W and Z production in the forward region with the LHCb experiment - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

w and z production in the forward region with the lhcb
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

W and Z production in the forward region with the LHCb experiment - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

W and Z production in the forward region with the LHCb experiment Philip Ilten on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration University College Dublin July 25, 2011 PANIC11, MIT Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 1 / 19 Outline Outline


slide-1
SLIDE 1

W and Z production in the forward region with the LHCb experiment

Philip Ilten

  • n behalf of the LHCb Collaboration

University College Dublin

July 25, 2011 PANIC11, MIT

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 1 / 19

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

Outline

❼ Introduction

❼ LHCb ❼ Motivation

❼ Selection and Backgrounds

❼ Z → µµ ❼ W → νµµ ❼ Z → ττ (µ, e) and (µ, µ)

❼ Efficiencies ❼ Results ❼ Conclusion

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 2 / 19

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction : LHCb

LHCb

❼ 2010 dataset

❼ 37.7 pb−1

❼ 2011 dataset

❼ 210 pb−1 (processed) ❼ 389 pb−1 (recorded)

❼ designed for B decays ❼ forward arm spectrometer

❼ 1.9 ≤ η ≤ 2.5 (common) ❼ 2.5 < η ≤ 4.9 (unique)

❼ tracker, ECAL, HCAL, muon

chambers (common)

❼ Cherenkov detectors (unique) ❼ pT > 10 GeV muon trigger

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 3 / 19

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction : Motivation

Asymmetry and PDF’s

❼ W ± asymmetry at high η ❼ new constraints on PDF’s at

low x and high Q

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 4 / 19

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction : Motivation

PDF Uncertainty

σ(x, Q2) =

  • i,j
  • fi(xi, Q2)fj(xj, Q2)
  • ≈1−8%

× ˆ σ(xi, xj, Q2)

  • ≈1%

dxi dxj

❼ W/Z boson y < 2 PDF

uncertainty ≈ 1%

❼ W/Z boson y ≈ 5 PDF

uncertainty ≈ 6 − 8%

❼ partonic σ uncertainty ≈ 1%

at NNLO

❼ measure σZ→µµ and σW→νµµ,

can be used to constrain PDF’s

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 5 / 19

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Selection and Backgrounds : Z → µµ

Z → µµ (LHCb-CONF-2011-039)

❼ trigger on single muon

❼ pµ

T > 10 GeV

❼ reconstruct two muons

❼ track quality ❼ pµ

T > 20 GeV

❼ 2.0 < ηµ < 4.5 ❼ 60 ≤ Mµµ ≤ 120

❼ NZ

tot = 1966

❼ heavy flavor background

❼ b¯

b and c¯ c events with µµ final state

❼ impact parameter cut and

estimate efficiency from simulation

❼ 4.3 ± 1.7 events

❼ Z → ττ background

❼ estimated from simulation ❼ 0.61 ± 0.04 events

❼ generic QCD background

❼ calculated from same sign

events ❼ NZ

bkg = 4.9 ± 2.0

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 6 / 19

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Selection and Backgrounds : W → νµµ

W → νµµ (LHCb-CONF-2011-039)

❼ trigger on single muon

❼ pµ

T > 10 GeV

❼ reconstruct one muon

❼ track quality ❼ pµ

T > 20 GeV

❼ 2.0 < ηµ < 4.5 ❼ no other muons with pT > 5

GeV

❼ IPµ < 40 µm ❼

EECAL

µ

+EHCAL

µ

< 0.04

❼ ptracks,γ

T

< 2 GeV within ∆R < 0.5 ❼ NW +

tot

= 15608

❼ NW −

tot

= 12301

❼ electroweak

❼ shapes from MC ❼ normalization from observed

rates in data ❼ heavy flavor

❼ shape from anti-cut on IP ❼ normalization from

simulation ❼ π/K punch-through

❼ shape from anti-cut on E/p ❼ normalization from data

❼ π/K decay

❼ shape from events with other

triggers

❼ normalization from fit

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 7 / 19

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Selection and Backgrounds : W → νµµ

W → νµµ

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 8 / 19

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Selection and Backgrounds : W → νµµ

W → νµµ

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 9 / 19

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Selection and Backgrounds : Z → ττ → µe

Z → ττ → µe (LHCb-CONF-2011-041)

❼ trigger on single muon

❼ pµ

T > 10 GeV

❼ reconstruct one muon and

electron

❼ pµ

T > 20 GeV

❼ pe

T > 5 GeV

❼ 2.0 < ηµ,e < 4.5

❼ acoplanarity

❼ ∆φµ,e > 2.7

❼ isolation asymmetry

❼ min

  • pµ,e

T

−P ptrack

T

pµ,e

T

+P ptrack

T

  • > 0.8

❼ NZ

tot = 81

❼ electroweak background

❼ WW, W, and γ∗/Z events ❼ calculated from simulation ❼ 3 ± 1.2 events

❼ QCD background

❼ calculated from data ❼ 9.5 ± 3 events

[GeV]

e µ

m

50 100 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Preliminary LHCb

  • 1

= 7 TeV, L = 247 pb s

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 10 / 19

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Selection and Backgrounds : Z → ττ → µµ

Z → ττ → µµ (LHCb-CONF-2011-041)

❼ trigger on single muon

❼ pµ

T > 10 GeV

❼ reconstruct two muons

❼ pµ1

T > 20 GeV

❼ pµ2

T > 5 GeV

❼ 2.0 < ηµ < 4.5

❼ acoplanarity, ∆φµ > 2.7 ❼ pT asymmetry, pµ1

T −pµ2 T

pµ1

T +pµ2 T

> 0.2

❼ lifetime, IPµ1+µ2

σIP

> 4

❼ min

pµ1,µ2

T

−P ptrack

T

pµ1,µ2

T

+P ptrack

T

  • > 0.8

❼ Mµµ < 80 ❼ NZ

tot = 33

❼ electroweak background

❼ normalized from data ❼ 5.5 ± 1.8 events

❼ QCD background

❼ calculated from data ❼ 1.6 ± 1.3 events

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 11 / 19

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Efficiencies : Z → µµ, W → νµµ

Z → µµ, W → νµµ

ǫ = Aǫtriggerǫtrackǫidǫselection

❼ ǫtrigger

❼ trigger on single high pT muon ❼ separate into µ+, µ−, and µ+µ− triggered

❼ ǫtrack

❼ use Z → µµ sample ❼ muon firing trigger is tag ❼ probe is muon stub, look for associated track

❼ ǫid

❼ use Z → µµ sample ❼ muon firing trigger is tag ❼ probe is track, look for associated muon stub

❼ A and ǫZ

selection defined as 1

❼ ǫW

selection from Z → µµ sample

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 12 / 19

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Efficiencies : Z → ττ

Z → ττ

ǫ = Aǫtriggerǫµ

trackǫℓ trackǫµ idǫℓ idǫselection

❼ ǫtrigger from tag-and-probe method using the Z → µµ sample ❼ ǫµ

track from tag-and-probe method using the Z → µµ sample

❼ ǫe

track from MC scaled by ǫµ track(data)/ǫµ track(MC)

❼ ǫµ

id from tag-and-probe method using the Z → µµ sample

❼ ǫe

id from tag-and-probe method using the Z → ee sample

❼ ǫselection from MC with systematics from MC data comparison ❼ A from MC using Pythia 8 and Herwig++

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 13 / 19

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Results : Cross Sections

Definition and Uncertainties

σ(Z → ℓℓ, W → νµµ) = Ntot − Nbkg ǫL

❼ 2.0 < ηℓ < 4.5, pℓ

T > 20 GeV, 60 < Mℓℓ < 120 GeV

❼ cross sections corrected for FSR with HORACE

uncertainty [%] σW + σW − σZ→µµ σZ→ττ→µe σZ→ττ→µµ background ±1.6 ±1.6 ±0.4 ±5 ±9 template ±1.9 ±1.7 −− −− −− efficiency ±2.0 ±1.8 ±5.1 ±5 ±5 FSR ±0.2 ±0.2 ±0.3 −− −− systematic ±3.5 ±3.2 ±5.1 ±7 ±11 luminosity ±3.5 ±3.5 ±3.5 ±3.5 ±3.5 statistical ±0.9 ±1.1 ±2.1 ±12 ±17

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 14 / 19

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Results : Cross Sections

Cross Sections

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 15 / 19

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Results : Differential Cross Sections

Z → µµ

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 16 / 19

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Results : Differential Cross Sections

W → νµµ

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 17 / 19

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Results : PDF Improvement

PDF Improvement

❼ M. Ubiali, Assessment of the impact of LHC W lepton asymmetry

data on PDF fits, 04/05/11, Working Group on Electroweak precision measurements at LHC

❼ using only 16.5 pb−1 of data from initial 2010 run

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 18 / 19

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusion

Conclusion

❼ W → νµµ and Z → µµ cross section measurements in good

agreement with NNLO theory

❼ expected asymmetry observed ❼ initial cross section measurements already begin to restrict PDF’s ❼ initial Z → ττ analysis presented, further work on additional

channels underway

Ilten (UCD) Forward EW at LHCb July 25, 2011 19 / 19