Thermodynamics of hadrons using the Gaussian functional method in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

thermodynamics of hadrons using the gaussian functional
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Thermodynamics of hadrons using the Gaussian functional method in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Thermodynamics of hadrons using the Gaussian functional method in the linear sigma model Shotaro Imai 1 and Hua-Xin Chen 2 , Hiroshi Toki 3 , Li-Sheng Geng 2 Kyoto Univ. 1 , Beigang Univ. 2 , RCNP/Osaka Univ. 3 Oct. 27 2013 Chiral 13 @ Beihang


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Thermodynamics of hadrons using the Gaussian functional method in the linear sigma model

Shotaro Imai1

and

Hua-Xin Chen2, Hiroshi Toki3, Li-Sheng Geng2

Kyoto Univ.1, Beigang Univ.2, RCNP/Osaka Univ.3

  • Oct. 27 2013

Chiral 13 @ Beihang Univ. arXiv:1309.0591 [nucl-th]

1 / 15

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

Chiral symmetry breaking

▶ Mass generation for (massless or light) fermion ▶ Nambu-Goldstone boson ▶ Restoration at high temperature (phase transition)

Non-perturbative interaction among mesons The interaction term of linear sigma model (λ ∼ O(10)) Lint = λ 4 (σ2 + π2)2 Chiral symmetry with the fluctuations of mesons around their mean field values at finite temperature

▶ The Cornwall-Jackiw-Tomboulis (CJT) formalism

  • J. M. Cornwall, R. Jackiw and E. Tomboulis PRD 10 (1974) . . .

▶ The optimized perturbation theory

  • S. Chiku and T. Hatsuda PRD 58 (1998) . . .

▶ The Gaussian Functional Method:

corresponding to Hartree-Fock approx. + RPA

  • T. Barnes and G. Ghandour PRD 22 (1980) . . .

2 / 15

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Gaussian Functional Method (view of my talk) Gaussian Functional Method

Barnes and Ghandour PRD 22 (1980), Nakamura and Domitrasinovic PTP 106 (2001)

  • 1. Schr¨
  • dinger picture in field theory with the Gaussian ground

state functional ansatz

  • 2. The minimization condition: determination of the variational

parameters

▶ The resulting (dressed) mass of Nambu-Goldstone (NG) boson

is not zero due to the non-perturbative effect

  • 3. Considering the bound state of mesons (4 quarks state):

Bethe-Salpeter equation

▶ Emergence of the NG bosons → Physical mass

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

▶ Fixing the parameters with the sigma meson mass (500 MeV) ▶ Dressed mass vs. Physical mass

  • 4. The phase transition at finite temperature

3 / 15

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Gaussian Functional Method I

O(2) Linear sigma model (φ = (ϕ0, ϕ1, ϕ2, ϕ3) = (σ, π)) L =1 2(∂µφ)2 + 1 2µ0φ2 − λ0 4 (φ2)2 + εσ The Hamiltonian H[φ] = ∫ dyδ(y − x) ( −1 2 δ2 δϕi(x)ϕi(y) + 1 2∇xϕi(x)∇yϕi(y) −1 2µ0φ2 + λ0 4 (φ2)2 + εσ ) The Gaussian ground state functional Ψ[φ] = N exp ( −1 4 ∫ dxdy [ϕi(x)

fluctuation

− ⟨ϕi(x)⟩

V.E.V

]G−1

ij (x, y)[ϕj(y) − ⟨ϕj(y)⟩]

) Gij(x, y) =1 2δij ∫ d3k (2π)3 1 √ k2 + M2

i dressed mass

eik·(x−y) Energy with the variational parameters Mi and ⟨ϕi⟩ E(Mi, ⟨ϕi⟩) = ∫ DφΨ∗[φ]H[φ]Ψ[φ]

4 / 15

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Gaussian Functional Method II

The minimization condition: Determination of parameters (⟨ϕi⟩, Mi) (∂E(Mi, ⟨ϕi⟩) ∂⟨ϕi⟩, Mi )

min

= 0 , for i = 0 . . . 3 ⇔ (One- and two-point) Schwinger-Dyson equations

= 1

2

+1

6

+

The mean field values: One-point SD equation ⟨ϕ0⟩ =v, ⟨ϕi⟩ = 0 for i = 1, 2, 3 µ2

0 = − ε

v + λ0 [ v2 + 3I0(Mσ) + 3I0(Mπ) ] I0(Mi) =i ∫ d4k (2π)4 1 k2 − M2

i + iϵ

5 / 15

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Gaussian Functional Method III

Two-point SD equation: (Determination of masses Mi)

= +1

2

+1

2

Dressed mass (M0 = Mσ, Mi = Mπ) M2

σ = − µ2 0 + λ0

[ 3v2 + 3I0(Mσ) + 3I0(Mπ) ] =ε v + 2λ0v2 M2

π = − µ2 0 + λ0

[ v2 + I0(Mσ) + 5I0(Mπ) ] =ε v + 2λ0 [I0(Mπ) − I0(Mσ)]

non-perturbative effect

The pion mass Mπ ̸= 0 even in the chiral limit ε → 0 → DO NOT satisfy The Nambu-Goldstone theorem

6 / 15

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Nambu-Goldstone Theorem

The dressed mass cannot satisfy the Nambu-Goldstone theorem Relation between Mσ and Mπ with some cutoff Λ

200 400 600 800 1000 500 1000 1500 2000 500 1000 1500 2000 M [MeV] M [MeV]

(a) ε = 0

200 400 600 800 1000 500 1000 1500 2000 500 1000 1500 2000 M [MeV] M [MeV]

(b) ε ̸= 0

▶ The dressed masses depend on the cutoff ▶ They cannot satisfy the NG theorem independently the cutoff

▶ There are no finite sigma mass and zero pion mass in the

chiral limit ε = 0

▶ The physical mass of sigma (600 MeV) and pion (140 MeV)

cannot exist in ε ̸= 0

We cannot identify these masses as physcal mass (NG boson)

7 / 15

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Bethe-Salpeter Equation I

Physical masses appear as pole of the Bethe-Salpeter (four-point SD) euqarion (bound state of mesons) σ − π channel → Physical pion mass mπ (s = p2) Gσπ→σπ(p2) =i ∫ d4k (2π)4 1 [k2 − M 2

σ + iϵ] [(k − p)2 − M 2 π + iϵ]

Vσπ→σπ(s) =2λ0 [ 1 + ( 2λ0 v2 s − M2

π

)] Tσπ→σπ(s) =Vσπ→σπ(s) + Vσπ→σπ(s)Gσπ→σπ(s)Tσπ→σπ(s) = Vσπ→σπ(s) 1 − Vσπ→σπ(s)Gσπ→σπ(s)

8 / 15

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The Bethe-Salpeter Equation II

The coupled channel σ − σ and π − π → Physical sigma mass mσ V = (Vσσ→σσ Vσσ→ππ Vππ→σσ

1 3Vππ→ππ

) = 2λ0  3 [ 1 + 3 2λ0v2

s−M2

σ

] [ 1 + 3 2λ0v2

s−M2

σ

] [ 1 + 3 2λ0v2

s−M2

σ

]

1 3

[ 5 + 3 2λ0v2

s−M2

σ

]   T = (Tσσ→σσ Tσσ→ππ Tππ→σσ

1 3Tππ→ππ

) , G = (Gσσ→σσ 3Gππ→ππ ) T = V + 1 2V GT =(1 − 1 2V G)−1V Physical mass mσ, mπ vs. Dressed mass Mπ (NG boson)

m m

200 400 600 800 1000

  • 200

200 400 600 800 1000

M [MeV] m [MeV] (a) ε = 0

m

m

200 400 600 800 1000

  • 200

200 400 600 800 1000

M [MeV] m [MeV] (b) ε ̸= 0

9 / 15

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Parameters

We accept the parameters below (ε = fπm2

π0 = 93 × 1422 MeV3)

chiral limit breaking case λ0 =83.6 λ0 =75.5 µ0 =1680 MeV µ0 =1610 MeV Λ =800 MeV Λ =800 MeV ε =0 MeV3 ε =1.86 × 106 MeV3 ⇓ ⇓ Mσ =1200 MeV Mσ =1150 MeV Mπ =580 MeV Mπ =564 MeV mσ =500 MeV mσ =500 MeV v = fπ =93 MeV v = fπ= 93 MeV mπ =0 MeV mπ =138 MeV We fit the parameters to reproduce the pion decay constant fπ and the pion mass mπ

10 / 15

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Finite Temperature I

Finite temperature with the Matsubara formalism E(v, Mσ, Mπ) → E(v(T), Mσ(T), Mπ(T); T) The behavior of the free energy as a function of the mean field value v (fixing Mσ, Mπ) In the case of the chiral limit

50 100 150 200

  • 2

2 4 6 8 10

v [MeV]

9 4

T = T = 1 9 T = 1 9 4 T = 1 9 5 T = 3

(a) Free energy

100 200 300

  • 20

20 40 60 80 100

T [MeV]

v [MeV] (b) Mean field values v

The free energy is suddenly change at 195 MeV and the first order phase transition

11 / 15

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Finite Temperature II

In the case of the explicit chiral symmetry breaking EχSB = εv

50 100 150 200

  • 2

2 4 6 8 10

v [MeV]

9 4

T = T = 1 9 5 T = 1 9 8 .2 T = 1 9 9 T = 3

(a) Free energy

100 200 300

  • 20

20 40 60 80 100

T [MeV] v [MeV] (b) Mean field values v

Similar behavior even in the case of explicit symmetry breaking: Suddenly change at 195 MeV and the first order phase transition

▶ The whole energy at transition temperature E ∼ −108MeV4 ▶ The chiral symmetry breaking term EχSB ∼ −107MeV4

Since the contribution of EχSB is 10 times smaller, the free energy suddenly change → In the MFA, they are comparable ∼ −108 MeV4

12 / 15

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Finite Temperature III

Solutions of the BS equation at finite temperature G(s) → G(s, T)

m

m 100 200 300

  • 200

200 400 600 800 1000

T [MeV]

m [MeV]

m

(a) ε = 0

m m

100 200 300

  • 200

200 400 600 800 1000

T [MeV]

m [MeV] m

(b) ε ̸= 0

▶ Mesons bound state picture holds only in the symmetry

broken phase

▶ In the symmetric phase, they are unbound and their masses

coincide the dressed mass m2

π = M 2 π + 4λ0v2Gσπ→σπ(m2

π)

1−2λ0Gσπ→σπ(m2

π)

The second term vanishes due to the symmetry restoration (v → 0)

13 / 15

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Summary

  • 1. We treat the non-perturbative effect using Gaussian ground

state functional ansatz

  • 2. Determination of the variational parameters

(One- and Two-point Schwinger-Dyson Equation)

▶ There are NO NG bosons: unphysical particle

  • 3. Mesons bound state in the Bethe-Salpeter Equation

▶ Emergence of the NG bosons ▶ 4 quarks picture of mesons

  • 4. The behavior of the chiral symmetry at finite temperature

▶ The phase transition ▶ The meson-meson bound state

Future work

▶ Investigation of 3 flavor case ▶ Application to 2 color system at finite density

14 / 15

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The end

Thank you for your kind attention

15 / 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Back up slides

16 / 15

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Parameter dependence

Chiral limit(ε = 0)

50 100 150 200 1000 2000 3000 1000 2000 3000 M M 50 100 150 200 500 1000 1500 2000 500 1000 1500 2000 M [MeV]

Explicit breaking(ε ̸= 0)

50 100 150 200 1000 2000 3000 1000 2000 3000

(a) µ0 vs. λ0

M M 50 100 150 200 500 1000 1500 2000 500 1000 1500 2000 M [MeV]

(b) Mσ, Mπ vs. λ0

17 / 15

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Dressed mass at finite temperature

Dressed mass at finite temperature M 2

σ(T) =

ε v(T) + 2λ0v2(T) M 2

π(T) =

ε v(T) + 2λ0 [I0(Mπ(T)) − I0(Mσ(T))]

M M

100 200 300 500 1000 1500

T [MeV] M [MeV] M

(a) ε = 0

M M 100 200 300 500 1000 1500

T [MeV]

M [MeV] M

(b) ε ̸= 0

18 / 15