Universal Theory of Residuated Distributive Lattice-Ordered - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

universal theory of residuated distributive lattice
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Universal Theory of Residuated Distributive Lattice-Ordered - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Universal Theory of Residuated Distributive Lattice-Ordered Groupoids and Its Complexity Rostislav Hork, Zuzana Hanikov Institute of Computer Science Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic AL gebra and CO algebra Meet P roof Theory


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Universal Theory of Residuated Distributive Lattice-Ordered Groupoids and Its Complexity

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková

Institute of Computer Science Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic

ALgebra and COalgebra Meet Proof Theory Utrecht, 18–20 April 2013

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 1 / 16

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

Consider a class of algebras K of the same type which is finitely axiomatizable.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 2 / 16

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

Consider a class of algebras K of the same type which is finitely axiomatizable. Th∀(K) denotes the universal theory of K.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 2 / 16

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction

Consider a class of algebras K of the same type which is finitely axiomatizable. Th∀(K) denotes the universal theory of K. A usual way how to prove decidability of Th∀(K) is to establish the finite embeddability property for K.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 2 / 16

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction

Consider a class of algebras K of the same type which is finitely axiomatizable. Th∀(K) denotes the universal theory of K. A usual way how to prove decidability of Th∀(K) is to establish the finite embeddability property for K.

Definition

A class of algebras K has the finite embeddability property (FEP) if every finite partial subalgebra B of any algebra A ∈ K is embeddable into a finite algebra D ∈ K.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 2 / 16

slide-6
SLIDE 6

FEP

A B

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 3 / 16

slide-7
SLIDE 7

FEP

A B

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 3 / 16

slide-8
SLIDE 8

FEP

A B D

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 3 / 16

slide-9
SLIDE 9

FEP

A B D a ⋆A b a b

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 3 / 16

slide-10
SLIDE 10

FEP

A B D a ⋆A b a b a ⋆D b a b

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 3 / 16

slide-11
SLIDE 11

FEP

A B D a ⋆A b a b a ⋆D b a b A | = Φ = ⇒ B = eval. of subterms = ⇒ D | = Φ .

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 3 / 16

slide-12
SLIDE 12

A bit of history

McKinsey and Tarski 1946 – FEP for Heyting algebras

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 4 / 16

slide-13
SLIDE 13

A bit of history

McKinsey and Tarski 1946 – FEP for Heyting algebras Evans 1969 – definition of FEP, a variety has the FEP iff its finitely presented members are residually finite.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 4 / 16

slide-14
SLIDE 14

A bit of history

McKinsey and Tarski 1946 – FEP for Heyting algebras Evans 1969 – definition of FEP, a variety has the FEP iff its finitely presented members are residually finite. Blok, van Alten 2002 – FEP <=> SFMP, FEP for pocrims, integral commutative residuated lattices

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 4 / 16

slide-15
SLIDE 15

A bit of history

McKinsey and Tarski 1946 – FEP for Heyting algebras Evans 1969 – definition of FEP, a variety has the FEP iff its finitely presented members are residually finite. Blok, van Alten 2002 – FEP <=> SFMP, FEP for pocrims, integral commutative residuated lattices Blok, van Alten 2005 – FEP for integral residuated ordered groupoids

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 4 / 16

slide-16
SLIDE 16

A bit of history

McKinsey and Tarski 1946 – FEP for Heyting algebras Evans 1969 – definition of FEP, a variety has the FEP iff its finitely presented members are residually finite. Blok, van Alten 2002 – FEP <=> SFMP, FEP for pocrims, integral commutative residuated lattices Blok, van Alten 2005 – FEP for integral residuated ordered groupoids

Problem

Does ROG have the FEP?

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 4 / 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Answer

An affirmative answer was given by Farulewski 2008.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 5 / 16

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Answer

An affirmative answer was given by Farulewski 2008. He also proved that the class of residuated distributive lattice-ordered groupoids has the FEP.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 5 / 16

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Answer

An affirmative answer was given by Farulewski 2008. He also proved that the class of residuated distributive lattice-ordered groupoids has the FEP. Farulewski’s proof uses methods from proof-theory and also from algebra.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 5 / 16

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Answer

An affirmative answer was given by Farulewski 2008. He also proved that the class of residuated distributive lattice-ordered groupoids has the FEP. Farulewski’s proof uses methods from proof-theory and also from algebra. Recall that ROG forms an algebraic semantics for nonassociative Lambek calculus NL.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 5 / 16

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Answer

An affirmative answer was given by Farulewski 2008. He also proved that the class of residuated distributive lattice-ordered groupoids has the FEP. Farulewski’s proof uses methods from proof-theory and also from algebra. Recall that ROG forms an algebraic semantics for nonassociative Lambek calculus NL.

Lemma (Buszkowski 2005)

Let S ∪ {X[Z] ⇒ C} be a finite set of sequents and T the set of all subformulas occuring in S ∪ {X[Z] ⇒ C}. If S ⊢NL X[Z] ⇒ C, then there exists an interpolant D ∈ T such that S ⊢NL X[D] ⇒ C and S ⊢NL Z ⇒ D.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 5 / 16

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Residuated distributive lattice-ordered groupoids

Definition

A structure A = A, ·, \, / ≤ is called residuated ordered groupoid (rog) if A, · is a groupoid and for all a, b, c ∈ A: ab ≤ c iff b ≤ a \ c iff a ≤ c/b .

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 6 / 16

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Residuated distributive lattice-ordered groupoids

Definition

A structure A = A, ·, \, / ≤ is called residuated ordered groupoid (rog) if A, · is a groupoid and for all a, b, c ∈ A: ab ≤ c iff b ≤ a \ c iff a ≤ c/b . A residuated distributive lattice-ordered groupoid (rdlog) A = A, ∧, ∨, ·, \, / is a rog such that A, ∧, ∨ is a distributive lattice.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 6 / 16

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Residuated distributive lattice-ordered groupoids

Definition

A structure A = A, ·, \, / ≤ is called residuated ordered groupoid (rog) if A, · is a groupoid and for all a, b, c ∈ A: ab ≤ c iff b ≤ a \ c iff a ≤ c/b . A residuated distributive lattice-ordered groupoid (rdlog) A = A, ∧, ∨, ·, \, / is a rog such that A, ∧, ∨ is a distributive lattice.

Theorem

Every rog A embeds into a rdlog O(A) via x → ↓{x}.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 6 / 16

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Residuated distributive lattice-ordered groupoids

Definition

A structure A = A, ·, \, / ≤ is called residuated ordered groupoid (rog) if A, · is a groupoid and for all a, b, c ∈ A: ab ≤ c iff b ≤ a \ c iff a ≤ c/b . A residuated distributive lattice-ordered groupoid (rdlog) A = A, ∧, ∨, ·, \, / is a rog such that A, ∧, ∨ is a distributive lattice.

Theorem

Every rog A embeds into a rdlog O(A) via x → ↓{x}.

Corollary

FEP for rdlogs = ⇒ FEP for rogs.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 6 / 16

slide-26
SLIDE 26

FEP for rdlogs

A ⊤ ⊥

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 7 / 16

slide-27
SLIDE 27

FEP for rdlogs

A ⊤ ⊥ D

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 7 / 16

slide-28
SLIDE 28

FEP for rdlogs

A ⊤ ⊥ D γ(x) =

  • {y ∈ D | x ≤ y}

σ(x) =

  • {y ∈ D | y ≤ x}

γ[A] = σ[A] = D

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 7 / 16

slide-29
SLIDE 29

FEP for rdlogs

A ⊤ ⊥ D x γ(x) σ(x) γ(x) =

  • {y ∈ D | x ≤ y}

σ(x) =

  • {y ∈ D | y ≤ x}

γ[A] = σ[A] = D

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 7 / 16

slide-30
SLIDE 30

FEP for rdlogs

A ⊤ ⊥ D x γ(x) σ(x) γ(x) =

  • {y ∈ D | x ≤ y}

σ(x) =

  • {y ∈ D | y ≤ x}

γ[A] = σ[A] = D x ◦ y = γ(xy) xy = σ(x \ y) xy = σ(x/y)

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 7 / 16

slide-31
SLIDE 31

FEP for rdlogs

A ⊤ ⊥ D x γ(x) σ(x) γ(x) =

  • {y ∈ D | x ≤ y}

σ(x) =

  • {y ∈ D | y ≤ x}

γ[A] = σ[A] = D x ◦ y = γ(xy) xy = σ(x \ y) xy = σ(x/y) D = D, ∧, ∨, ◦, , is a rdlog.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 7 / 16

slide-32
SLIDE 32

FEP for rdlogs

A ⊤ ⊥ D x γ(x) σ(x) γ(x) =

  • {y ∈ D | x ≤ y}

σ(x) =

  • {y ∈ D | y ≤ x}

γ[A] = σ[A] = D x ◦ y = γ(xy) xy = σ(x \ y) xy = σ(x/y) D = D, ∧, ∨, ◦, , is a rdlog. x◦y = γ(xy) ≤ z iff xy ≤ z iff y ≤ x \ z iff y ≤ σ(x \ z) = xz .

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 7 / 16

slide-33
SLIDE 33

FEP for rdlogs

Theorem

Let RDLOG be the class of rdlogs. Then RDLOG has the FEP. The same holds for ROG.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 8 / 16

slide-34
SLIDE 34

FEP for rdlogs

Theorem

Let RDLOG be the class of rdlogs. Then RDLOG has the FEP. The same holds for ROG.

Corollary

The universal theories Th∀(RDLOG), Th∀(ROG) are decidable.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 8 / 16

slide-35
SLIDE 35

FEP for rdlogs

Theorem

Let RDLOG be the class of rdlogs. Then RDLOG has the FEP. The same holds for ROG.

Corollary

The universal theories Th∀(RDLOG), Th∀(ROG) are decidable. What about computational complexity of Th∀(RDLOG)?

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 8 / 16

slide-36
SLIDE 36

FEP for rdlogs

Theorem

Let RDLOG be the class of rdlogs. Then RDLOG has the FEP. The same holds for ROG.

Corollary

The universal theories Th∀(RDLOG), Th∀(ROG) are decidable. What about computational complexity of Th∀(RDLOG)? Buszkowski 2005 proved that the set of quasi-inequalities valid in ROG is in PTIME.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 8 / 16

slide-37
SLIDE 37

FEP for rdlogs

Theorem

Let RDLOG be the class of rdlogs. Then RDLOG has the FEP. The same holds for ROG.

Corollary

The universal theories Th∀(RDLOG), Th∀(ROG) are decidable. What about computational complexity of Th∀(RDLOG)? Buszkowski 2005 proved that the set of quasi-inequalities valid in ROG is in PTIME. Buszkowski, Farulewski 2008 claim that the quasi-equational theory

  • f RDLOG is in 2-EXPTIME.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 8 / 16

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Duality for finite bounded distributive lattices

Size of countermodel is doubly exponential in n = |B|.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 9 / 16

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Duality for finite bounded distributive lattices

Size of countermodel is doubly exponential in n = |B|. To represent a finite n-generated distributive lattice L, it suffices to store its poset of join-irreducibles J (L).

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 9 / 16

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Duality for finite bounded distributive lattices

Size of countermodel is doubly exponential in n = |B|. To represent a finite n-generated distributive lattice L, it suffices to store its poset of join-irreducibles J (L). FBDL FPOSop Stone Pred

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 9 / 16

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Duality for finite bounded distributive lattices

Size of countermodel is doubly exponential in n = |B|. To represent a finite n-generated distributive lattice L, it suffices to store its poset of join-irreducibles J (L). FBDL FPOSop Stone Pred Thus |J (L)| is bounded by 2n − 2 (the number of join-irreducibles in the free n-generated distributive lattice).

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 9 / 16

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Relational frames

Definition

A frame is a structure W = W , ≤, R◦ where W , ≤ is a finite poset and R◦ ⊆ W 3 such that for all x, y, z, x′, y′, z′ ∈ W we have x ≤ x′ and R◦xyz implies R◦x′yz, y ≤ y′ and R◦xyz implies R◦xy′z, z′ ≤ z and R◦xyz implies R◦xyz′.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 10 / 16

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Relational frames

Definition

A frame is a structure W = W , ≤, R◦ where W , ≤ is a finite poset and R◦ ⊆ W 3 such that for all x, y, z, x′, y′, z′ ∈ W we have x ≤ x′ and R◦xyz implies R◦x′yz, y ≤ y′ and R◦xyz implies R◦xy′z, z′ ≤ z and R◦xyz implies R◦xyz′. Having a finite rdlog A, we define Stone(A) = J (A), ≤, R◦, where R◦xyz iff z ≤ xy . Then Stone(A) is a frame.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 10 / 16

slide-44
SLIDE 44

From frames to algebras

Having a frame W, we define Pred(W) = O(W), ∩, ∪, ·, \, /, where A · B = {z ∈ P | ∃x ∈ A, ∃y ∈ B, R◦xyz} , A \ C = {y ∈ P | ∀z ∈ P, ∀x ∈ A, R◦xyz = ⇒ z ∈ C} , C/B = {x ∈ P | ∀z ∈ P, ∀y ∈ B, R◦xyz = ⇒ z ∈ C} . Then Pred(W) is a rdlog.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 11 / 16

slide-45
SLIDE 45

From frames to algebras

Having a frame W, we define Pred(W) = O(W), ∩, ∪, ·, \, /, where A · B = {z ∈ P | ∃x ∈ A, ∃y ∈ B, R◦xyz} , A \ C = {y ∈ P | ∀z ∈ P, ∀x ∈ A, R◦xyz = ⇒ z ∈ C} , C/B = {x ∈ P | ∀z ∈ P, ∀y ∈ B, R◦xyz = ⇒ z ∈ C} . Then Pred(W) is a rdlog.

Theorem

A finite rdlog A is isomorphic to PredStone(A) via µ: A → PredStone(A) given by µ(x) = J (A) ∩ ↓{x} for x ∈ A.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 11 / 16

slide-46
SLIDE 46

From frames to algebras

Having a frame W, we define Pred(W) = O(W), ∩, ∪, ·, \, /, where A · B = {z ∈ P | ∃x ∈ A, ∃y ∈ B, R◦xyz} , A \ C = {y ∈ P | ∀z ∈ P, ∀x ∈ A, R◦xyz = ⇒ z ∈ C} , C/B = {x ∈ P | ∀z ∈ P, ∀y ∈ B, R◦xyz = ⇒ z ∈ C} . Then Pred(W) is a rdlog.

Theorem

A finite rdlog A is isomorphic to PredStone(A) via µ: A → PredStone(A) given by µ(x) = J (A) ∩ ↓{x} for x ∈ A. To represent an n-generated rdlog A, it suffices to store J (A) of cardinality m ≤ 2n − 2 and a relation R◦ of size m3.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 11 / 16

slide-47
SLIDE 47

NEXPTIME

A problem P is in NEXPTIME if P = {x | ∃y : x, y ∈ R} for some binary relation R such that u, v ∈ R implies |v| ≤ 2p(|u|) for some polynomial p, R is decidable in time polynomial in the size of the given tuple.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 12 / 16

slide-48
SLIDE 48

NEXPTIME

A problem P is in NEXPTIME if P = {x | ∃y : x, y ∈ R} for some binary relation R such that u, v ∈ R implies |v| ≤ 2p(|u|) for some polynomial p, R is decidable in time polynomial in the size of the given tuple. Define R as a set of pairs Φ, C, where the universal formula Φ is not valid in RDLOG and C is a frame W together with an evaluation e such that Pred(W) | = Φ[e].

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 12 / 16

slide-49
SLIDE 49

NEXPTIME

A problem P is in NEXPTIME if P = {x | ∃y : x, y ∈ R} for some binary relation R such that u, v ∈ R implies |v| ≤ 2p(|u|) for some polynomial p, R is decidable in time polynomial in the size of the given tuple. Define R as a set of pairs Φ, C, where the universal formula Φ is not valid in RDLOG and C is a frame W together with an evaluation e such that Pred(W) | = Φ[e].

Theorem

The universal theory Th∀(RDLOG) is in coNEXPTIME.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 12 / 16

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Modifications

One may add into the signature a unit 1. Then every frame W have to be endowed with a unary relation U ⊆ W such that for all x, y, z ∈ W :

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 13 / 16

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Modifications

One may add into the signature a unit 1. Then every frame W have to be endowed with a unary relation U ⊆ W such that for all x, y, z ∈ W :

◮ z ≤ x iff there is u ∈ U such that R◦xuz, Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 13 / 16

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Modifications

One may add into the signature a unit 1. Then every frame W have to be endowed with a unary relation U ⊆ W such that for all x, y, z ∈ W :

◮ z ≤ x iff there is u ∈ U such that R◦xuz, ◮ z ≤ y iff there is u ∈ U such that R◦uyz. Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 13 / 16

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Modifications

One may add into the signature a unit 1. Then every frame W have to be endowed with a unary relation U ⊆ W such that for all x, y, z ∈ W :

◮ z ≤ x iff there is u ∈ U such that R◦xuz, ◮ z ≤ y iff there is u ∈ U such that R◦uyz.

Any combination of the following structural rules is preserved:

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 13 / 16

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Modifications

One may add into the signature a unit 1. Then every frame W have to be endowed with a unary relation U ⊆ W such that for all x, y, z ∈ W :

◮ z ≤ x iff there is u ∈ U such that R◦xuz, ◮ z ≤ y iff there is u ∈ U such that R◦uyz.

Any combination of the following structural rules is preserved:

◮ weakening (x ≤ 1), Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 13 / 16

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Modifications

One may add into the signature a unit 1. Then every frame W have to be endowed with a unary relation U ⊆ W such that for all x, y, z ∈ W :

◮ z ≤ x iff there is u ∈ U such that R◦xuz, ◮ z ≤ y iff there is u ∈ U such that R◦uyz.

Any combination of the following structural rules is preserved:

◮ weakening (x ≤ 1), ◮ contraction (x ≤ x2), Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 13 / 16

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Modifications

One may add into the signature a unit 1. Then every frame W have to be endowed with a unary relation U ⊆ W such that for all x, y, z ∈ W :

◮ z ≤ x iff there is u ∈ U such that R◦xuz, ◮ z ≤ y iff there is u ∈ U such that R◦uyz.

Any combination of the following structural rules is preserved:

◮ weakening (x ≤ 1), ◮ contraction (x ≤ x2), ◮ exchange (xy = yx). Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 13 / 16

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Semilinear rdlogs

Definition

A rdlog is semilinear if it is a subdirect product of totally ordered rdlogs.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 14 / 16

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Semilinear rdlogs

Definition

A rdlog is semilinear if it is a subdirect product of totally ordered rdlogs.

Theorem

The universal theory of totally ordered algebras in RDLOG is coNP-complete.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 14 / 16

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Semilinear rdlogs

Definition

A rdlog is semilinear if it is a subdirect product of totally ordered rdlogs.

Theorem

The universal theory of totally ordered algebras in RDLOG is coNP-complete.

Corollary

The quasi-equational theory of semilinear rdlogs is coNP-complete.

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 14 / 16

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Open problems

Problem

Is Th∀(RDLOG) coNEXPTIME-complete?

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 15 / 16

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Open problems

Problem

Is Th∀(RDLOG) coNEXPTIME-complete?

Problem

Does the class of residuated lattice-ordered groupoids have the FEP?

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 15 / 16

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Thank you!

Rostislav Horčík, Zuzana Haniková (ICS) FEP for Residuated Groupoids ALCOP 2013 16 / 16