A realistic view on the future of aviation Dont expect too much - - PDF document

a realistic view on the future of aviation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A realistic view on the future of aviation Dont expect too much - - PDF document

18-5-2018 A realistic view on the future of aviation Dont expect too much Joris Melkert Faculty of Aerospace Engineering Content Snowball effect in aviation Developments so far Supersonic aircraft Electric aircraft


slide-1
SLIDE 1

18-5-2018 1

A realistic view on the future of aviation

Don’t expect too much

Joris Melkert Faculty of Aerospace Engineering

Content

  • Snowball effect in aviation
  • Developments so far
  • Supersonic aircraft
  • Electric aircraft
  • Alternative fuels
  • An airport in the North Sea
  • New configurations
  • Conclusion
slide-2
SLIDE 2

18-5-2018 2

Snowball effect in aviation

1 kg more mass

  • > 1 kg more lift required

lift is not for free - > more aerodynamic drag more drag -> more thrust more thrust

  • > bigger engines
  • > more fuel

} -> more mass

Snowball effect in aviation

Maximum take-off weight 548,000 kg Payload 83,000 kg = 6.60 = Quick estimate numerical value snowball factor Airbus A380:

slide-3
SLIDE 3

18-5-2018 3

Developments so far - spot the differences

Sources: airliners.net, @zhangmx969, Shimin Gu

1967 1987 2017 Developments so far – fuel consumption

Source: Lee, IEA

slide-4
SLIDE 4

18-5-2018 4

Developments so far – fuel consumption

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 CO_2 emission (gramme/ seat‐km) Year of first flight propeller (560 km) short haul (900‐1200 km) short haul (1900 km) medium haul (4000‐5560 km) long haul (9300‐14100 km)

Developments so far - noise

slide-5
SLIDE 5

18-5-2018 5

Developments so far - manufacturers Developments so far - manufacturers

slide-6
SLIDE 6

18-5-2018 6

Source: IATA

$16.32 $6.94 $4.96 $4.96

  • $1.50

$2.87

Developments so far - airlines Net profit per ticket Supersonic flight

M < 0.8 subsonic aircraft 0.8 < M < 1.2 transsonic aircraft 1.2 < M < 4 supersonic aircraft M > 4 hypersonic “vehicles”

Mach number :

flight speed M speed of sound 

slide-7
SLIDE 7

18-5-2018 7

Supersonic flight Supersonic flight

slide-8
SLIDE 8

18-5-2018 8

Supersonic flight

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

drag coefficient Mach number

Supersonic flight

Bron: Aerion

slide-9
SLIDE 9

18-5-2018 9

Supersonic flight

Bron: Aerion

Supersonic flight

Bron: Aerion

slide-10
SLIDE 10

18-5-2018 10

Supersonic flight

Source: Medium

Supersonic flight

Source: EADS

slide-11
SLIDE 11

18-5-2018 11

Supersonic flight

Source: Lockheed Martin

Supersonic flight

Source: Avherald

slide-12
SLIDE 12

18-5-2018 12

Supersonic flight

Source: TU Delft

Electric Aircraft

Source: Pipistrel, Airbus

slide-13
SLIDE 13

18-5-2018 13

Electric Aircraft

Source: Pipistrel, Airbus

Electric Aircraft

Source: Pipistrel, Airbus

slide-14
SLIDE 14

18-5-2018 14

Electric Aircraft

Source: Hartzellprop.com

Electric Aircraft

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 50 100 150 volumetric energy density MJ/ liter gravimetric energy density MJ/ kg Liquid hydrogen LNG Lithium Battery Methanol Ethanol Biodiesel Jet A / Jet A-1 F-T kerosene

slide-15
SLIDE 15

18-5-2018 15

Electric Aircraft

Source: Hartzellprop.com

Electric flight will be there! However:

  • It will not be the next generation commercial aircraft
  • It will come via two routes
  • 1. General aviation
  • 2. Hybrid passenger aircraft

Alternative fuels

Source: KLM

slide-16
SLIDE 16

18-5-2018 16

Electric Aircraft

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 50 100 150 volumetric energy density MJ/ liter gravimetric energy density MJ/ kg Liquid hydrogen LNG Lithium Battery Methanol Ethanol Biodiesel Jet A / Jet A-1 F-T kerosene

Alternative fuels

Area-averaged probe Measurement of ICAO LTO emissions by DLR Direct particle size and number Cessna Citation II - P&W JT15Ds GTL 0-50% in two base fuels for ground testing GTL 0-90% in flight testing

slide-17
SLIDE 17

18-5-2018 17

Alternative fuels Alternative fuels

Soot filters in undiluted sampling line

Area-averaged probe Measurement of ICAO LTO emissions by DLR Direct particle size and number Cessna Citation II - P&W JT15Ds GTL 0-50% in two base fuels for ground testing GTL 0-90% in flight testing

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18-5-2018 18

Alternative fuels

Source: Olivier Cleynen

Is hydrogen an option? Yes, you can use hydrogen in jet engines. But you will need some modifications. A better alternative would be to make use of hydrogen fuel cells and electric motors.

An airport in the North Sea

Source: tix.nl, By Wylkie Chan - Wylkie Chan, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=11251117

slide-19
SLIDE 19

18-5-2018 19

An airport in the North Sea

Source: tix.nl, By Wylkie Chan - Wylkie Chan, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=11251117

An airport in the North Sea

Source: tix.nl, By Wylkie Chan - Wylkie Chan, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=11251117

slide-20
SLIDE 20

18-5-2018 20

An airport in the North Sea

Source: Vlucht naar Voren

An airport in the North Sea

Source: kwaliteitsatlas.nl

slide-21
SLIDE 21

18-5-2018 21

An airport in the North Sea

Source: kwaliteitsatlas.nl

An airport in the North Sea

Source: kwaliteitsatlas.nl

slide-22
SLIDE 22

18-5-2018 22

An airport in the North Sea

Source: kwaliteitsatlas.nl

Future developments on airports

Source: TU Delft

Ultra–green Highly customer oriented Highly time efficient

slide-23
SLIDE 23

18-5-2018 23

Future developments on airports

Safety & Security Airport Performance Optimization Efficiency & Resilience Noise & Emissions Circular Economy Passenger Experience Seamless door-to- door journeys Better Airport Regions Autonomous & electric vehicles Aircraft design & Propulsion Biofuels Emergency Airports Multimodal Transport systems Responsible Innovation Baggage Big Data

New configurations

Source: orbitalvector.com

slide-24
SLIDE 24

18-5-2018 24

New configurations

Source: DLR

New configurations

Source: NASA

slide-25
SLIDE 25

18-5-2018 25

New configurations

Source: theverge.com

New configurations

Source: Airbus

slide-26
SLIDE 26

18-5-2018 26

New configurations

Sources: GE, NASA, aerobuzz.fr,Entrevoisins, NLR

New configurations

Sources: NASA

slide-27
SLIDE 27

18-5-2018 27

New configurations – quick change New configurations – quick change

slide-28
SLIDE 28

18-5-2018 28

New configurations – quick change New configurations – quick change

slide-29
SLIDE 29

18-5-2018 29

New configurations – quick change

Source: Mets747, CNN, Airbus

New configurations – quick change

Source: blogs.wsj.com

slide-30
SLIDE 30

18-5-2018 30

Conclusions

There are no major quick changes to be expected We need more research and development We need to look into alternative “drop-in” fuels We need better procedures (Single European Sky) For more rapid changes we need stronger incentives (legislation + societal pressure)