The Pros and Cons of Wiikpedia Alex Bateman Anyone can edit - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the pros and cons of wiikpedia
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Pros and Cons of Wiikpedia Alex Bateman Anyone can edit - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Pros and Cons of Wiikpedia Alex Bateman Anyone can edit anything! By David S. Goodsell Nature (1992) 357:543-544. My personal scientific goal: to completely and accurately classify all proteins The Pfam Protein Families Database


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Pros and Cons of Wiikpedia

Alex Bateman

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Anyone can edit anything!

slide-3
SLIDE 3

By David S. Goodsell

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Nature (1992) 357:543-544.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

My personal scientific goal: “to completely and accurately classify all proteins”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk

The Pfam Protein Families Database

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • T. thermophilus - Ramakrishnan, Cell, 2002
slide-8
SLIDE 8

A database of non-coding RNA elements

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Curating annotation is the bottleneck!

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Community Annotation

Databases, data tombs and dust in the wind. Wren and Bateman. Bioinformatics. 2008

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

The Masterplan

MCB Wikiproject is awesome!

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Community Annotation

  • We chose to embrace Wikipedia

– Saves us implementing a wiki – Vast audience – Low barrier to entry – The Google factor

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Who is editing wikipedia pages?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

100 200 300 400 500 600 700

W i l l

  • w

W R f a m b

  • t

D O I b

  • t

S m a c k B

  • t

A d d b

  • t

P p g a r d n e A l e x b a t e m a n J e n n i f e r R f m C i t a t i

  • n

b

  • t

R i c h F a r m b r

  • u

g h A d d s h

  • r

e W g s c

  • t

t N a r a y a n e s e D O 1 1 . 1 Z a s h a w B a n u s W a v e s p

  • r

t 9 8 . 2 4 . 7 . 1 4 1 R j w i l m s i M a t t h e w e d w a r d s 1 3 . 1 2 6 . 5 1 . 5 6 C h e e k y M

  • n

k e y A w r f a m T r a n s C

  • n

t r

  • l

J a G a T i m V i c k e r s 1 9 3 . 6 2 . 2 3 . 2 1 4 S q u i d

  • n

i u s A r c a d i a n M w j e n s e n W

  • h
  • k

i t t y M a r c

  • T
  • l
  • 2

2 . 5 4 . 2 2 6 . 7 8 C e y

  • c

k e y

Robots Scientists Proof readers

  • As of 12th April - 1001 users - 7,645 edits
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Vandalism

  • User 203.59.66.54 added this line on 3rd June 2007, removed

17th June

  • Plausible because Ribwiches did appear in Simpsons in 2003
  • Most vandalism is reverted in minutes
  • Vandalism only made it onto Rfam website once
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Getting scientists to edit

  • 10 simple rules article in PLoS CB

– Help scientists understand how to get started

  • December 2008 we struck a deal with RNA Biology.
  • RNA families track created
  • RNA families articles require:

– Paper describing family – Stockholm formatted alignment – Wikipedia article

  • Paul Gardner acts as Editor
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

The problem with scientists

Knowledge

  • f subject

Knowledge

  • f Wikipedia

Wikipedia Pedants Ignorant Scientists

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Vanity

  • Most scientists gravitate to writing articles about

themselves, their groups or projects

  • This is an obvious conflict of interest and is

discouraged by Wikipedia

  • However, writing about a subject you are an

expert in is not!

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:An_article_

about_yourself_is_nothing_to_be_proud_of

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Example 1

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Example 1

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Example 1

slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Example 2

  • User Alexm1313 create page on Frozen

Ark on 19th July.

  • Page rapidly grows
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Example 2

Lots of discussions later …

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Attribution

  • Many scientists are worried about lack of

attribution

slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Attribution

  • Scientists still want to know what do I get
  • ut of editing Wikipedia
  • Do tenure committees consider this, etc…
  • This rather misses the point
slide-34
SLIDE 34