Work Package 1 Management and Practical Aspects Task 1.1: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

work package 1 management
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Work Package 1 Management and Practical Aspects Task 1.1: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Work Package 1 Management and Practical Aspects Task 1.1: Executive Management (UAB with support of all WP leaders) (M1-48). Task 1.2: Financial Management (UAB with support of all WP leaders) (M1-48). Task 1.3: Scientific Coordination Support


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Work Package 1 Management and Practical Aspects

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Task 1.1: Executive Management (UAB with support of all WP leaders) (M1-48). Task 1.2: Financial Management (UAB with support of all WP leaders) (M1-48). Task 1.3: Scientific Coordination Support (UAB with support of all WP leaders) (M1-48). Task 1.4: Coordination/Synergies with Relevant EU Projects and Other Initiatives (UAB with support of all WP leaders) (M1-48).

slide-3
SLIDE 3

This WP is dedicated to the management and coordination of the activities of the project, including overall legal, scientific, financial and administrative issues. This includes:

  • Management, administrative and financial procedures;
  • Financial transactions at the consortium level;
  • Project progress and outputs;
  • kick-off and progress meetings, Advisory Board meetings, and General

Assembly;

  • Technical and financial reporting.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Carefully plan your travel budget Other direct costs

  • Certificate on the Financial Statement;
  • Open access publications;
  • Conferences & workshops (dissemination) (travel and registration);
  • Scheduled project meetings;
  • Scheduled training session;
  • Ad-hoc task-force meetings.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Reporting Periods

Coordination will sollicit information for technical and financial reporting More info available at: H2020 Online Manual & AMGA

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/amga/h2020-amga_en.pdf

Reporting Period Starting Month Ending Month Duration (M) 1 1 12 12 2 13 30 18 3 31 48 18

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Yearly Progress Meetings Any candidates to host the first progress meeting?

Progress meeting Month Date Observation First 12 May 2017 Advisory Board Meeting Second 24 May 2018 Third 36 May 2019 Advisory Board Meeting Final 46 March 2020

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

More information on Management Structure: Magic Consortium Agreement Magic Grant Agreement (Annex1 DoA Part B) http://felipsoriano.com/magic-nexus/documents/ (http://magic-nexus.eu/documents)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Task Force/Work Package

WP2 WP3 WP4 WP7

Communication and visibility 

  

GIS

 

Science for Policy

 

Energy

   

Water

   

Agriculture/food 

   WP1

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Data management: Ansel Renner; Communication and Visibility, Dissemination: Samuele Lo Piano; Synergies Plans: Violeta Cabello; GIS: Tarik Serrano; Gender Issues: Maddalena Ripa; Thematic: Science for Policy: Zora Kova; Water: Violeta Cabello; Energy: Mario Giampietro; Agriculture and food: Tarik Serrano.

UAB Taskforces – first contact point/responsible

slide-11
SLIDE 11

UAB Taskforces – contacts

Data management/WP3: ansel.renner@gmail.com Communication and Visibility: samuele.lopiano@uab.cat, vcabellov@gmail.com, maddalena.ripa@gmail.com GIS: tarik.serrano@uab.cat; Thematic: Science for Policy: zora.kovacic@uab.cat, vcabellov@gmail.com Water: vcabellov@gmail.com , zora.kovacic@uab.cat Energy: mario.giampietro@uab.cat, samuele.lopiano@uab.cat, tarik.serrano@gmail.com, maddalena.ripa@gmail.com; Agriculture and food: tarik.serrano@gmail.com, maddalena.ripa@gmail.com Please do not forget always in cc: samuele.lopiano@uab.cat

slide-12
SLIDE 12

UAB – who to contact

Meetings: samuele.lopiano@uab.cat, sandra.bukkens@uab.cat Advisory Board, General Assembly: mario.giampietro@uab.cat, samuele.lopiano@uab.cat, sandra.bukkens@uab.cat Synergy Plan (with SIM4NEXUS & other projects): samuele.lopiano@uab.cat, vcabellov@gmail.com, sandra.bukkens@uab.cat Technical and financial reports/issues (deliverables): samuele.lopiano@uab.cat, sandra.bukkens@uab.cat Minutes (milestones): samuele.lopiano@uab.cat, sandra.bukkens@uab.cat

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Contacts – netiquette

  • Subject: [MAGIC]
  • Dedicated WP/taskforce/issue: [ENERGY], [WP4], [MINUTES], etc.
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Moving toward Adaptive Governance In Complexity:

informing NEXUS security

kick-off meeting .: WP3 wrap-up :.

Roberta.Siciliano@unina.it Michele.Staiano@unina.it

ICTA 15 june 2016

MAGIC LOGO (we have to vote for)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

WP3 objectives [M1— M48]

  • This WP will design and implement applications of the

Nexus Information Space (NIS) capable of guaranteeing the coherence

  • ver

non-equivalent quantitative representations of feasibility, viability and desirability of socio-ecological systems in relation to the nexus across different scales and different dimensions.

✧ SYSTEM: is the supporting technology that provides the data on

flow and fund, implements grammars (the expected relationships between components of the system in a particular context).

✧ SPACE: handles the technical information system, the databases,

the GIS, the visualization, the info-graphics, and the video aspects

  • f MAGIC.

.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

WP3 objectives [M1— M48]

  • This WP will deal with technical aspects making it possible to

carry-out a quality check on the integrated representation across scales associated with the chosen Quantitative Story Telling.

  • The WP3 will solve the problem of how to generate different

types of quantitative analysis (individuating relevant data and combining chosen models) on the basis of the grammars developed in WP4.

  • Fundamental is the contribution of WP4 [M1-M12] leader

UAB with support of all partners, specifically the task 4.2: Making grammars.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Which expertizes we can rely upon?

Twente water footprint water accounting grammar Bergen post-normal science data for governance C.A. carbon footprint climate change water availability UniNA statistics ML & visualization UAB assembling nexus MuSIASEM ITC data engineering water/energy JRC Sensitivity and QST participatory processes Wageningen food production crops & livestock Hutton land use geography & GIS

Work package number

3

Start Date or Starting Event M1 - M48 Work package title Nexus Information Space Participant number 7 9 1 2 3 4 8 Short name of UNINA ITC UAB JHI WUR UT UiB Person/months per participant:

48 32 18 4 14 24 2

slide-18
SLIDE 18

STAD team

@UniNA www.stad.unina.it/2016 STAD is “city” in Dutch. [Statistics, technology, analysis of data] is a “research city” of University

  • f Naples Federico II in the flat world where a new "citizen" can

aggregate from almost anywhere. This city contains a lot of "buildings" to create and work out ideas, provide statistical science, transfer technology, analyze data with a meta- disciplinary approach, "crossing the bridge" towards other scientific communities.

tad

Massimo Aria

Anto nio D’Ambro sio Roberta Siciliano Michele Staiano

slide-19
SLIDE 19

@UniNA expertise being leader WP3

  • Statistical learning, Data science, Big data,

Multidimensional Data Analysis, Visualization

  • Decision-Support Systems under Total Quality

Management perspective

  • Data edits, Data warehouse, Missing data
  • Abstract and conceptualize models

tad

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Tasks of WP3

Task 3.1: Data Management Plan (UNINA with support of ITC and UAB) [M1-M6]

Define a Data Management Plan on the structured metadata repository maintained by the consortium, the various methods of formalization used in the different case studies proposed in WP4, WP5, WP6, and the management of the data generated during the project, in accordance with the “Guidelines on Data Management in Horizon 2020”.

Task 3.2: Identifying Data and Populating and Structuring Databases (UNINA with support of ITC, UT, UAB, HUTTON, WU, UiB) [M1-M48]

Identification of statistical, scientific and other databases at local, regional, national and EU levels required for the chosen implementation of the NIS in the various case studies and creation of a scheme for the deployment of a structured metadata repository to be maintained by all partners in order to safely share the data sources required to formalize the various grammars selected for the specific assessments.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Tasks of WP3

Task 3.3 Supporting the Activities of WP4, 5 and 6 (UNINA with support

  • f ITC, UAB, HUTTON, WU, UT, UiB) [M6-M48]

Assisting the activities of WP4, WP5 and WP6 in the definition and integration of different metrics, the integration of different analytical frameworks, the design and integration of databases and visualization tools according to the chosen QST. The experience accumulated during the project will be used to define a tool-kit making it possible a quantitative characterization of different applications of the nexus framework developed in WP4.

Task 3.4 Visualization (UNINA with support of ITC, UAB, HUTTON, WU, UT, UiB) [M12-M48]

Development and testing of a system of integrated visualization of the quantitative results about the feasibility, viability and desirability in the selected case studies to be used for presenting the results of the project in the Nexus Dialogue Space (WP2), and to be included in the Nexus Knowledge Hub (WP7).

slide-22
SLIDE 22

UniNA

Cooperate to deliver such tools...

ITC

Statistics

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Statistical Learning within TQM

Plan Do Check Act survey design data collection data validation imputation data selection data transformation data organization pre-processing method selection data processing statistical analysis dissemination I when data are not available and need to be collected II when data are accessible and need to be selected III when datasets are available and need to be processed

slide-24
SLIDE 24 conceptual architecture

Nexus Information Space

Data sources Models Supporting technologies

Nexus Information System

Compiler

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Visualisation

slide-26
SLIDE 26

D3.1 Data Management Plan on the structured metadata repository maintained by the consortium, the various methods of formalization used in the different case studies proposed in WP4, WP5, WP6, and the management of the data generated during the project (M6) D3.2 Report on visualization methods developed in the NIS (M42) D3.3 Report on the datasets and tools used to support the applications of Quantitative Story Telling (M48) MS15 Data Repository Responsible: 7 – UNINA month 12

Basic data repository to support the applications of WP4,5, and 6 for use by all consortium members. To be in place by month 12, and then gradually expanded during the course of the project

Deliverables & Milestones

slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

WP3 specific activities we are in charge of:

  • Compilation and catalogue of existing databases: we are

hiring two junior researcher (one dedicated to data sources and one to models and their surrogates)

  • NIS relational structuring: we will structure metadata

and schemata for integration of sources (e.g. CIM★)

  • Visualization and coordination with web platform:

past experience and sub-contracting the last year.

Develop adapters with the tight collaboration of ITC: we already started to cooperate (active exchanges).

Action plan

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Z O R A K O V A C I C , T A R I K S E R R A N O

WORK PACKAGE 4

slide-30
SLIDE 30

WP3

NEXUS US Information

  • rmation Space

NEXUS US Dialog

  • gue

ue Space

WP4

Defin finin ing the Quantitati ntitative ve Story ry-Tell Tellin ing

WP2

EU admini nist strat ration

WP1

interac eractions tions during ng the proje ject ct permanent manent platfo tform rm of

  • f

interac eraction tion

WP WP7

NEXUS Knowledg edge Hub Hub Quality check on

  • n the

assessm essment of innovati ations

  • ns

WP6

Quality check on

  • n the

robustness ess of narrative ves

WP5

CASE STUDIES DIES

slide-31
SLIDE 31

QUANTITATIVE STORY-TELLING FOR GOVERNANCE

  • Problems of evidence based policy:
  • Over-simplification
  • Dealing with complexity
slide-32
SLIDE 32

OVERSIMPLIFICATION

“Based on historical trends, our projections show that population numbers should keep increasing: we look to the upcoming Thanksgiving with confidence…”

slide-33
SLIDE 33

GDP WILL RESUME GROWTH IN 2009

European Commission, Economic Forecast, autumn 2007. Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Economy, No. 7/2007

slide-34
SLIDE 34

GDP WILL RESUME GROWTH IN 2010

European Commission, Economic Forecast, autumn 2008. Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Economy, No. 6/2008

slide-35
SLIDE 35

GDP WILL RESUME GROWTH IN 2011

European Commission, Economic Forecast, autumn 2009. Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Economy, No. 10/2009

slide-36
SLIDE 36

GDP WILL RESUME GROWTH IN 2012

European Commission, Economic Forecast, autumn 2010. Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Economy, No. 7/2010

slide-37
SLIDE 37

GDP WILL RESUME GROWTH IN 2013

European Commission, Economic Forecast, autumn 2011. Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Economy, No. 6/2011

slide-38
SLIDE 38

GDP WILL RESUME GROWTH IN 2014

European Commission, Economic Forecast, autumn 2013. Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Economy, No. 7/2013

slide-39
SLIDE 39

EU (28 countries) Eurostat EC Forecast, abs average error 2.4 pts (140%) 2009

  • 4.8

2.4 error=7.2 2010 1.7 1 error=0.7 2011 1.4 1.5 error=0.1 2012

  • 0.7

2 error=2.7 2013

  • 0.1

1.5 error=1.6 Euro Area (18 countries) Eurostat EC Forecast, abs. average error 2.5 pts (170%) 2009

  • 4.8

2.1 error=6.9 2010 1.7 1 error=0.7 2011 1.3 1.5 error=0.2 2012

  • 0.9

2 error=1.1 2013

  • 0.6

1.4 error=2.0

Eurostat http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=t sdec100

slide-40
SLIDE 40

FORECASTS HAVE A MEAN REVERTING CORE

slide-41
SLIDE 41

COMPLEXITY

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Multi-scale analysis

Event: THE DEATH OF A PARTICULAR INDIVIDUAL EXPLANATION 1 --> “no oxygen supply in the brain”

Space-time scale: VERY SMALL Example: EMERGENCY ROOM Implications for action: APPLY KNOWN PROCEDURES Based on known HOW - past affecting strongly present actions

EXPLANATION 2 --> “affected by lung cancer”

Space-time scale: SMALL Example: MEDICAL TREATMENT Implications for action: KNOWN PROCEDURES & EXPERIMENTATION Looking for a better HOW - past affecting present, but room for change

EXPLANATION 3 --> “individual was a heavy smoker”

Space-time scale: MEDIUM Example: MEETING AT HEALTH MINISTRY Implications for action: MIX EXPERIENCE AND WANTS INTO POLICY Considering HOW and WHY - past and “virtual future” affecting present

EXPLANATION 4 --> “humans must die”

Space-time scale: VERY LARGE Example: SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES Implications for action: DEALING WITH THE TRAGEDY OF CHANGE Considering WHY - “virtual future” (values) affecting present

slide-43
SLIDE 43

pre-analytical definition

  • f what should be analyzed

car airplane boat truck bike horse WHAT tank

Economic

Criterion Safety Criterion Cultural Criterion Driving quality Criterion

SEMANTIC FRAMING OF THE ANALYSIS

WHY

moving people

  • n land

moving people

  • n water

moving people short distance moving people long distance moving around when at war moving heavy loads GOALS + CONTEXT

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Economic

Criterion Safety Criterion Cultural Criterion Driving quality Criterion

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Can we use the same multi-criteria space to characterize the choice between a TRABANT and a FERRARI?

NO WAY!

It does not provide enough information to either those interested in buying a TRABANT, nor those interested in buying a FERRARI

The two types of buyer will requires a different selection of indicators and attributes: a different WHAT

slide-46
SLIDE 46

(18 October 1919 – 28 March 2013)

George Box

Box, G. E. P., and Draper, N. R., (1987), Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. P 424

“Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful.”

slide-47
SLIDE 47

decoding

Non-equivalent Perceptions

encoding

Non-equivalent Representations

ecologist economist biologist engineer sociologist “SYSTEM”

Plurality of Observations

relevant attributes

models

PLURALISM

19

slide-48
SLIDE 48

ROSEN’S MODELLING RELATION

Narrative

slide-49
SLIDE 49

NEW NARRATIVES

What makes a model useful? Who defines the purpose? GDP was created during WWII in order to measure productive capacity to face the war – is this model still useful to assess economic performance?

slide-50
SLIDE 50

QUANTITATIVE CHECK OF THE USEFULNESS OF NARRATIVES

  • A different way of doing science
  • Using quantitative methods to check the usefulness
  • f narratives
  • Quantitative tools are used as heuristic tools
  • Beware of spurious quantification
slide-51
SLIDE 51

TET TET GDP GDP $ MJ El Salvador = 12.6 MJ/$ Finland = 12.6 MJ/$ = TET TET THA THA GDP GDP THA THA Year 1997

MJ MJ US$ US$ = 12.6 !!! 12.6 !!! No significance ! No external referent ! Finland = 29.73 MJ/hr El Salvador = 2.92 MJ/hr Finland = 2.35 $/hr El Salvador = 0.23 $/hr (20,600 $/year p.c) (2,020 $/year p.c)

ELPPW level n-1 ELPAG ELPPS ELPSG 14 $/hour 27 $/hour 31 $/hour 2 $/hour 0.8 $/hour 5 $/hour

HAAG HASG HAPS

slide-52
SLIDE 52

DEALING WITH UNCERTAINTY

Technical know-how ≠ Large scale application

slide-53
SLIDE 53
  • Grammars
  • Semantic description of the interaction of elements in the

system

  • Metabolic patterns
  • levels of consumption in extensive and intensive variables
  • Domestic production vs imports/exports in flows/hour and

flows/ha

WHAT TYPE OF QUANTIFICATION?

slide-54
SLIDE 54

DAY 2 – WP4

slide-55
SLIDE 55

HOW WP4 WORKS

1. Training 2. Development of analytical tools 3. Analysis of 8-10 EU countries 4. Global drivers 5. Planetary boundaries 6. Externalization 7. Interaction with EC 8. Updating Grammars

Case studies WP5 Case studies WP6

slide-56
SLIDE 56

WP4 TASKS

1. Training (UAB with support of all other partners) MuSIASEM Internal Project Training Session

  • Month 4: 5-9 September 2016
  • MILESTONE 1

Alternatively Liphe4 Summer School in 11-15 July !!!

slide-57
SLIDE 57

WP4 TASKS

  • 2. Development of analytical tools

(UAB with support of HUTTON, WU, UT, UiB, UNINA, CA, ITC) Definition of a general framework for the quantitative analysis of the nexus based on “grammars”

  • Months 1 to 12
  • DELIVERABLE 4.1
slide-58
SLIDE 58

WP4 TASKS

  • 3. State of the Play of 8-10 EU countries

(WU with support of UAB, HUTTON, UT, UiB, UNINA, CA, ITC) Develop a protocol for the characterization the whole EU with a granularity of NUTS1 or NUTS 2 regions

  • Months 9 to 18 -> DELIVERABLE 4.2

8-10 EU countries NUTS 1 NUTS 2

slide-59
SLIDE 59

WP4 TASKS

Deliverable 4.3 4.3 Global Drivers 4.4 Planetary Boundaries 4.5 Externalization

Deliverable led by University of Twente

slide-60
SLIDE 60

WP4 TASKS

  • 4. Global Drivers

(UAB with support of WU, HUTTON, UT, UNINA, CA, ITC) Generate simulations of the effect of existing drivers

  • n global metabolic patterns in the future for food,

water and energy requirements

  • Months 9 to 18
slide-61
SLIDE 61

WP4 TASKS

  • 5. Planetary Boundaries

(WU with support of UAB, HUTTON, UT, UNINA, CA, ITC) DPSIR of different types of SES in the world to check the limits to the expansion of societal consumption determined by external constraints

  • Months 9 to 18
slide-62
SLIDE 62

WP4 TASKS

  • 6. Externalization

(UT with support of UAB, HUTTON, WU, UNINA, CA, ITC) Effects of EU externalization of impacts to other SES because of imports

  • water footprint for embodied water
  • ghost land for agricultural production
  • stock depletion and GHG emissions associated with

imported energy

  • Months 9 to 18
slide-63
SLIDE 63

WP4 TASKS

  • 7. Interaction with EC

(UAB and JRC with support of all other partners) Interactive Meeting with EU Staff (from Policy and Innovation Teams) This meeting will lead to the selection of case studies

  • f WP 5 and WP6
  • Month 18
  • Milestone 2!
slide-64
SLIDE 64

WP4 TASKS

  • 8. Updating Grammars

(UAB with all other partners) Revisions and updating of the developed analytical frameworks in task 4.2 in response to the feed-backs received from the case studies in WP5 and WP6.

  • Months 21 to 48
slide-65
SLIDE 65

WP4 PERSONS/MONTHS

Partner number WP4 effort 1- UAB 48 2- HUTTON 4 3 – WU 24 4 – UT 24 5 – UiB 2 6 – JRC 4 7 – UNINA 10 8 – CA 18 9 – ITC 3 total 137

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Z O R A K O V A C I C , T A R I K S E R R A N O

WORK PACKAGE 4

slide-67
SLIDE 67

WP3

NEXUS US Information

  • rmation Space

NEXUS US Dialog

  • gue

ue Space

WP4

Defin finin ing the Quantitati ntitative ve Story ry-Tell Tellin ing

WP2

EU admini nist strat ration

WP1

interac eractions tions during ng the proje ject ct permanent manent platfo tform rm of

  • f

interac eraction tion

WP WP7

NEXUS Knowledg edge Hub Hub Quality check on

  • n the

assessm essment of innovati ations

  • ns

WP6

Quality check on

  • n the

robustness ess of narrative ves

WP5

CASE STUDIES DIES

slide-68
SLIDE 68

HOW WP4 WORKS

1. Training 2. Development of analytical tools 3. Analysis of 8-10 EU countries 4. Global drivers 5. Planetary boundaries 6. Externalization 7. Interaction with EC 8. Updating Grammars

Case studies WP5 Case studies WP6

slide-69
SLIDE 69

WP4 TASKS

1. Training (UAB with support of all other partners) MuSIASEM Internal Project Training Session

  • Month 4: 5-9 September 2016
  • MILESTONE 1

Alternatively Liphe4 Summer School in 11-15 July !!!

slide-70
SLIDE 70

WP4 TASKS

  • 2. Development of analytical tools

(UAB with support of HUTTON, WU, UT, UiB, UNINA, CA, ITC) Definition of a general framework for the quantitative analysis of the nexus based on “grammars”

  • Months 1 to 12
  • DELIVERABLE 4.1
slide-71
SLIDE 71

WP4 TASKS

  • 3. State of the Play of 8-10 EU countries

(WU with support of UAB, HUTTON, UT, UiB, UNINA, CA, ITC) Develop a protocol for the characterization the whole EU with a granularity of NUTS1 or NUTS 2 regions

  • Months 9 to 18 -> DELIVERABLE 4.2

8-10 EU countries NUTS 1 NUTS 2

slide-72
SLIDE 72

WP4 TASKS

Deliverable 4.3 4.3 Global Drivers 4.4 Planetary Boundaries 4.5 Externalization

Deliverable led by University of Twente

slide-73
SLIDE 73

WP4 TASKS

  • 4. Global Drivers

(UAB with support of WU, HUTTON, UT, UNINA, CA, ITC) Generate simulations of the effect of existing drivers

  • n global metabolic patterns in the future for food,

water and energy requirements

  • Months 9 to 18
slide-74
SLIDE 74

WP4 TASKS

  • 5. Planetary Boundaries

(WU with support of UAB, HUTTON, UT, UNINA, CA, ITC) DPSIR of different types of SES in the world to check the limits to the expansion of societal consumption determined by external constraints

  • Months 9 to 18
slide-75
SLIDE 75

WP4 TASKS

  • 6. Externalization

(UT with support of UAB, HUTTON, WU, UNINA, CA, ITC) Effects of EU externalization of impacts to other SES because of imports

  • water footprint for embodied water
  • ghost land for agricultural production
  • stock depletion and GHG emissions associated with

imported energy

  • Months 9 to 18
slide-76
SLIDE 76

WP4 TASKS

  • 7. Interaction with EC

(UAB and JRC with support of all other partners) Interactive Meeting with EU Staff (from Policy and Innovation Teams) This meeting will lead to the selection of case studies

  • f WP 5 and WP6
  • Month 18
  • Milestone 2!
slide-77
SLIDE 77

WP4 TASKS

  • 8. Updating Grammars

(UAB with all other partners) Revisions and updating of the developed analytical frameworks in task 4.2 in response to the feed-backs received from the case studies in WP5 and WP6.

  • Months 21 to 48
  • Deliverable 4.4
slide-78
SLIDE 78

WP4 PERSONS/MONTHS

Partner number WP4 effort 1- UAB 48 2- HUTTON 4 3 – WU 24 4 – UT 24 5 – UiB 2 6 – JRC 4 7 – UNINA 10 8 – CA 18 9 – ITC 3 total 137

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Workpages 5 & 6 (James Hutton Institute, Wageningen University)

Preliminary – dependent on WP2-4 Ideas at this stage

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Workpages 5 & 6 (James Hutton Institute, Wageningen University)

Aim WP5: quality check on the narratives behind policy WP6: quality check on the potential of innovations

Using framework developed in WP2-4: for real with stakeholders

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Steps

WP5

  • 1. Identify narratives

behind directives

  • 2. Interdependency

among narratives

  • deliberating
  • MuSIASEM
  • 3. Alternative

narratives WP6

  • 1. Identify narrative
  • f innovations
  • 2. Discuss the

potential

  • deliberating
  • MuSIASEM
  • 3. Conclude

potential

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Workpage 5

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Workpage 6

slide-84
SLIDE 84
  • What are the narratives within these policies,

behind innovations? Nexus expressed?

  • What are the aims of these stories and

narratives?

  • Use MUSIASEM to show why and where there

are inconsistencies in these narratives.

  • Bring in institutional analyses to show why

such narratives persist (avoid information deficit approach)

WP5 & WP6

slide-85
SLIDE 85

WP5 & WP6

  • What are the policy/innovation windows that

we are seeking to influence in our areas in the DoW

  • 5 teams looking at the individual policies / and 5

at innovation. Who are in these teams.

  • Content analysis and checking what they

currently do (policy as designed and policy as enacted or current) via interviews of key participants.

  • Opening up/closing down
slide-86
SLIDE 86

Questions?

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Work Package 7 Nexus Knowledge Hub

slide-88
SLIDE 88

WP3

NEXUS US Information

  • rmation Space

NEXUS US Dialog

  • gue

ue Space

WP WP4

Defin finin ing the Quantitati ntitative ve Story ry-Tell Tellin ing

WP2

EU admini nist strat ration

WP1

interac eractions tions during ng the proje ject ct permanent manent platfo tform rm of

  • f

interac eraction tion

WP WP7

NEXUS Knowledg edge Hub Hub Quality check on

  • n the

assessm essment of innovati ations

  • ns

WP6

Quality check on

  • n the

robustness ess of narrative ves

WP5

CASE STUDIES DIES

slide-89
SLIDE 89

Knowledge Exchange

  • Challenge the uni-directional approach of “informing citizens”
  • r “creating awareness”
  • Maximize impact by creating the opportunity for socially

mediated modes of knowledge production

slide-90
SLIDE 90

Post-Normal Science

Funtowicz & Ravetz 1993

slide-91
SLIDE 91

Citizen engagement

  • Identification of relevant narratives
  • Critical assessment of current narratives
  • Collaborative definition of new narratives
  • Interactive tools:

– On-line forum – Helpdesk for enquires – Social media accounts (twitter & facebook)

slide-92
SLIDE 92 Reusable Datasets Research Partners Direct Stakeholder Advisers Public Interest Groups Instrumental Change Conceptual Change Attitudinal Change (mainly willingness to engage) Enduring Connectivity Increased Capacity Transdisciplinary Research Methods (e.g. QST) Inputs to Policy Processes Science-Policy Seminars Mixed Team Making Process Awareness Social Media Debates Hotline/ Helpdesk Project Website Newsletters Leaflets etc Training/ CPD Print Media Broadcast Media Peer Review Publication Project Steering Group Webinars Online Learning Materials FAQ Forum KE Outcome KE Audience Popular Science Book Guidance Software Tools Conference /Session

A visual representation of the components of the MAGIC knowledge exchange, dissemination and exploitation plan

Citizen Engagement

slide-93
SLIDE 93

Plurality of interfaces

* The Nexus Times * Videos, Material, FAQs * Social media * Discussion forums * Nexus hotline * Publications * Conferences * Routledge Book series * Text book on Nexus * Educational games * MOOCs * Syllabi + materials * Summer schools * Specific Training * Continuing Professional Development course * Ad-hoc tool-kits Decision support for a better informed societal deliberation A permanent contact point with the society

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Tasks

  • 1. Dissemination Plan (M1-6)
  • 2. Nexus Knowledge Hub (M1 – M48)
  • 3. Scientific output (M12 – M48)
  • 4. Other dissemination (M24 – 48)
  • 5. Final conference (M47)
slide-95
SLIDE 95
  • 1. Dissemination Plan

(UAB, JRC, UiB)

Defining a Strategy for Dissemination, Communication, and Exploitation Identification of (i) target recipients, (ii) the communication strategy (frequency of communication, newsletter, science policy seminars, public seminars), (iii) language (teaching material, professional training, scientific report)

Ideas & suggestions?

  • Deliverable 7.7  Dissemination Plan (M 6)
slide-96
SLIDE 96
  • 2. Knowledge Hub

(UAB, UNINA and all)

Online platform  Within or linked to the project website  Related to Dialogued Space WP2 Dedicated PhD student at JRC

  • Deliverables 7.1  Nexus Times (M 12)

7.2  Website (M 3) 7.5  Educational Nexus Game (M 42) 7.8  Leaflet (M 3)

slide-97
SLIDE 97
  • Dissemination of results & case studies
  • Discussion forum on narratives & QST
  • Videos, webinars, teaching material
  • 2. Knowledge Hub

(UAB, UNINA and all)

Ideas & suggestions? How can we make this truly interactive?

slide-98
SLIDE 98

Twitter and facebook Hashtags? #MAGICNEXUS #NEXUS

https://www.facebook.com/MagicNexusEu https://twitter.com/MAGIC_NEXUS

@MAGIC_NEXUS

slide-99
SLIDE 99
  • 3. Scientific output

(UAB and all)

Conferences & Publications Obligation to publish in Open Access (manuscripts, data and bibliographic metadata) Book in the series Routledge Explorations in Sustainability and Governance

  • Deliverable 7.4  Report on publications & conferences (M 48)
slide-100
SLIDE 100

Other dissemination (UAB and all)

Teaching and training material on Nexus Assessment  Training and Continuing Professional Development course  MOOC in Coursera

  • Videos, training and other material in the knowledge hub
  • Book for the general audience
  • Deliverable 7.3  TCPD course – teaching material (M 26)
slide-101
SLIDE 101

5 Final conference (UAB and all)

  • Deliverable 7.3  Report on Final Conference (M 47)
slide-102
SLIDE 102

Person-months UAB 38.00 HUTTON 12.00 WU 14.00 UT 15.00 UiB 3.00 JRC 10.00 UNINA 9.00 CA 15.00 ITC 4.00 120.00

Person Months

slide-103
SLIDE 103

Important for publications!!

Obligation to publish in Open Access (Publications, Data and Bibliographic metadata). Article 29 of the GA:

1 – upload final manuscript accepted for publication (pre-printed version?) in a repository for scientific publications (Knowledge Hub, Research Gate and Academia, …) 2 – ensure open access to the deposited publication — via the repository — at the latest: (i)

  • n publication, if an electronic version is available for free via the

publisher, or (ii) within 6 months of publication (12 months for the social sciences and humanities) in any other case.

slide-104
SLIDE 104

(a) deposit in a research data repository and take measures to make it possible for third parties to access, mine, exploit, reproduce and disseminate — free of charge for any user — the following: (i) the data, including associated metadata, needed to validate the results presented in scientific publications as soon as possible; (ii) other data, including associated metadata, as specified and within the deadlines laid down in the 'data management plan' (see Annex 1); (b) provide information — via the repository — about tools and instruments at the disposal of the beneficiaries and necessary for validating the results (and — where possible — provide the tools and instruments themselves).

Important for publications!!

slide-105
SLIDE 105

EU GuidelinesGuidelines on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Research Data in Horizon 2020 http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/gra nts_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf Related cost are eligible and go under "other direct costs"

Important for publications!!

slide-106
SLIDE 106

Obligation to acknowledge EU funding and put disclaimer in any form of dissemination

Article 29.4 and 29.5 of the GA. Unless the Agency requests or agrees otherwise or unless it is impossible, any dissemination of results (in any form, including electronic) must: (a) display the EU emblem and (b) include the following text: “This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 689669”. Any dissemination of results must indicate that it reflects only the author's view and that the Agency is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.

slide-107
SLIDE 107

Obligation to inform other partners about the intention to publish/present results

Article 29.1 of the GA A beneficiary that intends to disseminate its results must give advance notice to the other beneficiaries of — unless agreed otherwise — at least 45 days, together with sufficient information on the results it will disseminate. Any other beneficiary may object within — unless agreed otherwise — 30 days

  • f receiving notification, if it can show that its legitimate interests in relation to

the results or background would be significantly harmed. In such cases, the dissemination may not take place unless appropriate steps are taken to safeguard these legitimate interests.

slide-108
SLIDE 108

Article 8.3 Dissemination of the CA

Prior notice of any planned publication shall be given to the other Parties at least 45 calendar days before the publication. Any objection to the planned publication shall be made in accordance with the Grant Agreement in writing to the Coordinator and to the Party or Parties proposing the dissemination within 30 calendar days after receipt of the

  • notice. If no objection is made within the time limit stated above, the

publication is permitted

slide-109
SLIDE 109

General communication guidelines

Horizon 2020 Guide "Communicating EU research and innovation guidance for project participants: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/gm/h2020-guide- comm_en.pdf See also Article 38 of the GA.

slide-110
SLIDE 110
slide-111
SLIDE 111
slide-112
SLIDE 112
slide-113
SLIDE 113
slide-114
SLIDE 114
slide-115
SLIDE 115

Silvio’s corner – Post-Normal Twitting The sobering wisdom of Vaclav Smil Skeptical Energetics – Charlie Hall Climatic Monitoring – by C.A. Water level logger – by ? Andrea’s corner – evidence based or policy based?

THESE SE ARE JUST ST IDEAS AS . . . To To be be dis iscusse ussed

Fracking observer – by Cristina Madrid (Yale)

We We need need a a “The Nexus us Tim ime Tas ask Force rce”!