TOP 3 S Demo NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming October 6, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

top 3 s demo
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TOP 3 S Demo NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming October 6, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TOP 3 S Demo NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming October 6, 2016 Todays Roadmap 1. Background and Planning Framework 2. Strategic Prioritization Process 3. Programming the STIP 4. TOP 3 S 5. Demos of Existing Products &


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TOP3S Demo

NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming October 6, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Transportation

Today’s Roadmap

  • 1. Background and Planning Framework
  • 2. Strategic Prioritization Process
  • 3. Programming the STIP
  • 4. TOP3S
  • 5. Demos of Existing Products & Applications
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Transportation

3

Background and Planning Framework

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Transportation

Background

NCDOT funds six modes of transportation Annual Budget of approx. $4.4B* ($1.8B for STI) Key Partners

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Transportation

Long-Range Planning Determine Needs Maintenance & Operations Maintain Facility Prioritization Project Planning Minimize Impacts Project Design Design and Acquire ROW Construction Build Facility Program Development Fund Projects

5

Planning & Programming Functions

Transportation Program Life Cycle

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Transportation

Planning, Prioritization, Programming Framework

6

STIP Prioritization

  • Scores

Long-Range Planning

  • CTPs (30 yr)
  • MTPs (20 yr)

ArcGIS Desktop MS Word

  • CTPs – NCDOT
  • MTPs – MPOs

SPOT On!ine MS Excel ArcGIS Online MS Access ArcGIS Desktop ArcGIS Online

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Transportation

7

Strategic Prioritization Process

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Transportation

Strategic Transportation Investments (STI) Law

Prioritizes Capital Expenditures across all modes (Mobility/Expansion + Modernization) Needs-based Directly ties funding to Prioritization Results Workgroup

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Transportation

How STI Works

9

40% of Funds 30% of Funds 30% of Funds Statewide Mobility Regional Impact Division Needs

Focus  Address Local Needs

  • Selection based on 50%

Data & 50% Local Input

  • Funding based on equal

share for each Division (14) = ~$39M / yr Focus  Address Significant Congestion and Bottlenecks

  • Selection based on

100% Data

  • Projects Programmed

prior to Local Input Ranking Focus  Improve Connectivity within Regions

  • Selection based on

70% Data & 30% Local Input

  • Funding based on

population within Region (7) Estimated $18B in Funds for SFY 2018-2027

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Transportation

10

regions & divisions

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Transportation

Eligibility Definitions

11

Mode Statewide Mobility

Highway

  • Interstates (existing & future)
  • NHS routes (July 1, 2012)
  • STRAHNET
  • ADHS Routes
  • Uncompleted Intrastate

projects

  • Designated Toll Facilities

Aviation Large Commercial Service Airports ($500K cap) Bicycle- Pedestrian N/A Public Transportation N/A Ferry N/A Rail Freight Capacity Service on Class I Railroad Corridors

Regional Impact

Other US and NC Routes Other Commercial Service Airports not in Statewide ($300K cap) N/A Service spanning two or more counties (10% cap) Ferry expansion Rail service spanning two or more counties not Statewide

Division Needs

All County (SR) Routes All Airports without Commercial Service ($18.5M cap) All projects ($0 state funds) All other service, including terminals and stations Replacement vessels Rail service not included on Statewide or Regional

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Fall Winter Summer Spring Fall Winter Summer Spring 2016 2017 2017 2018 Fall Winter Summer Spring 2018 2019

P4.0 Division Needs Local Input Point Assignment P4.0 Draft 2018‐ 2027 STIP Released P4.0 Final 2018‐ 2027 STIP Released P5.0 Workgroup BOT Approves P5.0 Workgroup Criteria/Weights Project Submittal Project Data Review and Scoring Release Quant. Scores & Statewide Funded Projects Regional Impact Local Input Point Assignment

Start P5.0

Release Regional Total Scores & Funded Projects Division Needs Local Input Point Assignment P5.0 Draft 2020‐ 2029 STIP Released P5.0 Final 2020‐2029 STIP Approved Local Input Methodologies Submitted and Approved

End P4.0 End P5.0

3-Year Prioritization & STIP Cycle

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Transportation

Workgroup Purpose

GS 136-189.11 (h): the Department shall endeavor to continually improve the methodology and criteria used to score highway and non-highway projects pursuant to this Article, including the use of normalization techniques, and methods to strengthen the data collection process. The Department is directed to continue the use of a Workgroup process to develop improvements to the prioritization process.

Purpose: Provide recommendations to NCDOT on prioritization criteria, weights, and scoring process for all modes

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Transportation

Criteria Existing Conditions Project Benefits (Future Conditions)

Highway Scoring – Quantitative Criteria

  • Congestion (Volume/Capacity + Volume)
  • Benefit/Cost (Travel Time Savings + Safety Benefits /

Cost to NCDOT)

  • Safety Score (Critical Crash Rates, Density, Severity)
  • Economic Competitiveness (Jobs, Change in County

Economy)

  • Accessibility / Connectivity (County Economic

Indicator, Improve Mobility)

  • Freight (Truck Volumes, STRAHNet/Future Interstate,

Freight Terminals)

  • Multimodal (Passenger Terminals)
  • Lane Width (Existing Width vs. Standard Width)
  • Shoulder Width (Existing Width vs. Standard Width)
  • Pavement Score (Pavement Condition Rating)
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Transportation

Statewide Mobility

Congestion = 30% Benefit-Cost = 25% Safety = 15% Economic Comp. = 10% Freight = 15% Multimodal = 5%

  • Funding

Category QUANTITATIVE LOCAL INPUT Data Division MPO/RPO

P4.0 Highway Scoring Criteria & Weights

Regional Impact

Congestion = 20% Benefit-Cost = 20% Safety = 10% Accessibility/Connectivity = 10% Freight = 10%

Division Needs

Congestion = 15% Benefit-Cost = 15% Safety = 10% Accessibility/Connectivity = 5% Freight = 5%

15

100% 70% 50% 25% 25% 15% 15%

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Transportation

P4.0 Scoring Process - Highways

Review of Projects from NEPA Perspective / Logical Termini (PDEA) Review of Mapping, Project Description, Cross-Section, and Attributes (SPOT, GIS Unit) Design Concepts - Intersection, Interchange, Superstreet, Operational Projects (CMT) Travel Time Savings - Intersection, Interchange, Superstreet, Operational Projects (CMT) Costs (TIP Unit, Feasibility Studies, NCTA, ITS & Signals Unit) Safety Scores and Crash Data - Intersection, Interchange, Projects (Traffic Safety Unit) Travel Time Savings - Corridor Statewide Mobility Projects (TPB / PB) All Other Data (SPOT, GIS Unit, SPOT On!ine) TREDIS (ERD- Group) MPO, RPO, and Division Data Review SPOT Updates Data as Needed Score Projects

Orange – NCDOT project review Green – Acquire scoring inputs/data Yellow – MPO, RPO, & Division data review Blue – Score projects

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Transportation

Scoring Process

17

Statewide Mobility Regional Impact Division Needs

  • Local input points

assigned

  • Total scores calculated
  • Projects programmed
  • Projects programmed

based on quant. score

  • Local input points

assigned

  • Total scores calculated
  • Projects programmed

Projects Submitted

  • Data reviewed
  • Quantitative scores calculated
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Transportation

Programming the STIP

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Transportation

State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)

STIP identifies funding and scheduling of projects in NCDOT’s capital program 10 Year Program (currently 2016-2025)

  • 1st Five Years is “Delivery STIP” – committed projects from

prioritization perspective

  • 2nd Five Years is “Developmental STIP” – projects in early scoping

and environmental development stage

Updated every 2 years Current STIP contains over $20 Billion of projects

  • Highway, non-highway, bridges, safety, Interstate

Maintenance, CMAQ

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Transportation

STIP Development

20

STIP

Committed Projects Project Development Time Funding Category Allocations Priority Ranking & Normalization STI Law Provisions

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Transportation

Scheduling Impacts to Programming

  • Regardless of priority, projects cannot be programmed for Right of Way (ROW) or

Construction prior to completion of planning/environmental (NEPA) and design work

  • A lower scoring project that can be delivered soon may get scheduled prior to a higher

ranking project that still needs extensive work

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Transportation

STI Legislation Funding Caps and Restrictions

Caps which Impact Programming:

  • Statewide Mobility corridor cap
  • Funding limits on airport projects in all categories
  • Funding limits on Regional Impact transit projects
  • Funding limit on light rail and commuter rail projects
  • Prohibition on using state funds to match federal-aid for

independent bicycle and pedestrian projects

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Transportation

23

STIP STIP

Statewide Mobility Projects Statewide Mobility Projects Regional Impact Projects Regional Impact Projects Division Needs Projects Division Needs Projects Exempt programs and transition projects Exempt programs and transition projects Alternate Criteria Projects Alternate Criteria Projects

Types of Projects in the STIP

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Transportation

24

TOP3S

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Transportation

Transportation On!ine Planning, Prioritization & Programming System

Project Data Repository (Spatial and Tabular) Ultimately includes all projects Initial focus on projects from Long-range Plans, evaluated through Prioritization Process, and Programmed in STIP Different Modules with varying functionality (based on use) Connects to multiple data sources & applications

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Transportation

26

Long-Range Planning Module

  • CTPs
  • MTPs

Programming Module

  • STIP
  • Scenario Testing

Cost Estimation Tool Prioritization Scoring SAP NCSTM TREDIS Roads & Highways (GIS Data) STARS Feasibility Studies Division Projects Public Interface (Project Info)

Project Data Repository (Spatial and Tabular Data)

Prioritization Module

  • Scores

TOP3S Overview

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Transportation

27

Demos of Existing Products & Applications

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Transportation

Long-Range Planning

Comprehensive Transportation Plans Metropolitan Transportation Plans (fiscally constrained)

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Transportation

Prioritization

SPOT On!ine Excel Spreadsheets ArcGIS Online

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Transportation

Programming

Access Databases ArcGIS Online

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Transportation

The End

31

https://www.ncdot.gov/sti