Dosimetry of an x-ray tube and Irradiation results of a DEPFET - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

dosimetry of an x ray tube
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Dosimetry of an x-ray tube and Irradiation results of a DEPFET - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dosimetry of an x-ray tube and Irradiation results of a DEPFET matrix Carried out at the University of Karlsruhe IMPRS Workshop Motivation: The KEKB accelerator and High luminosity collider Asymetric energy for studying


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Dosimetry of an x-ray tube and Irradiation results of a DEPFET matrix

Carried out at the University of Karlsruhe IMPRS Workshop

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motivation: The KEKB accelerator and…

  • High luminosity collider
  • Asymetric energy for

studying

  • Measure CKM matrix

elements

  • CP violation

Measuring device:

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

2

B B S Y e e    

 

) 4 (

slide-3
SLIDE 3

…the Belle II detector

  • The two innermost layers
  • f the vertex detector will

be consisted of DEPFET matrices

  • Ionizing Radiation from:
  • Beam-Gas Interaction
  • Synchrotron radiation

will damage those matrices

  • Ca. 1 Mrad/a (=10 kGy/a)
  • Simulating of these various

sources with x-ray radiation

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What are DEPFETs?

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

4

  • Depend on sideward

depletion: Internal Gate

  • Generated charges will be

stored in the Internal Gate

  • Modulation of Drain-

Source current

  • Clear operation necessary
  • Beneath Gate

metallization: Layer of silicon dioxide Sensitive to ionizing radiation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Damage mechanism

  • Generataion of

electron/hole pairs in the

  • xide
  • Mobility of holes is weak in

comparison to electrons

  • Holes will be trapped near

the interface and stay there for O(h) till O(a)

  • Also: Increase of interface

state density

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Dosimetry of the x-ray facility in Karlsruhe

  • To quantify the damage

done by ionizing radiation Applied Dose is necessary

  • Calibration was given, 

Recheck it  Problem Challenge started …

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Recipe for succsesfull Calibration

  • X-ray source
  • Detector

a) Fast readout, highly sensitive, good spectral response, low noise, superb amplifier b) If not (a), then find a compromise of (a)

  • Energy spectrum would be good

a) Measure one b) Simulate one

Thanks to my colleague: Oksana Brovchenko

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • 1. Determine dose rate in silicon diode
  • Dose rate measurement via

depleted diode

  • Measuring of reverse-current
  • X-ray photons generate

electron/hole-pairs in Si- Bulk

– Every charge carrier pair represents an energy of 3.6 eV – With the x-ray generated current one gets the deposited power, with the mass of the diode  dose rate in Si

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • 2. Making use of the spectrum
  • Spectrum of tungsten anode (including a 0.4 mm

Be filtering, black)

  • Generate via absorption function of Zr a new

transmitted spectrum (red)

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • 3. Dose in SiO2
  • Dose measurement

(diode)  power of spectrum (Si, blue) is known

  • Original spectrum

(black)  Filter (Zr, red) Absorption in SiO2 (green)

  • Final dose is

determined

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

New dose rates

  • Every dose rate matches to a specific set of

parameters, let’s assume

  • U=60 kV (max. tube voltage)
  • I=33 mA (max. tube current)
  • Distance is 155 mm ( )
  • Dose rate in silicon (300 µm)
  • Dose rate in silicon dioxide (180 nm)

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

11

New dose rates

7/21/2009 11 2

1 r D  

s Gy D

µm mm mA kv Si

305 , |

300 , 155 , 33 , 60

  s Gy D

nm mm mA kV SiO

239 , |

180 , 155 , 33 , 60

2

 

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Back to the DEPFET: Setup and DAQ

  • Study with a 6x16 Minimatrix
  • Important contacts on PCB 

easy accessibility

  • Drain contact needed probe

needle

  • Several irradiation and

measurement steps

  • Readout duration of input

characteristic of all 96 pixels

  • ~ 6…7h

– min. 4 days of room temperature annealing

  • DAQ via LabVIEW: Sweep of

Gate voltage, Drain current is measured

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Results of input characteristics √IDS(UGS)

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Change of threshold voltage

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Change of gain gm

  • Input characteristic curve

fitted with

– I=aU²+bU+c – Gain gm=mU+b via dI/dU m=2a no numeric deviation – Gain evaluated at Drain current = 50 µA

  • Maybe effect is part of

setup and readout process needs to be rechecked to find out if effect still

  • ccurs

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Outlook & Conclusions

  • Dosimetry

– A good agreement between simulated spectrum and dose measurement with silicon diode has been found – Further investigations are under way:

  • Spectrum has been measured (matches fine to the simulated one, except low energy photons

and L-Lines of tungsten)

  • Dosimetry with RadFETs have been done
  • DEPFET

– Shift of threshold voltage matches to previous single pixel measurements (strongly dependent on gate voltage) – Spreading of threshold voltage after irradiation increased

  • threshold voltage shift ∆ = ±0,12 V

unirradiated

  • threshold voltage shift ∆ = ± 0,20 V

at 142 krad (1.42 kGy)

  • threshold voltage shift ∆ = ±0,22 V

at 2.37 Mrad (23.65 kGy)

– Impact on Belle II

  • Steering chips (Switcher) won‘t have problems with the spreading
  • Change of gm interferes on gq (via gate oxide capacitance). Variations in Drain-Source current

may affect the current readout chip.

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Backup Slides

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Change of threshold voltage vs. Dose

7/21/2009

IMPRS Workshop

18