U.S. Navy Tank and Void Maintenance and Lifecycle Cost Reduction - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

u s navy tank and void maintenance and lifecycle cost
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

U.S. Navy Tank and Void Maintenance and Lifecycle Cost Reduction - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Materials Engineering Office, O5P23 U.S. Navy Tank and Void Maintenance and Lifecycle Cost Reduction Initiatives Arthur A. Webb Head, Marine Coatings Section Naval Research Laboratory Paul Slebodnick Corrosion Engineering Section Naval


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

U.S. Navy Tank and Void Maintenance and Lifecycle Cost Reduction Initiatives

Arthur A. Webb

Head, Marine Coatings Section Naval Research Laboratory

Paul Slebodnick

Corrosion Engineering Section Naval Research Laboratory

Beau Brinckerhoff

Corrosion Control Division Naval Sea Systems Command

Materials Engineering Office, O5P23

Presented to The International Symposium on Shipbuilding Technology (ISST 2007) September 6-7 2007 Osaka University, Japan

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Tank and Void Corrosion

  • Progression of Corrosion Control Coatings

Traditional Solvent Based System High Solids Systems 1996 Solvent Free Rapid Cure System 2001 Present

Reduction in VOC and HAPS

1994: Initial implementation of improved QA 2001: Improved application equipment 2002: Development of specialized resin materials 2004: First rapid cure product placed on Navy QPL 1995: Use of edge retentive coatings 1996: Initial implementation of plural

component for handling solvent-free coatings

1997: Institutionalization of enhanced QA!

1991 1997

Materials Engineering Office, O5P23

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Application Condition Drivers

Low Employ rapid cure coating with plural component High Employ post application heating Rapid Turn-around Required Low Employ plural component High Work Rapidly High Environmental Temperature Low Employ heated plural component High Employ localized heating Low Material Temperature Low Employ cold cure with plural component High Employ localized and or space heating Low Environmental Temperature Risk Long Term Solution Risk Short Term Solution Problem

Relative Humidity <50% Surface Profile 75-125um Condition SSPC SP-10 (Sa 2 1/2) Chloride <3ug/cm^2 Surface Preparation Requirements (Navy SI 009-32)

Required for all Critical Areas to include Tanks and Voids

Materials Engineering Office, O5P23

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Current Coating Scheme

1,125-1,350 375-450 375-450 375-450 Solvent Free 1000-1,250 200-250 200-250 200-250 200-250 200-250 High Solids 625-875 125-175 125-175 125-175 125-175 125-175 Solvent based Total Topcoat Stripe Coat Mid Coat Stripe Coat Primer System

Current U.S. Navy Shipboard Tank Coatings Systems at a Glance

(All thicknesses in microns)

Moving toward solvent free, direct-to-metal, fast-cure in all applicable areas

Reduce Maintenance Costs Rapid Turn-Around

Maintain Present Quality Assurance Requirements

Reduce overall Asset Protection and Maintenance Costs

Materials Engineering Office, O5P23

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Rapid Cure Coatings

  • Sponsored under Office of Naval Research, Code 332

(S&T Manager)

– 7 year program aimed at employing latest state of the art in solvent free coatings for reduction in maintenance costs and for life cycle extension – Program management and technology identification and insertion through demonstrations – Materials identification and performance/process development by the Naval Research Laboratory code 6138.

  • Shipboard demonstration and validation of performance
  • Transition managed by NAVSEA 05P2 (Materials Warrant

Holder)

– Acceptance documents and placement on Qualified Products List (QPL) – Revisions to standard maintenance procedures and fleet directives

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Rapid Cure Coatings

Sponsorship

Office of Naval Research Code 332 Materials and Process Development Naval Research Laboratory Code 6130 Design and Acquisition Managers Naval Sea Systems Command 05P23 Product Demonstration Naval Research Laboratory Naval Surface Warfare Center Fleet Implementation Regional Maintenance Centers Performance Review

Instituted Transition

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Rapid Cure Ship Tank Coatings

Technology Perspective

Traditional Solvent Based System Solvent Free Rapid Cure Systems

5-7 Years Service Life 15-20 Years Service Life

High Solids/Solvent Free System

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 Three-coat Rapid Cure Single-coat (Multipass) Rapid Cure Three-coat Traditional Cure Five-coat Traditional Cure

Theoretical Required Time for Application/Cure-out and QA (Hours) Required Time for Application/Cure-out and QA (Hours) Required Time for Application/Cure-out and QA (Hours)

10 20 30 40 10 20 30 40

15-20 Years Service Life

10 20 30 40

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Tank and Void Coatings

Cure Speed Classification

Cure Class Standard Cure Traditional solvent free epoxy Rapid Cure Solvent free epoxy using enhanced curing agents Single Coat Polyurethane and Polyurea with low catalyst levels Coating Chemistry

General classification of coatings based on cure times Typical cure times at various temperatures for coating types

< 5 sec 5-10 sec 30-45 sec 1-3 min 2-3 min 3-5 min Polyurea <1 min 5-10 min 10-20 min 20-30 min 40-60 min* 60-90 min* Rapid Cure Polyurethane 1-2 hrs 2-3 hrs 3-4 hrs 5-7 hrs 8 hrs No curing Rapid Cure Epoxy <4 hrs 4-6 hrs 6-8 hrs 8-12 hrs 12-18 hrs 18-24 hrs Cold Cure Epoxy 4-6 hrs 6-8 hrs 8-12 hrs 12-24 hrs No curing No curing Standard Cure Epoxy 43C 32C 24C 15C 4C 0C Time to Cure Coating Type

* High catalyst levels required

Materials Engineering Office, O5P23

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Tank & Void Coating Cure Speeds

Time to Cure at 25C (77F) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Standard Epoxy Cold Cure Epoxy Rapid Cure Epoxy Rapid Cure Polyurethane Product Type Cure Time (hrs)

20 minutes

Average Cure Times of Commercial Products

Materials Engineering Office, O5P23

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Rapid Cure Products

Type Cure to Handle Recoat (hrs) Full Service Equipment Reqt's Epoxy (8) 3 hours 4 to 8 max 7 days PC/single feed gun Polyurethane (2) 20 minutes 4 max 7 days PC/impingment gun

Current list of products under evaluation for corrosion control

Use Area Standard Cure Epoxy Rapid Cure Epoxy Rapid Cure Polyurethane Dedicated Seawater Freshwater Gray/black water Fuel/compensated fuel Voids Air Plenums Bilges Acceptable Marginal Not Recommended Solvent Free System Line-up System Application Acceptability

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Rapid Cure and Single Coat

  • Rapid Cure

– Epoxy based systems where coating is applied in separate evolutions, e.g.,

  • Prime (first evolution)
  • Stripe (second evolution)
  • Topcoat (third evolution)
  • Single Coat

– Polyurethane systems where:

  • Prime, Stripe, and Topcoat all applied during ONE

evolution.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Application Sequence

Blast Cleaned 1st Coat (primer)

Wait 3-4 Hours

Stripe Coat Topcoat

Wait 3-4 Hours

Inspect and Close

Rapid Cure Epoxy Systems

1st Evolution 2nd Evolution 3rd Evolution

Wait 3-4 Hours

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Application Sequence

Using a Single Coat Multipass System Sequence Approach: 2-10 minutes between sections

Completed

All inclusive process, In ONE evolution

First Pass Second Pass 3rd Pass (Completed)

Legend

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Single Coat Multi-Pass Method

  • Sequencing Process

Topcoat applied by First Crew

Primer Coat Application Mid Coat begins as Primer team finishes Final Coat begins as Mid Coat Team finishes

Wet Cure to Handle

Primer Mid Coat Topcoat Prepared Structure

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Single Coat Multi-Pass Method

  • Sequencing Process

Typical Painting Sequence Single Coat Multi-pass Sequence

Finished!!!

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Additional New Process

1,125-1,350 1,125-1,350 Multipass Single Coat 1,125-1,350 375-450 375-450 375-450 Solvent Free 1000-1,250 200-250 200-250 200-250 200-250 200-250 High Solids 625-875 125-175 125-175 125-175 125-175 125-175 Solvent based Total Topcoat Stripe Coat Mid Coat Stripe Coat Primer System

U.S. Navy Shipboard Tank Coatings Systems Including Single Coat

(All thicknesses in microns)

A new option for time savings and increased productivity!

All Inclusive in Application

Materials Engineering Office, O5P23

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Rapid Cure Coating Application

Application of a rapid cure solvent free polyurethane

(note that applicator is standing directly on completed and cured deck)

8,000ft2 Seawater Ballast Tank

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Application Comparison

Process Legacy System Solvent Free System Rapid Cure Epoxy Rapid Cure Polyurethane Surface preparation Sa 2.5 Sa 2.5 Sa 2.5 Sa 2.5 Required profile 75-125um 75-125um 75-125um 75-125um Time required (hrs) 40 40 40 40 Application Equipment Singe feed Singe feed Plural Feed Plural Feed Training QP-1 QP-1 QP-2 + Vendor Training QP-2 + Vendor Training Cure Temperature, C Minimum 15 15 10 Maximum 35 35 35 35 Paint Cure Schedule (hrs) Prime 8 8 3 1 Stripe 8 8 3 1 Mid 8 Stripe 8 Top 8 8 3 1 QA/QC Prime 4 4 4 4 Stripe 4 4 4 4 Mid 4 Stripe 4 Top 4 4 4 4 Overcoat Minimum 12 hrs 12 hrs 12hrs 1 hr Maximum 30 days 30 days 14 days 4 hrs Environmental Control <50 RH <50 RH <50 RH <50 RH Total Time to Completion (hrs) 100 76 61 55

900m2 (10,000 ft2) Tank

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Application Costs

Space Initial Application Subsequent Application Initial Application Subsequent Application Seawater Ballast

  • 13

49 2 31 Freshwater

  • 16

22 Fuel tanks 27 31 Polyurethane Epoxy System Savings Legacy Coating Rapid Cure Epoxy 51 Rapid Cure Polyurethane 30 Production Application Savings

Percent Savings During Production Percent Savings Versus During Demonstration

All costs based compared to “legacy (solvent based system)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Application Costs

Application Cost Comparison Relative to Legacy System

20 40 60 80 100 120 Legacy System, Tradational Application Rapid Cure Polyurethane, Initial Application Rapid Cure Polyurethane, Subsequent Application Rapid Cure Epoxy, Initial Application Rapid Cure Epoxy, Subsequent Application

Systems Employed Costs (%)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Comparison

  • Comparison for preservation using traditional versus rapid

cure coating. Example for recent 8,000 ft2 (800m2) application

Task Hours Hours Savings Staging and containment 23 23 Surface preparation 32 32 Painting 53 29 24 Containment removal 20 20 Total: 128 104 24 Costs for Corrosion Control Process Traditional Coating Rapid Cure Coating

Savings realized from: No required repairs due to premature damage (typically 20-30% add’l cost) Reduced time required for environmental controls Full system applied during one evolution (planned application work shift) Epoxy with 3-hour cure to handle time at 25C

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Rapid Cure Ship Tank Coatings

Program Milestone Accomplishments

Cost Comparison for First 35 Tanks Employed in Demonstration (Program Milestone Demonstrations)

Ship Tank Count Total Area (sq-ft) Average Cost (per sq-ft) Cost Avoidance (per sq-ft) Percent Savings (versus legacy system) Program Milestone Achievements GUNSTON HALL (LSD 44) 1 tank 2758 $28.44 ($2.44) (9) First-ever application of Polyurethane in a Navy-Shipboard tank WHIDBEY ISLAND (LSD 41) 1 Tank 3500 $18.63 $7.37 28 First Tank Cost primarly equipment setup, 1 Tank 4000 $12.23 $13.77 53 Second Tank Cost, application of Polyurathane WASP (LHD 1) 1 Tank 19495 $6.86 $19.14 74 First application of Rapid Cure product. Cost low because of high tank square footage G WASHINGTON (CVN 73) 1 Void 2200 $18.97 $7.03 27 First application of Polyurethane aboard Carrier TORTUGA (LSD 46) 3 Tanks 10849 $23.84 $2.16 8 First application during dry Dock Avail, First application both Single Coat & Rapid Cure ASHLAND (LSD 48) 4 Tanks, 2 PW Tanks 13551 $29.52 ($3.52) (14) First-ever application of Polyurethane in Shipboard Potable Water tanks T ROOSEVELT (CVN-71) 4 Voids 10177 $32.37 ($6.37) (25) First application during Dry Dock Avail, First application of Polyurethane aboard Carrier High visibility Demonstration GUNSTON HALL (LSD 44) 2 Tanks 5295 $13.01 $12.99 50 First Down River (pierside work) outside

  • f Industrial Availability. First Turn Key
  • peration

GUNSTON HALL (LSD 44) 9 Tanks 23737 $16.76 $9.24 36 First production application in multiple tanks using Rapid Cure coatings NASHVILLE (LPD-13) 6 Tanks 14562 $17.85 $8.15 31 First application in Center Line tank with Rapid Cure High Complexity and large size Application Cost Avoidance for First 35 Demonstration Tanks

Red denotes no initial cost savings due to “first time” learning curve. All subsequent applications in same tanks/ship were 30-40% below legacy cost

Application Costs

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Traditional Slow Cure Solvent Free Epoxy

Navy Standard Item 009-32 Three Coat Application

Rapid Cure Solvent Free Epoxy

Single Coat Application

Rapid Cure Solvent Free Epoxy

Two Coat Application

Rapid Cure Solvent Free Epoxy

Single Coat Application

*All Times include Touch-up

Application of Rapid Cure Coatings, 2 Full Coats & Stripe – 90 Hrs *

Most Recent Accomplishments

35 hours to Completion 35 hours to Completion 70 hours to Completion 216 hours to Completion

Rapid Cure Ship Tank Coatings

Materials Engineering Office, O5P23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Demonstration Results

Single Coat Polyurethane After 2 Years in a 300m2 Fresh Water Tank

(tank does not employ sacrificial anodes)

Completion in one day!

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Demonstration Results

Single Coat Polyurethane After Application in 290m2 tank

Completion in one day!

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Demonstration Results

Single Coat Polyurethane After Application in High Complexity 450m2 Tank

Completion in two days!

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Demonstration Results

Rapid Cure Epoxy After Application in 1,900m2 Tank

Completion in two days!

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Demonstration Results

Rapid Cure Epoxy After Application in High Complexity Fuel Tank

Completion in two days!

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Lifecycle Performance

Maintenance Legacy System (a) Solvent Free System (a) Rapid Cure Epoxy (b) Rapid Cure Polyurethane (b) Service Life 5-7 years 7-10 years 12-15+ years 15+ years** Repair Frequency 2-3 years 3-5 years 7-10 years 10 years Replacement* 100% 50% 25% Unknown Removal Full Abrasive Blasting Full Abrasive Blasting Full Abrasive Blasting Induction Heating + Sweep Blasting Training Minimal Minimal- moderate Moderate Moderate-high

(a) Demonstrated service life when applied under proper QA and environmental controls (b) Projected service life when applied under proper QA and environmental controls * Percent of tanks re-preserved (i.e., 100% of tanks coated with legacy coating are re-preserved after 7 years ** Projected service life based on comparison to epoxies under current field trials and laboratory testing

Materials Engineering Office, O5P23

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Paint Costs

  • Epoxy systems generally more economical

– $40-$60/gallon (~$12-16/liter) – Resin and curing agent ~equal in cost

  • Polyurethane systems slightly higher

– $46-$70 (~$12-$18/liter) – Direct labor savings and high productivity

  • ffset the increased price.
  • All prices the same as for conventional

solvent free or UHS systems

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Equipment and Training

  • Equipment represents single highest capital

investment

– Minimal cost unit to support one painter costs ~$26,000 – Full scale heavy production units to support 2

  • r more painters can cost >$150,000

– Rental units average $250/day

  • Training costs average of $3,000 to $5,000

– Discount rates available to high volume users

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Fixed Ratio Plural Feed

A B

2:1 Ratio 1:1 Ratio

A B

3:1 Ratio

A B Material Supplies Material Outlets Air Motor Hydraulic Metering Pumps Inlet Air (provides power) Pistons A B A B

2:1 Ratio Illustrated Components and Configurations

Ratio configuration change through quick disconnect

  • f metering cylinders

For Epoxy and Polyurethanes

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Slug Mix Variable Ratio

A B

Ratio Controller

A B A B

Inlets

Static Mix Line Gun Line (whip)

Required Application Setup

Not suitable for fast setting polyurethanes or polyureas!!!

For Epoxy Only!!!

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Equipment Use Criteria

Equipment Type UHS Epoxy Fast Cure Epoxy Fast Cure Polyurethane Plural Component Fixed Ratio YES YES YES Slug Mix Variable Ratio YES YES NO Equipment and Coatings Usage Allowance

Fixed Ratio Slug Mix Variable Ratio A B A B A B

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Spray Guns

Valve Trigger Mixed Material Inlet Spray Tip Valve Trigger Air Inlet for Operation Spray Tip Component A Supply Component B Supply

UHS Epoxy Fast Cure Epoxy Fast Cure Polyurethane

Single Feed Gun Single Feed Gun w/mix Block Impingement Mix Gun

Equipment and Coatings Usage Allowance

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Rapid Cure Coatings

  • Rapid Cure Polyurethane System

– Average 30% reduction in application cost (direct labor) – Very fast productivity, sequential application and real- time QA

  • ~20% faster than rapid cure epoxy
  • Rapid Cure Epoxy System:

– Average 50% reduction in application cost (direct labor)

  • Fleet Wide Tank and Void Cost Avoidance

– 50% reduction in overall preservation costs

  • More than 65 tanks ~20,000m2 have been coated

using rapid cure coatings with no failures!

Summary

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Rapid Cure Ship Tank Coatings

Conclusions

  • To-date more than 65 tanks comprising more than

20,000m2 have been coated using rapid cure coatings.

  • Rapid cure coatings have exhibited ~60 to 80%

reduction in process time for tank painting depending

  • n complexity and tank type1.
  • Time savings results in a tank preservation cost

avoidance of 20 to 25% during maintenance availabilities

1 Results of most recent field production rates during repair

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Rapid Cure Coatings

Conclusions

  • Fleet Wide Tank and Void Cost Avoidance

– Present legacy application: $175-180M – Use of Rapid Cure Coatings: $85M

  • 50% reduction in preservation costs
  • Benefits

– Solvent based legacy system life; 5-7 years – High solids system life; 15-20 years – Solvent free rapid cure service life; 15-20 years