A computerized consent management tool for breeders: why, how? B. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a computerized consent management tool for breeders why
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A computerized consent management tool for breeders: why, how? B. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A computerized consent management tool for breeders: why, how? B. Balvay, L. Journaux Speaker: Laurent Journaux A computerized consent management tool for breeders: why, how? B. Balvay; L. Journaux French genetic interbranch organization


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A computerized consent management tool for breeders: why, how?

  • B. Balvay, L. Journaux

Speaker: Laurent Journaux

slide-2
SLIDE 2

A computerized consent management tool for breeders: why, how?

  • B. Balvay; L. Journaux
slide-3
SLIDE 3

 Genetic improvement involves many differents actors. In France:

 Professional bodies

 Performance recording organizations (ECeL, OCPV)  Insemination agencies (EMP, ES)  Identification and pedigree recorders (EDE)  Breeding societies (OS)  Technical institute (idele)  Meat interbranch organisation (Interbev)  Computer regional centers (ARSOE)

 State agencies

 Ministry in charge of agriculture  National Agronomical Research Institute (INRA)

 Since 2006, most of them are clustered in an

interbranch organization : "France Génétique Elevage" (FGE)

French genetic interbranch

  • rganization

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

 FGE is in charge of « Genetic Information System » By extension of Interbranch agreement “on recording and management of SNIG data” (Decree of 31/10/2016)  Content: zootechnical data

 Breeders’ data

 Holding identification number  Name  Address

 Animals’ data

 Identity and movements  Reproductive events and certified filiations  Milk and meat performance  Morphological scores and qualifications  Genetic values  Public insemination males data

National Livestock Genetic Information System

Genetic Information System

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

 A system originally designed to organize data collection and

consolidation

 Emphasis on the reliability data recording first of all to estimate sound breeding values

 Computerized management of data collectors agreement  Wide data access to promote cross-valuation

 The issue of the access to data has been left to the

responsibility of local actors (field and / or computer centers)

Context and Place of Breeder’s Consent

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

 2006: Agricultural Guidance Act

 End of monopoly zones for animal insemination  Creation of “France Genetique Elevage” agreed as an interbranch organization  State’s progressive disengagement  SNIG decree of 12 September 2007

 2010s: Data, the new rising value!

 Restructuring of actors  Data as a commercial issue  Basic for breeder’s council (for all actors)  Multiplication of possible sources

with new equipment (robots, sensors ...)

 GENOMIC breeding values

 2014: Animal performance recording open to competition  2016: EU Regulation 2016-679 ”on the protection of natural persons with

regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data”

 Data access becomes a crucial issue !

French genetic data management context evolutions

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Some regulatory information about obligation of consent

 Special characteristics of certain data

 Personal data  Data subject to industrial and commercial secrecy

 Application to genetic data

 Animal data are personal since they can be linked to a holder  Inventory data characterize the production of a holding and therefore belong to

the industrial and commercial secrecy

These characteristics are at the origin of the obligation

  • f consent for animal data!

8

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Breeder’s consent

  • n genetic data

Requirements of the SNIG decree about access to data

 The decree refers to the "Informatique et Liberté" law of 1978

 by default, breeder’s consent is necessary.

In fact, collecting consents from breeders has always been a reality (via membership contracts in particular) but they are not recorded in the collective database France Génétique Elevage commitment: Enforcing rules

  • n breeders’ consent for data access

 Need to know which consents have really been collected

 recording into database is the only way !

Need for an effective computerized management tool for breeder’s consent.

10

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The new computerized consent management tool A batch database updating module encapsulated in a Web Service

Batch module  Possible integration in global batch treatment for contracts recording

Web Service (WS) = Normalized technique to make 2 computers cooperate  Possible integration in client applications like Internet portals, PC software, private information system

 Adaptive and efficient with different operational collect procedures !

11

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Web Service EDEL « Consent management »

 Accessible to:

 All organizations already

providing data to the system (empowered organizations)

 Breeders

 Allows:

 Providing organizations to record consents

they’re granted and consent to a third-party

  • rganization

 Breeders to record consents they grant  To all, to close consents

Consent recording

Mock-up of recording screen

13

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Web Service EDEL « Consent management » Consents and regulatory access rights consultation

 Open to organizations and breeders

 For an organization: lists the farms from which it can access data  For a breeder: lists the organizations having access to his data

 Specifying the characteristics of the right:

 Species: cattle, goat, sheep  Data family: performances, pedigree, insemination, embryo transplant  Breed  For which use  Recording modalities

Mock-up of consultation screen

14

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Future of the tool : impact of new EU zootechnical regulation ?

16  Regulation doesn’t mention data management  Responsibility of genetic improvement is entrusted to breeding

societies

Data collect and management will always be necessary and data access will still (or even more) be an issue !

 As data status (personal or commercial) will remain the same,

collecting and managing consents will still be an obligation.

Even if collective organization changes, need for a modern, adaptive and efficient tool will remain !

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Thank you for your attention !

We stay at your disposal.

Béatrice BALVAY: beatrice.balvay@idele.fr

Laurent JOURNAUX: laurent.journaux@idele.fr

17