Time, Space and Computation: Converging Human Neuroscience & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

time space and computation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Time, Space and Computation: Converging Human Neuroscience & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Time, Space and Computation: Converging Human Neuroscience & Computer Science Aude Oliva Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab Massachusetts Institute of Technology COMPUTATION Trevor Jitendra Darrell Malik Aude Antonio


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Time, Space and Computation:

Converging Human Neuroscience & Computer Science

Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Aude Oliva

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Pietro Perona Trevor Darrell Jitendra Malik Andrew Zisserman Antonio Torralba Aude Oliva

COMPUTATION

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Kalanit Grill- Spector James Haxby Talia Konkle Nancy Kanwisher Moshe Bar Russell Epstein

SPACE

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Aude Oliva Radoslaw Cichy Nikolaus Kriegeskorte Dimitrios Pantazis

TIME

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Computation with millions of instances

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Deep architectures

Geoffrey Hinton, Yann LeCun

Object-centric network Scene-centric network

PLACES

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Very deep ConvNets Simonyan & Zisserman (2014)

Object-centric deep architectures

R-CNN: Regions with CNN features

(graph by D. Hoeim)

Girshick, Donahue, Darrell & Malik (CVPR 2014)

VGGNet: Very deep ConvNet

Very deep ConvNet

Simonyan & Zisserman (2014)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Places Model

places.csail.mit.edu

Torralba Lapedriza Zhou Xiao

NIPS 2014 release: 2.5 million images, 205 scene categories Zhou, Lapedriza, Xiao, Torralba & Oliva (2014), NIPS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Deep architectures A Visualization of the learned representation for each unit

C1 filters C2 feature maps C5 feature maps C7 feature maps

Zhou, Lapedriza, Xiao, Torralba & Oliva (2014), NIPS

C1 filters C2 feature maps C5 feature maps C7 feature maps Object-centric CNN Scene-centric CNN Object like shapes Space like shapes

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Layer 5: Artificial Receptive fields

Object-centric units Scene-centric units

Zhou, Lapedriza, Xiao, Torralba & Oliva (2014), NIPS

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Non invasive neuro-imaging techniques

MEG (msec-resolution) fMRI (mm-resolution)

Magneto encephalography Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sensors (time) Voxels (space)

?

Radoslaw Cichy Dimitrios Pantazis

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Relative distances

Shepard et al., 1980; Kruskal and Wish., 1978; Edelman et al. 1998; Kriegeskorte et al., 2008; Mur et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2013

Sensor 1 Sensor 2 Voxel 1 Voxel 2

Representational Geometry

Nikolaus Kriegeskorte (2008)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Representational Geometry

“RDMs as a hub to relate different representations across sensors and models”

Nikolaus Kriegeskorte (2008)

Round shape Body part

slide-14
SLIDE 14

t

306 x 1 vector

voxel

Voxels within searchlight

vs.

MEG, 170ms

vs.

fMRI voxel

Spearman Correlation

Time-specific fMRI searchlight analysis

A spatially unbiased view of the relations in similarity structure between MEG and fMRI

Cichy, Pantazis, Oliva (in preparation)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The dynamics of object recognition

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Object recognition in context

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Spatiotemporal maps of correlations between MEG and fMRI

Visual areas Visual areas Parahippocampal cortex Inferior-temporal cortex 100 msec 100 msec

slide-18
SLIDE 18

voxel

Voxels within searchlight

Layer 3

vs.

fMRI voxel

Spearman Correlation

Algorithmic-specific fMRI searchlight analysis

A spatially unbiased view of the relations in similarity structure between deep architectures and fMRI

Cichy, Khosla, Pantazis, Torralba, Oliva (in preparation)

vs.

See also Kaligh-Razavi & Krigeskorte (2014)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Spatiotemporal map of correlations between fMRI and model layers

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Can we predict which images are memorable ?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Predicting Visual Memorability

~ 60,000 photographs with Memorability scores

Aditya Khosla

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Predicting Visual Memorability

~ 60,000 photographs with Memorability scores

Most memorable Less memorable

!""#$%"&'()"$*$+$,-./$ 0(1&2$*$+$,-.3$

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Cognitive-level Algorithms

Memorability: metric of the utility of information

Understand human memory Diagnose memory problems Design mnemonic aids Data Visualization Logos Slogans

  • words-

Education

  • !Individual

difference Mobile applications Social Networking Face Memorability Retrieve better images from search Computer Graphics

  • cognitive

saliency Summarize Bigdata – images, videos

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Time, Space and Computation Power of Prediction

Comparing large-scale processing between natural and artificial systems will not only allow us to understand why biological systems have implemented a certain mechanism, but will allow

  • Studying the strategies that work best for performing specific tasks
  • ! Characterizing the operations when the system is broken
  • ! Exploring the alternatives biological systems have not taken

A.I “Alien” Intelligence (Kevin Kelly, Wired magazine)

CISE, RI: 1016862 R01-EY020484

A converging framework for hypothesis testing