Assessing Earthquake Disaster Using ALOS Assessing Earthquake - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

assessing earthquake disaster using alos assessing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Assessing Earthquake Disaster Using ALOS Assessing Earthquake - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Assessing Earthquake Disaster Using ALOS Assessing Earthquake Disaster Using ALOS Assessing Earthquake Disaster Using ALOS PALSAR and Aerial Photographs: A Case Study of PALSAR and Aerial Photographs: A Case Study of PALSAR and Aerial


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Assessing Earthquake Disaster Using ALOS PALSAR and Aerial Photographs: A Case Study of the Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku Earthquake in 2008 Assessing Earthquake Disaster Using ALOS Assessing Earthquake Disaster Using ALOS PALSAR and Aerial Photographs: A Case Study of PALSAR and Aerial Photographs: A Case Study of the Iwate the Iwate-

  • Miyagi Nairiku Earthquake in 2008

Miyagi Nairiku Earthquake in 2008

Shin Shin-

  • ichi KANETA,

ichi KANETA, Hirotaka Hirotaka NARUI, Satoshi ONODA, Yoichi NUMATA NARUI, Satoshi ONODA, Yoichi NUMATA And Kazuya SAITO And Kazuya SAITO

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • “Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku Earthquake in 2008”
  • Aerial Survey
  • ALOS/PALSAR Pixel-Offset
  • Result & Summary

Outline

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 14 June, 2008, MJMA

= 7.2, hypocenter depth= 8km

  • 23 people death or missing
  • 448 people injured
  • Over 1,000 of buildings partially or completely collapsed

Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku Earthquake in 2008

Iwate Pref. Iwate Pref. Miyagi Pref. Miyagi Pref.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

GPS network (GEONET)

  • Near the epicenter (#0913);

Near the epicenter (#0913); 2m uprising, 1.6m south 2m uprising, 1.6m south-

  • east

east

  • Other places;

Other places; >0.1m vertical and 0.3m horizontal >0.1m vertical and 0.3m horizontal

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Cessna 208 Cessna 208 Gulfstream Commander 695 Gulfstream Commander 695

Aerial Survey ~ Aircrafts~

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Aerial Survey ~Digital Mapping Camera (DMC)~

  • Panchromatic image; 106 million pixels (13,824 x 7,680)

Panchromatic image; 106 million pixels (13,824 x 7,680)

  • Visible and NIR image: 6million pixels (3,072 x 2,048)

Visible and NIR image: 6million pixels (3,072 x 2,048)

  • Dynamic range: 12bit

Dynamic range: 12bit

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Survey Area

  • June 15 ~ 16, 2008

June 15 ~ 16, 2008

  • 18 flight lines for analogue camera

18 flight lines for analogue camera 683.4km 683.4km2

2 -

  • > Photo interpretation

> Photo interpretation

  • 4 flight lines for DMC

4 flight lines for DMC Aratozawa area (10km Aratozawa area (10km2

2)

)

  • > Aerial Photogrammetry (DSM)

> Aerial Photogrammetry (DSM)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Massive Landslide at Aratozawa Area

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Slope failure: 2,975

Slope failure: 2,975

  • Landslide: 37

Landslide: 37

Aerial Photo Interpretation

slide-10
SLIDE 10

( )

[ ] (

)

[ ]

( )

[ ]

( )

[ ]

) 1 ...( , , , , ) , (

2 2 ∑∑

∑∑ ∑∑

− − − − =

i j i j i j

Y j i Y X j i X Y j i Y X j i X v u ρ

Pre-Earthquake Post-Earthquake

SAR pixel-offset method

pixel correlation coefficient coefficient average maximum

X X : Intensity of pre : Intensity of pre-

  • earthquake SAR image

earthquake SAR image Y Y : Intensity of : Intensity of post-earthquake SAR image SAR image i i, , j j : Range and azimuth position of SAR images : Range and azimuth position of SAR images

SAR Intensity Images and Moving Window Correlation Coefficients Inside a Moving Correlation Coefficients Inside a Moving Window Window Correlation Coefficient and Local Pixel Offset

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Processing Flow

pre-earthquake pre pre-

  • earthquake

earthquake post-earthquake post post-

  • earthquake

earthquake SLC; Single Look Complex SLC; Single Look Complex SLC; Single Look Complex MLI; Multi Look Intensity MLI; Multi Look Intensity MLI; Multi Look Intensity

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ALOS/PALSAR Data Set

date mode latitude longitude path frame column line

  • Aug. 27, 2007

HH / FBS Dec 39.137 140.941 57 2830 14100 3925

  • Jun. 14, 2008
  • Jul. 16, 2008

HH / FBS Des 39.122 140.950 57 2830 14100 3900

Earthquake Earthquake Earthquake

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Processing Result

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Station # GEONET SAR average SAR-GEONET ΔE(m) ΔN(m) ΔE(m) ΔN(m) ΔE(m) ΔN(m) 0029

  • 0.087

0.021 0.5

  • 0.2

0.6

  • 0.2

0796 0.025 0.025

  • 0.6

0.3

  • 0.6

0.3 0912

  • 0.174

0.048 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.4 0173

  • 0.155

0.127 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.2 0174

  • 0.064
  • 0.001

0.6 0.3 0.7 0.3 0913 1.015

  • 1.199

1.4

  • 2.3

0.3

  • 1.1

0193 0.284

  • 0.073
  • 0.2

0.4

  • 0.4

0.4 0554 0.086

  • 0.027

0.5

  • 1.6

0.4

  • 1.6

0928 0.200

  • 0.106

0.5 0.2 0.3 0.3 RMSE 0.5 0.7

Comparison with GEONET

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Aratozawa Area ~ Massive Landslide ~

Aratozawa Aratozawa Aratozawa

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Aratozawa Area ~ Massive Landslide ~

道路位置は基盤地図情報より引用 http://www.gsi.go.jp/kiban/index.ht ml

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Aratozawa Area ~ Massive Landslide ~

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Pixel-Offset Result

  • North-West zone:

3 ~ 4m South-East-bound

  • South-East zone:

Lower than 1m

  • Massive landslide could not be

detected

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Other Research Ground Survey (AIST AFERC 2008) Other Research Ground Survey (AIST AFERC 2008)

Aratozawa Aratozawa Aratozawa

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Comparison with other researches

Fault scarp

  • Ground survey (AIST, 2008)

uplifting 3.6m east-bound 4 - 6m

  • SAR Pixel-Offset (this study)

east-bound 3 - 4m Fault scarp Fault scarp

  • Ground survey (AIST, 2008)

Ground survey (AIST, 2008) uplifting 3.6m uplifting 3.6m east east-

  • bound 4

bound 4 -

  • 6m

6m

  • SAR Pixel

SAR Pixel-

  • Offset (this study)

Offset (this study) east east-

  • bound 3

bound 3 -

  • 4m

4m

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Other Research Aerial Photogrammetry (Kamiya et al., 2008)

pre-earthquake

p

  • s

t

  • e

a r t h q u a k e

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Comparison with other researches

Fault scarp Aerial photo (Kamaya et al. 2008)

  • east-bound 6.2 - 6.7m

SAR image correlation (this study)

  • east-bound 3 - 4m

Fault scarp Fault scarp Aerial photo (Kamaya et al. 2008) Aerial photo (Kamaya et al. 2008)

  • east

east-

  • bound 6.2

bound 6.2 -

  • 6.7m

6.7m SAR image correlation (this study) SAR image correlation (this study)

  • east

east-

  • bound 3

bound 3 -

  • 4m

4m

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Summary

We assessed earthquake disaster by SAR Pixel-Offset method and Aerial Survey,

  • 2,975 slope failures and 37 landslides were newly

founded by aerial photo interpretation.

  • The minimum detectable magnitude of SAR Pixel-

Offset (ALOS/PALSAR FBS mode) is about 1m.

  • Estimated displacement has good consistency with
  • ther results in direction and position.
  • Magnitude is smaller than the other results.
  • Massive landslide could not be detected with this

method.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

  • The ownership of original ALOS/PALSAR data

belongs to METI (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) and JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency).

  • GEONET data, 50m gridded DTM, other GIS data

are provided by GSI (Geographical Survey Institute of Japan).

  • AIST AFERC (National Institute of Advanced

Industrial Science and Technology Active Fault and Earthquake Research Center) has published useful field research information.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Thank you for your time Thank you for your time