UNIVERSAL ACCESS TO CARE WORK GROUP 2018
LPRO: LEGISLATIVE POLICY AND RESEARCH OFFICE
July 19, 2018
1
UNIVERSAL ACCESS TO CARE WORK GROUP 2018 1 LPRO : L EGISLATIVE P - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
July 19, 2018 LPRO : L EGISLATIVE P OLICY AND R ESEARCH O FFICE UNIVERSAL ACCESS TO CARE WORK GROUP 2018 1 LPRO : L EGISLATIVE P OLICY AND R ESEARCH O FFICE AGENDA Welcome, Opening Remarks
LPRO: LEGISLATIVE POLICY AND RESEARCH OFFICE
July 19, 2018
1
Welcome, Opening Remarks ……………………..……………………………………8:30—8:35am
Oregon Health Insurance Marketplace..……………………………………………8:35—9:15am
Medicaid Buy-in, State Options………………….…………………………………..9:15—10:00am
House Resolution 6097………………….……………………………………………10:00—10:15am
Public Testimony………………………………………………………………………..10:15—10:30am Adjourn……………………………………………………………………………………………………..10:30 am
LPRO: LEGISLATIVE POLICY AND RESEARCH OFFICE
2
➢ Learn about Oregon’s Health Insurance Marketplace including coverage, enrollment, activities and operations ➢ Marketplace landscape 2018/19 ➢ Explore the concept of a Medicaid buy-in option in Oregon; identify key questions and next steps ➢ Brainstorm potential policy goals ➢ Identify initial design considerations ➢ Discuss next steps – August/September ➢ Understand House Resolution 6097 (115th Congress)
LPRO: LEGISLATIVE POLICY AND RESEARCH OFFICE
3
5
Legislative intent for the Marketplace (ORS 741.001)
6
Legislative intent for the Marketplace (ORS 741.001)
7
Functions of the Marketplace
8
Practical functions of the Marketplace
9
Practical functions of the Marketplace
10
The Marketplace’s most visible work
11
The Marketplace’s most visible work
12
The Marketplace landscape: our audience
13
Subsidies through the Marketplace
14
Subsidies through the Marketplace
15
Subsidies through the Marketplace
16
The Marketplace landscape: 2018 plan choices
17
The Marketplace landscape: 2018 plan choices
18
The Marketplace landscape: 2019 plan choices
19
The Marketplace landscape: 2019 plan choices
20
The Marketplace landscape: 2019 costs for consumers
LPRO: LEGISLATIVE POLICY AND RESEARCH OFFICE
21
incomes above the current state Medicaid eligibility level by leveraging Medicaid in some way – such as using the following to
State Health and Value Strategies | 22
Access and Competition Affordability Market Alignment Between Medicaid and Marketplace Single Payer Glide Path
some of which might be in conflict
when goals do not directly conflict— can be a challenge: prioritization is key
understand and account for divergent stakeholder perspectives (e.g., advocates, insurers,providers)
A state may need to obtain a 1332 waiver depending on its goals and Medicaid buy-in design
State Health and Value Strategies | 23
State Health and Value Strategies | 24
State Health and Value Strategies | 10
State may set the provider rates as part of product design State aligns eligibility with Marketplace coverage State designs a product to meet Marketplace standards and qualify for advance premium tax credits (APTCs) State procures the product through its Medicaid managed care plans
State Health and Value Strategies | 26
state’s plan meets all the requirements to be certified as a qualified health plan (QHP) in order to receive APTCs
directly, a 1332 waiver may be necessary; risk adjustment is an additional complexity if the state-sponsored product is not a certified QHP
insurance department is essential for successful implementation
State Health and Value Strategies | 27
State Health and Value Strategies | 28
A state would create a Medicaid buy-in product outside the Marketplace for people with incomes above Medicaid eligibility levels Benefits in this buy-in model could be similar to Medicaid or Marketplace, but with rates, premiums and cost-sharing set by the state Structured to allow consumers to use their APTCs to purchase the buy-in product The product would not be subject to private insurance rating requirements and would not be considered individual insurance coverage Eligibility levels above Medicaid and could mirror Marketplace eligibility
State Health and Value Strategies | 29
Marketplace and insurers increase premiums in response
populations
pool (and lowers premiums in the individual market), but it could put the state at financial risk to care for a sicker population
savings, but it could negatively impact the individual market risk and premiums
non-QHP product
State Health and Value Strategies | 30
Massachusetts Legislation passed the state Senate in November 2017 to provide a new coverage option for all residents, including those with employer-sponsoredinsurance Minnesota In April 2018, legislation was reintroduced to allow individuals with incomes above 201% FPL to purchase a MinnesotaCare-like product on the Marketplace A plan to allow residents to purchase Nevada Care Plan with APTC and CSRs was vetoed by the Governor in June 2017. A work group has been formed to explore additionaloptions NewMexico The legislature authorized a study on a Medicaid buy-in proposal to lower costs and expand coverage for residents, including those earning less than 200%FPL Hawaii In October 2017, the State Public Option Act was introduced by Senators Schatz and Lujan tocreate a Medicaid buy-in is designated as a QHP, treated as the second-lowest-cost silver plan, and eligible for APTCs. No further action has been taken Nevada Federal
State Health and Value Strategies | 31
program?
program in Oregon?
providers) do you want to hear from about this concept?
in Oregon? LPRO: LEGISLATIVE POLICY AND RESEARCH OFFICE
32