25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
Interfaces in composites based
- n wood and other
Interfaces in composites based on wood and other lignocellulosic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Interfaces in composites based on wood and other lignocellulosic fiber Mark Hughes Department of Forest Products Technology Helsinki University of Technology Finnish-Japanese Workshop on Functional Materials Espoo & Helsinki, Finland 25
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 20 40 60 80 Time [s] Contact angle [º] 20 ºC 40 ºC 50 ºC 70 ºC
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
2 4 6 8 10 12 100 200 300 400 500 Time [s] Bond strength [N/mm
2]
50 ºC 70 ºC 20 ºC
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
Fibre type Density (g cm-3) Young’s modulus (GPa) Tensile strength (MPa) E-glass 2.56 76 2000 Flax 1.4-1.5 50-70 500-900 Hemp 1.48 30-60 310-750 Jute 1.4 20-55 200-450
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
Shear stress distribution in an epoxy matrix adjacent to a defect in a strained specimen at small deformation
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
2 4 6 8 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 8 1 2 1 6 2
microcompressive defects
C B A
"interface" principal stress difference composite tensile stress far-field matrix principal stress difference principal stress difference (M N m-2) distance along fibre (fibre diameters)
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 100 200 300 400
Tensile stress (MPa) Strain (%) E D C B A
A - Initial linear region B - Yield point C - Reduced stiffness D - Strain hardening E - Failure
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
1 2 3 4 5 6 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Treatment Tensile strength, MPa
Untreated Water control EDTA Enzyme 1 stage 2 stage
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology
Damage on the Tensile Properties of Flax and Nettle Fibers. Textile Res. J., 68(9): 623-629
Dufresne, A., Entwistle, M., Herrera-Franco P.J., and Escamilla, G.C., Groom, L., Hughes M. and Hill, C., Rials, T.G., Wild P.M. (2001). Current International Research into Cellulosic fibres and Composites. J. Mat. Sci. 36: 2107-2131
Flax Fibre Reinforced Thermosetting Polymer Matrix Composites. J. Mat. Sci. 42(7):2499-2511
Investigation into the Effects of Microcompressive Defects on Interphase Behaviour in Hemp-Epoxy Composites Using Half Fringe Photoelasticity. Composite Interfaces 7(1): 13-29
University Press, Cambridge, UK
Reinforcement for Polymer Composites. In: Renewable Biproducts: Industrial Outlets and Research for the 21st Century. June 24-25, 1997, EC-symposium at the International Agricultural Center (IAC), Wageningen, The Netherlands
Structural Biocomposites from Flax – Part I: Effect of Bio-technical Fibre Modification