Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Change and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

behavior in a dynamic environment with costs of climate
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Change and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Change and Heterogeneous Technologies: an Experiment Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Florida State University Svetlana


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions

Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Change and Heterogeneous Technologies: an Experiment

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin

Florida State University

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Pollution, depletion of resources and climate change lead to environmental damage and costs

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Pollution, depletion of resources and climate change lead to environmental damage and costs

externality problems

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Pollution, depletion of resources and climate change lead to environmental damage and costs

externality problems dynamic

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Pollution, depletion of resources and climate change lead to environmental damage and costs

externality problems dynamic

Insu¢cient response to institutional arrangements

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Pollution, depletion of resources and climate change lead to environmental damage and costs

externality problems dynamic

Insu¢cient response to institutional arrangements The current climate situation is likely matching or exceeding the worst-case scenarios predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which issued warnings in 2007.

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Pollution, depletion of resources and climate change lead to environmental damage and costs

externality problems dynamic

Insu¢cient response to institutional arrangements The current climate situation is likely matching or exceeding the worst-case scenarios predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which issued warnings in 2007. New features of the environment

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Pollution, depletion of resources and climate change lead to environmental damage and costs

externality problems dynamic

Insu¢cient response to institutional arrangements The current climate situation is likely matching or exceeding the worst-case scenarios predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which issued warnings in 2007. New features of the environment

Slow reversability: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) determined that it would take more than 1,000 years to undo changes in temperature, sea level and rainfall after CO2 emissions had been completely stopped (NOAA, 2009)

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Some regional institutions have been relatively successful

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Some regional institutions have been relatively successful

European Union Emission Trading System

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Some regional institutions have been relatively successful

European Union Emission Trading System Clean Air Act (US)

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Some regional institutions have been relatively successful

European Union Emission Trading System Clean Air Act (US)

Insu¢cient results of international agreements (for example Kyoto treaty)

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Some regional institutions have been relatively successful

European Union Emission Trading System Clean Air Act (US)

Insu¢cient results of international agreements (for example Kyoto treaty) One of the reasons is the con‡ict between developed and developing nations (the latter having limited access to clean technologies and unwilling to jeopardize their economic growth).

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Some regional institutions have been relatively successful

European Union Emission Trading System Clean Air Act (US)

Insu¢cient results of international agreements (for example Kyoto treaty) One of the reasons is the con‡ict between developed and developing nations (the latter having limited access to clean technologies and unwilling to jeopardize their economic growth). Technological heterogeneity is one of the challenges

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Theoretical models of pollution and environmental damage (Heal and Tarui, 2008, Bretschger and Smulders, 2007, Breton, Sbragia and Zaccour, 2008, Mason, Polasky and Tarui, 2008, Dutta and Radner, 2004, Pindyck, 2009, etc.).

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Theoretical models of pollution and environmental damage (Heal and Tarui, 2008, Bretschger and Smulders, 2007, Breton, Sbragia and Zaccour, 2008, Mason, Polasky and Tarui, 2008, Dutta and Radner, 2004, Pindyck, 2009, etc.). Do human decision-makers act as agents in models?

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Theoretical models of pollution and environmental damage (Heal and Tarui, 2008, Bretschger and Smulders, 2007, Breton, Sbragia and Zaccour, 2008, Mason, Polasky and Tarui, 2008, Dutta and Radner, 2004, Pindyck, 2009, etc.). Do human decision-makers act as agents in models? In this study we use laboratory experiments to study decisions

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Theoretical models of pollution and environmental damage (Heal and Tarui, 2008, Bretschger and Smulders, 2007, Breton, Sbragia and Zaccour, 2008, Mason, Polasky and Tarui, 2008, Dutta and Radner, 2004, Pindyck, 2009, etc.). Do human decision-makers act as agents in models? In this study we use laboratory experiments to study decisions in an environment with costs of pollution and climate change (dynamic public bad) and

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Motivation

Theoretical models of pollution and environmental damage (Heal and Tarui, 2008, Bretschger and Smulders, 2007, Breton, Sbragia and Zaccour, 2008, Mason, Polasky and Tarui, 2008, Dutta and Radner, 2004, Pindyck, 2009, etc.). Do human decision-makers act as agents in models? In this study we use laboratory experiments to study decisions in an environment with costs of pollution and climate change (dynamic public bad) and heterogeneous technologies

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Model

Model There are n risk neutral players. In period t player i has endowment m and chooses production allocation xit 2 [0, m], which yields revenue axit, a > 1. Production by i in period t generates emissions eit = qixit; with technology qi 0; (if qi = 0 ) clean technology; baseline here qi = 1) Total level of emissions in period t, Et = ∑n

i=1 qixit leads to

pollution. Pollution level at the end of period t, Yt, evolves as Yt = γYt1 + Et; Y0 = 0. where, γ 2 [0, 1] - retention rate of pollution.

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Model

Baseline. Player i’s payo¤ in period t is πit = m xit + axit bγYt1. b > 0 is the cost of unit of pollution. πit = m + (a 1)xit bγ

t1

k=1

γt1kEk. where Et = ∑n

i=1 qixit.

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Model

In each period there is a continuation probability β 2 (0, 1). The expected payo¤ of player i in period t is Πit = ˜ Πi,t1 +

k=t

βktπik. where, ˜ Πi,t1 is the payo¤ player i has accumulated by the beginning of period t.

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Model

Benchmark solution concepts: Markov perfect Nash Equilibrium (NE) and social optimum (SO) Proposition 1. The NE pro…le of inputs for a player with emission factor qi is to choose xit = 0, 8t, if qi > ¯ qN; choose xit = m, 8t, if qi < ¯ qN; and choose 8xit 2 [0, m], 8t, if qi = ¯

  • qN. Here,

¯ qN = a 1 b 1 βγ 1

  • .

(1) Proposition 2. The SO pro…le of inputs for a player with emission factor qi is to choose xit = 0, 8t, if qi > ¯ qS; choose xit = m, 8t, if qi < ¯ qS; and choose 8xit 2 [0, m], 8t, if qi = ¯

  • qS. Here,

¯ qS = a 1 bn 1 βγ 1

  • .

(2)

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions

Experiment Design n = 2, m = 10, a = 5, b = 1, γ = 0.75, β = 0.95

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions

Experiment Design n = 2, m = 10, a = 5, b = 1, γ = 0.75, β = 0.95 Treatments (q1, q2) (1,1) (1,1.25) (1,0.75) Sessions 2 2 2 Subjects 44 44 42 Groups 22 22 21 NE (x1t, x2t) (m, m) (m, m) (m, m) SO (x1t, x2t) (0, 0) (0, 0) (0, m)

Table: Experimental design and theoretical predictions for input levels (x1t, x2t), by treatment.

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions

Experiment Design n = 2, m = 10, a = 5, b = 1, γ = 0.75, β = 0.95 Treatments (q1, q2) (1,1) (1,1.25) (1,0.75) Sessions 2 2 2 Subjects 44 44 42 Groups 22 22 21 NE (x1t, x2t) (m, m) (m, m) (m, m) SO (x1t, x2t) (0, 0) (0, 0) (0, m)

Table: Experimental design and theoretical predictions for input levels (x1t, x2t), by treatment. Look at: Production decision, xt Pollution, Yt Payo¤s, ˜ Πt

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions

Theoretical predictions

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Production decision Pollution Payo¤s Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Production decision Pollution Payo¤s

Result 1: There are no di¤erences in behavior across types within the same treatment. Result 2: Production input levels are lower than the NE but higher than the SO in all treatments. In treatment (1, 1.25), the input levels are lowest starting from period 7 of part 1; furthermore, in part 2 they are approximately halfway between the SO and NE levels (lowest).

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Production decision Pollution Payo¤s Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Production decision Pollution Payo¤s

Result 3: Pollution is between the NE and SO levels in all treatments. In part 1, the levels of pollution are the same for treatments (1, 1) and (1, 1.25) and lower for treatment (1, 0.75). With experience, in part 2, treatment (1, 1.25) has the lowest pollution due to strong adjustment of production behavior.

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Production decision Pollution Payo¤s Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions Production decision Pollution Payo¤s

Result 4: In part 1, the ranking of payo¤s is consistent with the NE, while subjects’ payo¤s are higher than the NE in all treatments. In part 2, payo¤s in treatment (1, 1.25) reached the same payo¤ level as (1, 1).

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions

Studied behavior in an environments with a dynamic public bad (costs of pollution) and heterogeneous pollution propensity

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions

Studied behavior in an environments with a dynamic public bad (costs of pollution) and heterogeneous pollution propensity Treatment variable: con…gurations of technological heterogeneity (1, 1.25), (1, 1), (1, 0.75).

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions

Studied behavior in an environments with a dynamic public bad (costs of pollution) and heterogeneous pollution propensity Treatment variable: con…gurations of technological heterogeneity (1, 1.25), (1, 1), (1, 0.75). Markov perfect NE and social optimum solution benchmarks

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions

Studied behavior in an environments with a dynamic public bad (costs of pollution) and heterogeneous pollution propensity Treatment variable: con…gurations of technological heterogeneity (1, 1.25), (1, 1), (1, 0.75). Markov perfect NE and social optimum solution benchmarks Production and pollution are below NE but above SO levels in all treatments

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions

Studied behavior in an environments with a dynamic public bad (costs of pollution) and heterogeneous pollution propensity Treatment variable: con…gurations of technological heterogeneity (1, 1.25), (1, 1), (1, 0.75). Markov perfect NE and social optimum solution benchmarks Production and pollution are below NE but above SO levels in all treatments No di¤erence in behavior across types. Developing countries would likely not curb emissions at the expense of production

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions

Sustainability is reached in (1, 0.75) in part 1 and in (1, 1.25) and (1, 0.75) in part 2

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions

Sustainability is reached in (1, 0.75) in part 1 and in (1, 1.25) and (1, 0.75) in part 2 Treatment (1, 1.25) corresponds with greatest adjustment

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions

Sustainability is reached in (1, 0.75) in part 1 and in (1, 1.25) and (1, 0.75) in part 2 Treatment (1, 1.25) corresponds with greatest adjustment Under unfavorable conditions countries are more likely to curb emissions and reach sustainability but only with experience.

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Introduction Theory Experiment Design Results Conclusions

Sustainability is reached in (1, 0.75) in part 1 and in (1, 1.25) and (1, 0.75) in part 2 Treatment (1, 1.25) corresponds with greatest adjustment Under unfavorable conditions countries are more likely to curb emissions and reach sustainability but only with experience. Regulation may be more necessary in the presence of moderate damage.

Svetlana Pevnitskaya and Dmitry Ryvkin Behavior in a Dynamic Environment with Costs of Climate Chang