Asymmetric dark matter from and New Strong Dynamics Mads Toudal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

asymmetric dark matter from and new strong dynamics
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Asymmetric dark matter from and New Strong Dynamics Mads Toudal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Asymmetric dark matter from and New Strong Dynamics Mads Toudal Frandsen Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics November 5 th 2010 What is the world made of? What is the world made of? Baryons but no anti- baryons Baryon mass


slide-1
SLIDE 1

November 5th 2010

Mads Toudal Frandsen

Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics

Asymmetric dark matter from and New Strong Dynamics

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What is the world made of?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What is the world made of?

Baryons but no anti- baryons Baryon mass (mainly) from strong dynamics ΩDM/ΩB~ O(1)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Mass scale Particle Symmetry/ Quantum # Stability Production Abundance ΛQCD Baryons U(1) baryon number ⊗ > 1033 yr (dim-6 OK) ‘freeze-out’ from thermal equilibrium asymmetry ΩB ~10-10 ΩB ~ 0.05

What should the world be made of ?

‘Freeze-out’ at T ~ mN /45, with:

A 'baryon disaster'?! Have to invoke an asymmetry:

Chemical equilibrium maintained when annihilaton rate exceeds the Hubble expansion rate

Observed ratio is 109 times bigger:

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Sakharov conditions for baryogenesis:

  • 1. Baryon number violation
  • 2. C and CP violation
  • 3. Departure from thermal equilibrium

Any pre-existing fermion asymmetry would be redistributed by the B+L violating processes (which conserve B-L) :

(Bahr, Chivukula & Farhi 90; Harvey and Turner 90)

The fermion number N i terms of the statistical function ci and the Chemical potential μ is: The fermion number violating processes (sphalerons) create equal number of fermion doublets:

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Mass scale Particle Symmetry/ Quantum # Stability Production Abundance ΛQCD Nucleons U(1) baryon number ⊗ > 1033 yr (dim-6 OK) ‘freeze-out’ from thermal equilibrium asymmetry ΩB ~10-10 ΩB ~ 0.05 ΛFermi ~ GF

  • 1/2

Neutralino?

R-parity? violated? ‘freeze-out’ from thermal equilibrium ΩLSP ~ 0.3

What should the world be made of ?

But why then is the abundance of thermal relics comparable to that of baryons born non-thermally, with ΩDM/ΩB ~ 5?

In (softly broken) susy we could have a ‘WIMP miracle’:

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Even more naturally is a ~ 5 GeV particle (e.g. a 'dark baryon' from a hidden strong sector)

(Gelmini et al 87, Raby and West 87, DB Kaplan 92, Hooper et al 05, Kitano and Low 05, DE Kaplan et al 09, Kribs et al 09, Sannino and Zwicky 09, An et al 10, M.T.F & Sarkar 10, ...) Mass scale Particle Symmetry/ Quantum # Stability Production Abundance ΛQCD Nucleons U(1) baryon number ⊗ > 1033 yr (dim-6 OK) ‘freeze-out’ from thermal equilibrium Asymmetry ΩB ~10-10 ΩB ~ 0.05 ΛTC ~ ΛFermi ΛDB ~5 ΛQCD Technibaryon? Dark Baryon? U(1) techibaryon U(1) dark baryon number ? Asymmetry ΩTC ~ 0.3 ΩDB ~ 0.3

Is it natural to have similar initial asymmetry in the visible and dark sector?

A TeV scale particle sharing the asymmetry (e.g. a technibaryon) could explain the ratio

  • f dark to baryonic matter... (Nussinov 1985)

(Bahr, Chivukula and Farhi 90)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Sakharov conditions for baryogenesis:

  • 1. Baryon number violation
  • 2. C and CP violation
  • 3. Departure from thermal equilibrium

Any pre-existing fermion asymmetry would be redistributed by the B+L violating processes (which conserve B-L) :

(Bahr, Chivukula & Farhi 90; Harvey and Turner 90)

The fermion number N i terms of the statistical function ci and the Chemical potential μ is: The fermion number violating processes (sphalerons) create equal number of fermion doublets:

slide-11
SLIDE 11

If composite ADM is electrically neutral but has constituents with EW charges, sphalerons may distribute the asymmetry among baryons and dark matter

EW scale ADM from Technicolor models

A dark mirror sector (e.g. a complete copy of the SM) is coupled via Higgs-Mirror Higgs and heavy right handed neutrinos which generate neutrino masses in the SM and provide leptogenesis of matter in the SM as well as ADM from the mirror sector Technicolour breaks the electroweak symmetry and the technifermions can form composite ADM

Dark mirror sector/world Minimal (Walking) Technicolour

Can we construct natural explicit models?

GeV scale ADM e.g. from a

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Technicolor Dark matter

and LHC Phenomenology Mads Toudal Frandsen

LAPTh

Annecy-le-Vieux, November 5th 2010 m.frandsen1@physics.ox.ac.uk

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Outline

1

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter

2

Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs

3

LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Technicolor

Technicolor: (Weinberg 78, Susskind 78)

1 In the SM without a Higgs, QCD breaks the EW symmetry:

¯ uLuR + ¯ dLdR = 0 → MW = gfπ 2 .

2 Consider a new strongly interacting gauge theory with

F TC

Π

= vEW = 246GeV .

3 Let the electroweak gauge group be a subgroup of the chiral

symmetry group.

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Technicolor

Technicolor: (Weinberg 78, Susskind 78)

1 In the SM without a Higgs, QCD breaks the EW symmetry:

¯ uLuR + ¯ dLdR = 0 → MW = gfπ 2 .

2 Consider a new strongly interacting gauge theory with

F TC

Π

= vEW = 246GeV .

3 Let the electroweak gauge group be a subgroup of the chiral

symmetry group.

Example: Scaled-up QCD !

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Technicolor

1 The SM gauge group is augmented:

GSM → SU(3)c × SU(2)W × U(1)Y × GTC .

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Technicolor

1 The SM gauge group is augmented:

GSM → SU(3)c × SU(2)W × U(1)Y × GTC .

2 The Higgs sector of the SM is replaced:

LHiggs → −1 4F a

µνF aµν + i ¯

QLγµDµQL + i ¯ QRγµDµQR + ...

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Technicolor

1 The SM gauge group is augmented:

GSM → SU(3)c × SU(2)W × U(1)Y × GTC .

2 The Higgs sector of the SM is replaced:

LHiggs → −1 4F a

µνF aµν + i ¯

QLγµDµQL + i ¯ QRγµDµQR + ... Minimal chiral symmetries: 3 GB’s + Custodial + DM. SUL(2) × SUR(2) × UTB(1) → SUV (2) × UTB(1) .

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Technicolor dark matter

Technocosmology (Nussinov 85)

Lightest Technibaryon as Asymmetric Dark Matter

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Technicolor dark matter

Technocosmology (Nussinov 85)

Lightest Technibaryon as Asymmetric Dark Matter

The LTB abundance: ΩTB/ΩB = mTB/mB × nTB/nB

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Technicolor dark matter

Technocosmology (Nussinov 85)

Lightest Technibaryon as Asymmetric Dark Matter

The LTB abundance: ΩTB/ΩB = mTB/mB × nTB/nB From initial nB ∼ nTB: ΩTB/ΩB ∼ mTB/mB × (mTB/Tsphaleron)3/2e−mTB/Tsphaleron Tsphaleron ∼ vEW ,

(Chivukula and Walker 90; Bahr, Chivukula and Farhi 90; Harvey and Turner 90; Ellis et al 95; Sarkar 95; Gudnason, Kouvaris and Sannino 05)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Technicolor dark matter

Technocosmology (Nussinov 85)

Lightest Technibaryon as Asymmetric Dark Matter

The LTB abundance: ΩTB/ΩB = mTB/mB × nTB/nB From initial nB ∼ nTB: ΩTB/ΩB ∼ mTB/mB × (mTB/Tsphaleron)3/2e−mTB/Tsphaleron Tsphaleron ∼ vEW , MTB ∼ TeV

(Chivukula and Walker 90; Bahr, Chivukula and Farhi 90; Harvey and Turner 90; Ellis et al 95; Sarkar 95; Gudnason, Kouvaris and Sannino 05)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Technicolor dark matter

Technocosmology (Nussinov 85)

Lightest Technibaryon as Asymmetric Dark Matter

The LTB abundance: ΩTB/ΩB = mTB/mB × nTB/nB From initial nB ∼ nTB: ΩTB/ΩB ∼ mTB/mB × (mTB/Tsphaleron)3/2e−mTB/Tsphaleron Tsphaleron ∼ vEW , MTB ∼ TeV

(Chivukula and Walker 90; Bahr, Chivukula and Farhi 90; Harvey and Turner 90; Ellis et al 95; Sarkar 95; Gudnason, Kouvaris and Sannino 05)

Scaled up ’technineutron’ now ruled out by recoil experiments σTN,p ∼ 10−32 cm2

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Extended Technicolor and fermion masses

ETC: (Eichten and Lane 80) New gauge theory with SM and TC fermions in the same multiplet.

ETC ¯ QR QL ¯ ψL, ¯ QL ψR,QR Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Extended Technicolor and fermion masses

ETC ¯ QR QL ¯ ψL, ¯ QL ψR,QR Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Extended Technicolor and fermion masses

ETC ¯ QR QL ¯ ψL, ¯ QL ψR,QR 1 Four fermion operators:

α ¯ QQ ¯ QQ Λ2

ETC

+ β ¯ QQ ¯ ψψ Λ2

ETC

+ γ ¯ ψψ ¯ ψψ Λ2

ETC

+ . . .

2 (Too!) Generically ΛETC > 103TeV to suppress FCNC’s:

(King 89; Evans and Ross 94; Appelquist and Shrock 02; Evans and Sannino 05; Christensen, Piai and Shrock 06)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Extended Technicolor and fermion masses

ETC ¯ QR QL ¯ ψL, ¯ QL ψR,QR 1 Four fermion operators:

α ¯ QQ ¯ QQ Λ2

ETC

+ β ¯ QQ ¯ ψψ Λ2

ETC

+ γ ¯ ψψ ¯ ψψ Λ2

ETC

+ . . .

2 (Too!) Generically ΛETC > 103TeV to suppress FCNC’s:

(King 89; Evans and Ross 94; Appelquist and Shrock 02; Evans and Sannino 05; Christensen, Piai and Shrock 06)

3 Focus on Technicolor sector Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Constraints from LEP

1 A minimal matter content in the TC sector is favored:

S ≡ −16πΠ′

W 3B(0) , T ≡

4π s2

W c2 W M2 Z

(ΠW 1W 1(0) − ΠW 3W 3(0))

W3 B Q , L

Snaive = ND

d(RTC) 6π

S = Snaive(1 + δ)

  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4

  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4

S T

68 % CL U≡0 sin2θlept sin2θeff mW prel. Γll mt mH

mt= 171.4 ± 2.1 GeV mH= 114...1000 GeV

(Kennedy and Lynn 89; Peskin and Takeuchi 90; Altarelli and Barbieri 91)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Minimal Technicolor Theory Space

2 EW charged Dirac Flavors. No QCD charges. QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ .

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Minimal Technicolor Theory Space

2 EW charged Dirac Flavors. No QCD charges. QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . ’Orthogonal TC’ ’QCD TC’ ’Symplectic TC’

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Minimal Technicolor Theory Space

2 EW charged Dirac Flavors. No QCD charges. QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . ’Orthogonal TC’ R real ’QCD TC’ R complex ’Symplectic TC’ R pseudo-real

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Minimal Technicolor Theory Space

2 EW charged Dirac Flavors. No QCD charges. QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . ’Orthogonal TC’ R real F of SO(N) ’QCD TC’ R complex F of SU(N) ’Symplectic TC’ R pseudo-real F of Sp(2N)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Minimal Technicolor Theory Space

2 EW charged Dirac Flavors. No QCD charges. QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . ’Orthogonal TC’ R real F of SO(N) SU(4)/SO(4) ’QCD TC’ R complex F of SU(N) GGB: SU(2) ’Symplectic TC’ R pseudo-real F of Sp(2N) SU(4)/Sp(4)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Minimal Technicolor Theory Space

2 EW charged Dirac Flavors. No QCD charges. QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . ’Orthogonal TC’ R real F of SO(N) SU(4)/SO(4) 3Π ⊕ 3 ⊕ ¯ 3 ’QCD TC’ R complex F of SU(N) GGB: SU(2) 3Π ’Symplectic TC’ R pseudo-real F of Sp(2N) SU(4)/Sp(4) 3Π ⊕ 1 ⊕ ¯ 1

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Minimal Technicolor Theory Space

2 EW charged Dirac Flavors. No QCD charges. QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . ’Orthogonal TC’ R real F of SO(N) SU(4)/SO(4) 3Π ⊕ 3 ⊕ ¯ 3 Π Ti T ∗

i

ΠT

  • ’QCD TC’

R complex F of SU(N) GGB: SU(2) 3Π Π = Π0 Π+ Π− Π0

  • ’Symplectic TC’

R pseudo-real F of Sp(2N) SU(4)/Sp(4) 3Π ⊕ 1 ⊕ ¯ 1 Π Ts T ∗

s

ΠT

  • Mads Toudal Frandsen

Technicolor Dark matter

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Minimal Technicolor Theory Space

2 EW charged Dirac Flavors. No QCD charges. QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . ’Orthogonal TC’ R real F of SO(N) SU(4)/SO(4) 3Π ⊕ 3 ⊕ ¯ 3 Π Ti T ∗

i

ΠT

  • Ti =

T 0 T + T − T 0∗

  • ’QCD TC’

R complex F of SU(N) GGB: SU(2) 3Π Π = Π0 Π+ Π− Π0

  • ’Symplectic TC’

R pseudo-real F of Sp(2N) SU(4)/Sp(4) 3Π ⊕ 1 ⊕ ¯ 1 Π Ts T ∗

s

ΠT

  • Ts =

T 0 T 0∗

  • Mads Toudal Frandsen

Technicolor Dark matter

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Dark Matter from Minimal Technicolor

TIMP: Complex scalar, charged under the U(1)TB symmetry QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . (1)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Dark Matter from Minimal Technicolor

TIMP: Complex scalar, charged under the U(1)TB symmetry QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . (1) ’iTIMP’

(M.T.F and F.Sannino 09)

’TIMP’

(Bahr, Chivukula and Farhi 90; Nussinov 92)

’TIMP’

(Ryttov and Sannino 08; Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 09)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Dark Matter from Minimal Technicolor

TIMP: Complex scalar, charged under the U(1)TB symmetry QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . (1) ’iTIMP’

(M.T.F and F.Sannino 09)

’TIMP’ 4 of SU(4)

(Bahr, Chivukula and Farhi 90; Nussinov 92)

’TIMP’

(Ryttov and Sannino 08; Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 09)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Dark Matter from Minimal Technicolor

TIMP: Complex scalar, charged under the U(1)TB symmetry QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . (1) ’iTIMP’

(M.T.F and F.Sannino 09)

’TIMP’ 4 of SU(4) ULDLULDL

(Bahr, Chivukula and Farhi 90; Nussinov 92)

’TIMP’

(Ryttov and Sannino 08; Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 09)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Dark Matter from Minimal Technicolor

TIMP: Complex scalar, charged under the U(1)TB symmetry QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . (1) ’iTIMP’

(M.T.F and F.Sannino 09)

’TIMP’ 4 of SU(4) ULDLULDL SM singlet

(Bahr, Chivukula and Farhi 90; Nussinov 92)

’TIMP’

(Ryttov and Sannino 08; Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 09)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Dark Matter from Minimal Technicolor

TIMP: Complex scalar, charged under the U(1)TB symmetry QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . (1) ’iTIMP’

(M.T.F and F.Sannino 09)

’TIMP’ 4 of SU(4) ULDLULDL SM singlet MT ∼ N3/2

TC FΠ

(Bahr, Chivukula and Farhi 90; Nussinov 92)

’TIMP’

(Ryttov and Sannino 08; Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 09)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Dark Matter from Minimal Technicolor

TIMP: Complex scalar, charged under the U(1)TB symmetry QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . (1) ’iTIMP’

(M.T.F and F.Sannino 09)

’TIMP’ 4 of SU(4) ULDLULDL SM singlet MT ∼ N3/2

TC FΠ

(Bahr, Chivukula and Farhi 90; Nussinov 92)

’TIMP’

(Ryttov and Sannino 08; Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 09)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Dark Matter from Minimal Technicolor

TIMP: Complex scalar, charged under the U(1)TB symmetry QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . (1) ’iTIMP’ R real

(M.T.F and F.Sannino 09)

’TIMP’ 4 of SU(4) ULDLULDL SM singlet MT ∼ N3/2

TC FΠ

(Bahr, Chivukula and Farhi 90; Nussinov 92)

’TIMP’ R pseudo-real

(Ryttov and Sannino 08; Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 09)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Dark Matter from Minimal Technicolor

TIMP: Complex scalar, charged under the U(1)TB symmetry QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . (1) ’iTIMP’ R real T 0 ∼ ULDL

(M.T.F and F.Sannino 09)

’TIMP’ 4 of SU(4) ULDLULDL SM singlet MT ∼ N3/2

TC FΠ

(Bahr, Chivukula and Farhi 90; Nussinov 92)

’TIMP’ R pseudo-real T 0 ∼ ULDL

(Ryttov and Sannino 08; Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 09)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Dark Matter from Minimal Technicolor

TIMP: Complex scalar, charged under the U(1)TB symmetry QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . (1) ’iTIMP’ R real T 0 ∼ ULDL Iso-spin 0 GB

(M.T.F and F.Sannino 09)

’TIMP’ 4 of SU(4) ULDLULDL SM singlet MT ∼ N3/2

TC FΠ

(Bahr, Chivukula and Farhi 90; Nussinov 92)

’TIMP’ R pseudo-real T 0 ∼ ULDL SM singlet GB

(Ryttov and Sannino 08; Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 09)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Dark Matter from Minimal Technicolor

TIMP: Complex scalar, charged under the U(1)TB symmetry QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . (1) ’iTIMP’ R real T 0 ∼ ULDL Iso-spin 0 GB MT 0 ∼ g FΠ

(M.T.F and F.Sannino 09)

’TIMP’ 4 of SU(4) ULDLULDL SM singlet MT ∼ N3/2

TC FΠ

(Bahr, Chivukula and Farhi 90; Nussinov 92)

’TIMP’ R pseudo-real T 0 ∼ ULDL SM singlet GB M2

T 0 ∼ −g2 F 2 Π

(Ryttov and Sannino 08; Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 09)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Dark Matter from Minimal Technicolor

TIMP: Complex scalar, charged under the U(1)TB symmetry QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ . (1) ’iTIMP’ R real T 0 ∼ ULDL Iso-spin 0 GB MT 0 ∼ g FΠ

(M.T.F and F.Sannino 09)

’TIMP’ 4 of SU(4) ULDLULDL SM singlet MT ∼ N3/2

TC FΠ

(Bahr, Chivukula and Farhi 90; Nussinov 92)

’TIMP’ R pseudo-real T 0 ∼ ULDL SM singlet GB M2

T 0 ∼ −g2 F 2 Π

(Ryttov and Sannino 08; Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 09) (Other candidates in MT: Gudnason, Kouvaris and Sannino 05; Kainulainen, Virkaj¨ arvi and Tuominen 06, 09, 10; Kouvaris 07; Khlopov and Kouvaris 08)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Direct detection

Charge radius LB = ie dB

Λ2 T ∗←

→ ∂µT ∂νF µν .

(Bagnasco, Dine and Thomas 93)

H γ T T N N T T N N

Composite Higgs LYuk

H

= dHvevT ∗TH or LGB

H

= d13

Λ H∂µT ∗∂µT . (M.T.F and Sannino 09)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Direct detection

Charge radius LB = ie dB

Λ2 T ∗←

→ ∂µT ∂νF µν .

(Bagnasco, Dine and Thomas 93)

H γ T T N N T T N N

Composite Higgs LYuk

H

= dHvevT ∗TH or LGB

H

= d13

Λ H∂µT ∗∂µT . (M.T.F and Sannino 09)

For colored baryons: Gluonic polarizabilities

(Nussinov 92 ; Chivukula et al 92)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Direct detection

Charge radius LB = ie dB

Λ2 T ∗←

→ ∂µT ∂νF µν .

(Bagnasco, Dine and Thomas 93)

H γ T T N N T T N N

Composite Higgs LYuk

H

= dHvevT ∗TH or LGB

H

= d13

Λ H∂µT ∗∂µT . (M.T.F and Sannino 09)

For colored baryons: Gluonic polarizabilities

(Nussinov 92 ; Chivukula et al 92)

For spin-1/2 baryons: Dipole moments

(Nussinov 92 ; Bagnasco, Dine and Thomas 93)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Direct Detection Limits on TIMPs

1 TeV d123 mH200 dB 0.3 0.3

50 100 200 500 1000 1048 1046 1044 1042 1040 mT GeV Σnucleon cm2

XENON100 CDMS Ge

(Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 09; Belyaev, M.T.F, Sannino and Sarkar; Exclusion limits courtesy of C. Mccabe 10)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Direct Detection Limits on TIMPs

1 TeV d123 mH200 dB 0.3 0.3

50 100 200 500 1000 1048 1046 1044 1042 1040 mT GeV Σnucleon cm2

XENON100 CDMS Ge

(Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 09; Belyaev, M.T.F, Sannino and Sarkar; Exclusion limits courtesy of C. Mccabe 10)

Indirect detection of Decaying Dark Matter: (Nardi, Sannino and

Strumia 09)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

LHC signatures of (i)TIMPs

(i)TIMP Invisible Higgs

(Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 08 ; Godbole, Guchait, Mazumdar, Moretti and Roy 03).

T T∗ ℓ+ ℓ− q ¯ q H Z Z,R1,2

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

LHC signatures of (i)TIMPs

(i)TIMP Invisible Higgs

(Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 08 ; Godbole, Guchait, Mazumdar, Moretti and Roy 03).

iTIMP ’Antlers’

(M.T.F and Sannino 09 ; Han, Kim and Song 09)

T T∗ ℓ+ ℓ− q ¯ q H Z Z,R1,2

¯ q q Z,R1,2 W∓ T0∗ T0 W± T± T±∗

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

LHC signatures of (i)TIMPs

(i)TIMP Invisible Higgs

(Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 08 ; Godbole, Guchait, Mazumdar, Moretti and Roy 03).

iTIMP ’Antlers’

(M.T.F and Sannino 09 ; Han, Kim and Song 09)

T T∗ ℓ+ ℓ− q ¯ q H Z Z,R1,2

¯ q q Z,R1,2 W∓ T0∗ T0 W± T± T±∗

Note: The same signatures from a new stable heavy lepton!

(M.T.F, Masina and Sannino 09 ; Antipin, Heikinheimo, Tuominen 09)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

(i)TIMP missing energy signals

T T ∗ ℓ+ ℓ− q ¯ q H Z Z, R1,2

1 10 10 2 10 3 100 200 300 400 ZZ WW MH=160 MH=200 MH=300 MA=500,gt=5,S=0.3

Missing pT (GeV) Number of events/5 GeV @ 100 fb-1

1 10 10 2 10 3 100 200 300 400 ZZ WW MH=160 MH=300 MH=450 MA=750,gt=5,S=0.3

Missing pT (GeV) Number of events/5 GeV @ 100 fb-1

(Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 08; Godbole, Guchait, Mazumdar, Moretti and Roy 03).

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Walking Technicolor

1 TC sector: Walking reduces the full S-parameter

(Sundrum and Hsu 92; Appelquist and Sannino 98; Harada, Kurachi and Yamawaki 03; Kurachi and Shrock 06)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Walking Technicolor

1 TC sector: Walking reduces the full S-parameter

(Sundrum and Hsu 92; Appelquist and Sannino 98; Harada, Kurachi and Yamawaki 03; Kurachi and Shrock 06)

2 ETC sector: Walking reduces tension between SM fermion

masses and FCNC’s

(Holdom 81, 85; Yamawaki, Bando and Matumoto 86; Appelquist, Karabali and Wijewardhana 86)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Conformal window and Walking

(Fig:Sannino, cp3-origins 09)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

ETC fermion masses and Walking

1 Four fermion operators:

α ¯ QQ ¯ QQ Λ2

ETC

+ β ¯ QQ ¯ ψψ Λ2

ETC

+ γ ¯ ψψ ¯ ψψ Λ2

ETC

+ . . .

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

ETC fermion masses and Walking

1 Four fermion operators:

α ¯ QQ ¯ QQ Λ2

ETC

+ β ¯ QQ ¯ ψψ Λ2

ETC

+ γ ¯ ψψ ¯ ψψ Λ2

ETC

+ . . .

2 Fermion masses:

Mψ ∼ ¯ QQETC Λ2

ETC

∼ d(RTC)Λ3−γ

TC Λγ ETC

Λ2

ETC

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

ETC fermion masses and Walking

1 Four fermion operators:

α ¯ QQ ¯ QQ Λ2

ETC

+ β ¯ QQ ¯ ψψ Λ2

ETC

+ γ ¯ ψψ ¯ ψψ Λ2

ETC

+ . . .

2 Fermion masses:

Mψ ∼ ¯ QQETC Λ2

ETC

∼ d(RTC)Λ3−γ

TC Λγ ETC

Λ2

ETC

3 Condensate enhancement from Walking:

< ¯ QQ >ETC∼ (ΛETC ΛTC )γ(α∗) < ¯ QQ >TC

(Holdom 81, 85; Yamawaki, Bando and Matumoto 86; Appelquist, Karabali and Wijewardhana 86)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

ETC fermion masses and Walking

1 Four fermion operators:

α ¯ QQ ¯ QQ Λ2

ETC

+ β ¯ QQ ¯ ψψ Λ2

ETC

+ γ ¯ ψψ ¯ ψψ Λ2

ETC

+ . . .

2 Fermion masses:

Mψ ∼ ¯ QQETC Λ2

ETC

∼ d(RTC)Λ3−γ

TC Λγ ETC

Λ2

ETC

3 Condensate enhancement from Walking:

< ¯ QQ >ETC∼ (ΛETC ΛTC )γ(α∗) < ¯ QQ >TC

(Holdom 81, 85; Yamawaki, Bando and Matumoto 86; Appelquist, Karabali and Wijewardhana 86)

4 (Too) Naively ΛETC > 103TeV to suppress FCNC’s:

(King 89; Evans and Ross 94; Appelquist and Shrock 02; Evans and Sannino 05; Christensen, Piai and Shrock 06)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Analytical approaches to the conformal window

1 Ladder approximation: αc =

π 3C2(R) , α∗ 4π = − β0 β1.

(Appelquist, Lane and Muhanta 88; Cohen and Georgi 89; Sannino and Tuominen 04; Dietrich and Sannino 06; Ryttov and Sannino 07)

2 All-orders beta function conjecture(s)

(Ryttov and Sannino 08; Antipin and Tuominen 09; Dietrich 09)

3 Dualities

(Sannino 09)

4 Compactification approach

(Unsal and Poppitz 09; Ogilvie and Myers 09;)

5 Worldline formalism

(Armoni 09)

6 Holography (Hong and Yee 06; Alvares, Evans, Gebauer and Weatherill

09)

7 Metric Confinenement MC and Causal Analytic couplings

(Oehme and Zimmerman 80; Nishijima 86; Oehme 1990; Gardi and Grunberg 98; M.T.F, Pickup and Teper 10)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Conformal window lower bounds: MC and AO

N f

I

N f

II,SD

N f

II,MC

N f

CA

N f

II,AO

2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5 10 15 20 25 NC N f Fundamental rep 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 NC N f Adjoint rep 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 1 2 3 4 NC N f 2index symmetric rep 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5 10 15 NC N f 2AS

(M.T.F, T. Pickup and M. Teper 10).

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Some Minimal Models of Walking Technicolor

QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ .. (2)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Some Minimal Models of Walking Technicolor

QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ .. (2) MWT model: (Sannino and Tuominen 04) GTC = SU(2). R = Adj. Leptons.

(Dietrich, Sannino and Tuominen 05)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Some Minimal Models of Walking Technicolor

QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ .. (2) MWT model: (Sannino and Tuominen 04) GTC = SU(2). R = Adj. Leptons.

(Dietrich, Sannino and Tuominen 05)

OMT model GTC = SO(4)

(M.T.F and F.Sannino 09)

NMWT model GTC = SU(3)

(Sannino and Tuominen 04)

UMT model GTC = SU(2)

(Ryttov and Sannino 08)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Some Minimal Models of Walking Technicolor

QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ .. (2) MWT model: (Sannino and Tuominen 04) GTC = SU(2). R = Adj. Leptons.

(Dietrich, Sannino and Tuominen 05)

OMT model GTC = SO(4) R = F

(M.T.F and F.Sannino 09)

NMWT model GTC = SU(3) R = 2S

(Sannino and Tuominen 04)

UMT model GTC = SU(2) R = F, Adj

(Ryttov and Sannino 08)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Some Minimal Models of Walking Technicolor

QL =

  • U+1/2

L

, D−1/2

L

T , U+1/2

R

, D−1/2

R

; λ .. (2) MWT model: (Sannino and Tuominen 04) GTC = SU(2). R = Adj. Leptons.

(Dietrich, Sannino and Tuominen 05)

OMT model GTC = SO(4) R = F iTIMP

(M.T.F and F.Sannino 09)

NMWT model GTC = SU(3) R = 2S

(Sannino and Tuominen 04)

UMT model GTC = SU(2) R = F, Adj TIMP

(Ryttov and Sannino 08)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Conformal window lower bounds: MC and AO

N f

I

N f

II,SD

N f

II,MC

N f

CA

N f

II,AO

2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5 10 15 20 25 NC N f Fundamental rep 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 NC N f Adjoint rep 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 1 2 3 4 NC N f 2index symmetric rep 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5 10 15 NC N f 2AS

(M.T.F, T. Pickup and M. Teper 10).

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Lattice simulations

(Dedicated collaborations: Lattice Strong Dynamics (US) ; Strong BSM (EU) )

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

EFT for strong dynamics @ LHC

common sector: SUL(2) × SUR(2) × UTB(1) → SUV (2) × UTB(1) . New states: Lightest (axial)-vector triplets and scalar R±,0

1

, R±,0

2

, H. TIMPs Input parameters and constraints: e, GF, MZ; S, Sum Rules. Main free parameters: MA, ˜ g, MH.

(Appelquist, Da Silva and Sannino 99; Foadi, M.T.F, Ryttov and Sannino

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

EFT for strong dynamics @ LHC

common sector: SUL(2) × SUR(2) × UTB(1) → SUV (2) × UTB(1) . New states: Lightest (axial)-vector triplets and scalar R±,0

1

, R±,0

2

, H. TIMPs Input parameters and constraints: e, GF, MZ; S, Sum Rules. Main free parameters: MA, ˜ g, MH.

(Appelquist, Da Silva and Sannino 99; Foadi, M.T.F, Ryttov and Sannino

EFTs for ’BESS’ models, ’3-site/4-site’ models and LSTC

(Casalbuoni, Deandrea, De Curtis, Dominici, Gatto, Grazzini 95; He et al 08; Lane and Martin 09)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Parameter space

(Foadi, M.T.F and Sannino 07 ; Belyaev, Foadi, M.T.F, J¨ arvinen, Pukhov, Sannino 08)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Mass spectrum, imposing S and WSR1

MA (TeV) Mass Spectrum (TeV)

2 ,0

1 ,0

S=0.3 g ˜=5 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2

MA (TeV) Mass Spectrum (TeV)

2 ,0

1 ,0

S=0.3 g ˜=2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2

Figure: R1,2 spectrum.

(Foadi, M.T.F, Ryttov and Sannino 08)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

LHC Phenomenology

Basic phenomenology controlled by ˜ g, MA, MH.

g/˜ g R1,2 ˜ g R1,2

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

LHC Phenomenology

Basic phenomenology controlled by ˜ g, MA, MH.

g/˜ g R1,2 ˜ g R1,2

Different decay channels probe R1, R2 and H.

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

LHC Phenomenology

Basic phenomenology controlled by ˜ g, MA, MH.

g/˜ g R1,2 ˜ g R1,2

Different decay channels probe R1, R2 and H.

Di-lepton: R0

1,2 → ℓ+ℓ−. Single top: R± 1,2 → tb

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

LHC Phenomenology

Basic phenomenology controlled by ˜ g, MA, MH.

g/˜ g R1,2 ˜ g R1,2

Different decay channels probe R1, R2 and H.

Di-lepton: R0

1,2 → ℓ+ℓ−. Single top: R± 1,2 → tb

Di-boson: R2 → ZW /WW .

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

LHC Phenomenology

Basic phenomenology controlled by ˜ g, MA, MH.

g/˜ g R1,2 ˜ g R1,2

Different decay channels probe R1, R2 and H.

Di-lepton: R0

1,2 → ℓ+ℓ−. Single top: R± 1,2 → tb

Di-boson: R2 → ZW /WW . Higgs-Strahlung: R1 → HZ/HW .

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

LHC Phenomenology

Basic phenomenology controlled by ˜ g, MA, MH.

g/˜ g R1,2 ˜ g R1,2

Different decay channels probe R1, R2 and H.

Di-lepton: R0

1,2 → ℓ+ℓ−. Single top: R± 1,2 → tb

Di-boson: R2 → ZW /WW . Higgs-Strahlung: R1 → HZ/HW . Higgs-Decays: H → ZZ/WW (b¯ b?).

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

LHC Phenomenology

Basic phenomenology controlled by ˜ g, MA, MH.

g/˜ g R1,2 ˜ g R1,2

Different decay channels probe R1, R2 and H.

Di-lepton: R0

1,2 → ℓ+ℓ−. Single top: R± 1,2 → tb

Di-boson: R2 → ZW /WW . Higgs-Strahlung: R1 → HZ/HW . Higgs-Decays: H → ZZ/WW (b¯ b?). boosted tops, W, Z and H

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

LHC Phenomenology

Basic phenomenology controlled by ˜ g, MA, MH.

g/˜ g R1,2 ˜ g R1,2

Different decay channels probe R1, R2 and H.

Di-lepton: R0

1,2 → ℓ+ℓ−. Single top: R± 1,2 → tb

Di-boson: R2 → ZW /WW . Higgs-Strahlung: R1 → HZ/HW . Higgs-Decays: H → ZZ/WW (b¯ b?). boosted tops, W, Z and H

Lattice can (in principle) narrow down parameter space for each model

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-86
SLIDE 86

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

LHC Phenomenology

Basic phenomenology controlled by ˜ g, MA, MH.

g/˜ g R1,2 ˜ g R1,2

Different decay channels probe R1, R2 and H.

Di-lepton: R0

1,2 → ℓ+ℓ−. Single top: R± 1,2 → tb

Di-boson: R2 → ZW /WW . Higgs-Strahlung: R1 → HZ/HW . Higgs-Decays: H → ZZ/WW (b¯ b?). boosted tops, W, Z and H

Lattice can (in principle) narrow down parameter space for each model

MWT/OMT, NMWT, UMT etc...

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Vector Production

Mass (TeV) σ(pb)

2

1

S=0.3 g ˜=2 10

  • 6

10

  • 5

10

  • 4

10

  • 3

10

  • 2

10

  • 1

1 10 10 2 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2

Mass (TeV) σ(pb)

2

1

S=0.3 g ˜=5 10

  • 5

10

  • 4

10

  • 3

10

  • 2

10

  • 1

1 10 10 2 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2

Figure: DY production of R1,2.

(Belyaev, Foadi, M.T.F, J¨ arvinen, Pukhov, Sannino 08)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Vector BRs

Mass (TeV) BR(R±

1)

tb ff nl W±Z W±H S=0.3 g ˜=2 10

  • 6

10

  • 5

10

  • 4

10

  • 3

10

  • 2

10

  • 1

1 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2

Mass (TeV) BR(R±

1)

tb ff nl W±Z W±H S=0.3 g ˜=5 10

  • 6

10

  • 5

10

  • 4

10

  • 3

10

  • 2

10

  • 1

1 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2

Figure: BR’s of R1.

(Belyaev, Foadi, M.T.F, J¨ arvinen, Pukhov, Sannino 08)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-89
SLIDE 89

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

ℓ+ℓ− signature @ LHC using CalcHEP

1 10 10 2 10 3 10 4 500 1000 1500 2000 S=0.3 g ˜=2

Mll (GeV) Number of events/20 GeV @ 100 fb-1

1 10 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 500 1000 1500 2000 S=0.3 g ˜=2

MT

l (GeV)

Number of events/20 GeV @ 100 fb-1

Figure: Left: Dilepton invariant mass distributions Mℓℓ for pp → R0

1,2 → ℓ+ℓ−

Right: Single lepton transverse mass distributions MT

ℓ pp → R± 1,2 → ℓ±

(Belyaev, Foadi, M.T.F, J¨ arvinen, Pukhov, Sannino 08)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-90
SLIDE 90

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Results for tb

), GeV rec M(tb 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 (tb) rec d M ev d N 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

b t → pp t t → pp b w+b → pp w+jj → pp

M(tb), GeV 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 d M(tb) ev d N 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Figure: Reconstructed (left plot) and partonic (right plot) invariant mass

  • f top and b-quarks after final cuts. Distributions normalized to 30 fb−1.

(A. Belyaev, M.T.F and A.Sherstnev in preparation)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-91
SLIDE 91

Technicolor and Technibaryon Dark Matter Minimal Walking Technicolor and (i)TIMPs LHC Phenomenology of MWT and (i)TIMPs

Di-boson vs Higgs-strahlung

Z, R2 ¯ q q W/Z W Z, R1 ¯ q q W/Z H

10

  • 1

1 10 10 2 500 1000 1500 2000 S=0.3 g ˜=5

MT

3l (GeV)

Number of events/20 GeV @ 100 fb-1

MA= 700 GeV, MH=200 S=0.3,s=0 g ~=5 pp → WH → WZZ pp → ZH → ZZZ pp → WZZ background pp → ZZZ background

MWZZ(ZZZ) (GeV) Events/15 GeV

1 10 10 2 10 3 10 4 400 600 800 1000 1200

(Belyaev, Foadi, M.T.F, J¨ arvinen, Pukhov, Sannino 08)

Mads Toudal Frandsen Technicolor Dark matter

slide-92
SLIDE 92

Symmetric vs Asymmetric TIMPs

Φ complex composite scalar with uncharged components ~ λs motivated by achieving Minimality & Walking (Dynamical realization of scalar singlet DM models)

(Griest & Seckel 85) (Belyaev, M.T.F, Sarkar & Sannino 10)

Can pNGB TIMPs have a symmetric relic density?

Yield and relic density in the presence of asymmetry: α=0 Specific model example: 'Ultra Minimal TC' (Ryttov & Sannino 09)

slide-93
SLIDE 93

Symmetric vs Asymmetric TIMPs TIMPs with charged constituents

Higgs interactions of T0 identical to those of φ In addition T0 has contact interactions with SM gauge bosons, due to EW charges of U, D: (Preskill 81; Chadha and Peskin 81) T may also have charge radius interaction : (Belyaev, M.T.F, Sarkar & Sannino 10) α=0 Symmetric relic density of T0

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Back to light ADM

Most nuclear recoil experiments optimized to heavy WIMPs with little sensitivity to low mass particles O(keV) recoil energies Recently several experiments have reported events close to threshold Region of interest for Solar neutrinos

~ 5 GeV Dark Matter candidates with ~10-39 cm2 spin-independent cross-section remains viable. Spin-dependent cross-sections up to 10-36 cm2

(Schwetz @IDM 10)

slide-95
SLIDE 95

Signatures of light ADM

Charge radius can provide ~10-39 cm2 SI cross-sections

Higgs exchange can naturally provide cross-section up to ~10-41 cm2

Similar to TIMPs light ADM may be a composite scalar or fermion Large SI and SD cross-sections of fermionic ADM can be realized via magnetic moment interactions

Interesting LHC signatures like for TIMPs incl 'monojets'

(Sigurdson et al 2006, Gardner 08, Heo 09, Masso et al 09, An et al 10, Banks et al 10, Barger et al 10...) (Goodman et al 10, Bai, Fox & Harnik 10) (Fit Courtesy of McCabe, McCabe 10) MH=150

slide-96
SLIDE 96

Long range self-interactions are more tightly constrained by the 'Bullet cluster'

(Feng, Kaplinghat and Yu 10)

Astrophysical aspects of light ADM

slide-97
SLIDE 97
slide-98
SLIDE 98
slide-99
SLIDE 99
slide-100
SLIDE 100
slide-101
SLIDE 101
slide-102
SLIDE 102
slide-103
SLIDE 103

Recent study of effects of DM on white dwarves and neutron stars, see e.g. (Fairbairn and McCullough 10; Kouvaris 10)

slide-104
SLIDE 104

Summary

  • Asymmetric Dark Matter motivated by the

asymmetry of baryonic matter and the wish to explain why ΩDM / ΩB ~ O(1)

  • Technicolor is a natural and dynamical model of

EWSB

  • ~ TeV scale ADM (Technibaryon) and

~ 100 GeV scale ADM (pseudo Goldstone Boson TIMPs) arise in (Minimal Walking) Technicolor models of DEWSB. ~ GeV scale ADM (Dark Baryons) arise from strong dynamics in Hidden/Mirror/Unbaryon sectors, and is motivated in addition by problems in structure formation and potentially in helioseismology.

  • Variety of signatures can test the scenarios
slide-105
SLIDE 105

DM Production mechanisms

Symmetric vs. asymmetric relics Freeze out vs. freeze-in Illustrative and simple model: A complex composite scalar

(Griest & Seckel 85) (Belyaev, M.T.F, Sarkar & Sannino 10) (Asaka, Ishiwata & Moroi 05) (Hall, Jedamzik, March-Russel and West 10)