A scalable quantum architecture for dark matter detection Daniel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a scalable quantum architecture for dark matter detection
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A scalable quantum architecture for dark matter detection Daniel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A scalable quantum architecture for dark matter detection Daniel Carney JQI/QuICS, University of Maryland/NIST Theory Division, Fermilab Based on Gravitational direct detection of dark matter DC , S. Ghosh, G. Krnjaic, J. M. Taylor,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A scalable quantum architecture for dark matter detection

Daniel Carney

JQI/QuICS, University of Maryland/NIST Theory Division, Fermilab

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Based on

  • Gravitational direct detection of dark matter

DC, S. Ghosh, G. Krnjaic, J. M. Taylor, 1903.00492

  • Ultralight dark matter detection with mechanical quantum sensors

DC, A. Hook, Z. Liu, J. M. Taylor, Y. Zhao, 1908.04797

  • Work in progress w/ above people
  • Preliminary experimental work (details later in talk)
slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Central questions

  • What are the fundamental limits imposed by quantum mechanics on

the detection of small forces/impulses?

  • Given these limits, can we detect dark matter purely through its

gravitational interaction? (Spoiler: yes, if heavy DM)

  • Using the same technology, what other DM/particle physics targets

can we look for?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Quantum force sensing

Wide variety of mechanical systems coupled to light used to do quantum-limited force sensing. Routinely achieve force sensitivities at or below the 10-18-21 N/√Hz level. These devices range from single electrons to huge devices (eg. LIGO m = 40 kg) Matsumoto et al, PRA 2015 Aspelmeyer ICTP slides 2013

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Fgrav = GN m2/d2 ~ 10-17 N for two masses m = mg separated by d = mm

slide-8
SLIDE 8

mechanics light drive-enhanced coupling

Aspelmeyer, Marquant, Kippenberg (Rev. Mod. Phys. 2014)

Quantum opto/electromechanical sensing

Strategy: imprint mechanical displacement

  • nto light, measure light, infer force
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Quantum measurement noise

Quantum mechanics imposes fundamental source of noise: the act

  • f measurement itself.

Shot noise: random variations in laser phase read out in detector Backaction noise: random variations in laser amplitude → random radiation pressure on mechanics light phase shift ~ x(t1) readout light phase via interferometer → learn x(t)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Total (inferred) force acting on the sensor: thermal noise forces (environmental) measurement added-noise force (fundamental quantum issue)

Noise and sensitivity

Key in what follows: Noise = stochastic, Brownian

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Detecting monochromatic forces (narrowband sensing)

Visible signal (w/ Tint = 1 sec of integration) “Standard quantum limit” (SQL) Location depends on laser power

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Ultralight DM detection

Suppose DM consists entirely of a single, very light field: m𝜚 ≲ 1 meV (ƛ ≳ 10-3 m). Locally, this will look like a wave with wavelength > detector size. If the field couples to an extensive quantity, produces sinusoidal force, coherent for some time Tcoh:

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Detection strategy and reach

Tune laser to achieve SQL in “bins”. Integrate as long as possible for each bin (coherence time or eg. laser stability limit) NB: this is off-resonant, can do better with resonant scan, much more time intensive

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Detecting fast impulses (broadband sensing)

Extreme example: F(t) = Δp ฀(t) → F(⍵) = Δp/2𝝆 flat distribution Sensitivity set by integral of noise over many frequencies Cannot integrate for indefinite period of time → calls for different measurement protocols

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Signal to noise

As an observable we will use the total impulse delivered to the sensor: The game is then to see this impulse above the noise:

signal thermal noise

Good case Bad case

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Impulse measurements naturally reduce noise

light phase ~ x(t1) impart +p to mirror light phase ~ -x(t2) impart -p to mirror → Output light phase ɸ ~x(t1)-x(t2) ~ v, momentum transfer to sensor Δp ~0 → No radiation pressure (“backaction noise evasion”)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Heavier DM targets

slide-18
SLIDE 18

DM-SM interactions via light mediators

m𝜚 ≳ 1 MeV (ƛ ≲ 10-13 m) dominated by single boson exchange (eg. WIMP detection via Z exchange) m𝜚 ≲ 0.1 meV (ƛ ≳ 10-3 m) dominated by eikonal limit → long-range force In particular: 𝜚 = graviton (exactly massless), N gV gD → GN m1 m2

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Long-range DM detection

Motion of the Earth through the galaxy: v ~ 220 km/s → flyby time 𝛖 ~ b/v ~ 10-6-8 sec → signal: near-instantaneous impulse (broadband up to MHz-GHz)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Detection reach with various noise reduction

(NB: actual numbers are preliminary/ unpublished, but scaling is accurate)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Review: Advanced quantum techniques for future gravitational-wave detectors Danilishin, Khalili, Miao 1903.05223

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Array of sensors

In the impulse problem: Signal ~ 1/b2 → want small impact parameter Number flux ~ A/m𝝍 → want large area Obvious solution: build a large, tightly packed array!

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Movie

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Correlated signals vs. uncorrelated noise

SNR ~ √N Impulse detection: N = sensors near track Ultralight detection: N = total # sensors Also, crucial advantage: exquisite background rejection

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Three big experimental asks

environmental isolation measurement noise scale

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Three big experimental asks

environmental isolation measurement noise scale ultralight DM long-range coupled DM, other short impulse signals gravitational detection

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Gravitational detection is the end game

~10 million-1 billion sensors ~10 mK &/or UHV environment Thermally limited detection (~50 dB backaction evasion):

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Direct DM detection via gravity

1903.00492 D.C., S. Ghosh, G. Krnjaic, J. M. Taylor

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Science program

End goal: gravitational DM detection. Find or rule

  • ut any DM candidates with masses ~ mpl and up

(until flux-limited). Shorter term: ultralight detection, various long range force models,... Experiments now beginning with pair of mg-scale pendula ~ 1 kHz, ultralight search & tech pathfinder. Single physical array, with multiple detection modes controlled by state prep & readout

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Photo from Dave Moore (Yale)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Cindy Regal, JILA (quant-ph exp) Dave Moore, Yale (hep-ex) Gordan Krnjaic, FNAL (hep-ph)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Open questions

Can we do gravitational detection of sub-Planck candidates? Can we go below the thermal noise floor? (Quantum error correction?) What other targets are there--eg. DM-SM with heavy mediators? “Chunky” DM candidates? Neutrinos? Gravitational waves? → Each requires its own measurement strategy (but with same physical devices!) How do we physically implement large arrays?

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Slide from Monika Schleier-Smith

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Damping/loss “Input noise” (note signal is part of Fin)

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Non-gravitational DM detection targets

Very broadly, we should be sensitive to anything that produces a classical force! In terms of DM, obvious guess is to then consider any DM scenario with a boson of mass mϕ < meV ~ 1 mm-1 that couples to standard model. # new particles 1 ≥2 type of particles Boson mϕ < meV +others, mass arbitrary signal coherent waves long-range DM-SM couplings

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Detecting monochromatic forces at the SQL

The “SQL” is a frequency-dependent concept: Tune laser power to a certain value → achieve SQL at a certain frequency