SLIDE 15 Some Experiments
A |A| Language Quasivariety Q(A) n F(n) M SC Reduction BA 2 ∧, ∨, ¬, ⊥, ⊤ Boolean algebras 2 2 sc 0 % PCL2 5 ∧, ∨,∗ , ⊥, ⊤ Q(PCL2) 1 7 5 sc 29 % PCL1 3 ∧, ∨,∗ , ⊥, ⊤ Stone algebras 1 6 3 sc 50 % L3 3 →, ¬ Algebras for Ł3 1 12 6 asc 50 % P 4 ∗ Q(P) 2 6 3 sc 50 % G106 3
2 10 2,2 no 80 % M5 5 ∧, ∨ Lattices in Q(M5) 3 28 5 sc 82 % L→
3
3 → Algebras for Ł→
3
2 40 3 sc 93 % Z→
3
3 → Algebras for RM→ 2 60 3 sc 95 % KL 3 ∧, ∨, ¬ Kleene lattices 2 82 4 no 95 % N5 5 ∧, ∨ Lattices in Q(N5) 3 99 5 sc 95 % PCL3 9 ∧, ∨,∗ , ⊥, ⊤ Q(PCL3) 2 625 19 no 97 % Z→¬
3
3 →, ¬ Algebras for RM→¬ 2 264 6 asc 98 % Z3 3 ∧, ∨, →, ¬ Q(Z3) 2 1296 6 asc 100 % Lat8 5 ∧, ∨ Q(Lat8) 5 7579 2 sc 100 %
Christoph Röthlisberger TAFA – A Tool for Admissibility in Finite Algebras September 17, 2013 15 / 16