Sustaining Fisheries and Mariculture for A Blue Economy in YSLME - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sustaining fisheries and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sustaining Fisheries and Mariculture for A Blue Economy in YSLME - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sustaining Fisheries and Mariculture for A Blue Economy in YSLME Mr. Yinfeng GUO Expert Group Meeting on Green Economy for Sustainable Development Goals: National Implementation of Low Carbon Chief Technical Adviser and Development Manager,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sustaining Fisheries and Mariculture for A Blue Economy in YSLME

  • Mr. Yinfeng GUO

Chief Technical Adviser and Manager, UNDP/GEF YSLME Phase II Project, UNOPS Email: yinfengg@unops.org

Expert Group Meeting on Green Economy for Sustainable Development Goals: National Implementation of Low Carbon Development March 13-15, 2018, Jeju, Republic of Korea

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Yellow Sea LME

 400,000 km2  Bordered by PR China, RO Korea, and DPR Korea  Tens of millions of people in five large cities in three 3 countries  Vulnerable: 7 years flushing time  Highly productive ecosystem, providing 1 m tons of capture fisheries and 14 m mariculture per year

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Transboundary issues

  • Pollution and contaminants;
  • Eutrophication
  • Harmful algae blooms (HABs)
  • Fishing efforts exceeding ecosystem carrying capacity
  • Unsustainable mariculture
  • Habitat loss and degradation
  • Jellyfish blooms
  • Change in ecosystem structure
  • Climate change-related issues
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Annual catches (tonnes) reported from 1950 to 2015 in the YS (SAU, 2017)

Catches in the Yellow Sea increased from 120,000 tones in 1950s to more than 1.1 million tones around 2015

slide-5
SLIDE 5

118.0 120.0 122.0 124.0 126.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0

A1 A3 C3 C5 C6 E3 E4 E6 E8 G2 G3 G5 G6 I1 I2 I3 I4 I5

The total biomass of fishery species fluctuated in last 30 years, and increased slightly last 10 yeas; trophic level appears stable

(SAU, 2017) (Survey data by R/V BeiDou of YSFRI)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

There are changes in biomass yields of dominant species

1986.05

Engraulis japonicus 60% Enchelyopus elongatus 5% Pampus argenteus 4% Loligo japonica 4% Lophius litulon 3% Raja porosa 1% Others 12% Pseudosciaena polyactis 1% Crangon affinis 2% Conger myriaster 1% Cleisthenes herzensteini 7%

1998.05

Hemitripterus villosus 2% Cleisthenes herzensteini 3% Collichthys niveatus 1% Pseudosciaena polyactis 4% Conger myriaster 2% Ammodytes personatus 11% Crustaceans 2% Crangon affinis 4% Gadus macrocephalus 2% Others 12% Engraulis japonicus 57%

2010.05

Pseudosciaena polyactis 23% Engraulis japonicus 3% Erisphex potti 3% Enedrias fangi 4% Others 35% Ammodytes personatus 3% Crangon affinis 9% Lophius litulon 12% Sepiola birostrat 3% Conger myriaster 3% Pampus argenteus 2%

The commercially important long-lived, high trophic level, piscivorous bottom fish have been replaced by the low-valued shorted-lived, low trophic level, planktivorous pelagic fish.

TL=3.7 TL=3.4 TL=3.66 TL=3.68

(Tang, Environmental Development, 2016)

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Reduction of total loading of nutrients

from 2006 level

  • Reduced standing stock of marine litter
  • Reducing contaminants in bathing beaches

and other marine recreational waters

  • 25-30% reduction in fishing efforts
  • Rebuilding marine living resources
  • Improving mariculture techniques to

reduce environmental stress

  • Meeting international

requirements on contaminants

  • Better understanding and prediction
  • f ecosystem changes for adaptive

management

  • Maintenance and improvement of current

populations and distributions of genetic diversity of living organisms including endangered and endemic species

  • Habitat maintenance according to 2007

standards

  • reduction of risks of introduced species

Responses

11 YSLME SAP Targets

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Yellow Sea Partnership

YSLME Commission

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Conservation of fish spawning, nursery and feeding grounds

PPAs

  • 1. Zhoushan Islands
  • 2. Yangtze River

Estuary Wetland

  • 3. Southern Jiangsu

Coast

  • 4. Northern Jiangsu

Coast

  • 5. Haizhou Bay
  • 6. Qingshi
  • 7. Yanwei
  • 8. Yellow River/

Laizhou Bay

  • 9. Bo Hai
  • 10. Qinhuangdao
  • 11. Liaohe River Estuary
  • 12. Haiyangdao/

Changxing

  • 13. Changshandao
  • 14. Yalu River Estuary
  • 15. Baengnyeong

Island/Yeonpyeong Island

  • 16. Gyeonggi Bay
  • 17. Cheonsu Bay
  • 18. Geum/Mangyeong/

Dongjin River Estuary

  • 19. Heuksan Island
  • 20. Yeongsan River

Estuary

  • 21. Boseong/Yeoja Bay
  • 22. Jeju Island
  • 23. Yellow Sea Cold

Water Mass

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Expand closed seasons and areas; reduce fishing efforts and total catch

Country commitments and progress:

  • From 2017 on, Yellow Sea is closed to fishing for 135 days (May 1 to Sept. 16) (PR China);
  • From 2015 to 2020, 20,000 fishing vessels with a total capacity of 1.5 million kW will be reduced through

implementation of buy-back scheme (PR China).

  • From 2015 to 2020, nearly 15% of total catch in China EEZ is to be reduced (PR China).
  • From 1994-2013, fishing vessels have been reduced to 18,560 with costs of 1.6 trillion KRW (RO Korea)
  • From 1990 to 2007, capture fishery in RO Korea decreased by 27% (SOC report, 2017)

During YSLME Phase II, after fishing closure there is increase in capture immediately after the lift of closure, but sharp decrease one month after. The harvest species changed from dominant fish species to crustaceans and cephalopods.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 50 100 150 200 250 300 放 流 后 天 数 (天 ) 体重 (g)

Body weight (g) Days after releasing

Stock enhancement and marine ranching

Release results before 2007: 10% survival rate after 9 months (YSLME) 62 national marine ranching demonstration sites established in PR China, 36 in RO Korea A typical release campaign in China Illustration of marine ranching in FuHan Co. Ltd, Shandong, PR China

slide-12
SLIDE 12

9,043 9,246 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 x 10000M/T Aquaculture Capture

Aquaculture vs capture fishery

World (FAO) RO Korea, Choi

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Integrated Multitrophic Aquaculture to address multi- stressors in Mariculture in Sungo Bay, PR China

  • Highly energy efficient
  • High production per unit area
  • Increases the social acceptability
  • f culturing systems
  • optimizing the carrying capacity of

coastal embayments

  • improving water quality through

intake of nutrients and phosphorus

  • increasing protein yields
  • through carbon capture,

contributing to mitigation of the effects of climate change

(IMTA structure from Fang et al. 2009)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Abalone culture net cage Kelp culture rope Suspending IMTA

Integrated farming system of abalone and kelp

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Aquaculture species and production in Sungo Bay

Annual production Kelp: 80,000t, dry Abalone: 2,000t, fresh with shell Oyster: 120,000t, fresh with shell Scallop: 10,000t, fresh with shell Fishes: 100 tones Sea cucumber: 50 tones ……

Sungo Bay Total Area: 13,000 ha

ChuDao In Shandong Province, mariculture sequesters over 110,000 t

  • f carbon each year (YSFRI)
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Ecosystem services of Integrated Multitrophic Aquaculture

  • The value of food provisioning service and climate/nutrient regulating service

provided by the IMTA mode is much higher than in a monoculture.

Services in different mariculture modes in Sungo Bay (adapted from Liu et al., 2013) Mariculture mode Net profit from sale (US$/ha/yr) Value of climate regulating service (US$/ha/yr) Kelp monoculture 7, 238 715 Abalone monoculture 34, 618 1,208 Abalone and kelp IMTA 47,875 1,999 Abalone, sea cucumber and kelp IMTA 71,164 2,034

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Soft tissue Shell Sum Species Production C N C N C N

Scallop 1148764 36789 10365 74382 585 111172 10950 Mussel 746058 15780 3912 66788 2897 82567 6809 Oyster 3892027 22718 4503 286054 2980 308772 7124 Clam 3018803 99580 25011 172760 8486 272340 33498 Other 2330281 53656 12663 163560 3653 217217 16316

Carbon and Nitrogen removal by harvest of shellfish in China in 2006

Total Sum: 992068 74697 Unit: MT C: 377,000 MT,N: 21,400 Mt 。 Carbon and Nitrogen removal by harvest of seaweed in 2006 The total C and N removal by harvest of shellfish and seaweed in 2006 is 1.37 million MT and 96,000 MT respectively

From Fang, J

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Education and awareness Partnership with academia Culture-based tourism as new sources of revenue generation Monumental facilities ChuDao Community sea-use zoning

slide-19
SLIDE 19

YSLME IMTA study sites in PR China and RO Korea

1 1 1 7 6 8

Studies by NIFS of ROK on IMTA of Sea Tangle, Gulfweed, Korean Rockfish, Pacific Oyster and Sea Cucumber indicates that:

  • Sea Cucumber grew 2.7 times faster;
  • survival rate of Korean Rockfish increased by 33.4% (from 56.8%

to 90.5%);

  • no fish disease occurred in IMTA (40% of Rockfish farmed in

monoculture infected with disease) In the IMTA in Namhae of Korean Rockfish, Sea Cucumber, Pacific Oyster, Undaria and brown Algae, studies found that:

  • No significant difference in growth of body

length and weight of Korean Rockfish;

  • No disease found in Rockfish (36.7% under monoculture);
  • Pacific Oyster grow faster by >20% in shell height and whole and meat weight, and 22.5%

higher fatness;

  • Sea Cucumber grew >40% faster

Yangyang Tongyeong Namhae Zhangzidao Haiyang Sungo Bay

slide-20
SLIDE 20

IMTA is a Typical Example of A Blue Economy

Elements of Blue Economy (summary of Session II of 2nd BE Forum, 2012, Tianjin)

Sustaining environment and ecosystem services

Sustainable economic growth

Job generation

Social equity and inclusiveness

Poverty alleviation

Science-based and innovation

Governance

Public participation

Prevention and reduction of natural disasters

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Barriers and Solutions to Promoting IMTA:

Engagement of service providers to develop the capacity and transfer knowledge Building partnerships with supply chains for sustainable aquaculture certification schemes Linking with policy makers Engaging with customers towards ethical purchases and uses, and access to finance by investors Partnerships with academia to closely monitor the health of species and monitoring of marine environment Development of a marine spatial plan which provides secure access to sea use by farmers Exploring Nutrient Trading Credits and Carbon Trading Credits Barriers for commercialization Lack of adequate financial resources and technical knowledge Lack of awareness Inefficient flow of information Inadequate policy framework and peer pressure favouring unsustainable practices.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Implementation of YSLME SAP and NSAPs Supports and advances the implementation of SDG 14: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development

14.1 Pollution reduction 14.2 Areas under ecosystem-based approach 14.3 Ocean acidification (blue carbon) 14.4 Sustainable fisheries/end IUU 14.5 Marine Protected Areas 14.6 reduction and elimination of fishery subsidies 14.a Increase scientific knowledge 14.c Implement international ocean law

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Yellow Sea:

Sea of Friendship Sea of Peace Sea of Cooperation Sea of Prosperity

  • Mr. Yinfeng GUO

Chief Technical Adviser and Manager, UNDP/GEF YSLME Phase II Project, UNOPS Email: yinfengg@unops.org

Thank you!