Impact of Setback Rules to Home Builders June 14-15, 2013 Randall - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

impact of setback rules to home builders
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Impact of Setback Rules to Home Builders June 14-15, 2013 Randall - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Impact of Setback Rules to Home Builders June 14-15, 2013 Randall J. Feuerstein, Esq. Kevin K. Gallaway, Esq. DUFFORD & BROWN, P.C. 1700 Broadway, Suite 2100 Denver, CO 80290-2101 303/861-8013 (Telephone) 303/832-3804 (Facsimile)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Impact of Setback Rules to Home Builders

Randall J. Feuerstein, Esq. Kevin K. Gallaway, Esq. DUFFORD & BROWN, P.C. 1700 Broadway, Suite 2100 Denver, CO 80290-2101 303/861-8013 (Telephone) 303/832-3804 (Facsimile) rfeuerstein@duffordbrown.com kgallaway@duffordbrown.com

June 14-15, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

SPLIT ESTATE AND REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION

  • REAL PROPERTY LAW: Separate Surface and Mineral Estates do exist;

Created by Reservation or Grant

  • CONTRACT LAW: Review the Lease, Addenda, and other documents

including Surface Use Agreements

  • Surface Estate is subject to an Implied Easement so that Mineral Owner may

use that portion of Surface reasonable and necessary to extract minerals

  • Both Estates must exercise their rights in a manner consistent with the other

(both estates are mutually dominant and mutually servient)

This “due regard” concept requires the operator to accommodate the surface owner to the fullest extent possible

The nature of the accommodation by the operator is fact driven based on the surface uses and on alternatives available to the operator

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CAHB’s INFLUENCE UPON NEW RULES

  • CAHB’s narrow definitions of High Occupancy Building Units in the 100 Series

Definitions tied to other statutory definitions were incorporated, drastically reducing uncertainty in the application and impact of the 1,000 foot setback.

  • CAHB succeeded in including exception language (“grandfathering”) for Existing

Surface Use Agreements or Site Specific Development Plans and for future Surface Development Pursuant to Surface Use Agreements or Site Specific Development

  • Plans. See Rules 604(b)(2) and 604(b)(3).
  • CAHB succeeded in maintaining the exception for Existing Surface Use Agreements
  • r Site Specific Development Plans as a mandatory exception through the use of the

word “shall” rather than a permissive exception through the use of the word “may” as advocated by several parties and supported by some Commissioners.

  • CAHB was influential in eliminating the consent requirement from adjacent land
  • wners. While waivers are still required in Urban Mitigation Areas, a variance

process now exists, eliminating the veto power of adjacent land owners as the initial draft Rules had provided.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

NEW DESIGNATED SETBACK LOCATIONS

Designated Setbacks for Oil and Gas Locations will be:

500’ from building units

1,000’ from High Occupancy Building Units

350’ from Designated Outside Activity Areas

Waivers are required from Building Unit owners within 500’ of

proposed Oil and Gas Location in Urban Mitigation Areas.

If waivers cannot be obtained, the operator can seek a variance from the director, and if not granted, have a hearing before the Commission

The measurement for determining any Designated Setback

Location shall be made from the center of the Well or Production Facility nearest any Building Unit to the nearest wall

  • r corner of such Building Unit.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

DEFINITIONS

  • BUILDING UNIT shall mean a Residential Building Unit; and every five

thousand (5,000) square feet of building floor area in commercial facilities or every fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet of building floor area in warehouses that are operating and normally occupied during working hours.

  • DESIGNATED OUTSIDE ACTIVITY AREA: Upon Application and Hearing, the

Commission, in its discretion, may establish a Designated Outside Activity Area (DOAA) for: (i) an outdoor venue or recreation area, such as a playground, permanent sports field, amphitheater, or other similar place of public assembly owned

  • r operated by a local government, which the local government seeks to

have established as a Designated Outside Activity Area; or

slide-6
SLIDE 6

DEFINITIONS CONTINUED…

(ii) an outdoor venue or recreation area, such as a playground, permanent sports field, amphitheater, or other similar place of public assembly where ingress to, or egress from the venue could be impeded in the event of an emergency condition at an Oil and Gas Location less than three hundred and fifty (350) feet from the venue due to the configuration of the venue and the number of persons known or expected to simultaneously occupy the venue on a regular basis. The Commission shall determine whether to establish a Designated Outside Activity Area and, if so, the appropriate boundaries for the DOAA based on the totality of circumstances and consistent with the purposes of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

DEFINITIONS CONTINUED, AGAIN…

  • HIGH OCCUPANCY BUILDING UNIT shall mean:

any operating Public School as defined in C.R.S. § 22-7-703(4); Nonpublic School as defined in C.R.S. § 22-30.5-103.6(6.5); Nursing Facility as defined in C.R.S. § 25.5-4-103(14); Hospital; Life Care Institutions as defined in C.R.S. § 12-13-101; or Correctional Facility as defined in C.R.S. § 17-1-102(1.7), provided the facility or institution regularly serves fifty (50) or more persons; or

an operating Child Care Center as defined in C.R.S. § 26-6-102(1.5).

  • URBAN MITIGATION AREA shall mean an area where: (A) At least twenty-two

(22) Building Units or one (1) High Occupancy Building Unit (existing or under construction) are located within a 1,000' radius of the proposed Oil and Gas Location; or (B) At least eleven (11) Building Units or one (1) High Occupancy Building Unit (existing or under construction) are located within any semi-circle

  • f the 1,000 radius mentioned in section (A) above.
slide-8
SLIDE 8

EFFECT OF SURFACE USE AGREEMENTS UNDER NEW SETBACK RULES?

Rule 604(b)(2) exempts Existing Surface Use

Agreement or Site Specific Development Plans (defined in C.R.S. §24-68-102(4)(a))

Rule 604(b)(3) exempts Surface

Development after August 1, 2013 Pursuant to a Surface Use Agreement or Site Specific Development Plan

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SURFACE USE AGREEMENTS

Ascertain the operators and all working interest owners –

Parties to SUA

Developer who applies for a land use change must comply with H.B. 01-1088, as amended, and provide notice of land use applications to mineral interest owners including working interest

  • wners (operators and other oil & gas lessees)

Ascertain the mineral interest owners and surface owners –

Parties to SUA

Parties to an SUA can agree to locate future Building Units

close to existing or proposed Oil and Gas Locations, but

  • perator must comply with all notice, consultation and meeting

requirements under COGCC Rules.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SURFACE USE AGREEMENTS – CLAUSES TO CONSIDER

There may be different working interest owners for different

formations (Sussex, Shannon, Niobrara, Codell, Greenhorn, J-Sand, D-Sand, Dakota, Lyons)

Access – location and dimensions of access to well site and

surface equipment

Operations areas – exclusive to Operator and specify setbacks;

specify number and location of future wells

Flowlines and pipe lines – specify easements and relocation

provisions

Payment – surface damages, relocation expenses and marginal

cost of directional drilling

Surface Release – The portion of the surface that will not be

used by the Operator

Covenant running with the land, successors and assigns, term

and indemnification

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2000' Radii

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2000' Radii

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CALCULATION OF INCREASED LOT COSTS – 500’ SETBACK

Per Lot Development costs: Land cost $30,000/lot Development cost $40,000/lot $70,000/lot Total project development cost: 700 lots x $70,000/lot = $49,000,000 500’ setback results in 183 lost lots: 700 lots – 183 lots = 517 lots New per lot development cost $49,000,000 / 517 lots = $94,778/lot Development cost increase per lot: $94,778 (per lot cost with 517 lots)

  • $70,000

(per lot cost with 700 lots) $24,778/lot

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2000' Radii

slide-15
SLIDE 15

2000' Radii

slide-16
SLIDE 16

2000' Radii )

Lots Impacted by 2000’ Radii”

All Lots Obliterated By 2000’ Setback

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

IN THE MATTER OF CHANGES TO THE RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE OIL & GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

  • COGCC Cause No. 1R, Docket No. 1211-RM-04
  • COGCC Final Setback Rules are located on the COGCC’s website at:

http://cogcc.state.co.us/RR_HF2012/Setbacks/FinalRules/Final_Setback Rules.pdf

slide-19
SLIDE 19

THANK YOU!