City of Huber Heights Parks and Recreation Master Plan Findings - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
city of huber heights
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

City of Huber Heights Parks and Recreation Master Plan Findings - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 05, 2023 271 likes •974 views

City of Huber Heights Parks and Recreation Master Plan Findings Presentation November 16, 2017 Agenda Research Process What We Have Learned Next Steps Discussion Process Overview Where Are We Going Tomorrow? Needs

slide-1
SLIDE 1

City of Huber Heights

Parks and Recreation Master Plan Findings Presentation November 16, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • Research Process
  • What We Have Learned
  • Next Steps
  • Discussion
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Process Overview

Site & facility assessments Programs & service assessments Park classification and level

  • f service standards

Related plans review

Where Are We Today?

Community outreach

  • Statistically
  • valid survey

Online survey

  • Demographics and trends
  • analysis

Stakeholder interviews

  • and focus groups

Where Are We Going Tomorrow?

Needs prioritization Management standards Capital improvement planning Funding and revenue planning Strategic action plan

How Do We Get There?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

“Data Packs”

The research process includes

  • :

Demographics and Trends

  • Site Assessments
  • Interviews
  • and Focus Groups

Public Forums

  • Recreation Program Assessment
  • Statistically
  • Valid Survey

Level

  • f Service (LOS) and Park Classifications
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Wha hat We Have ve Learne ned

  • Demographics
  • Population is aging
  • Population is diversifying
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Local Trends Analysis (MPI)

  • Measured by Market Potential Index (MPI)
  • National average = 100

Visiting an Indoor Water Park

  • (126)

Baseball

  • (119)

Golf (

  • 114)

Softball (

  • 114)

Volleyball (

  • 107)

Canoeing/Kayaking (

  • 106)

Swimming (

  • 106)

Boating

  • (105)

Cycling (

  • 105)

Walking for Exercise (

  • 105)

Weight Lifting (

  • 103)

Fishing (

  • 102)

Aerobics (

  • 101)

Football (

  • 101)

Basketball (

  • 100)
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Site Assessments

Reviewed all park sites

  • Used a form to ensure consistency across the system
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Site Assessments

  • Most corrective actions needed pertained to surface/mulch

replenishment, tree debris removal/stump grinding, edging repairs, structure supports, equipment repairs

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Site Assessments

The parks are a blank canvas for activation (repurposing,

  • more events, connectivity)
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Site Assessments

Athletic fields receive little to no rest time

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups

The City

  • ’s park acreage is largely a blank canvas

Huber Heights is a

  • “Sports Town”

Much competition among local sport organizations

  • The community is in need of more comprehensive
  • recreational programming

There is a lack of ADA compliance throughout the system

  • Opportunities exist for partnerships, sponsorships, and
  • alternative funding

Great cities have great parks and recreation systems

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Public Forum

Facilities

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Publ blic ic Fo Forum

Programs

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Publ blic ic Fo Forum

Communication

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Public Forum

Open Comment ADA compliance

  • Carriage Trails park space
  • New facility types:
  • Dog park
  • Skate park
  • Ice rink
  • RC park
  • More special events and park programming
  • Re
  • layout parks

*Girl Scout troop desires to assist with park improvements!

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Recreation ion Prog

  • gram Assessment

Core Program Area Preschool (5 & under) Elementary (6-12) Teens (13-17) Adult (18-54) Active Adult (55+) All Ages Programs Aquatics P P S S S Sports P P S S S Health and Wellness S S P P P Youth and Family P P P S S

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Recreation Program Assessment

Lifecycle Stage Description Actual Program Distribution Best Practice Distribution Introduction New program; modest participation 9% 49% 50-60% Take-off Rapid participation growth 6% Growth Moderate, but consistent population growth 34% Mature Slow participation growth 48% 48% 40% Saturated Minimal to no participation growth; extreme competition 8% 3% 0-10% Decline Declining participation 3%

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Recreation Program Assessment

Pricing determined by:

  • Residency or member status
  • By customer
  • ’s ability to pay

Cost recovery not necessarily a focus

  • Market duplication kept to a minimum due to programming
  • structure
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Recreation Program Assessment

  • Core programs are currently well-suited to address the

programmatic needs of the current population demographic

  • Additional programs to consider include:
  • Squash
  • Boxing
  • Lacrosse
  • Rugby
  • Roller hockey
  • Field hockey
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Recreation ion Prog

  • gram Assessment

Should the City desire to have a broader range of programs, the

  • conversation needs to be about:
  • Expanded recreation programming topics

Bringing programs into the parks

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Recreation ion Prog

  • gram Assessment

Core programs are currently

  • well-suited to address the

programmatic needs of the current population demographic Additional programs to consider include:

  • Squash
  • Boxing
  • Lacrosse
  • Rugby
  • Roller hockey
  • Field hockey
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Statistically-Valid Survey

Conducted by ETC Institute

  • Mailed to random sample of households
  • Goal:
  • 375

Completed:

  • 385

Survey report will be developed in the next two weeks

slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34
slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38
slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40
slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43
slide-44
SLIDE 44
slide-45
SLIDE 45
slide-46
SLIDE 46
slide-47
SLIDE 47
slide-48
SLIDE 48
slide-49
SLIDE 49
slide-50
SLIDE 50
slide-51
SLIDE 51
slide-52
SLIDE 52
slide-53
SLIDE 53
slide-54
SLIDE 54
slide-55
SLIDE 55
slide-56
SLIDE 56
slide-57
SLIDE 57
slide-58
SLIDE 58
slide-59
SLIDE 59
slide-60
SLIDE 60
slide-61
SLIDE 61
slide-62
SLIDE 62
slide-63
SLIDE 63

Level of Service (LOS) Analysis

  • Excel
slide-64
SLIDE 64

Demographic Analysis

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Demographic Analysis

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Demographic Analysis

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Demographic Analysis

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Next Steps

Statistically

  • valid community survey results

Online survey results

  • Level of service analysis finalization
  • Equity mapping
  • Needs assessment report
slide-69
SLIDE 69

Project Team Information

PROS Consulting

Austin Hochstetler Senior Project Manager (574) 209-0687 Austin.Hochstetler@prosconsulting.com Nick Deardorf Consultant (317) 450-1657 Nick.Deardorf@prosconsulting.com

MKSK

Matthew Leasure Associate (614) 621-2796 mleasure@mkskstudios.com