Cross-institutional Curricular Models Jin Kim, University of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

cross institutional curricular models
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Cross-institutional Curricular Models Jin Kim, University of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Beyond the EAP Border into Graduate Studies: Cross-institutional Curricular Models Jin Kim, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Nigel Caplan, University of Delaware English Language Institute Agenda 1. Consortium on Graduate


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Beyond the EAP Border into Graduate Studies: Cross-institutional Curricular Models

Jin Kim, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Nigel Caplan, University of Delaware English Language Institute

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • 1. Consortium on Graduate Communication (CGC)
  • 2. Characteristics of major assignments and student needs
  • 3. Recommendations for course designers
slide-3
SLIDE 3

A professional community of graduate communication specialists Founded 2014 >450 members in 25+ countries Active email list http://gradconsortium.wordpress.com

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Course Syllabus Project

21 universities Mostly U.S.

Cross- disciplinary Specific purposes (ESP) Total

Writing (W) 20 6 26 Speaking/Oral (S) 3 3 Integrated skills (W/S) 4 4 8

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Overview of Major Assignments

  • 1. Writing Assignments

1) Research-related (90%) 2) Source-based (48%) 3) Other short writing (57%)

  • 2. Oral Assignments
  • 3. Professionalization Assignments

Refer to your handout!

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Assigned in 90% of all W and S/W courses 1.Research paper (48%) 2.Annotated bibliography (40%) 3.Literature review (22%) 4.Individualized (22%) 5.Research proposal (18.5%)

Top 5 Research-related Writing Assignments

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Assigned in 48% of all W and S/W courses 1.Critique/article review (23%) 2.Summary (13%) 3.Argumentative paper (10%)

Top 3 Source-based Writing Assignments

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Other Writing Assignments

Assigned in 57% of all W and S/W courses 1.Reflections (30%) 2.Blogging (13%) 3.Vocabulary journal (10%) 4.Project proposal (10%)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Student Needs: Top 1-5 Writing Tasks (UIUC data)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Student Needs: Top 6-10 Writing Tasks (UIUC data)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Top 5 Challenging Writing Tasks (UIUC)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Other Findings

Students in advanced stages of their degrees:

  • Have more diverse writing experiences
  • Find research papers and lit reviews more challenging
  • Tend to be more satisfied with ESL courses

Compared to STEM, SSHA students write:

  • Fewer research proposals, tech reports, and abstracts
  • More reflective essays and case-based writing
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Oral Assignments

Assigned in 41% out of all CGC courses (n=13 out of 32) 1.Oral presentation (100%)

  • a. Topics: Research, culture, data commentary, definition of a

term, business communication, article review, design

  • b. Format: Conference style, individual or group assignments,

whole-class and/or poster

  • 2. Elevator speech (6.5%)

3.Other: debate, leading a discussion

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Top 5 Speaking Tasks (UIUC) Data)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Top 5 Speaking Challenges

(UIUC Data)

Giving presentations at conferences 45% Asking and answering questions in a job interview 44% Leading discussions 42% Participating in whole-class discussions 42% Giving presentations in class 36%

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Professionalization Assignments

  • Interview with scholars/mentors (6)
  • CV (3)
  • Application letters (3)
  • Bio (2)

Other: Digital story telling, department seminar analysis, memo, professional development activity report

slide-17
SLIDE 17

A Case (Study) in Point: MBA

Faculty survey, n = 28 University of Delaware Lerner School of Business 23 tasks 1 = not important ←→ 5 very important

slide-18
SLIDE 18

MBA: Importance of Skills

Rank Domain Rating (s.d.) 1 Listening 4.58 (.48) 2 Reading 4.17 (1.04) 3 Speaking 4.14 (.92) 4 Culture 3.71 (1.12) 5 Writing 3.69 (1.37)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Implications

  • 1. Meeting diverse students’ needs across disciplines by

a. Having students choose final projects (e.g., a paper for another course, publication, thesis)

  • b. Requiring interviews/meetings with mentors in their

field c. Having Ss Collect writing models from their field

  • d. Aligning assignments with their identified needs
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Implications

  • 2. Making our communication classes more relevant
  • a. Integrate professionalization assignments
  • b. Create authentic assignments/environments for

communication

  • c. Take advantage of the cross-disciplinary course setting
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Implications

  • 3. Support oral communication as well as writing

79% of CGC universities offer writing classes 49% offer oral communication classes (Caplan & Cox, 2016)

  • 4. Differentiate support (Caplan & Cox, 2016)

PhD vs Master’s Pre-matriculation, coursework, proposal, thesis

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Coming soon …!

University of Michigan Press May 2016 Summer Institute 2016 “Bridging English Language Teaching and Writing Studies in Supporting All Graduate Writers” June 9 - 11 Yale University http://gradconsortium.wordpress.com

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Questions?

slide-24
SLIDE 24

[Extra Slide] Student Needs: Writing skills (UIUC)

Logical development of ideas and arguments 37% Synthesizing ideas from different sources or data 30% Developing research questions or thesis 29% Using appropriate vocabulary 29% Reading and understanding sources 23%