Distributed Wind Technology for Hydrogen Production
Hosted by Val Stori, Project Director, CESA March 27, 2014
Distributed Wind Technology for Hydrogen Production Hosted by Val - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Clean Energy States Alliance and The Northeast Electrochemical Energy Storage Cluster Present Distributed Wind Technology for Hydrogen Production Hosted by Val Stori, Project Director, CESA March 27, 2014 Housekeeping
Hosted by Val Stori, Project Director, CESA March 27, 2014
www.cleanenergystates.org
2
www.cleanenergystates.org
3
The Northeast Electrochemical Energy Storage Cluster (NEESC) is a network of industry, academic, government and non- governmental leaders working together to help businesses provide energy storage solutions. The cluster is based in New York, New Jersey, and the New England States. Its initial formation and development is funded through the US Small Business Administration’s Innovative Economies Initiative and administered by the Connecticut Center for Advanced Technology, Inc. (CCAT). The cluster is focused on businesses that provide the innovative development, production, promotion and deployment of hydrogen fuels and fuel cells to meet the pressing demand for energy storage solutions.
www.cleanenergystates.org
5
Val Stori Project Director, CESA Val@cleanegroup.org Recording found at www.cleanenergystates.org/webinars/ Find us online: www.cleanenergystates.org facebook.com/cleanenergystates @CESA_news on Twitter
www.cleanenergystates.org
7
sszymanski@protononsite.com 203.678.2338
2
Proton’s World Headquarters in Wallingford, CT
S Series H Series Hydrogen Control Systems StableFlow HOGEN Hydrogen Generators
TM
GC
Fueling Biogas Renewable Energy Storage
Lab Gas Generators C Series
3
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E
Fueling Growth
4
Achieved Profitability
>20% CAGR
5
PEM Electrolysis PEM Electrolysis
Cathode
+
e- e- e-
O
e-
Power Supply
Solid Electrolyte Proton Exchange Membrane
+ +
O
e- e- e-
Oxygen + + + + + +
F F F F F F SO3H SO3H C F C O C F C F C O C F R
fR
f+
H H H H
Water
e- e-
H H
O
PEM Fuel Cell PEM Fuel Cell
Anode
+
e- e- e- e-
Electric load
Solid Electrolyte Proton Exchange Membrane
+ +
e- e- e-
Hydrogen Oxygen + + + + + +
F F F F F F SO3H SO3H C F C O C F C F C O C F R
fR
f+
H H H H
e- e-
Water
H H
O O O
PEM Electrolysis PEM Electrolysis
Cathode
+
e- e- e-
O
e-
Power Supply
Solid Electrolyte Proton Exchange Membrane
+ +
O
e- e- e-
Oxygen + + + + + +
F F F F F F SO3H SO3H C F C O C F C F C O C F R
fR
f+
H H H H
Water
e- e-
H H
O
Cathode
+
e- e- e-
O
e-
Power Supply
Solid Electrolyte Proton Exchange Membrane Solid Electrolyte Proton Exchange Membrane
+ +
O
e- e- e-
Oxygen + + + + + +
F F F F F F SO3H SO3H C F C O C F C F C O C F R
fR
fR
fR
f+
H H H H H H H H
Water
e- e-
H H
O
PEM Fuel Cell PEM Fuel Cell
Anode
+
e- e- e- e-
Electric load
Solid Electrolyte Proton Exchange Membrane
+ +
e- e- e-
Hydrogen Oxygen + + + + + +
F F F F F F SO3H SO3H C F C O C F C F C O C F R
fR
f+
H H H H
e- e-
Water
H H
O O O
PEM Fuel Cell PEM Fuel Cell
Anode
+
e- e- e- e-
Electric load
Solid Electrolyte Proton Exchange Membrane Solid Electrolyte Proton Exchange Membrane
+ +
e- e- e-
Hydrogen Oxygen + + + + + +
F F F F F F SO3H SO3H C F C O C F C F C O C F R
fR
fR
fR
f+
H H H H H H H H
e- e-
Water
H H
O O O O O
6
Integrated Low Pressure Electrolyzer
Photo courtesy of Hamilton Sundstrand
Virginia Class Submarine
Oxygen generation for life support: US, UK, French submarine fleets
Proton cell stack
streams
stabilization capability for high RE penetration
7
Courtesy of Fraunhofer ISE, 2013
8
Broad Applicability
9
Batteries Electrolysis Storage Capacity <10 hours Expandable with inexpensive storage Cycle Life Limited Unlimited Cost Challenges Yes Leverage fuel cell scale up Scale Unproven 100 year technology
Cost analysis shows cost effectiveness of hydrogen ESS
Sandia public report: SAND2011-4845
NORCO via tank trailer
Entegrity Wind Turbines
H6M Electrolyzers at Synthetic Energy
10
University of Minnesota, wind to ammonia pilot plant
11
Proton supplied H2 and N2 generation Haber-Bosch reactor Ammonia storage Onsite wind power
– Conversion of CO2 from biogas plants to useable methane – Storage of renewable energy for grid stabilization – Hydrogen fuel for industrial and light duty vehicles
12
13
Large Active Area PEM Stack
MW-scale concept
14
15
6 5 4 3
2
75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 105% 50 100 150 200
Stack $/kW Normalized Cells/Stack Baseline 1 MW Power Current Density = 2A/cm2
16
1000 kW 1300 kW 1600 kW 2000 kW 3200 kW 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 System $/kW Normailzed
Stack Current Density (A/cm2)
Baseline 1 MW
17
Gen 1 Design Gen 2 Design
Product Type HOGEN S-Series HOGEN H-Series HOGEN C-Series Product Launch 2000 2003 2010 Cells/stack 10-20 34 65 Stacks/system 1 1-3 1-3 H2 Output (Nm3/hr) 1.05 6 30 $/kW vs. S-series 100% 43% 28%
18
19 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% S40 H6M C30 0.5 MW 1 MW 2 MW 2 MW Adv % of Baseline Cost/kW
Market Application Examples: Target System Cost per kW in 2018 (10% IRR, 5 Year Forecast)
$- $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 Low High
CAISO Market (4 Hr)
Frequency Regulation Flexible Ramping Spinning Reserve Flexible Capacity for RA Energy Arbitrage $- $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 1 2
CAISO Renewable Integration (4 Hr)
ITC Wind firming (DA vs RT) Flexible Capacity for RA Flexible Ramping $- $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 Low High
PJM Regulation (15 min)
Frequency Regulation 24 $- $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 Low High
PJM Customer-side (6 Hr)
Spinning Reserves Economic DR Capacity Demand Charge Retail Energy Arbitrage
Except for frequency regulation, need to stack multiple applications
Source: J. Judson-McQueeny, 2013
20
21
@ Town of Hempstead Energy Park
Tara Schneider-Moran Town of Hempstead
Wind to Hydrogen Background Hydrogen Station Project Implementation Wind Turbine Project Implementation Wind to Hydrogen Present & Future
Presentation Timeline
ENERGY PARK
Conservation & Waterways Point Lookout, NY
Outreach for Community Environmental facility with an environmental message Model for Others Data Collection and Monitoring
ENERGY PARK NYIT Solar House
ENERGY PARK NYIT Solar House
Sustainable Materials
ENERGY PARK Geothermal
ENERGY PARK Shellfish Aquaculture Facility
ENERGY PARK Shellfish Aquaculture Facility
ENERGY PARK Wind to Hydrogen Project
100 kW Wind Turbine
WIND TO HYDROGEN Project Goals Evaluate Zero Emissions Fuel
Energy Storage with Hydrogen
Establish Partnerships
Outreach & Education
Demonstrate Alternative Fuels
WIND TO HYDROGEN Funding Partners
Hydrogen Fueling Station – Total Cost: $2.1 Million
HICE technology
100 kW Wind Turbine – Total Cost: $613,000
HYDROGEN STATION Contractors
Contractor Role
Town of Hempstead
Project Management & Site Construction
Air Products
Sub: Proton Electrolyzer Manufacturer & Integration
PW Grosser Consulting
Professional Engineer
EmPower Clean Energy
Assistant PM, Data Analysis & Outreach Coordinator Sub: Bravery Corporation Branding & Web Design Sub: TM Bier & Associates Data Acquisition & Monitoring System
Clean Vehicle Solutions
Ford F250 and E450 CNG/HCNG Conversions
HYDROGEN STATION Design & Permitting
Directional Drill
HYDROGEN STATION Design & Permitting
350 Bar vs. 700 Bar Electrolyzer Back-Up Power Fueling Capacity Electric Infrastructure
H2 Tube Trailer Switchgear Housing H2 Discharge Stanchion
HYDROGEN STATION
Requires electricity and connection to potable water system.
at 5000psi (350 bar)
infrastructure
3600psi
(Compressed Natural Gas)
equipment
Hydrogen & Compressed Natural Gas Blend
HCNG & CNG Nozzles
HYDROGEN STATION Major Equipment
Hydrogen PEM Electrolyzer – 12 kg/day
Hydrogen, CNG Compressors
Hydrogen, CNG Storage HCNG Blender
Hydrogen, HCNG, CNG Dispensers & Nozzles
Proton Electrolyzer
HYDROGEN STATION Vehicles
Hydrogen FCHVs HCNG Shuttle Bus CNG Pick-Up Trucks
WIND ENERGY 100 kW Wind Turbine
anemometer, proved excellent wind resource average 13 mph, 6 m/s @ 25 m
Industry
Merchant Marine Academy
Nursery
WIND ENERGY 100 kW Funding Energy Efficiency & Conservation Block Grant (EECBG)
– ARRA Funding – Administered by DOE – $4,577,700 grant – Assigned to Conservation & Waterways
Project Activities
– Building Audits & Retrofits – Lighting/HVAC Upgrades, Geothermal, Energy Billing Database, Marina LED Dock Lighting – Solar PV – Transportation – Anti-Idling Demo Project – Wind Turbine – 100kW – Energy & Sustainability Master Plan – Outreach & Education
WIND ENERGY Site Selection Technical Feasibility
Wind Resource – from anemometer and Skystream 2.4kW wind turbine @ Shellfish Facility Foundation – Test boring to 25 feet for foundation to determine soil type, groundwater elevation, weight bearing capacity
Energy Load, Innovation, Education
Hydrogen Fueling Station – new energy load, required solution, wind to hydrogen energy storage demonstration Energy Park – great addition for outreach & education
WIND ENERGY Site Selection Environmental Review & Public Process
Federal NEPA – Environmental Assessment (EA) was required, project received a Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI) State SEQRA – Project received a Negative Declaration
Permits
Not required on Town property, but worked very closely with the Town’s Building Department during the site selection, design and construction phases
WIND ENERGY Turbine Selection
Gearless Direct Drive: no gearbox, generator and rotor are direct coupled, moving together at same speed = Less moving parts = lower maintenance costs Tower Height – at 120 feet, this was a “small” wind turbine, compared to MW sizes, good fit for local community Power Size – 100 kW was acceptable for the existing electrical infrastructure, saving on up front installation costs Net Metering – NP100 is on the LIPA approved list for net metering, no Power Purchase Agreement required Buy American Provision – NP is a Vermont company, met ARRA funding requirements
WIND ENERGY Turbine Specs
Northern Power 100, Manufactured in Vermont, USA Tower Height 120 Feet Rotor Diameter 70 Feet (each blade, 35 feet) Yaw Upwind, Electronic Control System Wind Change > 5 degrees & sustains that change for 1 minute, nacelle will yaw into the wind Cut-In Speed 3.5 m/s (7.8 mph) Cut-Out Speed 27 m/s (60 mph) witnessed during Sandy Noise 55 dBA, quieter than nearby road noise Total Cost (Design & Construction) $613,000
WIND ENERGY Performance
2012 EPA Environmental Quality Award for Wind Turbine and Energy Park
Commissioned December 2011 1st Year 221,629 kWh (with approx.one month down time)
2nd Year 229,442 kWh (with approx. one month down time) To Date (3/26/14) 543,939 kWh
WIND TO HYDROGEN Operation & Maintenance
Hydrogen Station is not Turn-Key Dedicated Staff Observing the Station Daily Separate Contracts with major equipment manufacturers Train Town Employees to perform basic maintenance tasks Tower Climbing Certification for Town Employees
WIND TO HYDROGEN Resiliency
hurricane engineering review Hurricane Sandy
Future Mirogrid Opportunity
WIND TO HYDROGEN Outreach & Education
NY Agricultural Women Nassau County Bar Association NYC Engineering Society Utilities Local Municipalities Middle and High Schools Universities Science Summer Camps International Visitors - Tokyo Gas, Korean manufacturing company, Chinese Engineers, Engineers from Toyota HQ in Japan
School Group Visiting Shellfish Facility
WIND TO HYDROGEN Training & Workshops
Multimedia Website Social Media Videos Branding Brochures Signage (with Solar LED Lighting) Formalize Curriculum and Tours Partner w/ local education institutions Establish a team to give regular tours Develop Labs/Activities, Worksheets
WIND TO HYDROGEN Next Steps for Outreach
WIND TO HYDROGEN Future Projects
Microgrid
Desalination
Tidal Power
Data Acquisition & Monitoring System
Tara Schneider-Moran
516.431.9200 tara.schneider@gmail.com
March 27, 2014
This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information
2
2
3
See NRC scenario utilizing diverse feedstocks for hydrogen production
4
http://energystorage.org/system/files/resources/sand2013-5131.pdf
5
50 100 150 200 250 300 2000 2006 2012 2018 2024 2030 Cumulative Installed Capacity (GW) Offshore Land-based
2013 2013
6
7
Instrumented power signal from 100 kW wind turbine to drive 33 kW alkaline stack current to follow power available from turbine
1 2 3 4 5 40 80 120 160 200 240 10:43 10:43 10:43 10:43 10:43 10:43 10:44 10:44 10:44 10:44 10:44 10:44 10:45 Hydrogen Flow [Nm^3/hr] Stack Current [A] Time
Stack Current [A] H2 Flow [Nm^3/hr]
Grid AC Power Data Varying Stack Current 100 kW Wind Turbine
8
η ~ 100% η ~ 85% to 92%
series with full stack
combined stacks
9
Goal: Better align PV and stack operating points
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 20 40 60 80 100 Voltage (V) Current (A) PV Array IV 20-cell stack Relocated with 10 additional cells PV array maximum power point
Result: Additional 10-cell stack (electrically) in series with original 20-cell stack shifted stacks IV curve to the MPP of the PV array
10
11
The Sequential Actions
and Tertiary Frequency Controls Following the Sudden Loss of Generation and Their Impacts on System Frequency
http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/12/f5/Grid%20Energy%20Storage%20December%202013.pdf
12
AC micro-grid
PEM Electrolyzer
Experimental Setup showing AC micro-grid configuration to test frequency response of PEM and alkaline electrolyzers Electrolyzers have the potential to realize an additional revenue stream by providing ancillary grid support services
powering electrolyzers
shedding load to induce frequency disturbances
shed or add stack power
electrolyzer command initiated when frequency exceeded ± 0.2 Hz
13
58.0 58.5 59.0 59.5 60.0 60.5 61.0 61.5 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Frequency (Hz) Time (seconds)
Load Sim 0 to 10 kW, Alkaline at 40 kW Load Sim 0 to 10 kW, PEM at 40 kW
‘Natural’ un-mitigated frequency disturbances on AC micro-grid caused by 10 kW resistive load step while powering the alkaline and PEM electrolyzer
10 20 30 40 50 60 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2
AC Phase Current (Arms) Time (seconds)
Alkaline 100% to 25% PEM 100% to 25% Stack Command
PEM and alkaline system- level response showing AC phase current (rms) to command to shed stack power (100% down to 25%
14
58.0 58.5 59.0 59.5 60.0 60.5 61.0 61.5 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Frequency (Hz) Time (seconds) Load Sim 0 to 10 kW, Alkaline at 40 kW Load Sim 0 to 10 kW, Alkaline 40 to 30 kW, trig. 0.2 Hz Load Sim 0 to 10 kW, PEM 40 to 30 kW, trig. 0.2 Hz
58.0 58.5 59.0 59.5 60.0 60.5 61.0 61.5 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Frequency (Hz) Time (seconds) Load Sim 25 kW to 0, Alkaline at 15 kW Load Sim 25 kW to 0, Alkaline 15 to 40 kW, trig. 0.2 Hz Load Sim 25 kW to 0, PEM 15 to 40 kW, trig. 0.2 Hz
With Electrolyzer Without Electrolyzer Without Electrolyzer With Electrolyzer
10 kW steps -PEM and alkaline systems shorten magnitude and duration of under-frequency disturbance on AC micro-grid 25 kW steps - PEM and alkaline systems shorten and reduce magnitude of
15
Summary – Completed 10,000 hours on neglected stacks. Variable and constant power decay rates were within 10%. Path Forward – Two new stacks installed. (1200 hours to date) Monitoring and Control
25 50 75 100 125 150 175 14:15 14:16 14:17 Stack Current (A) Time (hh:mm) Stack A Stack B Stack C
16
Kevin.Harrison@nrel.gov
http://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/proj_wind_hydrogen.html
17
20% Wind Energy by 2030
http://www.20percentwind.org/20percent_wind_energy_report_revOct08.pdf
PV – Stack Coupling
http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/progress11/ii_e_4_harrison_2011.pdf http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review11/pd031_harrison_2011_o.pdf
PEM & Alkaline Electrolyzer Response Testing
http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/progress12/ii_d_3_harrison_2012.pdf http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review12/pd031_harrison_2012_o.pdf
Giner Electrolyzer and Stack Decay Testing
http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/progress13/ii_a_2_harrison_2013.pdf http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review13/pd031_harrison_2013_o.pdf