Tidal Disruptions of Binary Stars Ilya Mandel University of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

tidal disruptions of binary stars
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Tidal Disruptions of Binary Stars Ilya Mandel University of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Tidal Disruptions of Binary Stars Ilya Mandel University of Birmingham, UK (and Monash University, Melbourne) Collaborators: Yuri Levin (Monash), Ben Bradnick (Birmingham) Aspen, 2/11/2016 Tidal disruption [Rees, 1988; Gezari, 2014;


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Tidal Disruptions of Binary Stars

Ilya Mandel University of Birmingham, UK (and Monash University, Melbourne) Collaborators: Yuri Levin (Monash), Ben Bradnick (Birmingham) Aspen, 2/11/2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Tidal disruption

[Rees, 1988; Gezari, 2014; Guillochon & Ramirez-Ruiz, 2013]

slide-3
SLIDE 3

https://tde.space

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Tidal disruption

[Rees, 1988; Gezari, 2014; Guillochon & Ramirez-Ruiz, 2013]

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Binary tidal disruptions

5

[I. Mandel and Y. Levin. 2015. Double tidal disruptions in galactic nuclei. ApJ Letters, 805, L4. arXiv:1504.02787]

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Binary tidal disruptions

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Binary tidal disruptions

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Loss cone physics

8

L r l*TD lLC rmin

full empty

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Double tidal disruptions

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Double tidal disruptions, I

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Double tidal disruptions, II

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Visualizations

12

[visualizations courtesy of James Guillochon]

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Simulations

13

Mainetti et al., arXiv:1601.05478

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

[Merloni et al., 2015, ArXiv: 1503.04870 Grupe et al., 2015, ArXiv: 1504.01389]

More unusual tidal disruptions?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Tidal disruption + jets

15

[Bloom et al., 2011, Science, 333, 203; Levan et al., 2011, Science, 333, 199; also Burrows et al., 2011, Nature; Zauderer et al., 2011, Nature]

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Tidal disruption + jets

16

[Bloom et al., 2011, Science, 333, 203; Levan et al., 2011, Science, 333, 199; also Burrows et al., 2011, Nature; Zauderer et al., 2011, Nature] [Tchekhovskoy et al., 2014, MNRAS, 437, 2744:
 prompt jet requires magnetic flux > 1029 G cm2]

slide-17
SLIDE 17

What about the empty loss cone?

17

Bradnick, Levin, Mandel, in prep.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

What about the empty loss cone?

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

What about the empty loss cone?

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Conclusions

§ Around 5—10% of all TDEs are double TDEs of binaries

» How important is the self-interaction of the tidal streams? » What would the spectrum look like? » Are these easy distinguish?

§ Tens of percent of binaries in the empty loss cone regime may merge before the merger product is tidally disrupted

» What is the distinguishing observational signature? » Could the enhancement of the magnetic field due to recent merger power prompt jet formation?

20