Absorption Measure Distribution in Active Galactic Nuclei T. P. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

absorption measure distribution in active galactic nuclei
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Absorption Measure Distribution in Active Galactic Nuclei T. P. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Absorption Measure Distribution in Active Galactic Nuclei T. P. Adhikari Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, Warsaw, Poland June 26, 2017 Collaborators Agata R a ska, Bozena Czerny, Krzysztof Hryniewicz AGN Winds on the Georgia


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Absorption Measure Distribution in Active Galactic Nuclei Collaborators Agata Różańska, Bozena Czerny, Krzysztof Hryniewicz

  • T. P. Adhikari

Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, Warsaw, Poland June 26, 2017

AGN Winds on the Georgia Coast , 25-29 June 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Absorption Measure Distribution (AMD) in AGNs:

definition and observational motivation

  • Photoionisation modelling of AMD
  • Results from our modelling

using TITAN (Dumont+ 2000) photoionisation code

  • Summary
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Absorption measure distribution (AMD) in AGNs : from observations

Holczer+ 2007

ξ =L/nR2

Holczer+ 2007

  • Nion is derived by fitting Gaussian

profiles to the X-ray absorption lines in the observed spectra

  • AMD requires ξ and NH
  • ξ and fion are computed from

photoionisation models

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Equivalent H- column densities

Holczer+ 2007

Importance of different ions, Fe in particular

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Absorption measure distribution (AMD): Observation

Behar 2009

Discontinuity in the observed AMD Observational evidence of Thermal instability (TI)? Holczer + 2007, Behar 2009

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Absorption measure distribution (AMD): Observation

Mrk 509 (Detmers + 2011)

two AMD dips !

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Main Codes: CLOUDY (Ferland

+2013), TITAN (Dumont+ 2000), XSTAR (Kallman & Bautista 2001),..

  • Broad band SED
  • Gas density n
  • Metallicity Z
  • Column Density NH
  • Ionisation parameter, ξ =L/nR2
  • Solving the radiative transfer, ionisation

equilibrium and thermal balance absorption lines n,Z, NH SED

Absorption measure distribution (AMD): Modelling

slide-8
SLIDE 8

AMD: models ξ (erg cm s-1) Radiation Pressure Confinement (RPC) model (Stern+ 2014) using CLOUDY RPC model in CLOUDY did not reproduce TI

slide-9
SLIDE 9

AMD in Mrk 509: constant total pressure (Pgas+Prad) single model

Adhikari + 2015, ApJ

TITAN code reproduces TI problem with the normalisation!

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Density dependence of AMD for Mrk 509 SED, the position of AMD dip depends on density

Adhikari + 2015, ApJ

slide-11
SLIDE 11

RPC in Cloudy versus constant pressure in TITAN

TITAN (Constant total pressure ) CLOUDY (RPC)

  • Escape probability method
  • f radiative transfer
  • more accurate Accelerated

Lambda Iteration (ALI) method Escape probability method versus ALI method (Dumont+ 2003)

  • radiation pressure is computed

from radiation field and goes into the gas structure directly

  • pressure induced by the

trapped emitted radiation is not considered

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Systematic study of AMD using TITAN

high-spin-low-mdotr low-spin-high-mdotr Adhikari+ 2017, in preparation

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Systematic study of AMD using TITAN

Adhikari+2017, in preparation

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Systematic study of AMD using TITAN: normalisation and position of dip in AMD

SED - with strong X-ray illumination

SED- with strong opt/UV component

normalisation is higher for SED with strong X-ray illumination NH≥1023 cm-2 NH~1021-1022cm-2 Adhikari+ 2017, in preparation

slide-15
SLIDE 15

In case of SED with strong optical/UV component and for high density, free free heating dominates over the Compton heating

slide-16
SLIDE 16

data: Behar 2009 TITAN model: SED with with strong optical/ UV component, log NH =22.48, log nH =12

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Summary

  • Constant total pressure single component WA model explains

the observed AMD in Mrk 509.

  • For the given SED, the position of AMD dip depends on the density
  • f the absorber.
  • Computations of AMDs with the constant pressure assumption for

different SED components shows that the normalisation is higher for SED with strong X-ray illumination and weak optical/UV component.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Back up slides…