Chemical Modeling of the TMA- CO 2 -H 2 O System in Forward Osmosis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

chemical modeling of the tma co 2 h 2 o system in forward
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Chemical Modeling of the TMA- CO 2 -H 2 O System in Forward Osmosis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Chemical Modeling of the TMA- CO 2 -H 2 O System in Forward Osmosis G. Kolliopoulos, T.J. Clark 1 , A.M. Holland 1 and V.G. Papangelakis Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3E5 1


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Chemical Modeling of the TMA- CO2-H2O System in Forward Osmosis

  • G. Kolliopoulos, T.J. Clark1, A.M. Holland1 and

V.G. Papangelakis

Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3E5

1Forward Water Technologies, 945 Princess Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 5L9

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Forward Osmosis (FO)

Difference in H2O activity: the driving force of the process No application

  • f

hydraulic pressure

1

Advantages of FO:

  • High H2O recovery (>90%)[1]
  • Energy savings based on equivalent work:

72-85% comparing with Reverse Osmosis (RO), Evaporation-Condensation[2]

  • Lower membrane fouling (vs. RO)

[1]T.Y. Cath et al., J. Membr. Sci. 281 (2006), pp. 70–87 [2]R.L. McGinnis, M. Elimelech, Desalination 207 (2007), pp. 370-382

Challenges of FO:

  • FO-specific membranes
  • Ideal draw solute:

– Highly soluble – Easily separated from the DDS – Recoverable products upon separation

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Conceptual FO Process Flow Diagram

2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

FO Process Treatment Window

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Draw Solution

Thermolytic salts exhibit phase change upon heating:

  • NH3-CO2 (well studied)

– formation of carbamates (stable in solution-difficult to separate)

  • Trimethylamine (TMA)-CO2 (newly proposed)

– no formation of carbamates (easier separation) – higher water flux N Concentration (molal) CO2 Concentration (molal) Osmotic Pressure (atm) Carbonated NH3 3.53 3.53 88.5 Carbonated TMA 3.53 3.53 104.8 Carbonated NH3 13.84 7.5 366.1 Carbonated TMA 13.84 13.5 371.7

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Objective

Develop an accurate mathematical model describing the various equilibria in the ternary system TMA-CO2-H2O in

  • rder to design an integrated FO process:

a) Develop analytical techniques for the determination

  • f total dissolved TMA and CO2 at high concentrations

b) Verify the properties binary TMA-H2O system (well studied since the 1930s) - ionization constant and its vapour-liquid equilibria (VLE) c) Generate thermodynamic data for the ternary system TMA-CO2-H2O that can be incorporated in chemical chemical modeling software, such as OLI (www.olisystems.com)

5

slide-7
SLIDE 7

a) Analytical Techniques for total dissolved TMA and CO2

slide-8
SLIDE 8

b) Binary TMA-H2O System

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Binary TMA-H2O System - Ionization Constant

Known mass (20 g) of 2 M HCl was titrated with aqueous TMA at 25 °C:

8

2.14% Error

OLI-MSE

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Binary TMA-H2O System - VLE

9

[6] S.D. White, B.K. O'Neill, Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 38 (1993) 234-237.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

VLE (20 °C)

10

Liquid Samples

  • Water content measured by

Karl-Fischer titration Vapor Samples

  • Mole fraction of H2O in the

vapor phase determined on the basis of i) molecular weight of TMA and H2O, ii) measured mass

  • f vapor phase, and iii) ideal-gas

law

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Binary TMA-H2O System - VLE (20 °C)

11

slide-13
SLIDE 13

c) Ternary TMA-CO2-H2O System

slide-14
SLIDE 14

pH-Composition Experiments (4 and 25 °C)

13

CTMA=42 wt.% in H2O Inject CO2(g) (P=5 bar) for 60 min Sample every 10 min

TMA(aq)+CO2(g)+H2O = TMAH++HCO3-

slide-15
SLIDE 15

VLE (50 and 60 °C)

14

Liquid Samples

  • Water content measured by Karl-

Fischer titration and GC (Agilent Technologies 7890A with thermal conductivity detector - Capillary column: CPVolamine 30x0.32, Agilent Technologies CP7447) Vapor Samples

  • GC:

i. Injection of He into the vapor flask (room T); contents at 100 kPa absolute pressure ii. Sealed flask placed in controlled hot-air chamber; contents to at least 10 °C higher than T at which sample was collected à contents vaporized completely prior to withdrawing sample

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Experimental Results vs. OLI-MSE

4 °C 25 °C

15

TMA Evaporation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Regressed OLI-MSE Model

4 °C 25 °C

16

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Evaluation of Developed Model

pH and composition experimental measurements (25 °C) in solutions that were not used to fit the model:

17

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusions

  • Speciated VLE for TMA-H2O are consistent with literature data

(embedded in OLI-MSE model)

  • Significantly low accuracy of the default OLI-MSE model for

TMA-CO2-H2O, as a result of missing binary interaction parameters

  • Existing

databank for TMA-CO2-H2O was improved by incorporating these parameters between the dominant species, i.e., TMAH+ and HCO3-,as well as TMA and HCO3-

  • Developed OLI-MSE model is able to predict the properties of

TMA-CO2-H2O with Absolute Average Relative Deviation (AARD) of 8, 15, 10 and 1% for total pressure, partial pressures

  • f TMA and CO2as well as pH, respectively

18

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Acknowledgements

19