TJA Outcomes in Immunocompromised Patients: A Matched-Pair Analysis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

tja outcomes in immunocompromised patients a matched pair
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TJA Outcomes in Immunocompromised Patients: A Matched-Pair Analysis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TJA Outcomes in Immunocompromised Patients: A Matched-Pair Analysis Controlling for Comorbidity Grace Plassche, Ariel Silverman, Suhas Masilamani Abel Boenerjous, MD, Morteza Meftah, MD, Ira H. Kirschenbaum, MD Background HIV and Hepatitis


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TJA Outcomes in Immunocompromised Patients: A Matched-Pair Analysis Controlling for Comorbidity

Grace Plassche, Ariel Silverman, Suhas Masilamani Abel Boenerjous, MD, Morteza Meftah, MD, Ira H. Kirschenbaum, MD

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

  • HIV and Hepatitis are immunocompromising

diseases that appear to negatively affect the results of total hip and knee arthroplasties

  • These results have been mixed in the

literature

  • The impact of comorbidities has not been fully

addressed

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Material and Methods

850 Consecutive Total Joint Arthroplasties b/w 2008-2014, min. 2 yr follow-up

Hepatitis 122

HIV 32 31

665 Controls

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Groups

Analyzed Comorbidities

  • Study Group 1

– 108 HIV and/or Hepatitis patients – Matched 1:1 with controls

  • Sex, Age, BMI, & Procedure
  • Study Group 2

– 66 HIV and/or Hepatitis patients – Matched 1:1 with controls

  • Sex, Age, BMI, Procedure & Major Comorbidities
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Comorbidities

  • Diabetes
  • Smoking
  • Renal Disease
  • Asthma
  • Cardiac Conditions
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Negative Outcomes Definitions

  • Revision
  • Complication

– Prosthetic Joint Infection – Post-op Medical Complications – Neurovascular Complications

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Results in Study/Control Group 1

(Not Controlling for Comorbidities)

  • Results worse in the HIV/Hepatitis group

(P=0.0391, n=108)

Average Age Average BMI Number of Complications Number of Revisions Number of Smokers (Y/F) Number of Diabetes Control: 108 57.5 31.9 18 (16.7%) 3 (2.8%) 41/17 27 Study: 108 57.3 31.6 26 (24.07%) 11 (10.2%) 48/17 30

Complications Study Group- 24.1% Control Group- 16.7% Revisions Study Group- 10.2% Control Group 2.8%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Results in Study/Control Group 2

(Controlling for Comorbidities)

  • Results are not statistically significant in the

immunocompromised group (P=0.2311, n=66)

Complications Study Group- 15.2% Control Group- 10.6% Revisions Study Group- 4.6% Control Group 1.5%

Average Age Average BMI Number of Complications Number of Revisions Number of Smokers (Y/F) Number of Diabetes Control: 66 56.682 30.3 7 (10.61%) 1 (1.52%) 24/14 12 Study: 66 56.981 30.8 10 (15.15%) 3 (4.55%) 32/9 12

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Study Specifics

  • This was a large single center study
  • Urban setting where patients all came from the

same catchment area

  • While HIV and Hepatitis have been looked at

separately, the role of comorbidities have not previously been fully appreciated

  • There is a wide range of comorbidities in this

population

  • Differs from previous study…
slide-12
SLIDE 12

2017 JBJS Study Our Study Total Number of Patients 137,801 850 Number of Not Infected Patients 136,604 (99.13%) 665 (78.24%) Number of Hepatitis Monoinfected Patients 851 (0.62%) 122 (14.35%) Number of HIV Monoinfected Patients 278 (0.20%) 32 (3.76%) Number of HIV and Hepatitis Coinfected Patients 68 (0.05%) 31 (3.76%) Comorbidities Not Controlled For Controlled For Results Poorer Outcomes No Statistical Difference in Outcomes

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Summary & Conclusions

In our two phase study, what originally appeared to be a difference in outcomes in HIV/Hepatitis patients disappeared when we controlled for major comorbidities.