COAST/Pierce vs. SBCAG
The Coalition for Sustainable transportation for Santa Barbara County (COAST) and David Pierce, a resident of Lompoc versus Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBGAG) Regarding Unmet Transit Needs 2001-2003
COAST/Pierce vs. SBCAG The Coalition for Sustainable transportation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
COAST/Pierce vs. SBCAG The Coalition for Sustainable transportation for Santa Barbara County (COAST) and David Pierce, a resident of Lompoc versus Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBGAG) Regarding Unmet Transit Needs
The Coalition for Sustainable transportation for Santa Barbara County (COAST) and David Pierce, a resident of Lompoc versus Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBGAG) Regarding Unmet Transit Needs 2001-2003
Santa Barbara’s North County:
Cities interspersed among rural areas
Transit Districts in Santa Barbara County:
Santa Maria Area Transit District (SMAT) City of Lompoc Transit District (COLT) Santa Ynez Valley Transit (SYVT)
Transit Dependency Indicators:
North County and South Coast have similar Transit Dependency Indicators
Households without vehicles:
North County and South Coast have similar percentages of households without vehicles
Commuting in Santa Barbara County
North County residents have longer commutes than South Coast residents, except for Carpinteria
Geographical distribution of poverty:
The majority of the lowest income population lives in the North County
The North and South portions of the County have about the same population but 9
trips in Santa Barbara County take place in the South Coast
(MTD) that requests and invests all available TDA funds in transit.
transit.
transit development.
have competing priorities for TDA funds, e.g. road maintenance.
majority of members from the North County (8 versus 5).
SBCAG Board of Directors
13 Board Members:
NORTH AND SOUTH AREAS OF THE COUNTY HAVE EQUAL POPULATION BUT
North County Representatives have a voting majority on SBCAG Board
Intercommunity transit in North County
Santa Maria to Goleta and Santa Barbara)
Clipper Service
Valley was established in 1997 and eliminated in 1999.
History of a lawsuit
improvement of transit service linking the North County communities, SBCAG Board indicates its commitment to study and develop a proposal.
projections (“Moore Study”).
Chytilo to review the legality of SBCAG’s actions.
Chambers shows methodology mistakes in that study.
group (SB CAN) joins the effort with the distribution of transit surveys.
but not reasonable to meet based on low ridership.
exposure to the 2003 UTN process by distributing transit surveys on buses and writing letters to newspapers.
Santa Maria, indicates a strong desire for commute service. (Bus service is considered a lower security risk.)
and agrees to a 3-year pilot project connecting Lompoc, VAFB and Santa Maria.
SBCAG on 4/15/04 and adopted on the next meeting.
Recent Developments
the 2004 UTN hearings.
describe their arduous and dangerous trip to work every morning. 55 of them return in February for televised testimony.
clergy to state their needs. COAST documents the location of their residences (origins) and places of work (destinations) in the 2004 UTN “white paper”.
Mixtec Indians originally from Oaxaca, Southern Mexico. Between 15,000 and 28,000 Mixtecs live within Santa Maria City limits.
excellent outreach and analysis, but it is cowered into denying the existence of transit needs that could use TDA funds.
Notice that the only intercommunity services that are “Reasonable to Meet” are those that will not require use of North County TDA funds (Settlement & MTD’s)!!
Recurring Issues
“Unmet Transit Need” and “Reasonable to Meet”.
www.coast-santabarbara.org