International Achievement Assessments: The Good, the Bad, and the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
International Achievement Assessments: The Good, the Bad, and the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
International Achievement Assessments: The Good, the Bad, and the Future David P. Baker Pennsylvania State University Towards a Schooled Society Dimensions of the Worldwide Education Revolution World Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary
Towards a Schooled Society Dimensions of the Worldwide Education Revolution
World Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Students, 1815-2000.
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 Num ber of S tudents (M illions) Primary Secondary Tertiary
Take off 1900
World Secondary and Tertiary Students, 1815-2000.
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 Number of Students (Millions)
Secondary Tertiary
Take-off 1945
World Tertiary Students, 1815-2000.
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
Number of Students (Millions)
Take-off 1960
- Teaching Methods: Germany, Japan,
US, %var. among nations
- Seatwork
0.6
- Individual Guidance
7.4
- Whole class
7.0
- Pair work
4.5
- Explain Reasoning
1.2
- Open-ended
7.2
Math is: Abstract 8.6 Real appls. 4.3 Natural Talent 2.4 Needs Practice 14.0 Important to: Like Students 3.0
20 40 60 80 100
Nation Percentage of Students Participating Weekly2 Figure 1: Shadow Education Participation by Nation, Eighth Grade Mathematics1
1: Mean = 37.6 % , SD = 21.3 % , N = 41 2: Any amount of participation.
International Civic Study 1999 Political Knowledge, Skill, Attitudes: . No influence of nation raised-in . Teacher effects..training . Open communication classroom
- Does curriculum matter for academic
achievement?
- Of course, but not cross-nationally
- Why?
Rise in IQ, Wechsler Tests and Stanford-Binet, 1932-1992
1930 Grades 1/2
1966 Kindergarten Question: What figure should come next?
1991 Grade 2
Percent of countries with male advantage gender differences in 8th grade math by year of IEA study.
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% FIMS 1964 SIMS 1982 TIMSS 1995