ESQPT in systems with long-range interactions Lea F. Santos Yeshiva - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

esqpt in systems with long range interactions
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ESQPT in systems with long-range interactions Lea F. Santos Yeshiva - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ESQPT in systems with long-range interactions Lea F. Santos Yeshiva University, New York, NY, USA Francisco Prez-Bernal Universidad de Huelva, Spain G. Luca Celardo and Fausto Borgonovi Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Lea F. Santos

Yeshiva University, New York, NY, USA

ESQPT in systems with long-range interactions

Francisco Pérez-Bernal

Universidad de Huelva, Spain PRA 94, 012113 (2016)

arXiv:1604.06851 (Fort. Physik) PRA 92, 050101R (2015)

Ø Consequences of the presence of an ESQPT (static and dynamics). Ø Lipkin model [U(2)]: experiments with ion traps, BEC, NMR but valid also for U(n+1)

  • G. Luca Celardo and Fausto Borgonovi

Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Trapped ions: long-range interaction

H = B ! n

z n

!

+ J | n " m |" ! n

x! m x n<m

!

  • P. Richerme et al, Nature 511, 198 (2014)
  • P. Jurcevi et al, Nature 511, 202 (2014)

0 ~ ! ! 3

Ion Traps

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Trapped ions: long-range interaction

H = B ! n

z n

!

+ J | n " m |" ! n

x! m x n<m

!

  • P. Richerme et al, Nature 511, 198 (2014)
  • P. Jurcevi et al, Nature 511, 202 (2014)
  • P. Hauke and L. Tagliacozzo, PRL 111, 207202 (2013)

N=100, excitation on 50

!!..!!"!!..!!Z ! = 3

Magnetization in z of each site Faster than Lieb-Robinson bound

! = 0.7

0 ~ ! ! 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Lipkin Model: infinite-range interaction

H = B ! n

z n

!

+ J ! n

x! m x n<m

!

! = 0

H = B ! n

z n

!

+ J | n " m |" ! n

x! m x n<m

!

dimension = 2N to dimension = N 2 +1

S z = ! n

z n

!

S x = ! n

x n

!

N = number of sites

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Lipkin Model: infinite-range interaction

H = B ! n

z n

!

+ J ! n

x! m x n<m

!

! = 0

H = B ! n

z n

!

+ J | n " m |" ! n

x! m x n<m

!

dimension = 2N to dimension = N 2 +1

S z = ! n

z n

!

S x = ! n

x n

!

H = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

N = number of sites

Control parameter

Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model

!c = 0.2

Ground state quantum phase transition

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Lipkin Model: U(2) algebraic structure

Schwinger representation:

S + = 2t+s S z = 1 2 (t+t ! s+s)

H = (1!!)nt + ! N (t+s+ s+t)2

nt = t+t

H = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

U(2) U(1) SO(2) Two species of scalar bosons Ground state QPT U(2) U(1) SO(2)

HU(n+1) = (1!!)HU(n) + ! N HSO(n+1)

In general:

PRA 92, 050101R (2015)

!c = 0.2

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Excited State Quantum Phase Transition

!c = 0.2 ! = 0.4 ! = 0.6 ! = 0.8

HU(n+1) = (1!!)HU(n) + ! N HSO(n+1)

H = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

Separatrix

that marks the ESQPT

QPT ESQPT ESQPT ESQPT

EESQPT = (1! 5!)2 16!

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

ESQPT: participation ratio in U(1) basis

!U(2)

(k)

= Csz

(k) S mz sz=!N/2 N/2

"

Participation Ratio

PR(k) ! 1 |Csz

(k) |4 sz="N/2 N/2

#

LFS & Pérez-Bernal PRA92, 050101R (2015).

H = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

U(1)-basis

Large PR: delocalized state Small PR: localized state

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

!U(2)

(k)

= Csz

(k) S mz sz=!N/2 N/2

"

Participation Ratio

PR(k) ! 1 |Csz

(k) |4 sz="N/2 N/2

#

PRA92, 050101R (2015).

H = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

U(1)-basis

N=600, 2000

! = 0.4

EESQPT

Eigenstate at ESQPT localized at U(1) basis with mz=-N/2

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Eigenstate at ESQPT localized at U(1) basis with mz=-N/2

N=600

! = 0.6

ez '/ N ez '/ N ez '/ N ez '/ N

Csz

(k) 2

!U(2)

(k)

= Csz

(k) s mz sz=!N/2 N/2

"

EESQPT

U(1) basis s mz

H = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

ez = s mz HU(2) s mz

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Eigenstate at ESQPT localized at U(1) basis with mz=-N/2

N=600

! = 0.6

ez '/ N ez '/ N ez '/ N ez '/ N

Csz

(k) 2

Energy of the U(1) basis vectors

ez = s mz HU(2) s mz

!!..!!!!..!!Z

mz = !N / 2

!U(2)

(k)

= Csz

(k) s mz sz=!N/2 N/2

"

EESQPT

U(1) basis s mz

H = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

ez = s mz HU(2) s mz

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Eigenstate at ESQPT localized at U(1) basis with mz=-N/2

N=600

! = 0.6

ez '/ N ez '/ N ez '/ N ez '/ N

Csz

(k) 2

Energy of the U(1) basis vectors

ez = s mz HU(2) s mz

!!..!!!!..!!Z

mz = !N / 2

U(1): z SO(2): x

!U(2)

(k)

= Csz

(k) s mz sz=!N/2 N/2

"

EESQPT

U(1) basis s mz

!c

Ground state QPT H = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

HU(2) = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

!(0) = S mz

Initial state U(1)-basis

Quench from U(n) to U(n+1)

F(t) = !(0) | !(t)"

2

Survival Probability

!!..!!!!..!!Z

U(1) ground state

HU(2) = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

!(0) = s mz = Csz

(k) !U(2) (k) k

"

Initial state

Initial state: U(1)-basis vector Slow decay

Survival Probability

10 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Time

10

  • 4

10

  • 2

10

F(t) !!..!!!!..!!Z

!!..!""!..!!Z

U(1) ground state

N=1000

! = 0.6

PRA 94, 012113 (2016)

F(t) = !(0) | !(t)"

2 =

Cmz

(k) 2 e#iEkt k

$

2

= !ini(E)e#iEt dE

#% %

&

2

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Magnetization in z: slow dynamics

PRA 94, 012113 (2016)

mz

(k) / N = !k S z !k / N

U(1): z SO(2): x

HU(2) = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

!(0) =""..""""..""Z !(0) ="".."##"..""Z

Same initial states studied in ion traps

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Magnetization in z: dip

PRA 94, 012113 (2016)

mz

(k) / N = !k S z !k / N

U(1): z SO(2): x

!!..!!!!..!!Z

E'k / N

At the separatrix is localized at mz = !N / 2

!k

EESQPT

HU(2) = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Magnetization in x: bifurcation

PRA 94, 012113 (2016)

mz

(k) / N = !k S z !k / N

U(1): z SO(2): x

E'k / N

EESQPT

HU(2) = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

EESQPT

mx

(k) / N = !k S x !k / N

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

QPT with parity-symmetry breaking

H = ! 2 S z

2 "S x # !

2 z2 " 1" z2 cos!

Trenkwalder … Inguscio, Fattori arXiv: 1603.02979

Tuning g to large negative values, the ground state of the system goes from a gapped symmetric state (z = 0) to two degenerate asymmetric states (|z| > 0). The system undergoes a second-order QPT where the spatial parity symmetry is broken. Imbalance

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Magnetization in x: bifurcation

mx

(k) / N = !k S x !k / N

U(1): z SO(2): x

HU(2) = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

Bifurcation of mx for the ground state as increases

!

! < !c

! > !c

!c = 0.2

Ground state QPT

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Magnetization in x: bifurcation

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

ξ

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

E’

k/N

U(1): z SO(2): x

HU(2) = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Magnetization in x: bifurcation

mx

(k) / N = !k S x !k / N

U(1): z SO(2): x HU(2) = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

Bifurcation of mx for the ground state as increases

!

Bifurcation of mx at the ESQPT EESQPT EESQPT

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Classical bifurcation

H = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

H = ! 2 J z

2 "J x # !

2 z2 " 1" z2 cos!

Oberthaler’s group PRL 105 (2010) BEC Oliveira’s group PRA 87 (2013) NMR

z = (Na ! Nb) / N

V(!) !

z = Temporal mean magnetization

V(!) = 1! z2 cos!

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Self-trapping: depending on

H = (1!!) N 2 +S z " # $ % & '! 4! N S x

2

H = ! 2 J z

2 "J x # !

2 z2 " 1" z2 cos!

! <1 ! >1 ! = 0.15 < !c ! = 0.6 > !c

!(0) = s mx

!

SO(2) basis

++..+!++..!+X

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Self-trapping: depending on energy

mx

(k) / N = !k S x !k / N

Bifurcation of mx at the ESQPT

Eini < EESQPT Eini > EESQPT

!(0)

Superposition of eigenstates

  • nly below or only above the

separatrix

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Conclusions

Ø Different ways to capture an ESQPT: (1) Structure of the Hamiltonian matrix. (2) Level of delocalization of the eigenstates. (3) Magnetization in x and z. (4) Dynamics. Ø The dynamics of the system depends on the interplay between the initial state and the final Hamiltonian.

!!..!!!!..!!Z

!!..!""!..!!Z

Evolution of as done in experiments with ion traps. PRA 94, 012113 (2016) arXiv:1604.06851 (Fort. Physik) PRA 92, 050101R (2015)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

ESQPT: participation ratio

In the SO(2)-basis

Participation Ratio

PR(k) ! 1 |Cn

(k) |4 n=L N

"

N=500, 2000

!SO(2)

(k)

= Cn

(k) s mx mx=!N/2 N/2

"

LFS, Távora, Bernal arXiv:1604.04289

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Classical bifurcation

H = ! 2 J z

2 "J x # !

2 z2 " 1" z2 cos!

! <1 ! >1

U(1): z SO(2): x

!c = 0.2

Ground state QPT

! < !c

! > !c

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Structure of the eigenstates

QPT

Caprio, Cejnar, and Iachello

  • Ann. Phys. 323, 1106 (2008).

Structure of the eigenstates above and below the separatrix.

U(3) model Eigenstates in the U(2)-basis

!U(3)

(k)

= Cn

(k) [N] n L k n=L N

!

HU(3) = (1!!)HU(2) + ! N HSO(3)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Classical bifurcation

H = ! 2 J z

2 "J x # !

2 z2 " 1" z2 cos!

! <1 ! >1

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

!(0) = s mz = Cmz

(k) !U(2) (k) k

"

Initial state

Initial state: U(1)-basis vector Slow decay

F(t) = !(0) | !(t)"

2 =

Cmz

(k) 2 e#iEkt k

$

2

= !ini(E)e#iEt dE

#% %

&

2

Survival Probability

10 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Time

10

  • 4

10

  • 2

10

F(t) !!..!!!!..!!Z

!!..!""!..!!Z

U(1) ground state

N=1000

! = 0.6

arXiv:1604.04289

!ini(E) = Cmz

(k) 2 k

!

"(E " Ek)

LDOS (local density of states)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Lea F. Santos, Yeshiva University Long-range, Trieste, 2016

Initial state

Initial state: U(1)-basis vector Slow decay

F(t) = !(0) | !(t)"

2 =

Csz

(k) 2 e#iEkt k

$

2

Survival Probability

10 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Time

10

  • 4

10

  • 2

10

F(t) !!..!!!!..!!Z

!!..!""!..!!Z

U(1) ground state

N=1000

! = 0.6

!(0) = S mz = Csz

(k) !U(2) (k) k

"

arXiv:1604.04289