Thermodynamic singularities of QCD in the complex baryo-chemical - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

thermodynamic singularities of qcd in the complex baryo
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Thermodynamic singularities of QCD in the complex baryo-chemical - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Thermodynamic singularities of QCD in the complex baryo-chemical potential plane and the extended analyticity conjecture David Mesterhzy Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, Universitt Bern In collaboration with: Misha Stephanov,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Thermodynamic singularities of QCD in the complex baryo-chemical potential plane and the extended analyticity conjecture

David Mesterházy

Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, Universität Bern In collaboration with: Misha Stephanov, Xin An

SIGN 2015, Debrecen, Hungary

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction: Nothing new here (sorry)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Taylor series expansion of the QCD pressure p in powers of µ/T:

p(µ/T) T4 =

  • n=0

cn(T)(µ/T)n cn(T) = 1 n! ∂np(T, µ)/T4 ∂ (µ/T)n

  • µ=0

Coefficients can be calculated with standard techniques at µ = 0

Bernard et al., Phys. Rev. D55, 6861 (1997); Karsch et al., Phys. Lett. B478, 447 (2000); Ali Khan et al., Phys. Rev. D64, 074510 (2001) Ejiri et al., Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 153:118 (2004)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Taylor series expansion of the QCD pressure p in powers of µ/T:

p(µ/T) T4 =

  • n=0

cn(T)(µ/T)n cn(T) = 1 n! ∂np(T, µ)/T4 ∂ (µ/T)n

  • µ=0

Coefficients can be calculated with standard techniques at µ = 0

r = limn→∞ r2n r2n =

  • c2n

c2n+2

  • 1/2

Karsch et al., Phys. Lett. B698, 256 (2011) Ejiri et al., Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 153:118 (2004)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Convergence radius is limited by the nearest singularity to the real axis. Yang-Lee theory states that these are related to the zeros zn of the partition function.

ZV =

  • n

(z − zn) F(z) = − T V log ZN = − T V

  • n

log(z − zn)

For finite system partition is a entire function – zeros located off the real axis (at complex zn). Electrostatic analogy (two-dimensional Coulomb gas):

φ = Re F(z) = − T V

  • n

log |z − zn | E = −∇φ

In the thermodynamic limit the zeros coalesce into one-dimensional curves with continuous charge density ρ(z). A phase transition occurs only if these curves pinch (second order) or cross (first order) the real axis.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Complement lattice calculations at µ = 0 with low-energy effective models of QCD where zeros can be determined. A comparison of these methods can shed light on their range of applicability.

ZRM =

  • dX exp
  • −N Tr XX†

[det(D + m)]Nf D =

  • iX + iC

iX† + iC

  • Stephanov, Phys. Rev. D73, 094508 (2006)
slide-7
SLIDE 7

ZRM =

  • dX exp
  • −N Tr XX†

[det(D + m)]Nf D =

  • iX + iC

iX† + iC

  • Stephanov, Phys. Rev. D73, 094508 (2006)

Ejiri et al. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 8, 083B02 (2014)

Landau-Ginzburg potential

Ω(σ) = −mσ + a

2σ2 + b 4σ4 + c 6σ6

slide-8
SLIDE 8

In the scaling regime the singular part of the potential F(t, h = 0) is proportional to a power of

t ≡ (z − zc)/zc: Fsing(t, h = 0) = A+ t2−α , t > 0 A− (−t)2−α , t < 0

Off the real axis F(t) must be an analytic function everywhere except for discontinuities across the cuts. Their location can be determined using the electrostatic analogy, which requires φ to be continuous across the cut. With t = −s eiϕ, s > 0:

A+ cos[(2 − α)(ϕ − π)] = A− cos[(2 − α)ϕ]

Cuts are straight lines at an angle ϕ with negative t axis:

tan[(2 − α)ϕ] = cos(πα) − A−/A+ sin(πα)

In the presence of a symmetry-breaking field

Fsing(t, h) = |h|1+1/δΦ(η = t/h1/(βδ)) + . . .

up to h-independent term. Critical point is shifted away from the origin in the complex t-plane:

t∗ = |η∗ |eiψh1/(βδ)

ψ = π 2βδ

ψ t∗(h) h = 0 t plane h = 0 t∗(0) ϕ

slide-9
SLIDE 9

U(1)A anomaly

suppressed anomaly at Tc QCD

SU(Nf )L ⊗ SU(Nf )R → SU(Nf )V U(Nf )L ⊗ U(Nf )R → U(Nf )V Nf = 1

crossover or first order

O(2) or first order Nf = 2 O(4) or first order U(2)L ⊗ U(2)R/U(2)V or first order Nf ≥ 3

first order first order aQCD

SU(2Nf ) → SO(2Nf ) U(2Nf ) → O(2Nf ) Nf = 1 O(3) or first order U(2)/O(2) or first order Nf = 2 SU(4)/SO(4) or first order

first order

  • E. Vicari, PoS LAT2007:023 (2007)
slide-10
SLIDE 10

U(1)A anomaly suppressed anomaly at Tc QCD

SU(Nf )L ⊗ SU(Nf )R → SU(Nf )V U(Nf )L ⊗ U(Nf )R → U(Nf )V Nf = 1

crossover or first order

O(2) or first order Nf = 2 O(4) or first order U(2)L ⊗ U(2)R/U(2)V or first order Nf ≥ 3

first order first order

Vicari, PoS LAT2007:023 (2007)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Nf = 2 QCD effective theory S =

  • d3x
  • Tr(∂µΦ†)(∂µΦ) + τ Tr Φ†Φ + 1

4 u(Tr Φ†Φ)2 + 1 4 v Tr(Φ†Φ)2+ +w(g)(det Φ† + det Φ) + 1 4x(g)(Tr Φ†Φ)(det Φ† + det Φ) + 1 4y(g)

  • (det Φ†)2 + (det Φ)2

w, x, y = O(g)

Taking into account the U(1)A anomaly, we expect that the chiral-symmetry restoration transition is in the three-dimensional O(4) universality class If that assumption holds, expect an analytic crossover for nonzero values of the quark masses (first order transition is quite stable with respect to the presence of non-vanishing quark masses) g g T T O(4) O(4)

U(2)xU(2)/U(2)

O(4) 1st order O(4)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

In the chiral limit (m = 0) we identify t ∼ µ2 − µ2

c (T) in the vicinity of the phase transition

(conformal transformations µ → µ2 do not affect the angles φ and ψ away from µ = 0). At a given temperature T, we are therefore inquiring about the location of the singularities in the complex µ-plane (Fisher zeros, relevant perturbation temperature-like). The (two) cuts originate at the branching point located at µc(T) on the real axis:

O(4) universality class : α ≈ −0.25 , A+/A− ≈ 1.6 ϕ ≈ 77◦ , ϕ ≈ 77◦

At tricritical point mean-field exponents (up to logarithmic corrections).

µc(T) µ∗(m) ϕ ψ m = 0 m = 0 µ plane Fixed T ∈ (T3, Tc) T > TE T = TE T < TE µ plane Fixed m = 0 µ∗(m) µE(m) m1/(βδ)

Stephanov, Phys. Rev. D73, 094508 (2006)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

At nonvanishing (sufficiently small) quark masses and fixed T > T3, we identify h ∼ m in the vicinity of the crossover point. QCD critical end point (TE, µE) lies in the three-dimensional Ising universality class. The initial direction of the cuts near this point is perpendicular to the real axis (relevant perturbation µ − µE is magnetic-field-like – Lee-Yang zeros). Both thermal and magnetic operators with scaling dimensions yt = 1/ν and yh = βδ/ν couple linearly to the variable µ − µE. Since yh > yt, the magnetic field operator dominates near the critical point

µc(T) µ∗(m) ϕ ψ m = 0 m = 0 µ plane Fixed T ∈ (T3, Tc) T > TE T = TE T < TE µ plane Fixed m = 0 µ∗(m) µE(m) m1/(βδ)

Stephanov, Phys. Rev. D73, 094508 (2006)

min

T

µ2

R(T) ∼ m1/(βδ) ∼ m0.54

Below TE the singularity continues to move away from the origin, and the radius is now determined by the spinodal point of the first order phase transition.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Equation of state (EOS) for Ising field theory:

h(τ, ϕ) = U′(ϕ) h = chH (1 + O(∆T, H)) τ = cτ∆T (1 + O(∆T, H))

In the critical domain, where |h|, |τ | ≪ 1, the EOS satisfies the following scaling form

h(τ, ϕ) = ϕ |ϕ |δ−1f τ |ϕ |−1/β

where f (z = τ |ϕ |−1/β) is a universal, dimensionless scaling function, uniquely defined up to normalization; The exponents β and δ characterize the asymptotic scaling behavior of the magnetization ϕ for vanishing h and τ, respectively.

|h| = f (0)|ϕ |δ

and

τ = z0 |ϕ |1/β

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Consider an expansion around (possibly non-vanishing) ¯

ϕ: U(ϕ) =

  • τ ¯

ϕ + 1 3! λ4 ¯ ϕ3

  • δϕ + 1

2

  • τ + 1

2 λ4 ¯ ϕ2

  • δϕ2 + 1

3! λ4 ¯ ϕδϕ3 + 1 4! λ4δϕ4 + const

Second-order phase transition where the correlation length diverges:

U′′( ¯ ϕ) = 0

while U′( ¯

ϕ) = ¯ h ¯ ϕ = 0 and small δϕ = ϕ − ¯ ϕ: Ising universality class (associated by the breaking of the Z2-symmetry of the order parameter ϕ2).

In mean-field theory, τ = ¯

h = 0, λ4 > 0, and critical exponents given by: Ising critical point : β = 1 2, δ = 3

...and from scaling relations: α = 0, γ = 1, η = 0, and ν = 1

2 .

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Additional singularities in the high-temperature phase (τ > 0) at non-vanishing (complex) values

  • f the external field h – cannot be associated with a characteristic symmetry-breaking pattern

(field-expectation value nonvanishing on both sides of the transition).

τ > 0 : ¯ h = 2 3τ ¯ ϕ = ±iλ4 3 2τ λ4 3/2 EOS: δh = U′(ϕ) − U′( ¯ ϕ) ≡ δU′ϕ

Scaling form near the LY critical point:

δh = δϕ |δϕ |δ−1g µ2 |δϕ |−1/β µ2 = τ + 1 2 λ4 ¯ ϕ2(Λ) Lee-Yang critical point : β = 1, δ = 2

... and using scaling relations: α = −1, γ = 1, η = 0, and ν = 1

2

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Same argument goes through in the low-temperature phase (τ < 0) where we identify a set of critical points with values ¯

h that lie on the real axis Re h: τ < 0 : ¯ h = ± λ4 3 −2τ λ4 3/2 ,

Spinodal singularity (associated with the limit of metastability) lies in the same universality class

  • f Lee-Yang theory

What happens to the spinodal singularity?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Consider the cubic theory with scalar field

S =

  • ddx

1 2 (∂µϕ)2 + 1 2 µ2ϕ2 + λ3 3! ϕ3

  • One-loop ǫ = 6 − d expansion around the upper critical dimension:

βv = (ǫ − 3η) + 2v2 , v ≡ λ2

3

η = d − 4 2d v Yang-Lee FP : β = 1 , δ = 2 + ǫ/3 η = −ǫ/9

Im λ3 Re λ3 UV IR v = (λ3)2 βv

Same flow characteristics at two- and three-loop order

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Two-dimensional Ising model (analytic properties of the universal scaling function)

F(τ, h) = τ2 8π logτ2 + τ2G(ξ) ξ = h/|τ |1/(βδ) Ghigh(ξ) = G2 ξ2 + G4 ξ4 + G6 ξ6 + . . .

  • ther references

high-T dispersion relation

G2

  • 1.8452280...
  • 1.8452283

G4

8.33370(1) 8.33410

G6

  • 95.1689(4)
  • 95.1884

G8

1457.55(11) 1458.21

G10

  • 25884(13)
  • 25889

G12

5.03(1)×105 5.02×105

G14

  • 1.04×107
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Two-dimensional Ising model (analytic properties of the universal scaling function)

F(τ, h) = τ2 8π logτ2 + τ2G(ξ) ξ = h/|τ |1/(βδ) Glow(ξ) ≃ ˜ G1 ξ + ˜ G2 ξ2 + . . .

  • ther references

low-T dispersion relation

˜ G1

  • 1.35783834...
  • 1.35783835

˜ G2

  • 0.0489532...
  • 0.0489589

˜ G3

0.0387529; 0.039(1) 0.0388954

˜ G4

  • 0.0685535; -0.0685(2)
  • 0.0685060

˜ G5

0.18453

˜ G6

  • 0.66215

˜ G7

2.952

˜ G8

  • 15.69

˜ G9

96.76

˜ G10

  • 6.79×102

˜ G11

5.34×103

˜ G12

  • 4.66×104

˜ G13

4.46×105

˜ G14

  • 4.66×106
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Extended analyticity conjecture (two-dimensional Ising model)

Fonseca and Zamalodchikov, J. Stat. Phys. 110, 527 (2003)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Two-dimensional Ising model Fonseca and Zamalodchikov, J. Stat. Phys. 110, 527 (2003)

9π/5 7π/5 5π/5 3π/5 π/5 2π

Arg( ) η LTW HTW HTW SHD SHD

Two-dimensional Ising quantum gravity Bourgine and Kostov, J. Stat. Mech. 1201, P01024 (2012)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

For d = 2 the Yang-Lee singularity turns out to be located relatively far under the Langer branch cut.

θ = π − 3π 2 1 2 − α − β

“If extended analyticity assumption holds for d = 3, one should expect the effect of the Yang-Lee singularity being quite prominent at real negative H at least in the critical domain T → Tc.”

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Nonperturbative functional renormalization group Scale-dependent effective action:

Γk[ϕ] =

  • ddx
  • Uk(ϕ) + 1

2

  • Zk(ϕ)(∂µϕ)2 + Wa

k (ϕ)(ϕ)2

+ Wb

k (ϕ)(∂µϕ)2 ϕ + Wc k (ϕ)

  • (∂µϕ)22

Zk(ϕ) and Wa,b,c

k

(ϕ) parametrize all contributions up to O(∂4) in the derivative expansion (state

  • f the art!) and Uk(ϕ) is the scale-dependent effective potential.

ϕ = ˆ ϕ scalar order parameter (i.e., bare field-expectation value) ϕ Uk(ϕ) Zk(ϕ) Wa

k (ϕ)

Wb

k (ϕ)

Wc

k (ϕ)

Canonical dimension

d−2 2

d −2 − d+2

2

−d

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Classical potential UΛ(ϕ) (defined at the short-distance cutoff Λ) receives contributions from modes q2 ≈ k2 that are integrated out successively starting from the cutoff scale – This procedure introduces a k-dependence to the potential:

∂ ∂s Uk(ϕ) = 1 2

  • ddq

(2π)d ∂ ∂s Rk(q) Gk(ϕ; q) , s = ln(k/Λ) Gk(ϕ; q) = Γ(2)

k

(ϕ; q) + Rk(q)−1

We obtain an infinite set of flow equations for the derivatives of the effective potential

U(n)

k (ϕ) ≡ ∂nUk(ϕ) ∂ϕn

with respect to constant field ϕ:

∂ ∂s U′

k(ϕ) = −1

2

  • ddq

(2π)d Γ(3)(ϕ; q, 0) Gk(ϕ; q) ∂ ∂s Rk(q) Gk(ϕ; q) ∂ ∂s U′′

k (ϕ) = 1

2

  • ddq

(2π)d

∂s

  • Γ(4)(ϕ; q, 0, 0) Gk(ϕ; q) −
  • Γ(3)(ϕ; q, 0) Gk(ϕ; q)

2 . . . Γ(3)

k

(ϕ; q, 0) ≡ ∂ ∂ϕ Γ(2)

k

(ϕ; q) = Z′

k(ϕ) q2 + Wa k ′(ϕ)(q2)2 + U(3) k (ϕ)

Γ(4)

k

(ϕ; q, 0, 0) ≡ ∂2 ∂ϕ2 Γ(2)

k

(ϕ; q) . . .

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Simplest possible truncation:

Zk 0 (but field-independent), Wa,b,c

k

= 0,

and Uk(ϕ) = 1

3! λ3,kϕ3

One-loop universality states that O(ǫ) should be reproduced – but deviations on the order of 10 % around d = 4.

3 4 5 6 d

  • 0.5
  • 0.4
  • 0.3
  • 0.2
  • 0.1

η

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Let’s continue:

Zk 0 (but field-independent), Wa,b,c

k

= 0,

and Uk(ϕ) = 1

3! λ3,kϕ3 + n≥4 1 n! λn,kϕn

One-loop O(ǫ) result is reproduced – but fixed point no longer extends to d = 4!

  • 2
  • 1

1 2

  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2

slide-29
SLIDE 29

More to come ...