First Quarter 2017 Investor Update Investor Presentation November - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

first quarter 2017 investor update
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

First Quarter 2017 Investor Update Investor Presentation November - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

First Quarter 2017 Investor Update Investor Presentation November 2016 May 10, 2017 NASDAQ: PVAC Forward Looking and Cautionary Statements Certain statements contained herein that are not descriptions of historical facts are


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Investor Presentation November 2016

May 10, 2017

NASDAQ: PVAC

First Quarter 2017 Investor Update

slide-2
SLIDE 2

1

Certain statements contained herein that are not descriptions of historical facts are "forward-looking" statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We use words such as “guidance,” “projects,” “estimates,” “expects,” “continues,” “intends,” “believes,” “forecasts,” “future,” and variations of such words or similar expressions in this presentation to identify forward-looking statements. Guidance and projections regarding our future production or other results is based

  • n management’s reasonable estimates but is preliminary and subject to material change. Because such statements include risks, uncertainties and contingencies, actual results may differ

materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and contingencies include, but are not limited to, the following: potential adverse effects

  • f the completed bankruptcy proceedings on our liquidity, results of operations, brand, business prospects, ability to retain financing and other risks and uncertainties related to our emergence

from bankruptcy; the ability to operate our business following emergence from bankruptcy; our ability to satisfy our short-term and long-term liquidity needs, including our inability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations or to obtain adequate financing to fund our capital expenditures and meet working capital needs; negative events or publicity adversely affecting our ability to maintain our relationships with our suppliers, service providers, customers, employees, and other third parties; post-bankruptcy capital structure and the adoption of fresh start accounting, including the risk that assumptions and factors used in estimating enterprise value vary significantly from the current estimates in connection with the application of fresh start accounting; plans,

  • bjectives, expectations and intentions contained in this presentation that are not historical; our ability to execute our business plan in volatile and depressed commodity price environments; any

decline in and volatility of commodity prices for oil, NGLs, and natural gas; our anticipated production and development results; our ability to develop, explore for, acquire and replace oil and natural gas reserves and sustain production; our ability to generate profits or achieve targeted reserves in our development and exploratory drilling and well operations; any impairments, write- downs or write-offs of our reserves or assets; the projected demand for and supply of oil, NGLs and natural gas; our ability to contract for drilling rigs, frac crews, supplies and services at reasonable costs; our ability to obtain adequate pipeline transportation capacity for our oil and gas production at reasonable cost and to sell the production at, or at reasonable discounts to, market prices; the uncertainties inherent in projecting future rates of production for our wells and the extent to which actual production differs from that estimated in our proved oil and natural gas reserves; drilling and operating risks; concentration of assets; our ability to compete effectively against other oil and gas companies; leasehold terms expiring before production can be established and our ability to replace expired leases; costs or results of any strategic initiatives; environmental obligations, results of new drilling activities, locations and methods, costs and liabilities that are not covered by an effective indemnity or insurance; the timing of receipt of necessary regulatory permits; the effect of commodity and financial derivative arrangements; the

  • ccurrence of unusual weather or operating conditions, including force majeure events; our ability to retain or attract senior management and key employees; counterparty risk related to the

ability of these parties to meet their future obligations; compliance with and changes in governmental regulations or enforcement practices, especially with respect to environmental, health and safety matters; physical, electronic and cybersecurity breaches; litigation that impacts us, our assets or our midstream service providers; geologic formations and results of drilling in new areas with new technologies; uncertainties relating to general domestic and international economic and political conditions; and other risks set forth in our filings with the SEC. Additional information concerning these and other factors can be found in our press releases and public filings with the SEC. Many of the factors that will determine our future results are beyond the ability of management to control or predict. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect management's views only as of the date hereof. The statements in this presentation speak only as of the date of this presentation. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, or to make any other forward- looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by applicable law. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in Penn Virginia’s Annual Report on Form 10‐K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2017, the latter of which will be made available on Penn Virginia’s website at www.pennvirginia.com under Investors or from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Definitions Proved reserves are those quantities of oil and gas which, by analysis of geosciences and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulation before the time at which contracts providing the right to

  • perate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether the estimate is a deterministic estimate or probabilistic estimate. Probable reserves are those

additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves, but which are as likely than not to be recoverable (there should be at least a 50% probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the proved plus probable reserve estimates). Possible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recoverable than probable reserves (there should be at least a 10% probability that the total quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the proved plus probable plus possible reserve estimates). Estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) is the sum of reserves remaining as of a given date and cumulative production as of that date. EUR is a measure that by its nature is more speculative than estimates of reserves prepared in accordance with SEC definitions and guidelines and accordingly is less certain.

Forward Looking and Cautionary Statements

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2

Penn Virginia Today

Granite Wash Net Acreage: ~7,150 (100% HBP) Q1 2017 Production 85 MBOE (934 BOEPD) Proved Reserves: 2.5 MMBOE2 Eagle Ford Core Net Acreage: ~56,0003 (93% HBP) Drilling Locations: ~525 gross locations Economics: 50% IRR at $50 WTI oil Q1 2017 Production 770 MBOE (8,561 BOEPD) Proved Reserves: 47.0 MMBOE2

Houston (HQ)

  • Strong Q1 2017 Operating and Financial

Performance

Exceeded guidance with Q1 2017 production of 9,495 BOEPD, or 855 MBOE (71% crude oil)

Recently turned 4-well Kudu pad to sales; PVAC’s first test of latest slickwater completion design on 400-foot spaced laterals at an estimated 30-day IP of 3,522 BOEPD (94% crude oil)(1)

Successfully tested slickwater completion design in Area 2 with Lager 3H; well is currently flowing 1,500 BOEPD and climbing on day five of flowback

30-day IP for 3-well Axis pad of 3,804 BOEPD (94% crude oil)

Added/extended approximately 1,700 net acres to core leasehold

  • Strong liquidity

Approximately $100 million of liquidity, with $35.0 million currently drawn

  • n the credit facility
  • Positioned for growth

2017 capital program of $120 - $140 million, with ability to accelerate

Expected 20% - 30% per year production growth through 2018 based

  • n current 2-rig program

Focused Eagle Ford Producer

1) Preliminary estimate based on 25 days of production. 2) As of December 31, 2016 3) Excludes 19,600 net acres expiring in 2017. Includes acreage leased in 2017.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

3

Axis Unit 1H : IP 1,740 BOE/D 2H : IP 1,795 BOE/D 3H : IP 2,806 BOE/D EOG Guadalupe Unit 14H : IP 3,678 BOE/D Sable Unit 4H : IP 2,077 BOE/D 5H : IP 3,418 BOE/D 6H : IP 1,045 BOE/D2 Kudu Unit 6H : IP 1,411 BOE/D 7H : IP 1,284 BOE/D 8H : IP 1,188 BOE/D 9H : IP 2,005 BOE/D Chicken Hawk Unit 2H, 3H, 4H & 5H : Drilling Zebra Unit 6H : Waiting on completion 7H : Waiting on completion Lager Unit Area 2 test 3H : Flowing back Schacherl-Effenberger 3H Proposed Area 2 test EOG Novosad Unit 10H : IP 969 BOE/D (Chalk) EOG Boedecker Unit 18H: IP 3,923 BOE/D 19H: IP 3,185 BOE/D EOG Kasper Unit 1H: IP 3,586 BOE/D 2H: IP 1,473 BOE/D 3H: IP 2,464 BOE/D 4H: IP 2,727 BOE/D Jake Berger Unit 2H, 3H, 4H & 5H “Super Pad” combined with Chicken Hawk completion

1) Results are based on 24-hour IPs of the listed wells. Please see slide 4 for the 30-day IPs of PVAC’s wells, where available. EOG results are as reported to the Texas Railroad Commission. 2) IP measured with only 9 stages flowing. The remaining 14 stages were drilled out after the recording of the metric.

Comparable to On-Trend and Down-Dip Wells1

Recent Well Results

Lavaca County Dewitt County Gonzales County Fayette County

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4

  • Kudu pad results in line with PVAC type curve expectations
  • Axis and Sable continue to perform as expected
  • Early indications on Lager 3H in Area 2 are very encouraging

‒ Flowing pressures in excess of 4,900 psi among highest ever observed on our acreage ‒ On day five of flowback, well producing over 1,500 BOEPD (78% crude oil) and still increasing

  • Strong results on Lager 3H could change the drilling plan for second half of 2017

‒ Expand Schacherl-Effenberger pad ‒ Move rig into Area 2 ‒ Option to accelerate the development of Area 2 with third rig

Encouraging Well Results Support 2017 Drilling Objectives

1) Wellhead rate only. The natural gas liquids yield is 135 to 155 barrels per million cubic feet of natural gas. 2) Excludes the Sable 6H which had operational issues and only had 9 open stages at the time of measuring the 24-hour and 30-day IP rates. The remaining stages were subsequently opened to flow. 3) Preliminary estimate based on 25 days of production.

2-String Lower Eagle Ford Production Results and Related Operating Information

Gross / Net Lateral Frac Oil Equivalent Oil Oil Equivalent Oil Wells Length Stages Proppant Rate Rate Percentage Rate Rate Percentage Feet lb per foot BOPD/ 1000 ft BOEPD/ 1000 ft BOPD/ 1000 ft BOEPD/ 1000 ft 2-String Type Curve 6,000 24 2,000 225 251 90% 169 189 90% Sable Pad (4H & 5H)(2) 2 / 1.1 6,401 32 2,404 399 423 94% 174 185 94% Axis Pad (1H - 3H) 3 / 1.9 7,056 35 2,484 278 299 93% 167 179 94% Kudu Pad (6H - 9H)(3) 4 / 1.7 5,429 27 2,415 261 283 92% 156 166 94% Averages 24-Hour IP Average Gross Daily 30-Day Average Gross Daily Production Rates(1) Production Rates(1)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5

50 100 150 200 250 300 200 400 600 800 1,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Cumulative Oil - MBO Daily Average Oil Production - BOPD Months on Production Daily Oil Production (BOPD) Cumulative Oil Production (MBO)

Approximately 50% Estimated Rate of Return at $50/barrel WTI Oil Price

Attractive Eagle Ford Type Curve and Economics

1) Type curve is management’s estimate. Calculated predominantly with data from wells with Gen 1 to 3 slickwater completion designs. 2) Wellhead rate, pre-processing. Post processing type curve production mix is 86% oil, 7% natural gas, 7% NGLs 3) The calculation of PV-10 assumes a $5.0mm well cost, $50.00 NYMEX oil, $3.00 Henry Hub gas pricing and NGL pricing at 30% of NYMEX Oil flat for the economic life of the well.

Area 1 Lower Eagle Ford Type Curve1

Area 1 Lower Eagle Ford Type Curve1 Well Costs $4.9 – $5.1 million Frac Stages 24 Lateral Length (Ft.) 6,000 Production Mix2 90% Oil, 10% Natural Gas Gross EUR (MBOE) 490 PV-103 $3.1 million

20 40 60 80 100 $35 $40 $45 $50 $55 $60 Expected Rate of Return - % NYMEX Oil Price (Assumed flat) - $/Bbl Slickwater Completion Previous Hybrid Completion Gas Price assumed $3.00 Flat

Avg Hawg Hunter Well

(Normalized to 6,000 ')

Well Economics Have Improved Substantially

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Financial Review

slide-8
SLIDE 8

7

Highlights (compared to Q4 2016)

  • 7.4% increase in total product revenue

(87% from crude oil sales) primarily driven by higher realized prices and slightly higher oil volume

  • Cash direct operating expenses of

$14.97 per BOE vs. $14.81 per BOE

  • 16.3% increase in operating income
  • Derivatives gain of $17.1 million vs. loss
  • f $12.3 million
  • Net income of $28.4 million vs. net loss
  • f $1.9 million
  • Adjusted EBITDAX(1) of $20.5 million vs

$21.1 million

Q1 2017 Financial Overview

1 Adjusted EBITDAX is a non-GAAP measure, reconciled to net income in the Appendix of this presentation.

($ thousands) Three Months Three Months Ended Ended March 31, December 31, 2017 2016 Revenues Crude oil 30,073 $ 27,649 $ Natural gas liquids (NGLs) 2,302 2,374 Natural gas 2,343 2,315 Total product revenues 34,718 32,338 Gain (loss) on sales of assets, net 65 (49) Other, net 602 365 Total revenues 35,385 32,654 Operating expenses Lease operating 4,989 4,575 Gathering, processing and transportation 2,551 2,467 Production and ad valorem taxes 1,979 2,123 General and administrative 3,281 3,531 Total direct operating expenses 12,800 12,696 Share-based compensation - equity classified awards 846 81 Exploration

  • Depreciation, depletion and amortization

9,810 9,623 Total operating expenses 23,456 22,400 Operating income (loss) 11,929 10,254 Other income (expense) Interest expense (538) (661) Derivatives 17,016 (12,253) Other

  • 805

Income (loss) before income taxes 28,407 (1,855) Income tax benefit (expense)

  • Net income (loss)

28,407 $ (1,855) $

slide-9
SLIDE 9

8

Simple Capital Structure - Ample Liquidity

1) As defined in the Company’s Credit Agreement dated September 12, 2016.

Highlights

  • Credit facility is only debt

‒ $30 million drawn at 3/31/17 ‒ $128 million borrowing base ‒ $200 million credit facility ‒ Spring redetermination is in process

  • Current credit facility balance of $35.0

million

  • Low leverage of 0.4x total debt to

Adjusted EBITDAX(1)

  • Intend to fund the 2017 capital program

with cash flow from operations and borrowings under the credit facility

  • Ability to finance attractive growth
  • pportunities and/or acceleration

Borrowing Base Drawn Letters of Credit Cash Liquidity

$96.9 Million of Liquidity as of May 5, 2017

Million

$128.0 $96.9 $4.7 $35.0 $0.8

slide-10
SLIDE 10

9

  • 2017 and 2018 guidance are unchanged
  • Strong growth in second half of 2017 with “super pad”

expected to come online in early Q3 2017

  • Projecting 20% to 30% growth through 2018, with exit

rate approaching 15,000 BOE per day

  • Manageable outspend in 2017, financed on credit

facility, spending within cash flow for 2018 1Q17 2Q17E 3Q17E 4Q17E 4Q18E

Production Growth in 2017 Builds Into 20181 Key Highlights 2017 and 2018 Guidance

Delivering Production Growth through 2018

1) Graphical representation of 2017 and 2018 production growth profile only. Not intended to be quarterly guidance. Not to scale.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

10

Substantial Portion of Oil Production is Hedged

4,408 3,476 2,916 $48.62 $49.12 $49.90

$47.50 $48.00 $48.50 $49.00 $49.50 $50.00 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 Hedged Volumes (BOEPD) Swap Price

Hedged Volumes (Bbls/d)

Oil Hedges  Swap portfolio has provided downside protection  Mark to market at first quarter end was a net liability of $8.7 million  Natural gas and NGL volumes are unhedged

Swap Price ($/Bbl)

Oil Hedge Portfolio Summary as of 3/31/2017

2017 - Remaining 2018 2019

slide-12
SLIDE 12

11

Excellent Assets Financial Strength Demonstrated Execution Positioned For Growth

Strong Multi-year Inventory of High Rate of Return Drilling Locations

Attractive Asset Base in the Core of the Eagle Ford

  • Consistent operational execution
  • Strong financial performance
  • Solid liquidity
  • Positioned for growth
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Q & A

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Appendix

slide-15
SLIDE 15

14

Non-GAAP Reconciliation – Adjusted EBITDAX

Successor Successor Predecessor Three Months Three Months Three Months Ended Ended Ended

(in thousands)

March 31, December 31, March 31, 2017 2016 2016 Reconciliation of GAAP "Net income (loss)" to Non- GAAP "Adjusted EBITDAX" Net income (loss) 28,407 $ (1,855) $ (33,473) $ Adjustments to reconcile to Adjusted EBITDAX: Interest expense 538 661 24,434 Income tax expense (benefit)

  • Depreciation, depletion and amortization

9,810 9,623 13,812 Exploration

  • 1,327

Share-based compensation expense (equity-classified) 846 81 (602) (Gain) loss on sale of assets, net (65) 49 153 Accretion of firm transportation obligation

  • 175

Adjustments for derivatives: Net (gains) losses (17,016) 12,253 (4,492) Cash settlements, net (1,992) 384 30,559 Adjustment for special items: Strategic and financial advisory costs

  • 11,063

Restructuring expenses (20) (98) 748 Adjusted EBITDAX 20,508 $ 21,098 $ 43,704 $ Adjusted EBITDAX represents net income (loss) before interest expense, income tax expense (benefit), depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, exploration expense and share-based compensation expense, further adjusted to exclude the effects of gains or losses on sale of assets, accretion of firm transportation

  • bligation, non-cash changes in the fair value of derivatives, strategic and financial advisory costs, restructuring

expenses and other non-cash items. We believe this presentation is commonly used by investors and professional research analysts in the valuation, comparison, rating and investment recommendations of companies within the

  • il and gas exploration and production industry. We use this information for comparative purposes within our
  • industry. Adjusted EBITDAX is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered

as a measure of liquidity or as an alternative to net income (loss). Adjusted EBITDAX as defined by Penn Virginia may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies and should be considered in conjunction with net income (loss) and other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, such as operating income or cash flows from operating activities. Adjusted EBITDAX should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for an analysis of Penn Virginia’s results as reported under GAAP.