonverbal communicative

behaviors used for social interaction

  • Deficits in developing and maintaining

relationships, appropriate to developmental level

TITLE

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Examples (not intended to be exhaustive)

  • A. Abnormal social approach
  • B. Failure to have back and forth conversations
  • C. Reduced sharing of interests, emotions and

affect

  • D. Lack of and/or interest in initiation of social

interaction

slide-38
SLIDE 38
  • A. Poorly integrated verbal and nonverbal

communication

  • B. Abnormalities in eye contact and body

language

  • C. Deficits in understanding of nonverbal

communication

  • D. Lack of facial expression or gestures
  • 2. Deficits in nonverbal communicative

behaviors used for social interaction

slide-39
SLIDE 39
  • A. Lack of imaginative play
  • B. Difficulties in making friends
  • C. Adjusting behavior to suit different social

contexts

  • D. Absence of interest or response to people
  • 3. Deficits in developing and maintaining

relationships appropriate to developmental level (beyond those with caregivers)

slide-40
SLIDE 40
  • A. Stereotyped or repetitive speech, motor movements or use
  • f objects
  • B. Excessive adherence to routines, ritualized patterns of

verbal or nonverbal behavior or excessive resistance to change

  • C. Highly restricted, fixated interests that are abnormal in

intensity or focus

  • D. Hyper- or hypo-reactivity to sensory input or unusual

interest in sensory aspects of environment

slide-41
SLIDE 41
  • A. Simple motor stereotypies and echolalia
  • B. Repetitive use of objects
  • C. Idiosyncratic phrases and stereotypic speech
  • A. Stereotyped or repetitive speech, motor

movements or use of objects

slide-42
SLIDE 42
  • A. Motoric rituals
  • B. Insistence on same route or food
  • C. Repetitive questioning
  • D. Extreme distress at small changes
  • 2. Excessive adherence to routines, ritualized

patterns of verbal or nonverbal behavior or excessive resistance to change: nonexhaustive examples

slide-43
SLIDE 43
  • A. Strong attachment to unusual objects
  • B. Preoccupations with unusual objects
  • C. Excessively circumscribed or perseverative

interests

  • 3. Highly restricted, fixated interests that are

abnormal in intensity or focus

slide-44
SLIDE 44
  • A. Apparent indifference to pain/heat/cold
  • B. Adverse response to specific sounds or textures
  • C. Excessive smelling or touching of objects
  • D. Fascination with lights or spinning objects
  • 4. Hyper- or hypo-reactivity to sensory input or

unusual interest in sensory aspects of environment

slide-45
SLIDE 45

 General levels (often severe, moderate, mild,

none)

 For a variety of domains relevant to almost any

psychiatric condition – “Cross Cutting” measures Some of them are:

  • Developmental level or nonverbal and verbal IQ
  • Adaptive functioning
  • Verbal abilities at the time of intake
  • Hyperactivity/impulsivity
  • Sleeping difficulties

 Co-occurring medical/psychiatric problems or

achievement issues

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Dimensional Ratings for DSM V ASD Social Communication Fixated Interests and Repetitive Behaviors Requires very substantial support Minimal social communication Marked interference in daily life Requires substantial support Marked deficits with limited initiations and reduced or atypical responses Obvious to the casual observer and occur across context Less Severe Even with support, noticeable impairments Significant interference in at least one context Subclinical symptoms Some symptoms in this or both domains; no significant impairment Unusual or excessive but no interference Normal variation Maybe awkward or isolated but WNL WNL for developmental level and no interference

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Age of perceived onset Pattern of onset -- E.g., Loss? Of what skills?

Examples:

ASD w/ onset before 18 months and loss of words & social skills ASD with onset by age 30 months and loss of social skills ASD with no clear onset and no loss

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Use of the Specifier: Associated with Known Medical or Genetic Condition or Environmental Exposure Known Medical Condition –

Possibly etiologic: Seizure disorder Comorbid – Chronic irritable bowel syndrome

Known Genetic Condition –

Associated with Fragile X Disorder Associated with 15q11-13 Associated with Rett Syndrome (MECP-2)

Known Environmental Exposure –

Associated with Fetal Alcohol Exposure

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Commonalities in Core Symptoms Deficits of Social Communication Restrictive-Repetitive Behaviors & Fixated Interests Variety (n = 1) of: Course and Severity of core symptoms Intellectual Functioning Number & type of co-occurring sx’s Etiologies

slide-50
SLIDE 50
  • Perhaps, ASD could be conceived as a

neurodevelopmental disorder similar to Cerebral Palsy, which implies a constellation of attributes with a clear effect on function…

 But has a range of etiologies  A range of severities  Can be highly impairing or not at all as development

progresses

 Has predictable but different trajectories  Is treated or perhaps eventually prevented as we

understand its causes

 Should be addressed in all developmental screenings