Distric ts L oc a l Pla nning G oa ls Katherine Antos, Branch - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Distric t’s L

• c a l Pla nning G oa ls

Katherine Antos, Branch Chief

Partnering & Environmental Conservation Branch Department of Energy & Environment DOEE CAST Workshop October 19, 2018

@ DOEE_DC

Va lue o f Che sa pe a ke Ba y to F ish a nd Wildlife

2

Open‐Water Habitat Migratory Fish Spawning and Nursery Use Deep‐Channel Seasonal Refuge Use Shallow‐Water Bay Grass Use Deep‐Water Seasonal Fish and Shellfish Use

Oxygen Requirements (mg/L) of Bay Species

Open‐Water Habitat

@DO EE_DC

Wha t the Che sa pe a ke Ne e ds

3

• E

no ug h Air: Disso lve d Oxyg e n

• E

no ug h L ig ht: Wa te r Cla rity/ Ba y Gra ss Ab unda nc e

• No t T
• o Muc h Alg a e :

Chlo ro phyll a

T

• make this happe n, must

re duc e nitro ge n, pho spho rus and se dime nt po llutio n to the Che sape ake

3

T he Che sa pe a ke Po llutio n Die t a ka Ba y T MDL

@DO EE_DC

4

S

cience tells us how much pollution Bay is receiving now and how much to reduce

Chesapeake partnership

divides that among states/ DC

S

tate/ DC writes a “ watershed implementation plan” (WIP) to achieve the diet Each S t at e/ DC current ly updat ing it s WIP cleanup st rat egy

• ~90%

pollution is from wastewater

• Much progress already
• Wastewater pollution

will increase with growth

• S

till more work to be done to reduce stormwater pollution

5

• 500,000

1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 2009 2017 WIP2 Planning Target

Nitrogen

Wastewater Developed and Natural Planning Target

• 20,000

40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 2009 2017 WIP2 Planning Target

Phosphorus

Wastewater Developed and Natural Planning Target

• Almost 30%

land federal

• Phase 6 Model enables

planning, tracking by agency

• Maj or agencies:

– National Park S

ervice

– Department of Defense – General S

ervices Administration

– Agricultural Research S

ervice

– S

mithsonian

• EP

A oversight of federal agencies and j urisdictions

F e de ra l L a nd in the Distric t

6

I de ntifying F e de ra l L a nds

• Federal agencies defined their areas and land

uses using Federal Facility Editing Tool in 2013

• Federal agencies will be able to amend this

information for the 2019 Progress run (i.e., the 7/ 1/ 2018– 6/ 30/ 2019 reporting period)

• This area and corresponding land uses were

initially used in distributing planning target across the j urisdictions

Work with stakeholders to meet local planning goals Remove additional climate pounds from nonfederal Keep “other federal” at 2010 No Action because model lacks capacity to plan at this scale Distribute remaining load among nonfederal land, major federal agencies, and other federal using same principles as setting planning targets Take DC’s planning target and set aside wastewater loads Identify federal lands in district (CBP)

Method to Devel

• p F

eder al Agenc y Goal s

8

Agency 2010 No Action 2017 Progress* Draft Planning Goal 2010 E3 Planning Goal as a %

• f E3

Agricultural Research S ervice 1,272 1,328 1,212 775 12% Department of Defense 12,224 12,388 11,538 6,517 12% General S ervices Administration 2,095 2,118 1,965 1,038 12% National Park S ervice 37,060 35,287 35,178 22,266 13% S mithsonian Institution 439 691 430 362 12% Other Federal Land 130 152 130 80 0% Nonfederal 146,924 133,830 132,298 71,992 20% Total 200,143 185,795 182,750 103,030

L

• c a l Nitro g e n Pla nning Go a ls - No nwa ste wa te r

* DOE E re c o g nize s 2017 pro g re ss do e s no t fully re fle c t imple me nta tio n to da te . I mple me nte d BMPs sho uld b e re sub mitte d fo r 2018 pro g re ss

Agency 2010 No Action 2017 Progress Draft Planning Goal 2010 E3 Planning Goal as a %

• f E3

Agricultural Research S ervice 104 106 83 46 35% Department of Defense 1,145 1,141 941 588 37% General S ervices Administration 141 141 109 57 38% National Park S ervice 13,197 4,553 9,128 2,826 39% S mithsonian Institution 103 112 82 47 37% Other Federal Land 9 11 9 5 0% Nonfederal 15,344 10,844 10,701 3,041 38% Total 30,042 16,908 21,053 6,610

L

• c a l Pho spho rus Pla nning Go a ls - No nwa ste wa te r

* DOE E re c o g nize s 2017 pro g re ss do e s no t fully re fle c t imple me nta tio n to da te . I mple me nte d BMPs sho uld b e re sub mitte d fo r 2018 pro g re ss

Wo rk with F e de ra l Pa rtne rs to Da te

• Ongoing: DOEE participates on Federal Facility Working Group
• May 24, 2018: DOEE webinar provides overview of Phase III WIP

, Chesapeake Assessment S cenario Tool (CAS T) and District’s S tormwater Database (S WDB) and preliminary planning goals

• May 31, 2018: DOEE workshop provides training on:
• How to create planning scenarios in CAS

T

• How to report implementation progress in S

WDB

• June 2018: DOEE distributes template for submitting voluntary BMPs
• S

eptember 14, 2018: DOEE distributes draft local planning goals

11

DRAFT Planning Targets released DRAFT Planning Targets released Potential Workshop #3/Comments due to DOEE Potential Workshop #3/Comments due to DOEE Planning Goals Finalized Planning Goals Finalized CAST Scenario #1 DUE CAST Scenario #1 DUE Scenario #2/Prelim WIP 3 Text DUE Scenario #2/Prelim WIP 3 Text DUE Scenario #3/DRAFT WIP 3 Text DUE Scenario #3/DRAFT WIP 3 Text DUE Scenario #4/FINAL WIP 3 Text DUE Scenario #4/FINAL WIP 3 Text DUE

SEPT EMBER O CT O BER NO VEMBER JANUARY JUNE

DOEE will help with the development of the federal scenarios if needed DOEE will include a breakdown of the methodology used to create the planning goals First attempt at narrative describing federal partner’s Phase 3 WIP methodologies

2018

Next S teps

2019

DECEMBER F EBRUARY

Oppo rtunitie s

• Fine-tuning the S

tormwater Database for more complete federal submissions

• S

treamlining the annual reporting process

• Cataloging BMPs Increased efficiency in

identifying and inspecting BMPs approaching the end of their life cycle Continuation of BMP credits

Othe r T a rg e ting a nd E ng a g e me nt E ffo rts

• Targeting for co-benefits
• Chesapeake Partner

Advisory Group

• S

takeholder focus groups

• Existing forums
• S

takeholder and public meetings

14

Oppo rtunitie s

• Fine-tuning the S

tormwater Database for more complete federal submissions

• S

treamlining the annual reporting process

• Cataloging BMPs Increased efficiency in

identifying and inspecting BMPs approaching the end of their life cycle Continuation of BMP credits

Sug g e stio ns fo r Sc e na rio De ve lo pme nt

• What practices are already in place but not

reported to Chesapeake Bay Program

• What practices will occur through complying

with District stormwater management regulations

• What voluntary practices are already planned
• What more could be done, either on own or

in partnership with District

Re so urc e s

• https:/ / www.epa.gov/ sites/ production/ file

s/ 2018-09/ documents/ epa-phase-3-wip- expectations-federal-8-16-18.pdf

• http:/ / cast.chesapeakebay.net/
• https:/ / www.chesapeakebay.net/ document

s/ BMP-Guide_Full.pdf

• Updated Chesapeake Bay Program

information on DOEE website forthcoming

Upc o ming De a dline s fo r F e de ra l Ag e nc ie s

• AS

AP/ no later than November 1: S ubmit BMPs using S WDB template to receive credit for 2018 Progress

• December 3: CAS

T planning scenario #1 due

• January 3: CAS

T planning scenario #2 due

• January 10: Text for preliminary WIP due
• February 15: CAS

T planning scenario #3 due

• February 25: Text for draft WIP due
• April 12: Draft WIP posted online (EP

A deadline)

• June 14: CAS

T planning scenario #4 due

• June 21: Text for final WIP due
• August 9: Final WIP posted online (EP

A deadline)

Katherine Antos

Branch Chief Partnering & Environmental Conservation Branch Department of Energy & Environment katherine.antos@ dc.gov (202) 574-7606