1
Transport and Fate of Contaminants in the Subsurface
GWPC Annual Forum
- Sept. 23-26, 2012
Transport and Fate of Contaminants in the Subsurface GWPC Annual - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transport and Fate of Contaminants in the Subsurface GWPC Annual Forum Sept. 23-26, 2012 Nashville, TN Mike Wireman National Ground-Water Expert US Environmental Protection Agency 1 Natural Ground-Water Quality Nearly all GW originates
1
2
2
3
3
4
– (> 5mg/l)
Bicarbonate (HCO3) Calcium (Ca) Chloride (Cl) Magnesium (Mg) Silicon (Si) Sodium (Na) Sulfate (SO4) Carbonic Acid (H2CO3)
– (> 0.01 -10mg/l)
4
5
Lithium Phosphate Radium Selenium Silver Uranium Zinc
5
6
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Natural processes that tend to remove or degrade
– Advection – Dispersion – Partitioning
Sorption Dissolution/Precipitation Volatilization
– Biological transformation – Abiotic transformation
Complexation Acid-base reactions Redox reactions
16
Atmospheric Losses
Infiltration
Residual Product
Dense Vapor Flow
Water table
17
Dissolution
DNAPL
Volatilization Aquifer Confining Unit Dispersion Sorption Degradation Leachate Mixing
LNAPL
Dissolution Advection
18
19
20
Distance from Slug-Release Contaminant Source
Relative Concentration
Advection
21
Distance from Continuous Contaminant Source Relative Concentration Advection
22
23
24
Mechanical Dispersion due to water moving results when
each other
pore
Mechanical dispersion usually greater than diffusion
Transverse Longitudinal
25
A Advection D Dispersion
Distance from Slug-Release Contaminant Source
Relative Concentration A + D
A
26
Distance from Continuous Contaminant Source Relative Concentration A A + D
A Advection D Dispersion
27
28
29
– Assumes a linear reversible relationship – Not always adequate
30
31
(related to Kow = octanol water partition coefficient)
(if foc > 0.001)
32
33
A Advection D Dispersion S Sorption
Distance from Slug-Release Contaminant Source
Relative Concentration A + D
A
A + D + S
34
A Advection D Dispersion S Sorption
Distance from Continuous Contaminant Source Relative Concentration A A + D A + D + S
35
Retardation processes remove contaminants from the groundwater during transport. Thus the contaminant concentration arriving at a certain point at a certain time is less than it would have been for a conservative (non-retarded) contaminant.
Aquifer Confining Unit R = 5 R = 3 R = 2 R = 1
Groundwater
Flow
Waste 1, 2, 3 DETECTED 1 & 2 DETECTED 1 DETECTED
Water table
36
37
A Advection D Dispersion S Sorption B Biodegradation
Distance from Slug-Release Contaminant Source
Relative Concentration A + D
A
A + D + S A + D + S + B
38
A Advection D Dispersion S Sorption B Biodegradation
Distance from Continuous Contaminant Source Relative Concentration A A + D A + D + S + B A + D + S
39
40
42
(Solution, Volatilization, & Precipitation)
43
k2 k1
44
2- + H+
45
46
47
2-
2-
48
49
2-, CO3 2-
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
59
60
Waterloo, Canada, Biology 447
61
62
Microbial Process Electron Acceptor Products Eh (V) Aerobic respiration O2 H20 +810 Denitrification NO3, etc N2 +750 Manganese reduction Mn4+ Mn2+ +396 Iron reduction Fe3+ Fe2+
Sulfate reduction SO4
2-
H2S
Methanogenesis CO2 CH4
63
Waterloo, Biology 447
64
John Wilson, USEPA
65
BIOCHLOR: http://www.epa.gov/ada/csmos/models/biochlor.html
66
BIOCHLOR: http://www.epa.gov/ada/csmos/models/biochlor.html
67
Natural Attenuation
Interpretation Score
Screening
Inadequate evidence for anaerobic biodegradation* of chlorinated organics
0 to 5
Protocol
Limited evidence for anaerobic biodegradation* of chlorinated organics
6 to 14
Score: e: 11 11
Adequate evidence for anaerobic biodegradation* of chlorinated organics
15 to 20
Strong evidence for anaerobic biodegradation* of chlorinated organics
>20 Scroll to End of Table
Concentration in Points
Analysis
Most Contam. Zone
Interpretation
Yes No
Awarded
Oxygen* <0.5 mg/L Tolerated, suppresses the reductive pathway at higher 3 concentrations > 5mg/L Not tolerated; however, VC may be oxidized aerobically Nitrate* <1 mg/L At higher concentrations may compete with reductive 2 pathway Iron II* >1 mg/L Reductive pathway possible; VC may be oxidized under 3 Fe(III)-reducing conditions Sulfate* <20 mg/L At higher concentrations may compete with reductive 2 pathway Sulfide* >1 mg/L Reductive pathway possible Methane* >0.5 mg/L Ultimate reductive daughter product, VC Accumulates Oxidation <50 millivolts (mV) Reductive pathway possible 1 Reduction Potential* (ORP) <-100mV Reductive pathway likely pH* 5 < pH < 9 Optimal range for reductive pathway TOC >20 mg/L Carbon and energy source; drives dechlorination; can be natural or anthropogenic
* reductive dechlorination The following is taken from the USEPA protocol (USEPA, 1998). The results of this scoring process have no regulatory significance.
BIOCHLOR: http://www.epa.gov/ada/csmos/models/biochlor.html