De la wa re Co unty DPW F a c ility Site Se le c tio n July 12, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
de la wa re co unty
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

De la wa re Co unty DPW F a c ility Site Se le c tio n July 12, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 01, 2023 326 likes •837 views

De la wa re Co unty DPW F a c ility Site Se le c tio n July 12, 2017 We nde l T e a m Ge ra ld Summe Ma rk Mo lna r, PE Da vid Duc hsc he re r, PE , F ASE E xe c utive Vic e Pre side nt Princ ipa l Cha irma n E me ritus We nde l

slide-1
SLIDE 1

De la wa re Co unty

DPW F a c ility

Site Se le c tio n

July 12, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

We nde l T e a m

Ge ra ld Summe E xe c utive Vic e Pre side nt Ma rk Mo lna r, PE Princ ipa l Da vid Duc hsc he re r, PE , F ASE Cha irma n E me ritus

slide-3
SLIDE 3

We nde l Arc hite c ts & E ng ine e rs

  • Significant years of DPW / Maintenance Garage Experience
  • Proven Technical Site Selection Process
  • Nationally Recognized Expertise
  • Totally Independent and transparent Evaluation
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Site Se le c tio n Pro c e ss

  • 1. Facility Programing
  • 2. Typical Building/Site Layout
  • 3. Candidate Sites
  • Sites 3, 4 and 6 originally by

County Planning,

  • plus 8 volunteered sites and

existing site

  • Confirmed availability of all
  • Site 6 off list due to unavailability
  • 4. Establish Selection Criteria
  • Supervisor Input
  • 5. Score Sites (1 – 10)
  • Site visits on 5/30/17 and 5/31/17
  • 6. Establish Criteria Weight

Parameters

  • Supervisor Input
  • 7. Ranking of Sites
  • (Score x Average Weight)
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Ca ndida te Site s

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Supe rviso r/ Co mmitte e We ig hting

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Se le c tio n Crite ria & We ig hting

Selection Criteria Average Weight Access

12.67 %

Capital Cost

12.56 %

Demolition

6.00 %

Environmental

8.00 %

Flood Plain

14.11 %

Neighborhood

6.61 %

Increased Operational Costs

11.33 %

Soils

8.44 %

Topography

6.39 %

Utilities

8.39 %

Water

5.50 %

Total

100 %

slide-8
SLIDE 8

T

  • p 4 Hig he st Ra nke d Site s

Selection Criteria Average Weighting

Site 9

Score Weighted Score Access 12.67 % 6 76.02 Capital Cost 12.56 % 7 87.92 Demolition 6.00 % 9 54.00 Environmental 8.00 % 7 56.00 Flood Plain 14.11 % 10 141.10 Neighborhood 6.61 % 6 39.66 Increased Operational Costs 11.33 % 5 56.65 Soils 8.44 % 6 50.64 Topography 6.34 % 10 63.90 Utilities 8.39 % 6 50.34 Water 5.50 % 4 22.00 Total 100 % 698.23 Ranking

1

Site 1

Score Weighted Score 5 63.35 7 87.92 10 60.00 7 56.00 9 129.99 9 59.49 3 33.99 8 67.52 8 51.12 6 50.34 5 27.50 684.22

2

Site 3

Score Weighted Score 3 38.01 4 50.24 10 60.00 6 48.00 8 112.88 7 46.27 9 101.97 6 50.64 10 63.90 5 41.95 8 44.00 657.86

3

Site 11

Score Weighted Score 6 76.02 8 100.48 7 42.00 6 48.00 7 98.77 7 46.27 5 56.65 6 50.64 8 51.12 6 50.34 5 27.50 647.79

4

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Ca ndida te Site s

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Site 1

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Site 1

Positive A e Attributes es

  • Flat area for development
  • Out of Floodplain
  • Soils

Negative A e Attributes es

  • Access Bridge Approaches in Floodplain
  • Historic Bridge with Low Boy Clearance Issue
  • Distance to C.O. = 13.2 miles
  • Transmission Lines Bisect Parcel
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Ca ndida te Site s

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Site 2

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Site 2

Positive A e Attributes es

  • Out of Floodplain

Negative A e Attributes es

  • Blind Corner at Rt. 10
  • Rolling Topography
  • Neighborhood Access
  • Distance to C.O. = 9.0 miles
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Ca ndida te Site s

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Site 3

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Site 3

Positive A e Attributes es

  • Distance to C.O. Approximately 2 Miles
  • Flat area for development
  • Useable area out of Floodplain
  • Gravel Soils
  • Alternate Access to CR18

Negative A e Attributes es

  • Access Acquisition
  • Capital Cost – Bridge/Road Required
  • Archeological (?)
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Ca ndida te Site s

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Site 4

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Site 4

Positive A e Attributes es

  • Neighborhood
  • Distance to C.O. Approximately 2 miles

Negative A e Attributes es

  • Entire site in Floodplain
  • Capital Costs – Build-up Site
  • Access & Sight Distance
  • Soils (Prime Farmland)
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Ca ndida te Site s

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Site 5

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Site 5

Positive A e Attributes es

  • Out of Floodplain

Negative A e Attributes es

  • Steep Topography
  • Capital Costs
  • Access & Sight Distance
  • Distance to C.O. (8 Miles)
  • Single Phase Power
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Ca ndida te Site s

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Site 6

NOT AVAI L ABL E

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Ca ndida te Site s

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Site 7

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Site 7

Positive A e Attributes es

  • Utilities
  • Distance to C.O.
  • Topography is flat
  • Existing Neighborhood

Negative A e Attributes es

  • Entire site in Floodplain
  • Capital Costs – Build-up Site
  • Access at Time of Flood
  • Fill at Old Mill Pond – Deep Foundations
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Ca ndida te Site s

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Site 8

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Site 8

Positive A e Attributes es

  • Out of Floodplain

Negative A e Attributes es

  • Steep Topography
  • Capital Costs
  • Access, Speed Limit & Sight Distance
  • Neighborhood
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Ca ndida te Site s

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Site 9

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Site 9

Positive A e Attributes es

  • Flat Area for Development
  • Out of Floodplain

Negative A e Attributes es

  • Access – Bridge Approach in Floodplain
  • Distance to C.O. (8 miles)
  • Capital Costs – Narrow Road/Bridge/Intersections

at CR2 and SR10 and CR2 and Backriver

  • Neighborhood
  • Cemetery
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Ca ndida te Site s

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Site 10

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Site 10

Positive A e Attributes es

  • Out of Floodplain
  • Neighborhood

Negative A e Attributes es

  • Steep Topography
  • Capital Costs
  • Access, Speed Limit and Sight Distance
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Ca ndida te Site s

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Site 11

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Site 11

Positive A e Attributes es

  • Capital Costs
  • Flat area for Development
  • Development area Out of Floodplain

Negative A e Attributes es

  • Distance to C.O. (10 Miles)
  • Neighborhood/Church
  • Access, Speed Limit & Sight Distance
  • Demolition
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Ca ndida te Site s

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Site 12

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Site 12

Positive A e Attributes es

  • Out of Floodplain
  • Gravel Soils

Negative A e Attributes es

  • Steep Topography
  • Capital Costs
  • Access, Speed Limit & Sight Distance
  • Environmental
  • Distance to C.O. (10 Miles)
slide-44
SLIDE 44

Site Ra nking

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Site Ra nking

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Site Ra nking

slide-47
SLIDE 47

T

  • p 4 Hig he st Ra nke d Site s

Selection Criteria Average Weighting

Site 9

Score Weighted Score Access 12.67 % 6 76.02 Capital Cost 12.56 % 7 87.92 Demolition 6.00 % 9 54.00 Environmental 8.00 % 7 56.00 Flood Plain 14.11 % 10 141.10 Neighborhood 6.61 % 6 39.66 Increased Operational Costs 11.33 % 5 56.65 Soils 8.44 % 6 50.64 Topography 6.34 % 10 63.90 Utilities 8.39 % 6 50.34 Water 5.50 % 4 22.00 Total 100 % 698.23 Ranking

1

Site 1

Score Weighted Score 5 63.35 7 87.92 10 60.00 7 56.00 9 129.99 9 59.49 3 33.99 8 67.52 8 51.12 6 50.34 5 27.50 684.22

2

Site 3

Score Weighted Score 3 38.01 4 50.24 10 60.00 6 48.00 8 112.88 7 46.27 9 101.97 6 50.64 10 63.90 5 41.95 8 44.00 657.86

3

Site 11

Score Weighted Score 6 76.02 8 100.48 7 42.00 6 48.00 7 98.77 7 46.27 5 56.65 6 50.64 8 51.12 6 50.34 5 27.50 647.79

4

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Ne xt Ste ps

  • 1. TOP 4 SITES
  • Due Diligence - Environmental Impact Paper Search
  • Contact Local Code Officials
  • Test Fitting – Conceptual Design/Cost Estimate/Schedule
  • Traffic and Site Access (Bridges, Roads, Intersections, etc.)
  • Assess Operational Costs
  • 2. TOP RANKED SITE
  • Preliminary Design/Cost Estimate
  • SEQR
  • Detailed Impact Assessments
  • Temporary Relocation – TBD (?)
  • Acquisition
  • Final Design/Cost Estimate
  • Bidding
  • Construction
slide-49
SLIDE 49

Que stio ns