The Palma measure of inequality Filling the Gap: Inequality - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the palma measure of inequality
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Palma measure of inequality Filling the Gap: Inequality - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Is It All About the Tails? The Palma measure of inequality Filling the Gap: Inequality Indicators for Post - 2015 CGD: Washington, 16 September 2013 Alex Cobham and Andy Sumner Pop quiz If x and y are (tail) points in a distribution,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Is It All About the Tails? The Palma measure of inequality

‘Filling the Gap: Inequality Indicators for Post-2015’

CGD: Washington, 16 September 2013 Alex Cobham and Andy Sumner

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Pop quiz

If x and y are (tail) points in a distribution, which measure would you prefer? P = y/x G = 0.581y – 1.195x + 0.419

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Three points

  • For post-2015, need measures of inequality

which are intuitively clear to support accountability.

  • Inequality is in the tails - stability of ‘middle’

deciles (5-9) – hence Palma; while Gini is inappropriate in theory.

  • Gini is inappropriate in practice: reflects same

two points of distribution as Palma, but with much less clarity.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Palma

What is the Palma?

  • Ratio of national income shares:

top 10% to bottom 40%

  • Rests on Gabriel Palma finding:

stability of ‘middle’ deciles (5-9)

  • ‘Basically, it seems that a schoolteacher, a junior or mid-

level civil servant, a young professional (other than economics graduates working in financial markets), a skilled worker, middle-manager or a taxi driver who owns his or her own car, all tend to earn the same income across the world — as long as their incomes are normalized by income per capita of respective country.’

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Palma

Country Palma Gini Year Most unequal on the Palma Jamaica 14.67 0.66 2002 South Africa 7.05 0.63 2008 Namibia 6.69 0.64 2003 Least unequal on the Palma Ukraine 1.05 0.29 1999 Bulgaria 1.00 0.28 2007 Romania 0.95 0.27 2011

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Inequality in the tails Middle stability across countries

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 1990 2010 Combined Highest 10% Lowest 40% Middle 50%

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Inequality in the tails Middle stability across time

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14%

Argentina Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica Dominican Rep. Ecuador El Salvador Honduras Mexico Panama Paraguay Peru Venezuela UK

Top 10% Middle 50% Bottom 40%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Inequality in the tails Stability across income stages

  • 20%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Argentina Brazil Mexico Peru Top 10% Bottom 40% Middle 50%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Gini in practice

Data source: PovCal PovCal PovCal WIDER WIDER WIDER Survey type All Income Cons’n All Income Cons’n Bottom 40%

  • 1.195***
  • 1.196***
  • 1.184***
  • 1.205***
  • 1.202***
  • 1.246***

(-336.60) (-148.17) (-592.51) (-312.88) (-289.30) (-159.49) Top 10% 0.581*** 0.576*** 0.585*** 0.565*** 0.566*** 0.543*** (267.68) (118.50) (491.03) (235.25) (218.30) (112.93) Constant 0.419*** 0.421*** 0.415*** 0.425*** 0.425*** 0.439*** (328.71) (147.42) (588.11) (309.24) (286.03) (157.42) Obs 826 309 517 1293 1139 154 Adjusted R-Squared

1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.999 1.000

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Pop quiz

Which inequality measure do you prefer? P = y/x G = 0.581y – 1.195x + 0.419

slide-11
SLIDE 11

@AlexCobham

Thank you cgdev.org/europe