Urban Form Effect on Outdoor Thermal Environment Case Study of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Urban Form Effect on Outdoor Thermal Environment Case Study of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
10th International Conference on Urban Climate/ 14th Symposium on the Urban Environment Presentation Urban Form Effect on Outdoor Thermal Environment Case Study of Traditional Arcade-Street Neighborhood in Hot Humid Zone Shi Yin, Werner Lang,
Urban Form Effect on Outdoor Thermal Environment | Shi Yin
Introduction BACKGROUND Traditional Neighborhood 1900s
- Compact and Uniform Layout
- Humanity Scale
- Shading Facility (Grey and
Green Infrastructure)
Modern Neighborhood 2000s
- High Rise Building
- Over Wide Street
- High Sky Explosion
Guangzhou
LCZ classification map of Guangzhou
http://geopedia.world/#T4_L107_x12622485.993643802_y2641625.479021549_s11_b17
Legend Modern area Guangzhou Zhujiang New Town Traditional area Guangzhou Enning Road
Urban Form Effect on Outdoor Thermal Environment | Shi Yin
- What we can learn from the strategy
adopted in such local neighborhoods to respond their climate, and furthermore, how apply the historical experience on current urban form design to improve the pedestrian thermal comfort?
RESEARCH ISSUE
Urban Form Effect on Outdoor Thermal Environment | Shi Yin
Traditional Neighborhood in South China CASE STUDY
Block Division Canyon Case Arcade Street Alley Neighborhood Da=3-9m H/W=1-4 A=30-120m B=25-30m H=7-21m Scale Dp=9-21m H/W=0.7-1.2 Type
A B
Taishan Guangzhou Shantou Xiamen
Urban Form Effect on Outdoor Thermal Environment | Shi Yin
Street Canyon Survey and Measurement Block Division Neighborhood Layout Type and Aspect-ratio HYPOTHESIS & FRAMEWORK Type and Scale In Traditional Arcade-street Neighborhood Climate Responding Simplified Spatial Model Simplified Spatial Model Pedestrian Thermal Comfort
- Correlate influence of
neighborhood layout and street canyon on urban climatology
- Combine the layout and
canyon according its climate adaptive code in design perspective
Urban Form Effect on Outdoor Thermal Environment | Shi Yin
Spatial Model METHODOLOGY
Set Volume: 120mx120mx12m Set depth of Building: 30m Set Context: Surrounded Arcade Street (W=12m) Variant: Block Division (Proportion, A/B)
| Neighborhood Design Level | Canyon Design Level | Pedestrian Thermal Comfort
Set height of Building: 12m Variant: Canyon Type/ Aspect Ratio Interval: 3m
12m
Analysis: Pedestrian Area
A B H W
Urban Form Effect on Outdoor Thermal Environment | Shi Yin
CANYON LAYOUT
A/B=4.00 A/B=2.00 A/B=1.33 A/B=1.00 A/B=0.75 A/B=0.50 A/B=0.25
ANALYSIS
Aspect Ratio Canyon Type Orientation Layout Type Thermal Comfort In Summer Daytime H/W=4.00/2.00/1.33 Dp=3m/6m/9m H/W=1.33/1.00/0.80 Da=9m/12m/15m
RESULT
Impact of Urban Form On OTC
Correlation Analysis METHODOLOGY
Urban Form Effect on Outdoor Thermal Environment | Shi Yin
Microclimate Model METHODOLOGY Model
Envi-met V4.3.1 Domain: 300x300x30m Net size: 3x3x2m Duration: 4am-8pm Boundary Condition: from measurement
Alley Dp=3m Arcade Da=12m Receptors
In orthogonal Axis Every 9m on each side Only in pedestrian area
Assessment
Pedestrian Thermal Comfort Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET). Calculate by Biomet Thermal comfort range:
- 1
(Slight Cool) (Comfort) 1 (Slight Warm) 2 (Warm) 3 (Hot) 4 (Very hot) PET Taiwan <26 26-30 30-34 34-38 38-42 42 (Lin, Matzarakis et al. 2008)
Time percentage of under Warm feeling Wind Environment
Boundary Condition
In Situ measurement, 4 days, two neighborhoods, Xiamen, Guangzhou Ta, Tg, V, rH recorded in 1.5m height Local weather data in measurement area:
4 8 12 16 20 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 2017.07.24@XM
Ta(OC)
4 8 12 16 20 24 2017.07.25@XM 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
rH(%)
4 8 12 16 20 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40
Ta(oC)
2017.07.30@GZ 4 8 12 16 20 24 Ta rH Ta rH 2017.08.06@GZ 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
rH(%)
Guangzhou Xiamen
Urban Form Effect on Outdoor Thermal Environment | Shi Yin
Validation
XIAMEN Date: 24.07.2017, 8am-8pm 25.07.2017, 8am-8pm GUANGZHOU Date: 30.07.2017, 8am-8pm 06.08.2017, 8am-8pm In Situ Measurement Validation of Simplified Model
RESULT
Simplified Scenario (Envi-met)
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 A1N A1 S A2 N A2 S A4 P
RMSE
0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 A1N A1 S A2 N A2 S A4 P
R2
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 A1E A1W TN TS P2
RMSE
Ta RH Tmrt PET 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 A1E A1W TN TS P2
R2
Ta RH Tmrt PET 0.86 0.84 0.63 0.71 Ta RH Tmrt PET 0.77 2.95 6.58 3.45 Ta RH Tmrt PET 0.82 0.87 0.64 0.76 Ta RH Tmrt PET 0.86 1.89 5.82 2.93
Urban Form Effect on Outdoor Thermal Environment | Shi Yin
Alley Scenario RESULT
40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Proportion of Thermal Stress (<Warm|2, 38℃) in ALLEY
AL3 AL6 AL9 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Wind in Alley (m/s)
AL3 AL6 AL9
- Better thermal comfort in south-north oriented alley
- Thermal comfort improved with decreasing W-E oriented alley
- Wind decreased by porosity increasing
PET at 16:00
Urban Form Effect on Outdoor Thermal Environment | Shi Yin
40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Proportion of Thermal Stress (<Warm|2, 38℃) in Arcade
AR9 AR12 AR15 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Wind in Arcade (m/s)
AR9 AR12 AR15
Arcade Scenario RESULT PET at 16:00
- Pedestrian thermal comfort deteriorate with adding S-N oriented street
- Wind decreased by porosity increasing
Urban Form Effect on Outdoor Thermal Environment | Shi Yin
Different Canyon Type RESULT
WE NS
40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Thermal Stress in Different Oriented Alley
AL3-NS AL3-WE AL6-NS AL6-WE AL9-NS AL9-WE 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Thermal Stress in Different Oriented Arcade
AR9-NS AR9-WE AR12-NS AR12-WE AR15-NS AR15-WE 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Proportion of Thermal Stress (<Warm|2, 38℃) in D=9m
AL9 AR9 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Wind in D=9m
AL9 AR9
Urban Form Effect on Outdoor Thermal Environment | Shi Yin
CONCLUSION
Common
- Wind decreased by porosity increasing;
- The value of A/B between 0.75-0.5 achieve better thermal comfort in both
canyon type; Difference
- Neighborhood layout effect the thermal comfort in alley street significantly;
- Better thermal comfort for pedestrian in W-E oriented Arcade street
Further research
- Canyon with greenery respond varying neighborhood layout
- Influence of wind direction
- Combination different canyon type in different oriented street