Systematic review searches performed 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

systematic review searches performed
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Systematic review searches performed 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Systematic review searches performed 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 04-2013 07-2013 10-2013 01-2014 04-2014 07-2014 10-2014 01-2015 1 Time needed to search 100% 92% Cumulative percentage of SRs 75% 70% (N=165) 50% 41% 25% 0%


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Systematic review searches performed

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 04-2013 07-2013 10-2013 01-2014 04-2014 07-2014 10-2014 01-2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Time needed to search

41% 70% 92% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 30 60 90 120 150 180 210

Cumulative percentage of SRs (N=165) Minutes needed to create search

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Major problems with systematic searching

Term completeness

  • the right terms to describe the topic
  • enough terms to be sensitive
  • not too much terms to lose precision

Translation to other databases

  • different syntax
  • different thesaurus terms
  • different number of thesaurus terms
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Time not depending on # of terms / databases

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 50 100 150 200 250 300

Time needed for searching # search terms used in embase

50 100 150 200 2 4 6 8 10

minutes needed to create search # of databases

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Term completeness

Optimization: ("brassica"[mh] NOT (brassica[tiab] OR broccoli[tiab])) AND ("neoplasms"[mh] OR neoplas*[tiab] OR cancer*[tiab])  cruciferous vegetable*[tiab]

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Translation between databases

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Are these searches good enough?

Compared to a random set of 100 recent SRs from PubMed, my searches:

Were more complex 49 terms 15 terms Used more databases 7 4 Found more includes 43 17 Less extreme # hits 108-10068 9-52046 Precision (50% interval) 1,1% - 3,2% 0,6%-5,1%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

‘Median’ search strategy for an SR

Embase.com 2093 ('RNA sequence'/de OR 'DNA sequence'/de OR 'gene sequence'/de OR 'gene rearrangement'/de OR (((rna OR mrna OR mirna OR microrna OR dna OR cdna OR exome OR genom* OR gene OR genes OR 'next-generation') NEAR/6 (sequenc* OR rearrange*))):ab,ti) AND ('colon cancer'/exp OR 'colon tumor'/de OR 'colorectal tumor'/de OR 'rectum tumor'/de OR 'rectum cancer'/exp OR ((colon* OR colorect* OR rect* OR sigmoid) NEAR/3 (cancer* OR neoplas* OR carcino* OR adenocarcino* OR tumo* OR malign*)):ab,ti) AND (prognosis/exp OR 'predictive value'/de OR 'biological marker'/de OR 'tumor marker'/exp OR survival/exp OR Mortality/exp OR (prognos* OR predict* OR marker* OR biomarker* OR surviv* OR Mortalit*):ab,ti) Medline (OvidSP) 1641 ("Sequence Analysis, RNA"/ OR exp "Sequence Analysis, DNA"/ OR "gene rearrangement"/ OR (((rna OR mrna OR mirna OR microrna OR dna OR cdna OR exome OR genom* OR gene OR genes OR "next-generation") ADJ6 (sequenc* OR rearrange*))).ab,ti.) AND ("Colorectal Neoplasms"/ OR exp "Colonic Neoplasms"/ OR "Rectal Neoplasms"/ OR ((colon* OR colorect* OR rect* OR sigmoid) ADJ3 (cancer* OR neoplas* OR carcino* OR adenocarcino* OR tumo* OR malign*)).ab,ti.) AND (prognosis/ OR "Predictive Value of Tests"/ OR exp "biological markers"/ OR Survival/ OR "Disease-Free Survival"/ OR exp Mortality/ OR Mortality.xs. OR (prognos* OR predict* OR marker* OR biomarker* OR surviv* OR Mortalit*).ab,ti.) Cochrane 10 ((((rna OR mrna OR mirna OR microrna OR dna OR cdna OR exome OR genom* OR gene OR genes OR 'next-generation') NEAR/6 (sequenc* OR rearrange*))):ab,ti) AND (((colon* OR colorect* OR rect* OR sigmoid) NEAR/3 (cancer* OR neoplas* OR carcino* OR adenocarcino* OR tumo* OR malign*)):ab,ti) AND ((prognos* OR predict* OR marker* OR biomarker* OR surviv* OR Mortalit*):ab,ti) Web-of-science 1471 TS=(((((rna OR mrna OR mirna OR microrna OR dna OR cdna OR exome OR genom* OR gene OR genes OR "next-generation") NEAR/6 (sequenc* OR rearrange*)))) AND (((colon* OR colorect* OR rect* OR sigmoid) NEAR/3 (cancer* OR neoplas* OR carcino* OR adenocarcino* OR tumo* OR malign*))) AND ((prognos* OR predict* OR marker* OR biomarker* OR surviv* OR Mortalit*))) PubMed (publisher) 49 ((((rna[tiab] OR mrna[tiab] OR mirna[tiab] OR microrna[tiab] OR dna[tiab] OR cdna[tiab] OR exome[tiab] OR genom*[tiab] OR gene[tiab] OR genes[tiab] OR next-generation[tiab]) AND (sequenc*[tiab] OR rearrange*[tiab])))) AND (((colon*[tiab] OR colorect*[tiab] OR rect*[tiab] OR sigmoid) AND (cancer*[tiab] OR neoplas*[tiab] OR carcino*[tiab] OR adenocarcino*[tiab] OR tumo*[tiab] OR malign*[tiab]))) AND ((prognos*[tiab] OR predict*[tiab] OR marker*[tiab] OR biomarker*[tiab] OR surviv*[tiab] OR Mortalit*[tiab])) AND publisher[sb] Google Scholar "rna|mrna|mirna|microrna|dna|cdna|exome|genome|gene|genes sequence|rearrangement" "colonic|colorectal|rectal cancer|neoplasms|carcinoma|tumor" prognosis|predictive|marker|biomarker|markers|biomarkers|survival|Mortalit y Embase.com 2093 2085 Medline (OvidSP) 1641 787 Web-of-science 1471 709 PubMed (publisher) 49 32 Cochrane 10 Google Scholar 200 176 Totaal 5464 3789

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Succes factors

The succes of our methodology is dependent of a few factors, most of which are controllable)

  • 1. Experience (hardly controllable)
  • 2. Interface choice and database order (habit /

management decision)

  • 3. Optimization techniques (shared today)
  • 4. Single-line search strategies (just a habit)
  • 5. Macros (shared today)
  • 6. The researcher immediately providing feedback on the

results (just a habit)

  • 7. Good management
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Performing systematic review searches within 2 hours is not the norm, nor is it the goal of this method. This method helps in creating confidence in searching for SRs, and is aiming at improving overall quality of searching. Attending a masterclass by some Kenyans does not make amateur marathon runners finish in 2 hours.

Disclaimer for managers