The Importance of Timing to Autonomous Vehicle Navigation John - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the importance of timing to autonomous vehicle navigation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Importance of Timing to Autonomous Vehicle Navigation John - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Importance of Timing to Autonomous Vehicle Navigation John Fischer, CTO jfischer@spectracom.com Spectracom: Precise, Secure, Synchronized Spectracom simplifies Position, Navigation, and Timing integration into our customers systems.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Importance of Timing to Autonomous Vehicle Navigation

John Fischer, CTO jfischer@spectracom.com

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 January 2016

Spectracom: Precise, Secure, Synchronized

Bringing Technology to:

  • Military, Aerospace
  • UAV’s
  • Electronic Warfare
  • C4ISR
  • High-End Commercial Apps
  • Datacenters
  • Robotics/Telematics
  • IDM
  • GIS Data Mining

Spectracom simplifies Position, Navigation, and Timing integration into our customer’s systems.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3 January 2016

Global Organization

3

Multi-domestic strategy 100+ Employees in 6 countries High reliability and superior service All sites ISO 9001 Registered

USA Brazil UK France Russia China

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • ADAS already in luxury cars and moving to mainstream
  • Anti-lock brakes and anti-slip traction control
  • Lane departure warning system
  • Speed assistance and autonomous emergency braking
  • Automatic parking
  • Driver wake-up and attention control
  • Pedestrian and low-speed obstacle avoidance

Advanced Driver Assisted Systems

4 January 2016

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Mix of correlated sensors for

navigation

  • Radar and proximity sensing
  • Optical, vision systems
  • GNSS
  • Accurate map matching
  • New regulations for safety
  • Four US states have laws for

autonomous vehicles on public roads

  • Google – over 1 million miles tested
  • UK -2013 – testing on public roads
  • France – 2015 – 2000 km roads for

testing – Peugeot-Citroen

  • Toyota Lexus GS autonomous car on

Tokyo expressways

  • Canada – starting 2016 testing

5 January 2016

ADAS -> Driverless Car

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6 January 2016

Safe and Secure Navigation

GNSS

GNSS by itself is insufficient

  • Weak signal / interference
  • Not always available
  • Tunnels
  • Parking garages
  • Urban canyons
  • City skyscrapers
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7 January 2016

Safe and Secure Navigation

GNSS Vision Systems Radars / Proximity Sensors Inertial Measurement Road / Map Matching Real Time Data Networking

GNSS by itself is insufficient Hybrid system must:

  • be safer than a human driver
  • have high reliability and integrity
  • utilize many sensors
  • including real time networks
  • Weak signal / interference
  • Not always available
  • Tunnels
  • Parking garages
  • Urban canyons
  • City skyscrapers
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Map Matching Database must be constantly updated to be current IMUs Self contained but not accurate

  • ver the long

term Autonomous Nav No interference or spoofing possible Reference Nav Determine position in relation to other reference points GPS Weak signal but ubiquitous in

  • pen sky, most

accurate Vision Systems Inhibited by smoke, fog precipitation Spotty coverage, inaccurate; Skyhook + E911 requirements Cellular Ubiquitous but inaccurate RFID Low cost, place sensors where needed – warehouse, controlled space Active Tx Radar, Lidar, Sonar Crowd-Sourced Via a network, location and proximity data is shared Signals of Opportunity Not necessarily designed for navigation, but useful for determining range or bearing DSRC Dedicated Short Range Comm – real time networking for V2V and V2X links

8 January 2016

Alternative PNT in Autonomous Unmanned Systems

Automotive autonomous navigation is part of a larger subject of robotic navigation in the absence of GPS.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Autopilot Systems

from Guided Missiles and Spacecraft to UAVs and Driverless Car

  • ver 50 years of Technology Advancement

9 January 2016

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10 January 2016

Autopilot Example – Cruise Control

Automatically maintain a set speed

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Underdamped – fast but erratic Overdamped – smooth but slow Critically damped – optimum

11 2 February 2016

Dynamic Response and Stability

Too much delay in feedback loop – instability and oscillation Low delay – tracking

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12 2 February 2016

Closed Loop Control – a Primer

  • Control a process via feedback
  • Accuracy determined primarily by the sensor
  • PID Controller – error value drives the system

Proportional Integrative Differential

Error = Setpoint – Measured Output

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Setpoint <= desired

trajectory or waypoint

  • Measured output <=

realtime position sensors

  • Error => steering

commands

  • Same process as:
  • Guided missiles
  • Spacecraft
  • Aircraft
  • Robotics

13 2 February 2016

Autopilot Navigation

GNSS Vision Systems Radars / Proximity Sensors Inertial Measurement Road / Map Matching Real Time Data Networking

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The Connected Car the network as part of the autopilot navigation system

14 January 2016

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15 January 2016

V2X Communications

  • V2V – Vehicle to Vehicle
  • V2I – Vehicle to Infrastructure

V2X communications integrated with navigation system can increase safety greatly 1. Real time data network

  • Traffic lights
  • Emergency vehicles
  • Construction zones

2. Coordination / early warning

  • Advanced braking
  • Platooning

3. “Crowd-sourced” location

  • Shared location
  • Proximity detection

DSRC – Dedicated Short Range Communications

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16 January 2016

The Connected Car –Two Separate Networks

Real Time / Critical Connectivity Non-Real Time / User Experience Connectivity where every millisecond matters where a few seconds is ok

Navigation Internet, Infotainment, Telematics, etc.

cellular DSRC

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Low latency
  • Predictable latency
  • Reduce worst case delays
  • Priority scheduling/pre-emption
  • Instant switching to alternate

paths

  • Ensure delivery
  • Reliable for critical operations
  • Under fading conditions
  • Congestion and Doppler
  • Fault tolerance and redundancy
  • Security and Privacy
  • Time delay implies distance
  • Regulatory compliance
  • Scalable to larger networks

17 January 2016

Time Sensitive Network Issues

IEEE Network Specs 802.11p – Wireless Vehicles

[DSRC]

802.1AS – Time Sync 1588v2 – Precise Time Protocol 802.1Qac – Path Control 802.1Qbv – Scheduled Traffic 802.1Qbu – Pre-emption 802.1Qca – Path Control

802.1Qcb – Seamless Redundant

802.11Qcc – Stream Reservation 802.11Qci – Filtering and Policing 802.11Qv – Time Mgmt Protocol

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18 January 2016

Time Sensitivity for Automotive Networks

Let’s do the numbers [Order of Magnitude]

  • 60 mph => 100 km/hr

30 m/s => 3 cm/millisecond

  • System level response => msec

=> 1KHz update rates minimum

  • Subsystem responses =>

10 – 100 usec range

  • Network latency =>

< 100 usec over multiple hops [5-7]

  • alternate fault tolerant paths
  • all Bit Error Rate [BER] conditions

Latency is key if the network is part of the control loop:

  • Stability
  • Dynamic performance
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19 January 2016

Framework for Simulation and Test

Visualization

View into simulated stimuli and responses Enhanced Simulation

Instrumentation

Test equipment to monitor signal points Traditional Test

Vision Sensors Network Connections Vehicle Dynamics and Motion Control Road, Hazards and Weather Conditions Autopilot VUT Navigation Traffic – Vehicles, Pedestrians Vehicle Under Test

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20 January 2016

Simulation vs. Test

Model

  • Fully simulated models in Matlab or similar tools
  • Target system, environment, test stimulus all simulated

SIL

  • SW models replaced by executable code for the real target
  • HW, environment, test stimulus all simulated

HIL

  • Selected components replaced with target HW and SW -- ECUs
  • Mixed of simulation and test

Lab

  • Real code and HW
  • Simulated environment with mix of some real stimuli

Field

  • Target system fully integrated
  • Controlled environment and stimuli – test track

User

  • Human in the loop – road test
  • ADAS – human in VUT; Driverless – humans in other cars

Simulation Live Testing

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Driver assisted and driverless cars are here today…
  • …requiring very complex navigation systems
  • Much more than just GNSS
  • INS, mapping, radars, vision systems, realtime networks
  • Simulation and Test must address interaction effects in

complex control loops

  • Traffic and road conditions, objects, weather
  • Wireless network latency a key factor in the control

system

  • Fault tolerance, route changes, re-transmission, multiple hops
  • Time Sensitive Networks

Summary

21 January 2016

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Hiro Sasaki – Director, Architected Solutions
  • hsasaki@spectracom.com
  • Lisa Perdue – GNSS Systems
  • lperdue@spectracom.com
  • Gilles Boime – Senior Scientist
  • gboime@spectracom.com
  • Emmanuel Sicsik-Pare -- Strategic Product Mgr
  • Emmanuel.sicsik-pare@spectracom.orolia.com
  • John Fischer - CTO
  • jfischer@spectracom.com

Acknowledgements

22 January 2016