The Future of sDOR: a look into whats in store for todays sDOR kids - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the future of sdor a look into what s in store for today
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Future of sDOR: a look into whats in store for todays sDOR kids - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Future of sDOR: a look into whats in store for todays sDOR kids Yaffi Lvova, RDN Kristen Bunger, MS RDN Jessie Gruner, PhD RDN Agenda sDOR Yaffi Lvova, RDN Competent and Intuitive Relationship with Food Kristen Bunger, MS, RD


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Future of sDOR: a look into what’s in store for today’s sDOR kids

Yaffi Lvova, RDN Kristen Bunger, MS RDN Jessie Gruner, PhD RDN

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

sDOR

Yaffi Lvova, RDN

Competent and Intuitive Relationship with Food

Kristen Bunger, MS, RD

Body Satisfaction and Health

Jessie Gruner, PhD, RDN

Questions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Story Time

slide-4
SLIDE 4

sDOR

Yaffi Lvova, RDN

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Internal Cues

Parent ❖ Feeds on demand Child ❖ Roots ❖ Chews on fist ❖ Natural reflex to cheek stroke ❖ Turns head away ❖ Milk drunk

Present From Birth

slide-6
SLIDE 6

What is sDOR?

Parent ❖ What is being served ❖ When it is being served ❖ Where it is being served Child ❖ Whether she will eat ❖ How much she will eat ❖ The pace at which she will eat

Nutrition is a marathon, not a sprint

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What sDOR isn’t!

1. You’re not a short order cook

a. All food in the house isn’t fair game at any time in the day - that’s not how kids learn how to self-regulate

2. Not a pressured table environment 3. Child won’t live on noodles forever

slide-8
SLIDE 8

What’s Next?

  • Graduating from sDOR, continue to reinforce those

internal cues

  • Increasing responsibility for kids
  • Transitioning tasks to kids
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Where is your client starting?

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Bridge from sDOR

Deconstructed meals Cooking together Shopping together Recipe selection Meal planning (partial → full) Restaurant selection Snack shelf Packing own lunch

When to start?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Competent and Intuitive Relationship with Food

Kristen Bunger, MS, RD

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Where Does the Bridge Lead? Spoiler Alert!

1. Comprehensive health. 2. Absence of guilt/shame/preoccupation with food. 3. Enjoyment of food. 4. Gentle nutrition. 5. Body positivity. 6. Enjoyment of movement. 7. Weight/size acceptance.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The Bridge from sDOR to Competence and IE?

1. Why is this bridge so important?

a. Efficacy of treatment. b. Weight/size bias impedes progress. c. Reinforce the importance of internal cues.

2. How to know if you are on the “bridge.”

a. Language with kids versus adults. b. Are you fighting with me in your head right now? c. Knowledge/fear without experience. d. Alternative metrics of health to measure success.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What is EAting competence? What is IE?

  • Competent Eating (key elements)

○ The discipline of providing yourself with regular, reliable, and rewarding meals and snacks and paying attention while you eat. ○ The unconditional permission to eat what and as much as you want at those regular times.

  • Intuitive Eating (key elements)

○ Unconditional permission to eat. ○ Eating for physical rather than emotional reasons. ○ Reliance on internal hunger/satiety cues.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Comparing CE and IE!

1. Similarities of these two models.

a. Models versus ideas. b. Based on permission. c. Widely accepted.

2. Differences between the two.

a. Scheduled or not? Benefits of both models.

3. What they are not!

a. Free for all! b. Self-control versus restriction. c. Excuses to ignore disease states present.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Body Satisfaction and Health

Jessie Gruner, PhD, RDN

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Body Satisfaction

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Weight Stigma Impacts Health

  • Increased risk of

Eating disorders ○ Weight cycling

Depression

Less likely to join in physical activities

Higher overall weight gain

Poor school performance

Increased isolation

(Pont, 2017; Brewis & Bruening, 2018)

slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Why weight is a poor indicator of health

  • BMI is a poor indicator of metabolic

risk

  • ~50% of overweight, 29% of obese

and 16% of individuals with type 2 & 3 obesity were metabolically HEALTHY.

  • >30% of normal weight individuals

were metabolically UNHEALTHY

  • Using BMI alone would misclassify

an estimated 75 million people

(Tomiyama AJ, 2016)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Body Image Culture 2019

slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

http://decipher.uk.net/can-we-do-good-public-health-without-fat-shaming/

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Weight SHaming

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Story Time Reflection

slide-28
SLIDE 28

The Role of Weight Bias

slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Implicit Weight Bias

  • 9-11 yo more likely to rate

healthy-weight children as “good”

  • Similar to implicit racial

bias among adults (Skinner et al., 2017)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

What does this look like in practice?

First, do no harm. Acknowledge the complex etiology

  • f obesity.

What other indicators can you use besides weight? How can you promote positive body images in your work?

slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Messaging in Practice

slide-34
SLIDE 34
slide-35
SLIDE 35

“We can’t fight weight stigma while also advocating for weight loss.”

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Questions?

slide-37
SLIDE 37

References

  • 1. Lohse B, Satter E, Horacek T, Gebreselassie T, Oakland MJ. Measuring Eating Competence: Psychometric properties

and validity of the ecSatter Inventory. J Nutr Educ Behav Suppl. 2007;39:S154-S166.

  • 2. Psota T, Lohse B, West S. Associations between eating competence and cardiovascular disease biomarkers . J Nutr

Educ Behav Suppl. 2007; 39:S171-S178.

  • 3. Resch, E. Tribole, E.(1995). Intuitive Eating. New York, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • 4. Satter EM. Nutrition Education with the Satter Eating Competence Model. J Nutr Educ Behav Suppl. 2007;39:S189-S194.
  • 5. Satter EM. Eating Competence: Definition and evidence for the Satter Eating Competence Model. J Nutr Educ Behav
  • Suppl. 2007;39:S142-S153.
  • 6. Ashwell M, Gibson SWaist-to-height ratio as an indicator of ‘early health risk’: simpler and more predictive than using a

‘matrix’ based on BMI and waist circumferenceBMJ Open 2016;6:e010159. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010159

  • 7. Kahan, Scott; Puhl, Rebecca M.Obesity; Silver Spring Vol. 25, Iss. 2, (Feb 2017): 280-281.DOI:10.1002/oby.21772
  • 8. Brewis AA and Bruening M. Weight Shame, Cocial COnnection, and Depressive Symptoms in Late Adolescence.

Internation of Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018; 15: 891.

  • 9. Penney TL, Kirk FL. The Health at Every Size Paradigm and Obesity: Missing Empirical Evidence May Help Push the

Reframing Obesity Debate Forward. American Journal of Public Health. 2015; 105(5): 38-42.

  • 10. Skinner AC, Payne K, Perrin AJ, Panter AT, Howard JB, Bardone-Cone A, Bulik CM, Steiner MJ, Perrin EM. Pediatrics.

2017; 140(1).

  • 11. Tomiyama AJ, et al. Misclassification of cardiometabolic health when using body mass index categories in NHANES

2005–2012. International Journal of Obesity. 2016; 40: 883-886.

  • 12. Pont SJ, Ruhl R, Cook SR, Slusser W. Stigma Experienced by CHildren and Adolescents With Obesity. Pediatrics. 207;

140(6): e20173034.