Cell based therapy in inflammatory liver disease- the MERLIN trial - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Cell based therapy in inflammatory liver disease- the MERLIN trial - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Cell based therapy in inflammatory liver disease- the MERLIN trial Dr Ashnila Janmohamed Clinical research fellow in Hepatology Birmingham Rare Disease Symposium 18 May 2018 Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) Heterogeneous population of
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC)
Le Blanc K & Mougiakakos. Nature reviews 2012
- Heterogeneous
population of precursor cells
- Multiple sources of MSC
Potential applications of MSC in liver disease
Forbes & Newsome. J Hep 2012
MSC have a pleiotropy of action on the immune system
Alfaifi M et al. J Hep 2018
MERLIN programme: MEsenchymal stromal cells to Reduce Liver INflammation
Pintail Orbsen UoB NHSBT UNIPD Efficacy Mechanism
- f action
Clinical trial
CD362+ MSC
Immune-mediated liver disease
Webb GJ et al. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis 2018
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) share the same immune-pathogenesis
- Multifactorial-
genetic and environmental factors
- Complex disease
pathogenesis
MSC
Webb GJ et al. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis 2018
Tregs ê T cells é TH1é TH17 é Macrophages é
Studies
- Experimental
ØIn vivo studies in 3 murine models: UC-MSC effect on hepatic inflammatory activity (ALT and CD45) and T cell infiltration ØIn vitro studies: UC-MSC effect on T cell proliferation and activation using tissues from patients with PSC
- Clinical trial
Ø Safety and efficacy of UC-MSC in patients with PSC and AIH
In vivo models of inflammatory liver injury
- Ovalbumin (Ova)- Bil mouse model: Transgenic
mouse model of immune-mediated hepatobiliary injury
- C57BL/6 mice: Carbon-tetrachloride-induced liver
injury (CCL4)
- Chronic Mdr2 KO/FVB mouse model: Model of
sclerosing cholangitis
Human CD362+ UC-MSC reduce inflammation in 3 mouse models of inflammatory livery injury
U n i n j u r e d F V B I n j u r e d M d r 2 K O / F V B c
- n
t r
- l
U S U C M S C 2 5 k C D 3 6 2 + U C M S C 2 5 k 2 4 6 8
% area of CD45+ cells in liver
**
Mdr2-/- ALT Hepatic CD45
UC- Umbilical cord US: Unselected MSC Data from V Wigneswara & M Alfaifi
Ova bil 10 M (OT-1 & OT-2) US UC MSC CD362+ UC MSC 100 200 300 400 500
ALT level ( IU/L) *
Ova-Bil No MSC MSC
Control CCL4 US UC MSC 250K US UC MSC 1M CD362+ UC MSC 250K CD362+ UC MSC 1M 50 100 150 200
ALT level ( IU/L) * * M.O CCL4 CD362+ UC MSC Heat inactivated MSC 50000 100000 150000 200000
CD45
*
CCl4
Infusion of CD362+ UC-MSC reduce hepatic CD3+, CD4+ & CD8+ T cell infiltration in the chronic model of sclerosing cholangitis
*p < 0·05
Control US-UC MSC 250k CD362+ UC-MSC 250k 5000 10000 15000 20000 CD8+ cells /g * (p=0.0255) * (p=0.0255) Control US-UC MSC 250k CD362+ UC-MSC 250k 20000 40000 60000 CD4+ cells /g * (p=0.0264) * (p=0.0200) Control US-UC MSC 250k CD362+ UC-MSC 250k 20000 40000 60000 CD3+ cells /g * (p=0.0426) * (p=0.0375)
Data from V Vigneswara
Infusion of CD362+ UC-MSC induces CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs
*p < 0·05 Data from V Vigneswara
Control US-UC MSC 250k CD362+ UC-MSC 250k
5 10 15 20
CD3+CD4+ CD25highFOXP3+ cells (%) ** (p=0.0021) ** (p=0.0044)
In-vitro assessment of efficacy of UC- MSC in patients with PSC
Ø Effect of UC-MSC on CD4+ and CD8+ T cell proliferation and activation
T cell proliferation and activation
UC-MSC suppress peripheral blood CD4+ and CD8+ T cell proliferation from patients with PSC
Key Stim: stimulated PBMC only **** p≤0.0001
S t i m 1 : 1 1 : 4 1 : 1 6 1 : 6 4 1 : 2 5 6 20 40 60 80 100
MSC:PBMC % CD4+ proliferation **** **** ****
S t i m 1 : 1 1 : 4 1 : 1 6 1 : 6 4 1 : 2 5 6 50 100
MSC:PBMC % CD8+ proliferation **** **** ****
UC-MSC reduce peripheral blood CD4+ T cell activation
TNFα
* p< 0.05
*p ≤ 0.05
S t i m 1 : 1 1 : 4 1 : 1 6 1 : 6 4 1 : 2 5 6 20 40 60 80 100
MSC:PBMC %CD4+IFNγ+ expressing cells * *
S t i m 1 : 1 1 : 4 1 : 1 6 1 : 6 4 1 : 2 5 6 20 40 60 80 100
MSC:PBMC %CD4+ IL-2+ expressing cells
S t i m 1 : 1 1 : 4 1 : 1 6 1 : 6 4 1 : 2 5 6 50 100
MSC:PBMC %CD4+TNFα+ expressing cells *
TNFα IFN γ IL2
UC-MSC suppress Intrahepatic CD4+ and CD8+ T cell proliferation from patients with PSC
S t i m 1 : 1 1 : 4 1 : 1 6 1 : 6 4 1 : 2 5 6 20 40 60 80 100
MSC:CD4+ T cell % CD4+ proliferation * ** *
S t i m 1 : 1 1 : 4 1 : 1 6 1 : 6 4 1 : 2 5 6 20 40 60 80 100
MSC:CD8+ T cell % CD8+ proliferation **
UC-MSC reduce intrahepatic CD4+ T cell activation from patients with PSC
S t i m 1 : 1 1 : 4 1 : 1 6 1 : 6 4 1 : 2 5 6 20 40 60 80 100
MSC:CD4+ T cell %CD4+TNFα+ expressing cells ** * *
Stim 1:1 1:4 1:16 1:64 1:256 10 20 30 40 50
MSC:CD4+ T cell %CD4+IFNγ+ expressing cells ** * Stim 1:1 1:4 1:16 1:64 1:256 20 40 60 80 100
MSC:CD4+ T cell %CD4+IL2 expressing cells * **
TNFα IFN γ IL2
CD362+ UC-MSC
Summary of MSC actions
CD3 CD4 CD8 Tregs Hepatic inflammation Biliary epithelial cell inflammation and death
Reduction
CD8 CD4 Proliferation and Activation TNFα IFNγ
MSC clinical trials in liver disease
- MSC therapy has been used in a number of clinical
studies to treat liver disease (n=300)
- Found to be safe
- Variability in efficacy
- Most studies have short follow-ups so long-term efficacy
data is lacking
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH)
PSC
- Prevalence 16.2 per 100,000
inhabitants
- Affects young patients
- No licensed effective therapies
AIH
- Prevalence 16-18 cases per 100,000 inhabitants
- 10-20% patients are treatment intolerant or unresponsive
- Therapies limited by side-effects & limited 2nd line options
Williams R et al. Lancet 2018
Unmet needs of patients with PSC and AIH
Patients with PSC
Weismüller & Trivedi et al. Gastro 2017
- Mean transplant-free survival = 14.5 years
Groenbark et al. J Hep 2014
- Higher mortality risk for AIH patients
compared to matched general population
Patients with AIH
AIH PSCBucket trial concept
Common mechanistic and clinical primary end point
Primary Outcome measures
- Safety and Feasibility
- Disease end-point
Ø Change in serum ALP (PSC) and ALT (AIH) from baseline
- Mechanistic end-point
Ø Increase in circulating Tregs
Trial design
Safety: Assessed by dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and adverse events
Inclusion criteria Patients with PSC Serum ALP ≥ 1.5 ULN at screening visit Patients with AIH Patients refractory to treatment Serum ALT ≥ 1.5 ULN at screening visit
STAGE 1
Determine: Safety at a higher dose
STAGE 2
Determine: EFFICACY and safety
2.5 X 106 cells/kg n=3 Safe 1.0 X 106 cells/kg n=3 Safe
Stage 2 Chief Investigator: Prof Gideon Hirschfield Co-CI: Prof Philip Newsome
Screening Visit 1
SD -28
Pre-treatment Visit 2
SD -7
Registration Treatment Visit 3
SD 0
MSC infusion
SD 28
Primary efficacy
- utcome measures
Change in ALP (PSC)/ALT (AIH) from baseline Visit 7 Visit 8
SD 56
Initial f/u
SD 14
End of DLT reporting period (stage 1) Secondary efficacy
- utcome measures
Long term safety f/u
D720 D360 D180 D540 D270
Significant clinical events and serious adverse events will be captured Visit 5
Patient pathway in the trial
SD= study day
Clinical trial progress
- Ethical and regulatory approval (MHRA) obtained- April
2017
- Substantial amendment to MHRA submitted- April
2018
- Aim to recruit 19 patients per cohort
Acknowledgements
Prof Gideon Hirschfield & Prof Philip Newsome Vasanthy Vigneswara Mohammed Alfaifi Nguyet-Thin Luu Evaggelia Liaskou Collaborators Steve Elliman Martin Hoogdjuin Carla Baan Debashish Roy Dan Hollyman Jon Smythe Trial Co-ordinator Darren Barton Rebecca Storey Trial Statistician Daniel Slade Christina Yap