The Analysis of Key Financial Ratios in Nonprofit Management - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the analysis of key financial ratios in nonprofit
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Analysis of Key Financial Ratios in Nonprofit Management - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Analysis of Key Financial Ratios in Nonprofit Management Andrew C Holman C.P.A., Adjunct Professor (Partner-Ritz,Holman,Butala,Fine LLP) Douglas M. Ihrke, Associate Professor Nathan J. Grasse, PhD Candidate University of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Analysis of Key Financial Ratios in Nonprofit Management

Andrew C Holman C.P.A., Adjunct Professor (Partner-Ritz,Holman,Butala,Fine LLP) Douglas M. Ihrke, Associate Professor Nathan J. Grasse, PhD Candidate University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Importance of the Nonprofit Sector

 Increasingly important economically (10% of

GDP)

 Increasing role in provision of valuable services  Funded by government ($200 billion annually)

(Brooks)

 Services, such as social welfare, are being

provided by nonprofits in partnership with government (Van Slyke)

 Scholars have argued that nonprofits perform

important social functions better than either government or for-profit organizations (Frumkin)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Scrutiny of the Nonprofit Sector

 Has suffered from notable scandals

 NAACP  United Way  Adelphi University  Nature Conservancy  New Jersey Symphony Orchestra  Milwaukee Public Museum

 These influences have led to greater

scrutiny

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Governing Nonprofits

 Financial management more important

due to scrutiny and competition

 Executives and Board members need

financial information to make key decisions

slide-5
SLIDE 5

A SHORT HISTORY OF THIS PROJECT

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Nonprofit Organizations in Six Subsectors that Filed Tax Returns in 2003

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Financial Ratios

 Financial ratio analysis is one tool used to

improve financial decision making

 Ratios use financial data to summarize

  • rganizational performance
slide-8
SLIDE 8

LACK OF DATA HAS CREATED CHALLENGES

 It has been easier to

get financial data averages for a car wash than the average nonprofit.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

FOR PROFIT ANALYSIS DOESN’T FIT

 Financial analysis applicable to for profit

entities is only partially useful for nonprofits.

 Profit margins mostly do not apply.  Revenue streams are different  Equity is much different

slide-10
SLIDE 10

COMMON NONPROFIT FISCAL ANALYSIS

 Nonprofit Organizations are graded or

rated but not analyzed by external sources such as Charity Navigator.

 “Punitive” Ratios of Program, Management

and Fundraising. An organization should be rewarded or punished if funds are/ are not used primarily for program activities

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Ratio – Adequacy of Resources

Defensive I nterval ( DI ) :

Cash + Marketable Securities + Receivables Average Monthly Expenses Reflects how many months the organization could operate if no additional funds were received.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Ratio – Adequacy of Resources

Liquid Funds I ndicator

LFI= Total Net Assets – Restricted Net Assets – Fixed Assets Average Monthly Expenses

The liquid funds indicator is similar to the defensive interval in its use but is more conservative in removing assets with restrictions

  • n them from the calculation. It also determines the number of

months of expenses that can be covered by existing assets.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Ratio – Adequacy of Resources

Liquid Funds Am ount

LFA= Dollar Value of Unrestricted Net Assets-Net Fixed Assets + Mortgages and Other Notes Payable The liquid funds amount is a common size value that quantifies the liquid unrestricted dollar amount that an organization has available to meet current obligations.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Ratio – Adequacy of Resources

Savings I ndicator

(SI)= Revenue – Expense Total Expense

 The savings indicator measures the increase or decrease in

the ability of an organization to add to its net assets. Values greater than one indicate an increase in savings. The savings indicator is a simple way to determine if an

  • rganization is adding to or using up its net asset base.
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Ratio – Adequacy of Resources

Debt Ratio ( DR) :

Average Total Debt Average Total Assets

Measures the proportion of assets provided by debt. High values indicate future liquidity problems or reduced capacity for future borrowing.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Ratio - Revenue Comp. of Org.

Contributions and Grants

CG= Revenue from Contributions and Grants Total Revenue The contributions and grants ratio measures the composition of

  • rganization funds coming from these sources. Organizations can

use this indicator to determine long and short-term trends in line with strategic funding goals that can change the organizational revenue composition in this area.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Ratio - Revenue Comp. of Org.

Governm ent Grants

GG= Revenue from Government Grants Total Revenue The government grants ratio measures the composition of

  • rganization funds coming from government sources. Similar to

the contributions and grants ratio, organizations can use this ratio to determine long and short-term trends and tie strategic goals to changing the organizational revenue composition in this area.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Ratio - Use of Resources

Program Service Expense

PX= Program Service Expense Total Expense The programs service expense ratio measures the relationship of funds spent for program purposes to all expenses. This ratio has been the subject of much scrutiny including the Wise Giving Alliance of the Better Business Bureau which has set a standard of sixty five percent for this ratio.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Ratios

Revenue Ratios:

Revenue Source Total Revenue Seven revenue sources are analyzed in order to establish what proportion each of these revenue streams contributes to the organization’s total

  • revenues. These sources are:
  • 1. Public contributions
  • 2. Government grants
  • 3. Program service revenues
  • 4. Dividends and interest
  • 5. Net sales
  • 6. Membership Dues
  • 7. Special events
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Financial Ratios Provided for the Following Subsectors

Arts, Culture, and Humanities (ACH)

Community Improvement (CI)

Human Services – Multipurpose and Other (HS)

Recreation, Sports, Leisure, and Athletics (RSLA)

Crime and Legal Related (CL)

Mental Health and Crisis Intervention (MH)

slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Implications

 Improved information provided to

nonprofit organizations of all sizes and in all sub-sectors

 Baseline measures for nonprofits to use in

governance and administration

 Future research will examine differences

across sizes and sub-sectors of nonprofit

  • rganizations
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Acknowledgements

 Special Thanks to the

Helen Bader Foundation For Supporting This Research Project