How far is Africa from the World Technology Frontier? Closing the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

how far is africa from the world technology frontier
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

How far is Africa from the World Technology Frontier? Closing the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

How far is Africa from the World Technology Frontier? Closing the South-South Technology Gap Gouranga Das, Hanyang University Imed Drine, Islamic Development Bank Great strides over the last decade Six of the worlds ten fastest


slide-1
SLIDE 1

How far is Africa from the World Technology Frontier? Closing the South-South Technology Gap

Gouranga Das, Hanyang University Imed Drine, Islamic Development Bank

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Great strides over the last decade………

  • Six of the world’s ten fastest growing economies
  • f the past decade are in sub-Saharan Africa.
  • Many countries have enjoyed growth in income

per person of more than 5% a year since 2007.

  • Many of the countries whose well-being has

improved most in the past five years are in Africa.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

but, a rocky road still lies ahead

  • While the opportunities for development are

important, several African economies remain fragile and suffering from underdeveloped infrastructure, and limited diversification of their productive structure.

  • Poverty rates and inequality in many African countries

remain unacceptably high.

  • Africa is the only continent where per capita food

production has declined over the past 30 years and where unemployment rates remain extremely high.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Main Questions

  • 1. Why do some countries succeed in catching up, while

Africa falls behind?

  • 2. What critical factors for catch-up are?
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Angola Benin Botswana Brazil Brunei Darussalam Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Central African Republic Chad China Comoros Congo, Dem. Rep. Congo, Rep. Cote d'Ivoire Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia, The Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Hong Kong SAR, China India Indonesia Kenya Korea, Rep. Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Papua New Guinea Rwanda Senegal Sierra Leone Singapore South Africa Sudan Tanzania Thailand Togo Uganda Zambia

  • 1.5
  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 1.5

  • 6
  • 4
  • 2

2 4 6 8 10

Log(GDP per capita in 1990 (PPP , cte 2005) US$) Moving ahead Losing momuntum catching up Lagging behind GDP per capita growth 1990-2010 (PPP, cte 20005) US$)

Convergence in GDP per capita over 1990-2010

  • Due to good performance during the last two decades some African have moved closer to the frontier.
  • But, there are still many African countries in the group that falls behind.
  • The nature of African growth, with its dependence on mineral and mining sectors means that growth has not

necessarily contributed to a reduction in inequality.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Africa lags behind emerging economies in productivity.

0.5 1 1.5 2 SSA Emerging Economies Total Factor Productivity Growth (%) 1990s 2000s 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 1960s 1970s 1990s 1990s 2000s

Labour Productivity per person employed in 2012 US$

SSA Emerging Economies

1960s 1970s 1990s 1990s 2000s 21% 17% 12% 8% 8%

Labour productivity relative to Emerging Economies

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5

Labour productivity gap (relative to US)

Emerging Economies SSA

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Levels of output and input per capita and productivity (U.S. = 100 in 2000).

Group Summaries Output per capita Input per capita Productivity 2000 2005 2009 2000 2005 2009 2000 2005 2009 World 20.66 23.11 25.09 46.98 48.47 51.59 43.98 47.67 48.64 G7 85.039 90.59 90.18 92.25 94.95 96.46 92.19 95.41 93.49 Developing Asia 7.2017 9.54 12.67 25.00 28.73 35.13 28.80 33.21 36.06 Non-G7 71.74 77.43 79.14 84.15 90.95 96.15 85.25 85.13 82.31 Latin America 21.373 22.97 25.04 33.52 36.16 40.96 63.77 63.52 61.13 Eastern Europe 19.269 25.75 29.60 36.04 37.08 40.25 53.47 69.44 73.55 Sub-Sahara Africa 4.3387 4.84 5.32 15.74 16.85 18.73 27.56 28.72 28.37

  • N. Africa & M. East

15.317 17.56 19.07 28.53 31.28 34.45 53.69 56.12 55.37 Source: Table 3 of Jorgenson and Vu (2011), JPM.

Period 1989-1995 Period 2000-2004

GDP Growth Capital Input Labour input TFP GDP growth Capital Input Labour Input TFP

World 2.34 1.34 0.7 0.29 3.25 1.35 0.68 1.22 SSA 1.8 0.52 2.56

  • 1.28

4.22 1.55 1.8 0.88 MENA 4.03 00.95 2.61 0.47 4.4 1.1 1.74 1.56

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Literature: Main drivers of catching-up

  • 1. Capital accumulation
  • 2. Institutional conditions
  • 3. Knowledge/Human Development
  • 4. Social capital/Infrastructural Bottlenecks
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Growth Variations and TFP Gaps

Austria Belgium Cyprus Denmark Finland France West Germany Greece Iceland Ireland Italy Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Norway Portugal Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom Canada United States Australia New Zealand Albania Armenia Bulgaria Croatia Czech Republic Estonia Georgia Hungary Kazakhstan Kyrgyz Republic Latvia Lithuania Macedonia Moldova Poland Romania Russian Federation Slovak Republic Tajikistan Turkmenistan Ukraine Uzbekistan Bangladesh Cambodia China Hong Kong India Indonesia Japan Malaysia Pakistan Philippines Singapore South Korea Sri Lanka Taiwan Thailand Vietnam Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica Dominican Republic Ecuador Guatemala Jamaica Mexico Peru

  • St. Lucia

Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela Bahrain Iran Iraq Israel Jordan Kuwait Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Syria United Arab Emirates Yemen Algeria Angola Burkina Faso Cameroon Côte d'Ivoire Egypt Ethiopia Ghana Kenya Madagascar Malawi Mali Morocco Mozambique Niger Nigeria Senegal South Africa Sudan Tanzania Tunisia Uganda Zambia

  • 4
  • 2

2 4 6 8

  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5

GDP per capita growth TFP growth, 2000s

Albania Algeria Angola Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Benin Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Bulgaria Burkina Faso Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt, Arab Rep. El Salvador Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Fiji Finland France Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Guatemala Guinea Honduras Hong Kong SAR, China Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Ireland Israel Italy Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea, Rep. Kuwait Kyrgyz Republic Lao PDR Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Lithuania Luxembourg Macao SAR, China Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Mali Malta Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Moldova Mongolia Morocco Mozambique Namibia Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Oman Pakistan Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Qatar Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saudi Arabia Senegal Sierra Leone Singapore Slovak Republic Slovenia South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela, RB Vietnam Yemen, Rep. Zambia 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

GDP per capita , cte 2005 US$ Knowledge Index

Very high correlation between the level of GDP per capita and TFP growth Very high correlation between the level of income and the level of knowledge

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) estimations, October 2011. Regional totals for R&D Expenditure (GERD) 2002 and 2009 2002 2009 2002 2009 2002 2009 2002 2009 World 787.7 1,276.9 100.0% 100.0% 1.70% 1.77% 125.5 187.3 Developed countries 650.0 931.5 82.5% 72.9% 2.22% 2.32% 543.0 756.6 Developing countries 136.4 343.3 17.3% 26.9% 0.83% 1.11% 31.1 71.9 Least developed 1.3 2.1 0.2% 0.2% 0.22% 0.20% 1.8 2.6 Americas 319.2 457.5 40.5% 35.8% 2.08% 2.13% 372.9 494.6 North America 297.2 417.5 37.7% 32.7% 2.57% 2.72% 929.5 1,222.9 Latin America and the 22.0 40.0 2.8% 3.1% 0.59% 0.66% 41.0 68.6 Europe 236.4 363.4 30.0% 28.5% 1.66% 1.76% 297.7 448.7 European Union 205.7 300.3 26.1% 23.5% 1.76% 1.92% 424.5 602.2 Commonwealth of 16.9 37.0 2.1% 2.9% 1.18% 1.19% 81.6 183.2 Central, Eastern and 13.7 26.1 1.7% 2.0% 1.19% 1.36% 134.7 238.9 Africa 7.0 11.8 0.9% 0.9% 0.42% 0.41% 8.2 11.8 South Africa 2.3 4.7 0.3% 0.4% 0.73% 0.93% 50.6 95.5 Other Sub-Saharan 1.9 3.4 0.2% 0.3% 0.30% 0.29% 3.1 4.6 Arab States in Africa 2.5 3.7 0.3% 0.3% 0.36% 0.31% 13.6 17.7 Asia 214.0 421.8 27.2% 33.0% 1.48% 1.62% 57.1 104.2 Japan 108.2 137.1 13.7% 10.7% 3.17% 3.36% 858.1 1,083.5 China 39.2 154.1 5.0% 12.1% 1.07% 1.70% 30.5 115.5 Israel 7.1 8.8 0.9% 0.7% 4.59% 4.27% 1,138.0 1,211.2 India 13.3 … 1.7% … 0.74% … 12.2 … Commonwealth of 0.5 1.0 0.1% 0.1% 0.25% 0.23% 7.0 13.4 Newly Industrialised 39.7 78.7 5.0% 6.2% 1.44% 1.83% 98.3 178.8 Arab States in Asia 1.2 2.3 0.1% 0.2% 0.13% 0.14% 11.4 17.9 Other in Asia (excl. 4.8 11.0 0.6% 0.9% 0.31% 0.42% 7.2 15.2 Oceania 11.2 22.4 1.4% 1.8% 1.66% 2.20% 350.5 622.4 GERD (in billions PPP$) % world GERD GERD as % of GDP GERD per capita (in PPP$)

Africa is not investing enough in knowledge

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Global Competitive Index and some pillars for regions (2012-13)

Institutions Technological adoption Innovation and sophistication factors Efficiency enhancers Basic requirements GCI Values Regions according to Stages of Development Advanced Economies (average) 4.95 5.58 4.79 4.97 5.46 5.02 Asian Tigers (average) 5.15 5.77 5.01 5.36 5.95 5.37 Developing Asia (average) 3.87 4.65 3.60 4.02 4.42 4.18 Emerging and Developing Economies (average) 3.75 4.54 3.37 3.81 4.23 3.94 Middle East and North Africa (average) 4.20 4.77 3.55 3.95 4.71 4.22 Sub-Saharan Africa (average) 3.74 4.34 3.19 3.46 3.73 3.58 Source: Global Competitiveness Report 2012-13. Tables, Data Platform

Business environment is not favorable for innovation and knowledge diffusion

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Human Development Index and its Components

Human Development Index (HDI) Life expectancy at birth Mean years of schooling Expected years of schooling Gross National Income (GNI) per capita Non-income HDI Value (years) (years) (years) (Constant 2005 PPP$) Value 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011

Regions East Asia and the Pacific

0.671 72.4 7.2 11.7 6,466 0.709

Europe and Central Asia

0.751 71.3 9.7 13.4 12,004 0.785

Latin America and the Caribbean

0.731 74.4 7.8 13.6 10,119 0.767

South Asia

0.548 65.9 4.6 9.8 3,435 0.569

Sub-Saharan Africa

0.463 54.4 4.5 9.2 1,966 0.467

World

0.682 69.8 7.4 11.3 10,082 0.683

Source: Adapted from Table 1, Human Development Report 2011, The UN

Africa is still lagging behind in Human Development

slide-13
SLIDE 13

KEI Economic Incentive Innovation Education ICT recent 2000 recent 2000 recent 2000 recent 2000 recent 2000 East Asia and the Pacific 5.32 5.79 5.75 6.06 7.43 7.43 3.94 3.68 4.14 5.98 Latin America 5.15 5.54 4.66 5.14 5.8 6.14 5.11 5.07 5.02 5.8 MENA 4.74 5.16 5.41 5.41 6.14 6.44 3.48 3.8 3.92 4.97 SSA 2.55 3.04 2.91 3.13 3.95 3.95 1.44 1.7 1.9 3.36 World 5.12 5.95 5.45 5.61 7.72 7.75 3.72 3.89 3.58 6.53

Source: WB

African countries’ knowledge position is not on line with the level of economic development

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Conceptual Framework Principal pathways underlying mechanism behind distance from technological frontier

Educational attainment, Human Capital R&D, Skill, Technological Achievement, Brain Circulation Technological Progress and General-purpose Technology (ICT) Human Development Invention and Innovative Capability Internal behind-the- border factors Socio-Institutional Factors: Social Capital, Institutions, Financial Development, etc. Competitiveness and Productive Efficiency Beyond-the-border External Factors: Globalization-led Trade, FDI Technology Spillover/Diffusion Technology Adoption/Absorption Factors Technology Gap/Differences and Distance from Best-practice Frontier North-South, South- South TFP divergences

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Model Specification

The general model to be estimated is defined as follows : 𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈_𝐻𝐻𝐻𝑗𝑗 = 𝛽𝑗 + 𝛾1𝑌𝑗𝑗 + 𝜗𝑗𝑗 Technology gap: Measured using meta-frontier approach Xit includes:

  • An indicator of human development (health, education, demography).
  • An indicator of financial development.
  • An indicator of liberalization.
  • An indicator of the quality of business environment.
  • An indicator of the quality of infrastructure.
  • An indicator of knowledge.

1. Emerging dynamic South : Brazil, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, South Africa, India, and China. 2. Advance Economies: OECD countries 3. African Economies: Angola, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, DR Congo, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004

Technology gap

SSA Emerging 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Technical Efficiency

Emerging Africa

The increasing technology gap relative to the global technology suggests that the capacity of the region to absorb the new technology is very limited and that the region still lacks of real engines for economic growth.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Main causes of technology gap in Africa

Dependent variable : Technology Gap Ratio Model 1 Model 2

Infrastructure Quality 0.095 (0.013) 0.11 (0.018) Human Development 0.221 (0.056) 0.22 (0.05) Business Environment 0.038 (0.005) 0.03 (0.02) Trade 0.04 (0.02) 0.038 (0.006) Knowledge 0.006 (0.003) 0.004 (0.001)

Africa/Emerging Economies

Infrastructure Gap

  • 0.07 (0.03)

Human Development Gap

  • 0.061 (0.02)

Business environment Gap

  • 0.01 (0.0017)

L1.techgap 0.81 (0.032) 0.82 (0.034)

  • Knowledge capabilities backed by good infrastructure, human development, openness,

and favorable business environment are essential to succeed in catching up.

  • Africa’s poor infrastructure and lack of human development are the most significant

barriers to technology catch-up.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Conclusion

  • Growing external demand for Africa’s exports and growing internal demand

combined with high potential in agriculture and renewable energy provide Africa with a unique opportunity to become a global growth pole over the next decade.

  • However, African countries cannot expect an improvement in economic

performance unless they succeed to improve their ability to acquire and adapt to new technologies.

  • The development processes in the region is distorted and essential reforms are

needed if these are to remain viable in the global economy.

  • An effective reform approach in African countries can be based on the following

actions: building market institutions, developing political institutions, ameliorating the investment climate, strengthening the rule of law and combating

  • corruption. The African countries have also to encourage the private sector to

improve youth employment, develop the financial sector which is shown to be very important in increasing the economic efficiency.