The cyclic sieving phenomenon - an introduction Bruce Sagan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The cyclic sieving phenomenon - an introduction Bruce Sagan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The cyclic sieving phenomenon - an introduction Bruce Sagan Department of Mathematics Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824-1027 sagan@math.msu.edu www.math.msu.edu/ sagan July 5, 2011 Definitions and an example Proof by
Definitions and an example Proof by evaluation Proof by representation theory A combinatorial proof
Outline
Definitions and an example Proof by evaluation Proof by representation theory A combinatorial proof
Suppose S is a set and let G be a finite cyclic group acting on S.
Suppose S is a set and let G be a finite cyclic group acting on
- S. If g ∈ G, we let
Sg = {t ∈ S : gt = t}
Suppose S is a set and let G be a finite cyclic group acting on
- S. If g ∈ G, we let
Sg = {t ∈ S : gt = t} and o(g) = order of g in G.
Suppose S is a set and let G be a finite cyclic group acting on
- S. If g ∈ G, we let
Sg = {t ∈ S : gt = t} and o(g) = order of g in G. Note: if d = o(g) then d | #G, the cardinality of G.
Suppose S is a set and let G be a finite cyclic group acting on
- S. If g ∈ G, we let
Sg = {t ∈ S : gt = t} and o(g) = order of g in G. Note: if d = o(g) then d | #G, the cardinality of G. We also let ω = ωd = primitive dth root of unity.
Suppose S is a set and let G be a finite cyclic group acting on
- S. If g ∈ G, we let
Sg = {t ∈ S : gt = t} and o(g) = order of g in G. Note: if d = o(g) then d | #G, the cardinality of G. We also let ω = ωd = primitive dth root of unity. Finally, suppose f(q) is a polynomial in q with coefficients in Z.
Suppose S is a set and let G be a finite cyclic group acting on
- S. If g ∈ G, we let
Sg = {t ∈ S : gt = t} and o(g) = order of g in G. Note: if d = o(g) then d | #G, the cardinality of G. We also let ω = ωd = primitive dth root of unity. Finally, suppose f(q) is a polynomial in q with coefficients in Z.
Definition (Reiner-Stanton-White, 2004)
The triple (S, G, f(q)) exhibits the cyclic sieving phenomenon (c.s.p.) if, for all g ∈ G, we have #Sg = f(ω). where ω is chosen so that o(ω) = o(g).
Suppose S is a set and let G be a finite cyclic group acting on
- S. If g ∈ G, we let
Sg = {t ∈ S : gt = t} and o(g) = order of g in G. Note: if d = o(g) then d | #G, the cardinality of G. We also let ω = ωd = primitive dth root of unity. Finally, suppose f(q) is a polynomial in q with coefficients in Z.
Definition (Reiner-Stanton-White, 2004)
The triple (S, G, f(q)) exhibits the cyclic sieving phenomenon (c.s.p.) if, for all g ∈ G, we have #Sg = f(ω). where ω is chosen so that o(ω) = o(g).
- Notes. 1. At first blush, this is a surprising equation.
Suppose S is a set and let G be a finite cyclic group acting on
- S. If g ∈ G, we let
Sg = {t ∈ S : gt = t} and o(g) = order of g in G. Note: if d = o(g) then d | #G, the cardinality of G. We also let ω = ωd = primitive dth root of unity. Finally, suppose f(q) is a polynomial in q with coefficients in Z.
Definition (Reiner-Stanton-White, 2004)
The triple (S, G, f(q)) exhibits the cyclic sieving phenomenon (c.s.p.) if, for all g ∈ G, we have #Sg = f(ω). where ω is chosen so that o(ω) = o(g).
- Notes. 1. At first blush, this is a surprising equation.
- 2. The case #G = 2 was first studied by Stembridge.
Suppose S is a set and let G be a finite cyclic group acting on
- S. If g ∈ G, we let
Sg = {t ∈ S : gt = t} and o(g) = order of g in G. Note: if d = o(g) then d | #G, the cardinality of G. We also let ω = ωd = primitive dth root of unity. Finally, suppose f(q) is a polynomial in q with coefficients in Z.
Definition (Reiner-Stanton-White, 2004)
The triple (S, G, f(q)) exhibits the cyclic sieving phenomenon (c.s.p.) if, for all g ∈ G, we have #Sg = f(ω). where ω is chosen so that o(ω) = o(g).
- Notes. 1. At first blush, this is a surprising equation.
- 2. The case #G = 2 was first studied by Stembridge.
- 3. Dozens of c.s.p.’s have been found.
Suppose S is a set and let G be a finite cyclic group acting on
- S. If g ∈ G, we let
Sg = {t ∈ S : gt = t} and o(g) = order of g in G. Note: if d = o(g) then d | #G, the cardinality of G. We also let ω = ωd = primitive dth root of unity. Finally, suppose f(q) is a polynomial in q with coefficients in Z.
Definition (Reiner-Stanton-White, 2004)
The triple (S, G, f(q)) exhibits the cyclic sieving phenomenon (c.s.p.) if, for all g ∈ G, we have #Sg = f(ω). where ω is chosen so that o(ω) = o(g).
- Notes. 1. At first blush, this is a surprising equation.
- 2. The case #G = 2 was first studied by Stembridge.
- 3. Dozens of c.s.p.’s have been found.
- 4. Three proof techniques: evaluation, representation theory,
and combinatorics.
Running example. Let [n] = {1, 2, . . . , n}
Running example. Let [n] = {1, 2, . . . , n} and S = [n] k
- = {T ⊆ [n] : #T = k}.
Running example. Let [n] = {1, 2, . . . , n} and S = [n] k
- = {T ⊆ [n] : #T = k}.
- Ex. Suppose n = 4 and k = 2. We have
S = [4] 2
- = {12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 34}.
Running example. Let [n] = {1, 2, . . . , n} and S = [n] k
- = {T ⊆ [n] : #T = k}.
Let Cn = (1, 2, . . . , n).
- Ex. Suppose n = 4 and k = 2. We have
S = [4] 2
- = {12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 34}.
Running example. Let [n] = {1, 2, . . . , n} and S = [n] k
- = {T ⊆ [n] : #T = k}.
Let Cn = (1, 2, . . . , n). Now g ∈ Cn acts on T = {t1, . . . , tk} by gT = {g(t1), . . . , g(tk)}.
- Ex. Suppose n = 4 and k = 2. We have
S = [4] 2
- = {12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 34}.
Running example. Let [n] = {1, 2, . . . , n} and S = [n] k
- = {T ⊆ [n] : #T = k}.
Let Cn = (1, 2, . . . , n). Now g ∈ Cn acts on T = {t1, . . . , tk} by gT = {g(t1), . . . , g(tk)}.
- Ex. Suppose n = 4 and k = 2. We have
S = [4] 2
- = {12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 34}.
Also C4 = (1, 2, 3, 4) = {e, (1, 2, 3, 4), (1, 3)(2, 4), (1, 4, 3, 2)}.
Running example. Let [n] = {1, 2, . . . , n} and S = [n] k
- = {T ⊆ [n] : #T = k}.
Let Cn = (1, 2, . . . , n). Now g ∈ Cn acts on T = {t1, . . . , tk} by gT = {g(t1), . . . , g(tk)}.
- Ex. Suppose n = 4 and k = 2. We have
S = [4] 2
- = {12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 34}.
Also C4 = (1, 2, 3, 4) = {e, (1, 2, 3, 4), (1, 3)(2, 4), (1, 4, 3, 2)}. For g = (1, 3)(2, 4)
Running example. Let [n] = {1, 2, . . . , n} and S = [n] k
- = {T ⊆ [n] : #T = k}.
Let Cn = (1, 2, . . . , n). Now g ∈ Cn acts on T = {t1, . . . , tk} by gT = {g(t1), . . . , g(tk)}.
- Ex. Suppose n = 4 and k = 2. We have
S = [4] 2
- = {12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 34}.
Also C4 = (1, 2, 3, 4) = {e, (1, 2, 3, 4), (1, 3)(2, 4), (1, 4, 3, 2)}. For g = (1, 3)(2, 4) we have (1, 3)(2, 4)12 = 34,
Running example. Let [n] = {1, 2, . . . , n} and S = [n] k
- = {T ⊆ [n] : #T = k}.
Let Cn = (1, 2, . . . , n). Now g ∈ Cn acts on T = {t1, . . . , tk} by gT = {g(t1), . . . , g(tk)}.
- Ex. Suppose n = 4 and k = 2. We have
S = [4] 2
- = {12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 34}.
Also C4 = (1, 2, 3, 4) = {e, (1, 2, 3, 4), (1, 3)(2, 4), (1, 4, 3, 2)}. For g = (1, 3)(2, 4) we have (1, 3)(2, 4)12 = 34, (1, 3)(2, 4)13 = 13, (1, 3)(2, 4)14 = 23, (1, 3)(2, 4)23 = 14, (1, 3)(2, 4)24 = 24, (1, 3)(2, 4)34 = 12.
return 1 return 2
Let [n]q = 1 + q + q2 + · · · + qn−1
Let [n]q = 1 + q + q2 + · · · + qn−1 and [n]q! = [1]q[2]q · · · [n]q.
Let [n]q = 1 + q + q2 + · · · + qn−1 and [n]q! = [1]q[2]q · · · [n]q. Define the Gaussian polynomials or q-binomial coeffiecients by n k
- q
= [n]q! [k]q![n − k]q!.
Let [n]q = 1 + q + q2 + · · · + qn−1 and [n]q! = [1]q[2]q · · · [n]q. Define the Gaussian polynomials or q-binomial coeffiecients by n k
- q
= [n]q! [k]q![n − k]q!.
- Ex. Consider n = 4, k = 2. So
4 2
- q
= [4]q! [2]q![2]q! = 1 + q + 2q2 + q3 + q4.
Let [n]q = 1 + q + q2 + · · · + qn−1 and [n]q! = [1]q[2]q · · · [n]q. Define the Gaussian polynomials or q-binomial coeffiecients by n k
- q
= [n]q! [k]q![n − k]q!.
Theorem (Reiner-Stanton-White)
The c.s.p. is exhibited by [n] k
- , Cn,
n k
- q
- .
- Ex. Consider n = 4, k = 2. So
4 2
- q
= [4]q! [2]q![2]q! = 1 + q + 2q2 + q3 + q4.
Let [n]q = 1 + q + q2 + · · · + qn−1 and [n]q! = [1]q[2]q · · · [n]q. Define the Gaussian polynomials or q-binomial coeffiecients by n k
- q
= [n]q! [k]q![n − k]q!.
Theorem (Reiner-Stanton-White)
The c.s.p. is exhibited by [n] k
- , Cn,
n k
- q
- .
- Ex. Consider n = 4, k = 2. So
4 2
- q
= [4]q! [2]q![2]q! = 1 + q + 2q2 + q3 + q4. For g = (1, 3)(2, 4) we have o(g) = 2 and ω = −1
Let [n]q = 1 + q + q2 + · · · + qn−1 and [n]q! = [1]q[2]q · · · [n]q. Define the Gaussian polynomials or q-binomial coeffiecients by n k
- q
= [n]q! [k]q![n − k]q!.
Theorem (Reiner-Stanton-White)
The c.s.p. is exhibited by [n] k
- , Cn,
n k
- q
- .
- Ex. Consider n = 4, k = 2. So
4 2
- q
= [4]q! [2]q![2]q! = 1 + q + 2q2 + q3 + q4. For g = (1, 3)(2, 4) we have o(g) = 2 and ω = −1 so 4 2
- −1
= 1 − 1 + 2 − 1 + 1
Let [n]q = 1 + q + q2 + · · · + qn−1 and [n]q! = [1]q[2]q · · · [n]q. Define the Gaussian polynomials or q-binomial coeffiecients by n k
- q
= [n]q! [k]q![n − k]q!.
Theorem (Reiner-Stanton-White)
The c.s.p. is exhibited by [n] k
- , Cn,
n k
- q
- .
- Ex. Consider n = 4, k = 2. So
4 2
- q
= [4]q! [2]q![2]q! = 1 + q + 2q2 + q3 + q4. For g = (1, 3)(2, 4) we have o(g) = 2 and ω = −1 so 4 2
- −1
= 1 − 1 + 2 − 1 + 1 = 2
Let [n]q = 1 + q + q2 + · · · + qn−1 and [n]q! = [1]q[2]q · · · [n]q. Define the Gaussian polynomials or q-binomial coeffiecients by n k
- q
= [n]q! [k]q![n − k]q!.
Theorem (Reiner-Stanton-White)
The c.s.p. is exhibited by [n] k
- , Cn,
n k
- q
- .
- Ex. Consider n = 4, k = 2. So
4 2
- q
= [4]q! [2]q![2]q! = 1 + q + 2q2 + q3 + q4. For g = (1, 3)(2, 4) we have o(g) = 2 and ω = −1 so 4 2
- −1
= 1 − 1 + 2 − 1 + 1 = 2 = #S(1,3)(2,4).
Outline
Definitions and an example Proof by evaluation Proof by representation theory A combinatorial proof
Lemma
If m ≡ n (mod d) and ω = ωd,
Lemma
If m ≡ n (mod d) and ω = ωd, then lim
q→ω
[m]q [n]q =
m n
if n ≡ 0 (mod d),
Lemma
If m ≡ n (mod d) and ω = ωd, then lim
q→ω
[m]q [n]q =
m n
if n ≡ 0 (mod d), 1 else.
Lemma
If m ≡ n (mod d) and ω = ωd, then lim
q→ω
[m]q [n]q =
m n
if n ≡ 0 (mod d), 1 else. Proof Let m, n have remainder r modulo d.
Lemma
If m ≡ n (mod d) and ω = ωd, then lim
q→ω
[m]q [n]q =
m n
if n ≡ 0 (mod d), 1 else. Proof Let m, n have remainder r modulo d. So for ω = ωd: [m]ω =
- (1 + ω + · · · + ωd−1) + · · · + (1 + ω + · · · + ωr−1)
Lemma
If m ≡ n (mod d) and ω = ωd, then lim
q→ω
[m]q [n]q =
m n
if n ≡ 0 (mod d), 1 else. Proof Let m, n have remainder r modulo d. So for ω = ωd: [m]ω =
- (1 + ω + · · · + ωd−1) + · · · + (1 + ω + · · · + ωr−1) = [n]ω.
Lemma
If m ≡ n (mod d) and ω = ωd, then lim
q→ω
[m]q [n]q =
m n
if n ≡ 0 (mod d), 1 else. Proof Let m, n have remainder r modulo d. So for ω = ωd: [m]ω =
- (1 + ω + · · · + ωd−1) + · · · + (1 + ω + · · · + ωr−1) = [n]ω.
If n ≡ 0 (mod d) then [n]ω = 0
Lemma
If m ≡ n (mod d) and ω = ωd, then lim
q→ω
[m]q [n]q =
m n
if n ≡ 0 (mod d), 1 else. Proof Let m, n have remainder r modulo d. So for ω = ωd: [m]ω =
- (1 + ω + · · · + ωd−1) + · · · + (1 + ω + · · · + ωr−1) = [n]ω.
If n ≡ 0 (mod d) then [n]ω = 0 and [m]ω/[n]ω = 1, proving the ”else” case.
Lemma
If m ≡ n (mod d) and ω = ωd, then lim
q→ω
[m]q [n]q =
m n
if n ≡ 0 (mod d), 1 else. Proof Let m, n have remainder r modulo d. So for ω = ωd: [m]ω =
- (1 + ω + · · · + ωd−1) + · · · + (1 + ω + · · · + ωr−1) = [n]ω.
If n ≡ 0 (mod d) then [n]ω = 0 and [m]ω/[n]ω = 1, proving the ”else” case. If n ≡ 0 (mod d) then n = ℓd and m = kd,
Lemma
If m ≡ n (mod d) and ω = ωd, then lim
q→ω
[m]q [n]q =
m n
if n ≡ 0 (mod d), 1 else. Proof Let m, n have remainder r modulo d. So for ω = ωd: [m]ω =
- (1 + ω + · · · + ωd−1) + · · · + (1 + ω + · · · + ωr−1) = [n]ω.
If n ≡ 0 (mod d) then [n]ω = 0 and [m]ω/[n]ω = 1, proving the ”else” case. If n ≡ 0 (mod d) then n = ℓd and m = kd, so [m]q [n]q = (1 + q + · · · + qd−1)(1 + qd + q2d + · · · + q(k−1)d) (1 + q + · · · + qd−1)(1 + qd + q2d + · · · + q(ℓ−1)d) .
Lemma
If m ≡ n (mod d) and ω = ωd, then lim
q→ω
[m]q [n]q =
m n
if n ≡ 0 (mod d), 1 else. Proof Let m, n have remainder r modulo d. So for ω = ωd: [m]ω =
- (1 + ω + · · · + ωd−1) + · · · + (1 + ω + · · · + ωr−1) = [n]ω.
If n ≡ 0 (mod d) then [n]ω = 0 and [m]ω/[n]ω = 1, proving the ”else” case. If n ≡ 0 (mod d) then n = ℓd and m = kd, so [m]q [n]q = (1 + q + · · · + qd−1)(1 + qd + q2d + · · · + q(k−1)d) (1 + q + · · · + qd−1)(1 + qd + q2d + · · · + q(ℓ−1)d) . Cancelling and plugging in ω = ωd gives lim
q→ω
[m]q [n]q = k ℓ
Lemma
If m ≡ n (mod d) and ω = ωd, then lim
q→ω
[m]q [n]q =
m n
if n ≡ 0 (mod d), 1 else. Proof Let m, n have remainder r modulo d. So for ω = ωd: [m]ω =
- (1 + ω + · · · + ωd−1) + · · · + (1 + ω + · · · + ωr−1) = [n]ω.
If n ≡ 0 (mod d) then [n]ω = 0 and [m]ω/[n]ω = 1, proving the ”else” case. If n ≡ 0 (mod d) then n = ℓd and m = kd, so [m]q [n]q = (1 + q + · · · + qd−1)(1 + qd + q2d + · · · + q(k−1)d) (1 + q + · · · + qd−1)(1 + qd + q2d + · · · + q(ℓ−1)d) . Cancelling and plugging in ω = ωd gives lim
q→ω
[m]q [n]q = k ℓ = m n .
Corollary
If ω = ωd and d|n
Corollary
If ω = ωd and d|n then, n k
- ω
= n/d k/d
- if d|k,
Corollary
If ω = ωd and d|n then, n k
- ω
= n/d k/d
- if d|k,
else.
Corollary
If ω = ωd and d|n then, n k
- ω
= n/d k/d
- if d|k,
else.
Lemma
Let g ∈ Sn (symmetric group) have disjoint cycle decomposition g = g1 · · · gk.
Corollary
If ω = ωd and d|n then, n k
- ω
= n/d k/d
- if d|k,
else.
Lemma
Let g ∈ Sn (symmetric group) have disjoint cycle decomposition g = g1 · · · gk. Let T ⊆ [n].
Corollary
If ω = ωd and d|n then, n k
- ω
= n/d k/d
- if d|k,
else.
Lemma
Let g ∈ Sn (symmetric group) have disjoint cycle decomposition g = g1 · · · gk. Let T ⊆ [n]. Then gT = T ⇐ ⇒ T = gi1 ∪ · · · ∪ gim for some i1, . . . , im.
return 1 return 2
Corollary
If ω = ωd and d|n then, n k
- ω
= n/d k/d
- if d|k,
else.
Lemma
Let g ∈ Sn (symmetric group) have disjoint cycle decomposition g = g1 · · · gk. Let T ⊆ [n]. Then gT = T ⇐ ⇒ T = gi1 ∪ · · · ∪ gim for some i1, . . . , im.
return 1 return 2
- Ex. If g = (1, 3, 4)(2, 6)(5) then the T ∈
[6]
3
- with gT = T are
Corollary
If ω = ωd and d|n then, n k
- ω
= n/d k/d
- if d|k,
else.
Lemma
Let g ∈ Sn (symmetric group) have disjoint cycle decomposition g = g1 · · · gk. Let T ⊆ [n]. Then gT = T ⇐ ⇒ T = gi1 ∪ · · · ∪ gim for some i1, . . . , im.
return 1 return 2
- Ex. If g = (1, 3, 4)(2, 6)(5) then the T ∈
[6]
3
- with gT = T are
T = {1, 3, 4}
Corollary
If ω = ωd and d|n then, n k
- ω
= n/d k/d
- if d|k,
else.
Lemma
Let g ∈ Sn (symmetric group) have disjoint cycle decomposition g = g1 · · · gk. Let T ⊆ [n]. Then gT = T ⇐ ⇒ T = gi1 ∪ · · · ∪ gim for some i1, . . . , im.
return 1 return 2
- Ex. If g = (1, 3, 4)(2, 6)(5) then the T ∈
[6]
3
- with gT = T are
T = {1, 3, 4} and T = {2, 5, 6}.
Proposition
If S = [n]
k
- and g ∈ Cn has o(g) = d
Proposition
If S = [n]
k
- and g ∈ Cn has o(g) = d then
#Sg = n/d k/d
- if d|k,
Proposition
If S = [n]
k
- and g ∈ Cn has o(g) = d then
#Sg = n/d k/d
- if d|k,
else.
Proposition
If S = [n]
k
- and g ∈ Cn has o(g) = d then
#Sg = n/d k/d
- if d|k,
else. Proof If g ∈ Cn and o(g) = d then g = g1 · · · gn/d where #g1 = . . . = #gn/d = d.
Proposition
If S = [n]
k
- and g ∈ Cn has o(g) = d then
#Sg = n/d k/d
- if d|k,
else. Proof If g ∈ Cn and o(g) = d then g = g1 · · · gn/d where #g1 = . . . = #gn/d = d. So, by the second lemma , T ∈ [n]
k
- satisfies gT = T iff T is a union of k/d of the n/d
cycles gi.
Outline
Definitions and an example Proof by evaluation Proof by representation theory A combinatorial proof
If G acts on S = {s1, . . . , sk} then G also acts on the vector space V = CS = {c1s1 + · · · + cksk : ci ∈ C for all i}.
If G acts on S = {s1, . . . , sk} then G also acts on the vector space V = CS = {c1s1 + · · · + cksk : ci ∈ C for all i}. Element g ∈ G corresponds to an invertible linear map [g].
If G acts on S = {s1, . . . , sk} then G also acts on the vector space V = CS = {c1s1 + · · · + cksk : ci ∈ C for all i}. Element g ∈ G corresponds to an invertible linear map [g]. If B is a basis for V then let [g]B be the matrix of [g] in B.
If G acts on S = {s1, . . . , sk} then G also acts on the vector space V = CS = {c1s1 + · · · + cksk : ci ∈ C for all i}. Element g ∈ G corresponds to an invertible linear map [g]. If B is a basis for V then let [g]B be the matrix of [g] in B. In particular, [g]S is the permutation matrix for g acting on S.
If G acts on S = {s1, . . . , sk} then G also acts on the vector space V = CS = {c1s1 + · · · + cksk : ci ∈ C for all i}. Element g ∈ G corresponds to an invertible linear map [g]. If B is a basis for V then let [g]B be the matrix of [g] in B. In particular, [g]S is the permutation matrix for g acting on S.
- Example. G = S3 acts on S = {1, 2, 3} and so on
CS = {c11 + c22 + c33 : c1, c2, c3 ∈ C}.
If G acts on S = {s1, . . . , sk} then G also acts on the vector space V = CS = {c1s1 + · · · + cksk : ci ∈ C for all i}. Element g ∈ G corresponds to an invertible linear map [g]. If B is a basis for V then let [g]B be the matrix of [g] in B. In particular, [g]S is the permutation matrix for g acting on S.
- Example. G = S3 acts on S = {1, 2, 3} and so on
CS = {c11 + c22 + c33 : c1, c2, c3 ∈ C}. For g = (1, 2)(3) and basis S: (1, 2)(3)1 = 2, (1, 2)(3)2 = 1, (1, 2)(3)3 = 3.
If G acts on S = {s1, . . . , sk} then G also acts on the vector space V = CS = {c1s1 + · · · + cksk : ci ∈ C for all i}. Element g ∈ G corresponds to an invertible linear map [g]. If B is a basis for V then let [g]B be the matrix of [g] in B. In particular, [g]S is the permutation matrix for g acting on S.
- Example. G = S3 acts on S = {1, 2, 3} and so on
CS = {c11 + c22 + c33 : c1, c2, c3 ∈ C}. For g = (1, 2)(3) and basis S: (1, 2)(3)1 = 2, (1, 2)(3)2 = 1, (1, 2)(3)3 = 3. And so [(1, 2)(3)]S = 1 1 1 .
A G-module is any C-vector space V where G acts by invertible linear transformations.
A G-module is any C-vector space V where G acts by invertible linear transformations. The character of G on V is the function χ : G → C given by χ(g) = tr[g].
A G-module is any C-vector space V where G acts by invertible linear transformations. The character of G on V is the function χ : G → C given by χ(g) = tr[g]. Note that χ is well defined in that the trace is independent of the basis.
A G-module is any C-vector space V where G acts by invertible linear transformations. The character of G on V is the function χ : G → C given by χ(g) = tr[g]. Note that χ is well defined in that the trace is independent of the basis. For a group G acting on S, the character on CS is χ(g) = tr[g]S
A G-module is any C-vector space V where G acts by invertible linear transformations. The character of G on V is the function χ : G → C given by χ(g) = tr[g]. Note that χ is well defined in that the trace is independent of the basis. For a group G acting on S, the character on CS is χ(g) = tr[g]S = #Sg. (1)
A G-module is any C-vector space V where G acts by invertible linear transformations. The character of G on V is the function χ : G → C given by χ(g) = tr[g]. Note that χ is well defined in that the trace is independent of the basis. For a group G acting on S, the character on CS is χ(g) = tr[g]S = #Sg. (1) If G is cyclic, then there will be a basis B for CS such that every g ∈ G satisfies [g]B = diag(
m0
1, . . . , 1,
m1
- ω, . . . , ω,
m2
- ω2, . . . , ω2, . . .)
where ω = ωo(g).
A G-module is any C-vector space V where G acts by invertible linear transformations. The character of G on V is the function χ : G → C given by χ(g) = tr[g]. Note that χ is well defined in that the trace is independent of the basis. For a group G acting on S, the character on CS is χ(g) = tr[g]S = #Sg. (1) If G is cyclic, then there will be a basis B for CS such that every g ∈ G satisfies [g]B = diag(
m0
1, . . . , 1,
m1
- ω, . . . , ω,
m2
- ω2, . . . , ω2, . . .)
where ω = ωo(g). Thus χ(g) = tr[g]B
A G-module is any C-vector space V where G acts by invertible linear transformations. The character of G on V is the function χ : G → C given by χ(g) = tr[g]. Note that χ is well defined in that the trace is independent of the basis. For a group G acting on S, the character on CS is χ(g) = tr[g]S = #Sg. (1) If G is cyclic, then there will be a basis B for CS such that every g ∈ G satisfies [g]B = diag(
m0
1, . . . , 1,
m1
- ω, . . . , ω,
m2
- ω2, . . . , ω2, . . .)
where ω = ωo(g). Thus χ(g) = tr[g]B =
- i≥0
miωi
A G-module is any C-vector space V where G acts by invertible linear transformations. The character of G on V is the function χ : G → C given by χ(g) = tr[g]. Note that χ is well defined in that the trace is independent of the basis. For a group G acting on S, the character on CS is χ(g) = tr[g]S = #Sg. (1) If G is cyclic, then there will be a basis B for CS such that every g ∈ G satisfies [g]B = diag(
m0
1, . . . , 1,
m1
- ω, . . . , ω,
m2
- ω2, . . . , ω2, . . .)
where ω = ωo(g). Thus χ(g) = tr[g]B =
- i≥0
miωi = f(ω). (2) where f(q) =
i≥0 miqi.
A G-module is any C-vector space V where G acts by invertible linear transformations. The character of G on V is the function χ : G → C given by χ(g) = tr[g]. Note that χ is well defined in that the trace is independent of the basis. For a group G acting on S, the character on CS is χ(g) = tr[g]S = #Sg. (1) If G is cyclic, then there will be a basis B for CS such that every g ∈ G satisfies [g]B = diag(
m0
1, . . . , 1,
m1
- ω, . . . , ω,
m2
- ω2, . . . , ω2, . . .)
where ω = ωo(g). Thus χ(g) = tr[g]B =
- i≥0
miωi = f(ω). (2) where f(q) =
i≥0 miqi. Now (1) and (2) imply f(ω) = #Sg so
we have the c.s.p.
A G-module is any C-vector space V where G acts by invertible linear transformations. The character of G on V is the function χ : G → C given by χ(g) = tr[g]. Note that χ is well defined in that the trace is independent of the basis. For a group G acting on S, the character on CS is χ(g) = tr[g]S = #Sg. (1) If G is cyclic, then there will be a basis B for CS such that every g ∈ G satisfies [g]B = diag(
m0
1, . . . , 1,
m1
- ω, . . . , ω,
m2
- ω2, . . . , ω2, . . .)
where ω = ωo(g). Thus χ(g) = tr[g]B =
- i≥0
miωi = f(ω). (2) where f(q) =
i≥0 miqi. Now (1) and (2) imply f(ω) = #Sg so
we have the c.s.p. To get the S = [n]
k
- example, one uses the
kth exterior power of a vector space V with dim V = n.
Outline
Definitions and an example Proof by evaluation Proof by representation theory A combinatorial proof
To combinatorially prove (S, G, f(q)) exhibits the c.s.p., first find a weight function wt : S → Z[q] such that f(q) =
- T∈S
wt T. (3)
To combinatorially prove (S, G, f(q)) exhibits the c.s.p., first find a weight function wt : S → Z[q] such that f(q) =
- T∈S
wt T. (3) If B ⊆ S we let wt B =
T∈B wt T.
To combinatorially prove (S, G, f(q)) exhibits the c.s.p., first find a weight function wt : S → Z[q] such that f(q) =
- T∈S
wt T. (3) If B ⊆ S we let wt B =
T∈B wt T. For each g ∈ G we then find
a partition of S π = πg = {B1, B2, . . .} satisfying, the following two criteria where ω = ωo(g):
To combinatorially prove (S, G, f(q)) exhibits the c.s.p., first find a weight function wt : S → Z[q] such that f(q) =
- T∈S
wt T. (3) If B ⊆ S we let wt B =
T∈B wt T. For each g ∈ G we then find
a partition of S π = πg = {B1, B2, . . .} satisfying, the following two criteria where ω = ωo(g): (I) For 1 ≤ i ≤ #Sg we have #Bi = 1 and wt Bi|ω = 1.
To combinatorially prove (S, G, f(q)) exhibits the c.s.p., first find a weight function wt : S → Z[q] such that f(q) =
- T∈S
wt T. (3) If B ⊆ S we let wt B =
T∈B wt T. For each g ∈ G we then find
a partition of S π = πg = {B1, B2, . . .} satisfying, the following two criteria where ω = ωo(g): (I) For 1 ≤ i ≤ #Sg we have #Bi = 1 and wt Bi|ω = 1. (II) For i > #Sg we have #Bi > 1 and wt Bi|ω = 0.
To combinatorially prove (S, G, f(q)) exhibits the c.s.p., first find a weight function wt : S → Z[q] such that f(q) =
- T∈S
wt T. (3) If B ⊆ S we let wt B =
T∈B wt T. For each g ∈ G we then find
a partition of S π = πg = {B1, B2, . . .} satisfying, the following two criteria where ω = ωo(g): (I) For 1 ≤ i ≤ #Sg we have #Bi = 1 and wt Bi|ω = 1. (II) For i > #Sg we have #Bi > 1 and wt Bi|ω = 0. We then have the c.s.p. since for each g ∈ G f(ω)
To combinatorially prove (S, G, f(q)) exhibits the c.s.p., first find a weight function wt : S → Z[q] such that f(q) =
- T∈S
wt T. (3) If B ⊆ S we let wt B =
T∈B wt T. For each g ∈ G we then find
a partition of S π = πg = {B1, B2, . . .} satisfying, the following two criteria where ω = ωo(g): (I) For 1 ≤ i ≤ #Sg we have #Bi = 1 and wt Bi|ω = 1. (II) For i > #Sg we have #Bi > 1 and wt Bi|ω = 0. We then have the c.s.p. since for each g ∈ G f(ω) =
- T∈S
wt T|ω
To combinatorially prove (S, G, f(q)) exhibits the c.s.p., first find a weight function wt : S → Z[q] such that f(q) =
- T∈S
wt T. (3) If B ⊆ S we let wt B =
T∈B wt T. For each g ∈ G we then find
a partition of S π = πg = {B1, B2, . . .} satisfying, the following two criteria where ω = ωo(g): (I) For 1 ≤ i ≤ #Sg we have #Bi = 1 and wt Bi|ω = 1. (II) For i > #Sg we have #Bi > 1 and wt Bi|ω = 0. We then have the c.s.p. since for each g ∈ G f(ω) =
- T∈S
wt T|ω =
- i
wt Bi|ω
To combinatorially prove (S, G, f(q)) exhibits the c.s.p., first find a weight function wt : S → Z[q] such that f(q) =
- T∈S
wt T. (3) If B ⊆ S we let wt B =
T∈B wt T. For each g ∈ G we then find
a partition of S π = πg = {B1, B2, . . .} satisfying, the following two criteria where ω = ωo(g): (I) For 1 ≤ i ≤ #Sg we have #Bi = 1 and wt Bi|ω = 1. (II) For i > #Sg we have #Bi > 1 and wt Bi|ω = 0. We then have the c.s.p. since for each g ∈ G f(ω) =
- T∈S
wt T|ω =
- i
wt Bi|ω =
#Sg
- 1 + · · · + 1 +0+0+· · ·
To combinatorially prove (S, G, f(q)) exhibits the c.s.p., first find a weight function wt : S → Z[q] such that f(q) =
- T∈S
wt T. (3) If B ⊆ S we let wt B =
T∈B wt T. For each g ∈ G we then find
a partition of S π = πg = {B1, B2, . . .} satisfying, the following two criteria where ω = ωo(g): (I) For 1 ≤ i ≤ #Sg we have #Bi = 1 and wt Bi|ω = 1. (II) For i > #Sg we have #Bi > 1 and wt Bi|ω = 0. We then have the c.s.p. since for each g ∈ G f(ω) =
- T∈S
wt T|ω =
- i
wt Bi|ω =
#Sg
- 1 + · · · + 1 +0+0+· · · = #Sg.
Theorem (Reiner, Stanton, White)
The c.s.p. is exhibited by the triple [n] k
- , Cn,
n k
- q
- .
Theorem (Reiner, Stanton, White)
The c.s.p. is exhibited by the triple [n] k
- , Cn,
n k
- q
- .
Proof (Roichman & S) For T ∈ [n]
k
- let wt T = q
- t∈T t−(k+1
2 ).
Theorem (Reiner, Stanton, White)
The c.s.p. is exhibited by the triple [n] k
- , Cn,
n k
- q
- .
Proof (Roichman & S) For T ∈ [n]
k
- let wt T = q
- t∈T t−(k+1
2 ).
∴
- T
wt T = n k
- q
.
Theorem (Reiner, Stanton, White)
The c.s.p. is exhibited by the triple [n] k
- , Cn,
n k
- q
- .
Proof (Roichman & S) For T ∈ [n]
k
- let wt T = q
- t∈T t−(k+1
2 ).
∴
- T
wt T = n k
- q
.
- Ex. If n = 4 and k = 2 then wt{t1, t2} = qt1+t2−3.
Theorem (Reiner, Stanton, White)
The c.s.p. is exhibited by the triple [n] k
- , Cn,
n k
- q
- .
Proof (Roichman & S) For T ∈ [n]
k
- let wt T = q
- t∈T t−(k+1
2 ).
∴
- T
wt T = n k
- q
.
- Ex. If n = 4 and k = 2 then wt{t1, t2} = qt1+t2−3.
So T : 12 13 14 23 24 34,
- T wt T
= q0 + q1 + q2 + q2 + q3 + q4
Theorem (Reiner, Stanton, White)
The c.s.p. is exhibited by the triple [n] k
- , Cn,
n k
- q
- .
Proof (Roichman & S) For T ∈ [n]
k
- let wt T = q
- t∈T t−(k+1
2 ).
∴
- T
wt T = n k
- q
.
- Ex. If n = 4 and k = 2 then wt{t1, t2} = qt1+t2−3.
So T : 12 13 14 23 24 34,
- T wt T
= q0 + q1 + q2 + q2 + q3 + q4 = 4 2
- q
.
Theorem (Reiner, Stanton, White)
The c.s.p. is exhibited by the triple [n] k
- , Cn,
n k
- q
- .
Proof (Roichman & S) For T ∈ [n]
k
- let wt T = q
- t∈T t−(k+1
2 ).
∴
- T
wt T = n k
- q
. Suppose g ∈ Cn with o(g) = d,
- Ex. If n = 4 and k = 2 then wt{t1, t2} = qt1+t2−3.
So T : 12 13 14 23 24 34,
- T wt T
= q0 + q1 + q2 + q2 + q3 + q4 = 4 2
- q
.
Theorem (Reiner, Stanton, White)
The c.s.p. is exhibited by the triple [n] k
- , Cn,
n k
- q
- .
Proof (Roichman & S) For T ∈ [n]
k
- let wt T = q
- t∈T t−(k+1
2 ).
∴
- T
wt T = n k
- q
. Suppose g ∈ Cn with o(g) = d, so g = g1 . . . gn/d where #g1 = . . . = #gn/d = d.
- Ex. If n = 4 and k = 2 then wt{t1, t2} = qt1+t2−3.
So T : 12 13 14 23 24 34,
- T wt T
= q0 + q1 + q2 + q2 + q3 + q4 = 4 2
- q
.
Theorem (Reiner, Stanton, White)
The c.s.p. is exhibited by the triple [n] k
- , Cn,
n k
- q
- .
Proof (Roichman & S) For T ∈ [n]
k
- let wt T = q
- t∈T t−(k+1
2 ).
∴
- T
wt T = n k
- q
. Suppose g ∈ Cn with o(g) = d, so g = g1 . . . gn/d where #g1 = . . . = #gn/d = d. Suppose h ∈ Sn satisfies h = h1 . . . hn/d where #h1 = . . . = #hn/d = d.
- Ex. If n = 4 and k = 2 then wt{t1, t2} = qt1+t2−3.
So T : 12 13 14 23 24 34,
- T wt T
= q0 + q1 + q2 + q2 + q3 + q4 = 4 2
- q
.
Theorem (Reiner, Stanton, White)
The c.s.p. is exhibited by the triple [n] k
- , Cn,
n k
- q
- .
Proof (Roichman & S) For T ∈ [n]
k
- let wt T = q
- t∈T t−(k+1
2 ).
∴
- T
wt T = n k
- q
. Suppose g ∈ Cn with o(g) = d, so g = g1 . . . gn/d where #g1 = . . . = #gn/d = d. Suppose h ∈ Sn satisfies h = h1 . . . hn/d where #h1 = . . . = #hn/d = d. Then, by the second lemma , # [n]
k
g = # [n]
k
h.
- Ex. If n = 4 and k = 2 then wt{t1, t2} = qt1+t2−3.
So T : 12 13 14 23 24 34,
- T wt T
= q0 + q1 + q2 + q2 + q3 + q4 = 4 2
- q
.
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · ·
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d.
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4).
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4),
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4),
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
(a) If hT = T then B = {T}. Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4),
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
(a) If hT = T then B = {T}. Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4), and π: {12}, {34},
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
(a) If hT = T then B = {T}. (b) If hT = T, then find the smallest index i such that 0 < #(T ∩ hi) < d and let B = {T, hiT, h2
i T, . . . , hd−1 i
T}. Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4), and π: {12}, {34},
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
(a) If hT = T then B = {T}. (b) If hT = T, then find the smallest index i such that 0 < #(T ∩ hi) < d and let B = {T, hiT, h2
i T, . . . , hd−1 i
T}. Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4), and π: {12}, {34}, {13, (1, 2)13}
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
(a) If hT = T then B = {T}. (b) If hT = T, then find the smallest index i such that 0 < #(T ∩ hi) < d and let B = {T, hiT, h2
i T, . . . , hd−1 i
T}. Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4), and π: {12}, {34}, {13, (1, 2)13} = {13, 23},
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
(a) If hT = T then B = {T}. (b) If hT = T, then find the smallest index i such that 0 < #(T ∩ hi) < d and let B = {T, hiT, h2
i T, . . . , hd−1 i
T}. Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4), and π: {12}, {34}, {13, (1, 2)13} = {13, 23}, {14, (1, 2)14} = {14, 24}.
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
(a) If hT = T then B = {T}. (b) If hT = T, then find the smallest index i such that 0 < #(T ∩ hi) < d and let B = {T, hiT, h2
i T, . . . , hd−1 i
T}. Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4), and π: {12}, {34}, {13, (1, 2)13} = {13, 23}, {14, (1, 2)14} = {14, 24}. wt{12}|−1 = (−1)0 = 1, wt{34}|−1 = (−1)4 = 1,
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
(a) If hT = T then B = {T}. (b) If hT = T, then find the smallest index i such that 0 < #(T ∩ hi) < d and let B = {T, hiT, h2
i T, . . . , hd−1 i
T}. Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4), and π: {12}, {34}, {13, (1, 2)13} = {13, 23}, {14, (1, 2)14} = {14, 24}. wt{12}|−1 = (−1)0 = 1, wt{13, 23}|−1 = (−1)1 + (−1)2 = 0, wt{34}|−1 = (−1)4 = 1, wt{14, 24}|−1 = (−1)2 + (−1)3 = 0.
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
(a) If hT = T then B = {T}. (b) If hT = T, then find the smallest index i such that 0 < #(T ∩ hi) < d and let B = {T, hiT, h2
i T, . . . , hd−1 i
T}. Proof of (II) Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4), and π: {12}, {34}, {13, (1, 2)13} = {13, 23}, {14, (1, 2)14} = {14, 24}. wt{12}|−1 = (−1)0 = 1, wt{13, 23}|−1 = (−1)1 + (−1)2 = 0, wt{34}|−1 = (−1)4 = 1, wt{14, 24}|−1 = (−1)2 + (−1)3 = 0.
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
(a) If hT = T then B = {T}. (b) If hT = T, then find the smallest index i such that 0 < #(T ∩ hi) < d and let B = {T, hiT, h2
i T, . . . , hd−1 i
T}. Proof of (II) If ω = ωd, wt T = qj, ℓ = #(T ∩hi) so 0 < ℓ < d. Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4), and π: {12}, {34}, {13, (1, 2)13} = {13, 23}, {14, (1, 2)14} = {14, 24}. wt{12}|−1 = (−1)0 = 1, wt{13, 23}|−1 = (−1)1 + (−1)2 = 0, wt{34}|−1 = (−1)4 = 1, wt{14, 24}|−1 = (−1)2 + (−1)3 = 0.
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
(a) If hT = T then B = {T}. (b) If hT = T, then find the smallest index i such that 0 < #(T ∩ hi) < d and let B = {T, hiT, h2
i T, . . . , hd−1 i
T}. Proof of (II) If ω = ωd, wt T = qj, ℓ = #(T ∩hi) so 0 < ℓ < d. ∴ wt B = wt T + wt hiT + · · · + wt hd−1
i
T Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4), and π: {12}, {34}, {13, (1, 2)13} = {13, 23}, {14, (1, 2)14} = {14, 24}. wt{12}|−1 = (−1)0 = 1, wt{13, 23}|−1 = (−1)1 + (−1)2 = 0, wt{34}|−1 = (−1)4 = 1, wt{14, 24}|−1 = (−1)2 + (−1)3 = 0.
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
(a) If hT = T then B = {T}. (b) If hT = T, then find the smallest index i such that 0 < #(T ∩ hi) < d and let B = {T, hiT, h2
i T, . . . , hd−1 i
T}. Proof of (II) If ω = ωd, wt T = qj, ℓ = #(T ∩hi) so 0 < ℓ < d. ∴ wt B = wt T + wt hiT + · · · + wt hd−1
i
T ∴ wt B|ω = ωj + Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4), and π: {12}, {34}, {13, (1, 2)13} = {13, 23}, {14, (1, 2)14} = {14, 24}. wt{12}|−1 = (−1)0 = 1, wt{13, 23}|−1 = (−1)1 + (−1)2 = 0, wt{34}|−1 = (−1)4 = 1, wt{14, 24}|−1 = (−1)2 + (−1)3 = 0.
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
(a) If hT = T then B = {T}. (b) If hT = T, then find the smallest index i such that 0 < #(T ∩ hi) < d and let B = {T, hiT, h2
i T, . . . , hd−1 i
T}. Proof of (II) If ω = ωd, wt T = qj, ℓ = #(T ∩hi) so 0 < ℓ < d. ∴ wt B = wt T + wt hiT + · · · + wt hd−1
i
T ∴ wt B|ω = ωj + ωj+ℓ + Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4), and π: {12}, {34}, {13, (1, 2)13} = {13, 23}, {14, (1, 2)14} = {14, 24}. wt{12}|−1 = (−1)0 = 1, wt{13, 23}|−1 = (−1)1 + (−1)2 = 0, wt{34}|−1 = (−1)4 = 1, wt{14, 24}|−1 = (−1)2 + (−1)3 = 0.
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
(a) If hT = T then B = {T}. (b) If hT = T, then find the smallest index i such that 0 < #(T ∩ hi) < d and let B = {T, hiT, h2
i T, . . . , hd−1 i
T}. Proof of (II) If ω = ωd, wt T = qj, ℓ = #(T ∩hi) so 0 < ℓ < d. ∴ wt B = wt T + wt hiT + · · · + wt hd−1
i
T ∴ wt B|ω = ωj + ωj+ℓ + · · · + ωj+(d−1)ℓ Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4), and π: {12}, {34}, {13, (1, 2)13} = {13, 23}, {14, (1, 2)14} = {14, 24}. wt{12}|−1 = (−1)0 = 1, wt{13, 23}|−1 = (−1)1 + (−1)2 = 0, wt{34}|−1 = (−1)4 = 1, wt{14, 24}|−1 = (−1)2 + (−1)3 = 0.
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
(a) If hT = T then B = {T}. (b) If hT = T, then find the smallest index i such that 0 < #(T ∩ hi) < d and let B = {T, hiT, h2
i T, . . . , hd−1 i
T}. Proof of (II) If ω = ωd, wt T = qj, ℓ = #(T ∩hi) so 0 < ℓ < d. ∴ wt B = wt T + wt hiT + · · · + wt hd−1
i
T ∴ wt B|ω = ωj + ωj+ℓ + · · · + ωj+(d−1)ℓ = ωj 1 − ωdℓ 1 − ωℓ Ex: n = 4, k = 2, g = (1, 3)(2, 4). So h = (1, 2)(3, 4), and π: {12}, {34}, {13, (1, 2)13} = {13, 23}, {14, (1, 2)14} = {14, 24}. wt{12}|−1 = (−1)0 = 1, wt{13, 23}|−1 = (−1)1 + (−1)2 = 0, wt{34}|−1 = (−1)4 = 1, wt{14, 24}|−1 = (−1)2 + (−1)3 = 0.
Let h = (1, 2, . . . , d)(d + 1, d + 2, . . . , 2d) · · · = h1 · · · hn/d. For any T ∈ [n]
k
- define the block B of π containing T:
(a) If hT = T then B = {T}. (b) If hT = T, then find the smallest index i such that 0 < #(T ∩ hi) < d and let B = {T, hiT, h2
i T, . . . , hd−1 i
T}. Proof of (II) If ω = ωd, wt T = qj, ℓ = #(T ∩hi) so 0 < ℓ < d. ∴ wt B = wt T + wt hiT + · · · + wt hd−1
i