Interfaces in composites based on wood and other lignocellulosic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

interfaces in composites based on wood and other
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Interfaces in composites based on wood and other lignocellulosic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Interfaces in composites based on wood and other lignocellulosic fiber Mark Hughes Department of Forest Products Technology Helsinki University of Technology Finnish-Japanese Workshop on Functional Materials Espoo & Helsinki, Finland 25


slide-1
SLIDE 1

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Interfaces in composites based

  • n wood and other

lignocellulosic fiber

Mark Hughes

Department of Forest Products Technology Helsinki University of Technology Finnish-Japanese Workshop on Functional Materials Espoo & Helsinki, Finland 25 & 26 May 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Contents

  • Overview of research activities in the

Wood Materials Technology group

  • Wood veneer surfaces in relation to

bonding

  • Interfaces in lignocellulosic fibre reinforced

polymer matrix composites

slide-3
SLIDE 3

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Research & teaching groups at the department

  • Chemical Pulping and Wood Refinery
  • Clean Technologies
  • Forest Biorefinery
  • Forest Products Surface Chemistry
  • Paper Converting and Packaging
  • Paper Technology
  • Printing Technology
  • Wood Chemistry
  • Wood Material Technology
  • Wood Product Technology
slide-4
SLIDE 4

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Current research themes in Wood Materials Technology

  • Wood fracture (particularly in relation to its use as

a structural material)

  • Mechanics of wood and wood-based composites
  • Physics of the veneer peeling process
  • Non-destructive evaluation of veneer
  • Wood modification (thermal, chemical,

impregnation)

  • Surface properties in wood (veneer)
  • Wood and non-wood fibre reinforced polymer

matrix composites, including “nanocomposites” (particularly interfaces)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Interfaces in wood based materials

  • Composite materials based on wood or other

lignocellulosic fiber offer many opportunities for the development of new materials

  • Interfaces (or interphases) created during the

formation of wood and natural fibre-based composites largely control both the short and long term performance of these materials

  • Interfaces are influenced by the physical and

chemical properties of the substrate (fibre), the properties of the adhesive (matrix) and the interaction between the two in the formed system (micromechanics).

slide-6
SLIDE 6

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Veneer surfaces

slide-7
SLIDE 7

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Peeled veneer production for plywood

  • Industrially logs are soaked at

temperatures of up to 70 oC before peeling

  • r slicing into veneer
  • This is known to affect the colour of the

veneer

  • But how does this affect the surface in

relation to the formation of the adhesive bond with a liquid resin?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Effect of soaking on color

slide-9
SLIDE 9

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Effect of soaking temperature

  • n wetting behavior of veneer

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 20 40 60 80 Time [s] Contact angle [º] 20 ºC 40 ºC 50 ºC 70 ºC

slide-10
SLIDE 10

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Automated Bonding Evaluation System

slide-11
SLIDE 11

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Effect of soaking temperature on bond development

2 4 6 8 10 12 100 200 300 400 500 Time [s] Bond strength [N/mm

2]

50 ºC 70 ºC 20 ºC

slide-12
SLIDE 12

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Conclusions

  • History and processing influence the surface of

the peeled veneer

  • This in turn influences adhesive bond formation
  • Implications for all wood-adhesive joints
  • Current and future research is focussing on

mechanisms behind these changes in wood (chemistry) and the impact on adhesion

  • Subject of a forthcoming Tekes & industry funded

3 year project (starting in June 2009)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Interfaces in natural fibre reinforced composites

slide-14
SLIDE 14

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Bast fibre

slide-15
SLIDE 15

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Bast vs. glass…

  • The reported properties of many natural fibres

make them potentially suitable as reinforcement in high performance composite materials

Fibre type Density (g cm-3) Young’s modulus (GPa) Tensile strength (MPa) E-glass 2.56 76 2000 Flax 1.4-1.5 50-70 500-900 Hemp 1.48 30-60 310-750 Jute 1.4 20-55 200-450

(Sources: Hull & Clyne, 1996; Ivens et al, 1997)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Structural properties

  • For thermosetting polymer matrix

composites:

  • Good stiffness (comparable with GFRP)
  • Adequate strength
  • Poor fracture properties (order of

magnitude lower work of fracture)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Reinforcement efficacy

  • For good reinforcement fibres of high

aspect ratio are required

  • Aspect ratio of e.g. flax ultimate fibres

around 1200. Potentially good reinforcement

  • But fibre damage may play a significant

role

slide-18
SLIDE 18

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Fibre properties

  • Bast (and wood fibre) fail in compression

through the formation of kink bands

  • In 1998, Davies and Bruce published a

paper showing that the Young’s modulus and tensile strength of flax and nettle fibre are negatively affected by the presence of these so called micro-compressive defects

  • r kink bands….
slide-19
SLIDE 19

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Polarised light

Unprocessed hemp fibre Mechanically processed hemp fibre

slide-20
SLIDE 20

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Fibre structure

Failure through the formation of kink bands

slide-21
SLIDE 21

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Effect on the interface

  • Micro tensile specimen
  • Half fringe photoelasticity system
slide-22
SLIDE 22

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Stress concentrations

Shear stress distribution in an epoxy matrix adjacent to a defect in a strained specimen at small deformation

(Source: Hughes et al, 2000)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Matrix plastic deformation

slide-24
SLIDE 24

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Interface behaviour

  • 2

2 4 6 8 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 8 1 2 1 6 2

microcompressive defects

C B A

"interface" principal stress difference composite tensile stress far-field matrix principal stress difference principal stress difference (M N m-2) distance along fibre (fibre diameters)

(Eichhorn et al, 2001)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Fibre-matrix debonding

Failed single filament composites showing fibre-matrix debonding in regions of high shear stress concentration adjacent to fibre defects (and fracture)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Matrix cracking

slide-27
SLIDE 27

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Deformation behaviour

(UD composite of ca. 55% volume fraction)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 100 200 300 400

Tensile stress (MPa) Strain (%) E D C B A

A - Initial linear region B - Yield point C - Reduced stiffness D - Strain hardening E - Failure

(Hughes et al, 2007)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Fibre model

  • Continuous fibre acts as a series of shorter fibres
  • r segments
  • Kink bands act as the loci of microstructural

failure

– fibre fracture – fibre-matrix debonding – matrix cracking

  • Affects composite macroscopic behaviour
slide-29
SLIDE 29

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Summary

  • Composite properties are influenced by the

fibre properties and particularly the presence of micro-compressive defects

  • Micro-compressive can be removed, but not

practicable in reality

  • Alter the fibre architecture to improve

properties

  • “Deconstruct” the cell wall and isolate the

microfibrils – use these as reinforcement

slide-30
SLIDE 30

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

  • Manipulation of the “fibre architecture” at

macroscopic and microscopic levels, as well as “interface engineering” to improve composite performance

  • “Fibre architecture” includes:

– fibre geometry (aspect ratio) – fibre orientation – packing arrangement – fibre volume fraction (Vf)

Fibre architecture & interface engineering

slide-31
SLIDE 31

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Fibre modification

  • Pectinolytic enzymes were used to preferentially

remove the inter-cellular binding substances and degrade any extraneous adhering tissue

  • Chelating agents for calcium (EDTA), which forms

part of the pectin structure, was used to remove pectin

  • Combinations of chelating agents and enzymes

were employed, applied sequentially and together

slide-32
SLIDE 32

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Tensile strength

1 2 3 4 5 6 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Treatment Tensile strength, MPa

Untreated Water control EDTA Enzyme 1 stage 2 stage

(Stuart et al, 2005)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

Ongoing research

  • Continue to develop an understanding of the

effect of fibre defects and other structural features

  • n interface behaviour

– Wood and non-wood fibre – Micro-fibrillated cellulose

  • Interface engineering

– Bulk and surface modification

  • Development of NF textiles for composite

applications

– Bi- and multi-axial fibre structures; woven and non- woven

  • Nanocomposites
  • The above mentioned research is the subject of

several ongoing research projects funded by: The Academy of Finland, the European Commission and Helsinki University of Technology

slide-34
SLIDE 34

25 May 2009 Department of Forest Products Technology

References

  • Davies, G.C. and Bruce, D.M. (1998). Effect of Environmental Relative Humidity and

Damage on the Tensile Properties of Flax and Nettle Fibers. Textile Res. J., 68(9): 623-629

  • Eichhorn, S.J., Baillie, C. A. and Zafeiropoulos, N., Mwaikambo, L.Y. and Ansell, M.P.,

Dufresne, A., Entwistle, M., Herrera-Franco P.J., and Escamilla, G.C., Groom, L., Hughes M. and Hill, C., Rials, T.G., Wild P.M. (2001). Current International Research into Cellulosic fibres and Composites. J. Mat. Sci. 36: 2107-2131

  • Hughes, M., Carpenter, J. and Hill, C. (2007). Deformation and Fracture Behaviour of

Flax Fibre Reinforced Thermosetting Polymer Matrix Composites. J. Mat. Sci. 42(7):2499-2511

  • Hughes, M., Hill, C.A.S., Sèbe, G., Hague, J., Spear, M. and Mott, L. (2000). An

Investigation into the Effects of Microcompressive Defects on Interphase Behaviour in Hemp-Epoxy Composites Using Half Fringe Photoelasticity. Composite Interfaces 7(1): 13-29

  • Hull, D. and Clyne, T.W. (1996). An Introduction to Composite Materials. Cambridge

University Press, Cambridge, UK

  • Ivens, J., Bos, H. and Verpoest, I. (1997). The Applicability of Natural Fibres as

Reinforcement for Polymer Composites. In: Renewable Biproducts: Industrial Outlets and Research for the 21st Century. June 24-25, 1997, EC-symposium at the International Agricultural Center (IAC), Wageningen, The Netherlands

  • Stuart, T., Liu, Q., Hughes, M., McCall, R.D., Sharma, S. and Norton, A. (2005)

Structural Biocomposites from Flax – Part I: Effect of Bio-technical Fibre Modification

  • n Composite Properties. Compos Part A-Appl S 37(3): 393-404 2006