2014 2015 Review July 2014 Agenda School Board Policy 5.23 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2014 2015 review
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2014 2015 Review July 2014 Agenda School Board Policy 5.23 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Woodford County Schools 2014 2015 Review July 2014 Agenda School Board Policy 5.23 Energy Management Energy Management Strategy District Energy Management Team Avoided Cost Summary Energy Star Portfolio Manager


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Woodford County Schools 2014 – 2015 Review July 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • School Board Policy 5.23 – Energy Management
  • Energy Management Strategy
  • District Energy Management Team
  • Avoided Cost Summary
  • Energy Star Portfolio Manager
  • Annual Energy Reduction Report
  • Summary of Lighting Projects Completed
  • Changing Culture of Organization
  • Overall Summary
slide-3
SLIDE 3

School Board Policy 05.23 - Energy Management

It is the intent of the Board that the District use energy resources in a safe and efficient manner with an on-going focus on identifying and implementing cost saving measures and developing staff and student commitment to identified energy management practices.

To promote this effort, the Superintendent/designee shall direct the development of an energy management plan (EMP) for Board approval and oversee the implementation and maintenance of that plan, which shall address the following components:

1.

A District level committee shall be appointed by the Superintendent/designee to develop and implement the energy management plan (EMP).

2.

The District level committee shall track and monitor the EMP to determine progress toward managing and reducing energy costs.

3.

Effective with the 2011-2012 school year, the Superintendent/designee shall report the EMP results for each fiscal year, including annual District energy usage, costs and anticipated savings to KPPC - the Kentucky Pollution Prevention Center – by October 1st annually through the Kentucky Energy Efficiency Program for Schools (KEEPS).

 A status report on implementation of the plan in Board-owned and

Board-operated facilities shall be provided to the Board following the end of each fiscal year.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Energy Management Strategy

  • Students Come First in All Decisions
  • Any Change Must be to Improve Student Learning
  • Met with Each School Principal to Gain Support
  • Re-establish District Energy Management Team
  • Establish Student Energy Teams at Each School
  • Establish/Modify Energy Management Plan/Procedure
  • Establish Schedule for Energy Manager to visit Schools
  • Establish Monthly Measurement Package
  • Establish Weekly Energy Usage Report
  • Establish Energy Management Web Page
slide-5
SLIDE 5

District Energy Management Team

  • Amy Smith – Chairperson
  • Scott Hawkins – Superintendent
  • Mike Stacy – Chief Academic Officer
  • Glen Burnett – Maintenance Director
  • Philip Lowery – HVAC Technician
  • Bob Gibson – CIO
  • Jason McAllister – Principal
  • John Darnell – Assistant Principal WCHS
  • Tom Sheldon – Teacher
  • Ralph Slone – WCHS Head Custodian
  • Jim McClanahan – Energy Manager
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Energy Management Avoided Costs Summary

Project Description Refunds/Rebates Received Avoided Costs Total Avoided Costs Rate Change Savings Prior Years $34,363 $34,363 Rate Change Savings Current Year $17,073 $17,073 Consumption Savings Prior Years $241,444 $241,444 Consumption Savings Current Years $176,100 $176,980 Energy Projects Prior Years $18,740 $18,740 Energy Projects Current Year $5,506 $5,506 Total $24,246 $468,980 $493,226

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Rating Rating Energy Use Energy Use Change (1-100) (1-100) kbtu/sq ft kbtu/sq ft From June-15 June-13 June-15 June-13 Baseline Huntertown Elementary 91 77 33.7 41.2

  • 18.2%

Simmons Elementary 83 62 41.1 49.8

  • 17.5%

Safe Harbor 78 60 46.1 51.9

  • 11.2%

Central Office 76 67 39.2 43.9

  • 10.7%

Southside Elementary 70 62 48.5 50.7

  • 4.3%

Woodford County High School 68 39 51.2 67.5

  • 24.1%

Woodford County Middle School 64 54 44.2 48.1

  • 8.1%

Northside Elementary 58 49 58.1 62.2

  • 6.6%

Group Total 71 54 46.3 54.6

  • 15.2%

Facility Name

Energy Star Portfolio Manager Ratings

slide-8
SLIDE 8

91 83 78 76 70 68 64 58 77 62 60 67 62 39 54 49 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Huntertown Elementary Simmons Elementary Safe Harbor Central Office Southside Elementary Woodford County High School Woodford County Middle School Northside Elementary

June-15 June-13

Energy Star Portfolio Manager Rating

  • ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy Star = 75----------------------
slide-9
SLIDE 9

33.7 41.1 46.1 39.2 48.5 51.2 44.2 58.1 41.2 49.8 51.9 43.9 50.7 67.5 48.1 62.2 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0

Huntertown Elementary Simmons Elementary Safe Harbor Central Office Southside Elementary Woodford County High School Woodford County Middle School Northside Elementary

June-15 June-13

EUI (kbtu/sq.ft/)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

School Facility 2014 Actual Kwh 2015 Actual Kwh % Reduction Position

$ Cost Change

2013-14 Actual Kwh 2014-15 Actual Kwh % Reduction Overall Position

YTD $ Cost Change WCHS

183,065

157,207 14.1% 4

  • $2,250

2,072,049

1,768,172 14.7% 3

  • $26,020

WCMS

150,240

160,800

  • 7.0%

9 $919

1,696,080

1,662,240 2.0% 9

  • $2,898

Huntertown

68,800

54,000 21.5% 2

  • $1,288

795,000

679,600 14.5% 4

  • $9,881

Northside

67,200

67,400

  • 0.3%

8 $17

836,400

762,000 8.9% 7

  • $6,371

Simmons

49,320

41,400 16.1% 3

  • $689

786,757

675,480 14.1% 5

  • $9,528

Southside

77,534

70,478 9.1% 7

  • $614

882,583

805,764 8.7% 8

  • $6,578

Central Office

15,120

11,340 25.0% 1

  • $329

252,540

224,460 11.1% 6

  • $2,404

Bus Garage

9,581

8,278 13.6% 5

  • $113

233,907

144,653 38.2% 1

  • $7,643

Safe Harbor

11,429

10,120 11.5% 6

  • $114

159,312

132,170 17.0% 2

  • $2,324

Total

632,289

581,023 8.1%

  • $4,461

7,714,628

6,854,539 11.1%

  • $73,647

Woodford County Schools Energy Management Report June 2015

2014 - 2015 YTD Results June

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Electrical Energy Cost Comparison to Last Year

  • $80,000
  • $70,000
  • $60,000
  • $50,000
  • $40,000
  • $30,000
  • $20,000
  • $10,000

$0

July 2014 - June 2015 $ Cost Change

Note: The Schools with the Lowest Bars are doing the Best Job in Reducing Costs

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2013 2014 2014 Rank for Source Source Change From Kentucky Energy Use Energy Use 2013(%) Buildings Simmons Elementary 155.5 128.8

  • 17.2%

1 Woodford County High School 163.9 141.6

  • 13.6%

2 Woodford County Central Office 138.2 122.5

  • 11.4%

3 Southside Elementary 150.6 137.2

  • 8.9%

6 Huntertown Elementary 125.5 115.3

  • 8.1%

9 Northside Elementary 169.8 159.1

  • 6.3%

13 Woodford County Middle School 145.2 137.3

  • 5.4%

16 Total

  • 10.2%

8 * Facility Name Woodford County Schools Ranked 8th in the Nation for Teams

National Building Competition

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2014- 2015 Energy Reduction Winners

 July 2014 – Simmons Elementary  August 2014 - Safe Harbor  September 2014 – Central Office  October 2014 – Safe Harbor  November 2014 – Bus Garage  December 2014 – Bus Garage  January 2015 – Bus Garage  February 2015 – Bus Garage  March 2015 – Bus Garage  April 2015 – Bus Garage  May 2015 – Bus Garage  June 2015 – Central Office

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Funding Energy Reduction Projects

 School budget has been very tight  Desire not to use Performance Contracting

 Did not want to share savings with a third party  Want to use all savings to improve education

 Focus on low cost/no cost projects  Spent less than $60,000 total on projects thus far  Mainly re-lighting projects that have improved

lighting while saving energy

 Plan is to use the savings from the programs to do

more projects to save money long term

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Re-Lighting Projects

 Converted T-12 lamps at Bus Garage to T-8 lamps

 Installed LED exit signs at Central Office, Southside & Northside

 By performing the work in house and with the utility

company rebates, the projects had less than a year payback

 Installed LED lights in WCHS Gym

 Improved light level from 25 to 70 fc while saving energy

 Installed LED lights in Southside & Northside Libraries  Installed LED lights at Central Office  Installed LED Lights in Southside Gym  Install LED Lights in Northside Gym

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Energy Conservation Measures

 Install Occupancy Sensors in District Bathrooms (In Process)  Consider Dark Campus during Summer Months  Replace Metal Halide Lights at WCMS with LEDs ($20K - 2016)  Replace Parking Lot Metal Halide with LEDs ($62K - 2016+)  Improve HVAC System & Controls at Southside/Northside  Improve HVAC Controls at WCMS

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Key Factors for Successful Energy Management Program

 Support from School Board & Superintendent  Buy in by all Principals – the building leaders  Buy in from all faculty and staff  Educate students on saving energy  Provide and weekly and monthly report for competition  Identify Energy Conservation Measures (ECM’s)  Implement ECM’s  Recognize achievements

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Changing Culture of Organization

 Get everyone involved with saving energy  Energy teams at each school  Establish competition between facilities  Track savings and report monthly to board  Behavior changes alone can reduce energy usage by

10% or more

slide-19
SLIDE 19

EUI Ranking for Kentucky School Districts

2014 Rank District 2010 EUI 2014 EUI 2010 Rank 2014 Rank District 2010 EUI 2014 EUI 2010 Rank

1 Owen 62.5 37.9 67 31 Paintsville 53.3 50.4 26 2 Butler 42.8 38.3 1 32 Trimble 52.3 50.5 20 3 Corbin 51.6 41.0 17 33 Harlan Ind 52.3 50.5 21 4 Walton-Verona 44.6 42.5 4 34 Metcalfe 60.9 50.5 63 5 Scott 53.3 42.7 25 35 Monroe 48.6 50.6 10 6 Anderson 52.3 43.4 19 36 Edmonson 58.7 50.6 52 7 Burgin 60.5 44.5 61 37 Magoffin 64.7 50.8 81 8 Oldham 45.7 44.9 5 39 Clinton 53.5 51.0 28 9 Martin DNR 45.2 163 38 Livingston 56.9 51.0 46 10 Casey 49.5 45.3 12 40 Lawrence 68.6 51.1 97 11 Henry 67.7 45.4 93 41 Allen 57.1 51.3 47 12 Gallatin 60.0 45.6 57 42 Estill 53.4 51.5 27 13 Meade 48.7 45.7 11 43 Pendleton 55.9 51.6 41 14 Murray 47.2 46.0 8 44 Williamstown 63.3 52.2 73 15 Russell 80.5 46.0 140 45 Trigg 60.2 52.3 59 16 Bullitt 53.7 46.3 29 47 Daviess 53.9 52.7 31 17 Erlanger 56.9 46.4 45 46 Adair 71.1 52.7 112 18 Warren 50.7 46.6 15 48 Boyle 65.9 52.8 88 19 Shelby 71.6 47.2 114 49 Floyd 52.0 52.9 18 20 Hancock 57.8 47.4 51 50 Silver Grove 69.2 52.9 100 21 Dawson Springs 61.0 47.7 65 52 Barren 49.8 53.1 13 22 Jessamine 50.3 47.8 14

51 Woodford 63.5 53.1 75

23 Wayne 64.2 47.8 78 53 Jackson Co 57.4 53.3 49 24 Letcher 62.9 48.1 72 54 Boyd 81.2 53.4 144 25 Robertson 114.5 48.5 160 55 Knox 64.8 53.5 83 26 Hardin 54.3 48.9 32 56 Grayson 60.0 53.7 58 27 Glasgow 62.6 49.5 68 57 Crittenden 57.1 53.8 48 28 Russell ind 70.3 49.6 108 58 Spencer DNR 54.0 164 29 Lee 78.3 50.0 137 59 South Gate 47.2 54.1 9 30 Mclean 45.9 50.1 6 60 Science Hill 56.5 54.1 44

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Overall Summary

 Much progress has been made

 Compared to a Goal of 5%, A 11.1% reduction was achieved  Received $5,506 in refunds & rebates during the past year  Achieved $176,100 in consumption cost savings in past year  Achieved $17,073 in savings due to rate changes in past year  In spite of the cold winter, all school have reduced energy as

compared to last year

 Simmons Elementary, Huntertown Elementary, Safe Harbor

and Central Office achieved the Energy Star Award

 Achieved Outstanding Results in National Building

  • Competition. Presented to Interim Committee on Energy