INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2Q 2017 Forward Looking Statements and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

investor presentation 2q 2017 forward looking statements
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2Q 2017 Forward Looking Statements and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2Q 2017 Forward Looking Statements and Cautionary Statements Forward-Looking Statements The information in this presentation includes forward -looking statements that are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor Provisions of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2Q 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Forward Looking Statements and Cautionary Statements

2

Forward-Looking Statements The information in this presentation includes “forward-looking statements” that are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this presentation, regarding our strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. When used in this presentation, the words “could,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. These forward-looking statements are based on Parsley Energy, Inc.’s (“Parsley Energy,” “Parsley,” or the “Company”) current expectations and assumptions about future events and are based on currently available information as to the outcome and timing of future events. We caution you that these forward-looking statements are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, incident to the exploration for and development, production, gathering and sale of oil and natural gas. These risks include, but are not limited to, commodity price volatility, inflation, lack of availability of drilling and production equipment and services, environmental risks, drilling and other operating risks, regulatory changes, the uncertainty inherent in estimating reserves and in projecting future rates of production, the production potential of our undeveloped acreage, cash flow and access to capital, the timing of development expenditures and the risk factors discussed in or referenced in our filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K and our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this presentation. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, we disclaim any duty to update any forward-looking statements, all of which are expressly qualified by the statements in this section, to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this presentation. Our production forecasts and expectations for future periods are dependent upon many assumptions, including estimates of production decline rates from existing wells and the undertaking and

  • utcome of future drilling activity, which may be affected by significant commodity price declines or cost increases.

Industry and Market Data This presentation has been prepared by Parsley and includes market data and other statistical information from third-party sources, including independent industry publications, government publications or other published independent sources. Although Parsley believes these third-party sources are reliable as of their respective dates, Parsley has not independently verified the accuracy

  • r completeness of this information. Some data are also based on Parsley’s good faith estimates, which are derived from its review of internal sources as well as the third-party sources described

above. Oil & Gas Reserves This presentation provides disclosure of Parsley’s proved reserves, which are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible—from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions (using unweighted average 12-month first day of the month prices), operating methods, and government regulations—prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. In this presentation, proved reserves attributable to Parsley as of 12/31/16 are estimated utilizing SEC reserve recognition standards and pricing assumptions based on SEC pricing, as adjusted for market differentials, transportation fees, and quality, of $39.36 / Bbl crude, $2.23 / Mcf gas, and $15.03/ Bbl NGL. References to our estimated proved reserves as of 12/31/16 are derived from our proved reserve report audited by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (“NSAI”). We may use the term “expected ultimate recoveries” (“EURs”) or other descriptions of volumes of reserves, which terms include quantities of oil and gas that may not meet the SEC’s definitions of proved, probable and possible reserves, and which the SEC's guidelines strictly prohibit Parsley from including in filings with the SEC. Unless otherwise stated in this presentation, such estimates have been prepared internally by our engineers and management without review by independent engineers. These estimates are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved, probable and possible reserves and accordingly are subject to substantially greater risk of being actually realized, particularly in areas or zones where there has been limited or no drilling history. We include these estimates to demonstrate what we believe to be the potential for future drilling and production by the Company. Actual locations drilled and quantities that may be ultimately recovered from our properties will differ substantially. In addition, we have made no commitment to drill all of the drilling locations. Ultimate recoveries will be dependent upon numerous factors including actual encountered geological conditions, the impact of future oil and gas pricing, exploration and development costs, and our future drilling decisions and budgets based upon our future evaluation of risk, returns and the availability of capital and, in many areas, the outcome of negotiation of drilling arrangements with holders of adjacent or fractional interest leases. Our estimates may change significantly as development of our properties provides additional data and therefore actual quantities that may ultimately be recovered will likely differ from these estimates. Our related expectations for future periods are dependent upon many assumptions, including estimates of production decline rates from existing wells, the undertaking and outcome of future drilling activity and activity that may be affected by significant commodity price declines or drilling cost increases. Unless otherwise noted, Net Present Value (“NPV”) estimates are before taxes and assume the Company generated EUR and decline curve estimates based on Company drilling and completion cost estimates that do not include facilities, land, seismic, general and administrative (“G&A”) or other corporate level costs.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

High-margin growth

  • Production up 18% vs 1Q17

Portfolio optimization

  • Acreage trades added more than 500,000 net

lateral feet to horizontal drilling inventory Resource capture

  • Delineation milestones
  • Midland Wolfcamp B: Downspacing validated
  • Midland Wolfcamp A: 2nd target confirmed
  • Midland Wolfcamp C: Record payout in sight
  • S. Delaware Wolfcamp: 3 targets verified
  • Productivity enhancement
  • Compressed stage completion design showing

productivity uplift

2Q17 Highlights

3

Market Snapshot Premier Permian Position

NYSE Symbol: PE Market Cap: $9,193 MM(1) Net Debt: $997 MM(2) Enterprise Value: $10,190 MM Share Count: 314 MM Permian Basin Net Leasehold Acreage: ~231,000 Midland Basin: ~179,000 Delaware Basin: ~52,000 Permian Basin Net Royalty Acreage: ~7,000 2Q17 Net Production: 64.7 MBoe/d

Note: All data as of end 2Q17 pro forma for subsequent acreage trades; (1) Calculated using 8/1/2017 closing price; (2) Net Debt is a non-GAAP financial measure that is defined as total debt less cash and cash equivalents. Parsley Energy Leasehold

Multi-faceted Value Creation

ANDREWS MARTIN ECTOR LEA WINKLER LOVING WARD CRANE REEVES PECOS UPTON MIDLAND GLASSCOCK REAGAN HOWARD

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Sustained Production Momentum

4

  • Strong production momentum despite intensive

delineation agenda

  • 2Q17 daily net production up 18% versus 1Q17

and 81% year-over-year

  • Raising full-year and 4Q17E production

guidance

  • 16% compound quarterly production growth

rate over thirteen quarters as a public company(1)

(1) Parsley completed its initial public offering on May 29, 2014

Quarterly Production Trajectory Production Guidance (Net MBoe/d)

65 - 71 67 - 73 78 - 88 80 - 90 2017E (Previous) 2017E (Updated) 4Q17E (Previous) 4Q17E (Updated) 9.2 64.7 80.0 - 90.0 20 40 60 80 100 MBoe/d Net Production (MBoe/d)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00

Top-Tier Capital Efficiency

5

Source: SGS E&P Comp Sheets – Week Ending June 23, 2017. Companies include APA, APC, AR, BBG, CHK, CLR, CNX, COG, CPE, CRC, CRK, CRZO, CXO, DNR, ECA, ECR, EGN, EOG, EPE, EQT, FANG, GPOR, HES, HK, JONE, LPI, MRO, MTDR, MUR, NBL, NFX, NOG, OAS, OXY, PDCE, PE, PXD, QEP, REN, RICE, RRC, RSPP, SD, SGY, SM, SN, SRCI, SWN, UNT, WLL, WPX, WTI, XCO, and XEC. Operating margin based on 1Q17. Oily E&P Companies are defined as companies with oil accounting for 40% or more of 2016 production, and Gassy E&P Companies are defined as companies with oil accounting for less than 40% of 2016 production. (1) Based on 2016 data. Recycle ratio is equal to operating margin divided by PD F&D. PE recycle ratio includes actual 2016 PD F&D/Boe of $8.04.

  • Rank in top 10% of E&P universe on key capital efficiency measures
  • Superior capital efficiency translates to value-adding-growth
  • Position at low end of cost curve incents differentiated growth profile

Recycle Ratio(1)

Oily E&P Companies Gassy E&P Companies Parsley Energy

Operating Margin ($/Boe)

$0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 Parsley Energy Oily E&P Companies Gassy E&P Companies

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Accretive Acreage Trades

6

  • Recent acreage trades enhance development potential of core
  • perated footprint
  • Traded out of scattered non-operated properties with low

working interest (“WI”) into concentrated operated properties with high WI

  • ~25% average WI on acreage traded away
  • ~85% average WI on acreage traded for
  • Recent trades added more than 500,000 net lateral feet to

horizontal drilling inventory, on top of 900,000 net lateral feet previously added following Double Eagle (“DEEP”) acquisitions

  • Post-DEEP trades akin to adding ~5,600 premium net acres

with four target intervals(1)

Midland Basin Acreage Trades Trade Spotlight – “Four Corners” Trade

Leasehold Acquired via Trade Leasehold Traded Away Parsley Energy Leasehold

  • Gained operatorship of core “Four

Corners” acreage block

  • Traded away 24 net non-operated

locations with 21% average WI

  • Added 56 net operated locations with

85% average WI

  • Effectively adds 31 net operated locations

near the front of Parsley’s drilling inventory at no cost

  • Potential for subsequent fill-in trades to

further increase associated inventory

HOWARD GLASSCOCK REAGAN UPTON MIDLAND MARTIN

(1) Assumes 32 wells per drilling spacing unit (DSU) and that 7,500’ stimulated lateral length wells correspond to a 960 acre DSU

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Delineation Milestones

7

Parsley Energy Leasehold GLASSCOCK REAGAN UPTON MIDLAND WARD PECOS REEVES

Midland Basin Delineation Delaware Basin Delineation

Midland Basin Delineation Objectives First Wolfcamp C well First Upper Wolfcamp A well 330’ Downspacing in Upper/Lower Wolfcamp B Compressed stage spacing test Second Wolfcamp C well

1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5

Southern Delaware Basin Delineation Objectives First Upper Wolfcamp A well First Wolfcamp B well

1 2 2 1 1

Parsley Energy Leasehold

slide-8
SLIDE 8

100 200 300 400 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 30 60 90 120 150 Cumulative Production (MBoe) Daily Production (Boe/d) Days of Production

Glasscock Nose CBP

Wolfcamp C Play Fairway Paige Wolfcamp C

MARTIN MIDLAND UPTON HOWARD GLASSCOCK REAGAN

1,200’

10 mi.

Strong Indications from Wolfcamp C Interval

8

  • First Wolfcamp C well (Taylor) still naturally flowing and

continues robust production trend with 215,000 barrels

  • f oil recovered through 150 days(1)
  • Projected payout within six months(2)
  • Second Wolfcamp C well (Paige) yet to reach peak-24 hr

rate but already producing more than 1,300 barrels of oil per day during early flowback

  • Aggressively incorporating Wolfcamp C in development

program, with several wells in process or to be drilled by year-end

  • Abundant inventory in Wolfcamp C play fairway,

characterized by favorable thermal maturity and substantial thickness and reservoir pressure

Taylor Wolfcamp C Exceeding 1 MMBoe Type Curve by ~130%(3)

(1) Normalized for downtime; (2) Based on realized commodity prices; (3) 3-stream; Normalized for downtime; 1 MMBoe type curve normalized to Taylor lateral length (approx. 10,000’)

Wolfcamp C Fairway & Well Locations

200’ 400’ 600’ 800’ 1,000’ 1,200’ GROSS THICKNESS

Taylor Wolfcamp C 2017 Planned Wolfcamp C

900+ Wolfcamp C Locations in the Play Fairway

Increasing GOR and decreasing reservoir pressure to south and east (red arrows)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% % NPV Increase vs. 660’ Spaced Development Per Well Cost Savings from 660’ Spaced Development

Promising Results from Wolfcamp B Downspacing Pilot

9

(1) Standard 660’ Development: 4 wells with area-average type curve; Downspaced development: 8 wells at 330’ spacing; $50 oil, $3/mcf gas, $20 NGL

  • Initial results from 8-well Wolfcamp B project at 330’

spacing support downspacing potential with projected NPV uplift of 30%+ versus 660’ spaced development

  • Value uplift driven by favorable production rates and

cost savings

  • For the 7 wells that have achieved 30-day peak

rates, average IP30 of 960 Boe/d is 84% of offset wells with 660’ spacing

  • Dual-pad project design incorporates baseline cost

savings of 5%, driven primarily by facilities and infrastructure efficiencies

  • Analysis suggests less intensive frac design could

deliver comparable productivity at enhanced cost savings, driving additional NPV uplift Downspaced Test Results Suggest Value-Add Potential(1)

330’ Production % of 660’ Downspaced Pad Design 5% cost reduction & 84% production of 660’ spacing

1-Mile

Current Inventory Inventory Upside 330’ Downspaced Project

Wolfcamp B Downspaced Wolfcamp B Pilot Gun Barrel

~230’ 330’ Spacing

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Second Wolfcamp A Landing Zone Confirmed

10

  • Encouraging results from first Upper / Lower

Wolfcamp A stack test, confirming a second landing zone in the Wolfcamp A interval

  • Pad average production keeping pace with 1

MMBoe EUR type curve

  • Significant inventory upside pending additional

tests

Strong Production Trends from Upper / Lower WC A Stack Test

20 40 60 80 30 60 90 Cumulative Production (MBoe)(1) Days of Production

Wolfcamp A Stacked Well Average

1-Mile

Current Inventory Inventory Upside

Upper / Lower WC A Stack Test (Online)

2nd WC A Stack Test Combined with WC B Stack (1Q18)

Wolfcamp A Wolfcamp B

330’ Spacing

(1) 3-stream; Normalized to 7,000’ stimulated length and for downtime

Upcoming project tests two Wolfcamp A targets stacked over two Wolfcamp B targets, showcasing Parsley’s differentiated Wolfcamp thickness

800’ Stacked Upper / Lower Wolfcamp A Gun Barrel

slide-11
SLIDE 11

20 40 60 80 100 30 60 90 Cumulative Production (MBoe)(1)

Days of Production

Upper / Lower WC A Stagger Pad Well Average Upper WC A / WC B Stack Pad Well Average

Three Productive Wolfcamp Targets in Pecos County

11

  • Positive results in two previously-untested

Wolfcamp flow units in Pecos County, one above and one below traditional Lower Wolfcamp A landing zone

  • Lower Wolfcamp A / Wolfcamp B pad with stack

configuration on pace with Pecos standalone well average

  • Upper / Lower Wolfcamp A pad with stagger

configuration just 20% below Pecos standalone average

Promising Results in Wolfcamp Zone Delineation Tests

PECOS (1) 3-stream; Normalized to 7,000’ stimulated lateral and for downtime

Parsley Energy Leasehold 2017 Wells Planned or In Progress Completed Horizontal Wells / Pads Completed Vertical Wells

1-Mile

Note: Current inventory count based on an average of two flow units across acreage 330’ Spacing

Upper Wolfcamp A Wolfcamp B Lower Wolfcamp A

200’ 200’ Upper/Lower WC A Stagger Lower WC A / WC B Stack

  • S. Delaware Wolfcamp A and B Gun Barrel
slide-12
SLIDE 12

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 Cumulative Production (MBoe)(2) Days of Production Midland

  • S. Delaware

(1) 3-stream; Normalized for downtime; Average IP30s and IP30s per 1,000’ reflect unweighted average of well set; (2) Normalized to 7,000’ stimulated lateral and for downtime; (3) Wells achieving a 30-day IP since 1Q17 quarterly update

Robust Well Performance Trends

Midland Delaware Wells 22 5 Average Lateral Length 7,730’ 7,090’ 30-day IP (Boe/d) 1,245 1,056 30-day IP per 1,000’ (Boe/d) 165 154 % Oil 74% 78%

2Q17 Well Summary(1)(3) Midland Basin Normalized IP30s Continue to Strengthen(1)

163 167 171 180 165 50 100 150 200 2H15 1H16 2H16 1Q17 2Q17 IP30 per 1000' (Boe/d) 185*

* Excludes Downspaced Wolfcamp B Wells

  • Strong well performance despite high proportion of

delineation projects

  • The Morgan 25-26-4215H in Upton County set a new

company record for highest IP30 in the Wolfcamp A at 2,213 Boe/d

`

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

25 50 75 100 125 150 175 30 60 90 120 150 180 Cumulative Production (Mboe)(1) Days of Production

Louis 4413H (Compressed Stages) Louis 4415H (Standard Design)

Significant Productivity Gain with Compressed Stage Design

13

  • Initial Wolfcamp B compressed stage test outperforming

direct offset with standard design by 20% with less than 5% incremental cost

  • Reduced stage spacing from ~170’ to ~100’, increasing

number of total frac stages from ~30 to ~50

  • Parsley’s most prolific 1-mile Wolfcamp B well to date
  • Compelling early-time project economics
  • Design generated higher bottomhole pressures than

standard design, indicating increased fracture efficiency and hydrocarbon recovery factor

  • Broad application could translate to portfolio-wide

productivity increase

  • Several additional compressed stage tests planned in 2H17

(1) 3-stream; Normalized to 7,000’ stimulated length and for downtime

Compressed Stage Test Outperforming Standard Design

+20% vs Standard Design Standard Design

Compressed Stages

~170’ Stage Length ~100’ ~100’

5 clusters/stg 3 clusters/stg 3 clusters/stg Compressed Stage Design Modification

slide-14
SLIDE 14

$503 $997

$1,500 MM

Cash on hand First lien credit facility

  • Peer-leading(1) liquidity of $1.5 billion

provides ample flexibility to fund efficient growth plan

  • Fully undrawn borrowing base of $1.4

billion, with company-elected commitment

  • f $1.0 billion
  • Favorable maturity schedule, with earliest

notes maturity in 2024

Strong Financial Position

14

Favorable Debt Maturity Schedule

$1,000

$650 $450

$1,400 $400 $1,100 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 ($MM) Borrowing Base Senior Notes

Committed Amount Borrowing Base

1H25 2H25

Ample Liquidity

(2)

Liquidity vs. SMID-Cap Peers ($MM)(2)

$0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 PE Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 4 Peer 5 Cash on Hand Borrowing Base Availability

(1) Permian SMID-Cap peers include CPE, EGN, FANG, LPI, and RSPP. Calculated as availability on committed portion of borrowing base plus cash on hand. Peer data obtained from 1Q17 presentations and filings. Parsley data is as of end 2Q17. Parsley’s pro forma liquidity at 1Q16 was ~$1,600 MM, including ~$600 MM cash on hand; (2) Committed portion; net of letters of credit

  • n the Company’s fully undrawn revolver.
slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Proactive hedging program protects cash

flow and balance sheet

  • Over 70% of consensus oil volumes

hedged in 2018

  • Significantly more hedge protection

than peers in 2018

  • Heightened visibility facilitates
  • perational continuity and steady

execution

Substantial Oil Hedge Position

15

$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 4Q18 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 WTI ($/Bbl) MBbls/d MBbls/d Hedged Weighted Average Long Put Price

Hedge positions as of 8/1/2017; (1) Source: Wells Fargo E&P: Mile High View dated June 23, 2017. Operators include APA, BBG, CLR, CRZO, CXO, DVN, EOG, EPE, FANG, JAG, LPI, MTDR, NFX, OAS, PE, PXD, REN, RSPP, SRCI, WLL, WRD, and XOG. Includes operators with 2016 oil production greater than or equal to 40% of total production; (2) Excludes swaps

Oil Volumes Hedged Estimated Percent of 2018 Oil Hedged(1)

(2)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Parsley Energy

5 operators with 0% hedged

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Updated 2017 Guidance

16

Unit Costs LOE ($/Boe) $3.50 - $4.50 $3.50 - $4.50 Cash G&A ($/Boe) $4.00 - $5.00 $4.00 - $5.00 Production & Ad Valorem Taxes (% of Revenue) 6.0 - 7.0% 6.0 - 7.0% Capital Program Drilling & Completion ($MM) $840 - $960 $840 - $960 Infrastructure & Other ($MM) $160 - $190 $160 - $190 Total Development Expenditures ($MM) $1,000 - $1,150 $1,000 - $1,150 % Non-Operated 3 – 5% 3 – 5% Activity Gross Operated Horizontal Completions Midland Basin Delaware Basin Average Lateral Length 130 – 150 95 – 105 35 – 45 ~8,000’ 120 – 140 95 – 105 25 – 35 ~8,000’ Gross Operated Vertical Completions 5 - 10 5 - 10 Average Working Interest 85 – 95% 85 – 95% Production Annual Net Production (MBoe/d) % Oil 4Q17 Net Production (MBoe/d) 2017E (Previous) 65 – 71 68 – 73% 78 – 88 2017E (Updated) 67 - 73 67 – 70% 80 - 90

  • Increasing FY17 and 4Q17 production guidance on stronger

well productivity

  • Adjusting product mix to reflect infusion of acquired

vertical production, improved plant efficiencies, increased Wolfcamp C contribution, and broadly higher gas recoveries

  • Shifting 10 Delaware completions to early 2018
  • Maintaining full-year capital budget
  • Accelerated spuds offset fewer completions

Quarterly Completion Cadence

Midland Basin Delaware Basin Capital Allocation (% of 2017E capex) 65 – 70% 30 – 35%

2017E Capital Allocation

22 27 30 - 40 40 - 50 1Q17 2Q17E 3Q17E 4Q17E Gross Operated Horizontal Completions

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Parsley Energy Investment Summary

17

Parsley Energy Leasehold HOWARD GLASSCOCK REAGAN UPTON MIDLAND MARTIN ANDREWS ECTOR CRANE WARD PECOS REEVES LOVING WINKLER GAINES DAWSON MITCHELL STERLING IRION

  • Premier acreage
  • Proven execution
  • Strong financial position
  • Robust returns
  • Abundant resource upside
  • Capital efficient growth
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Investment Highlights

18

SUPPLEMENTARY SLIDES

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Expansive, High-quality Drilling Inventory

19

Horizontal Drilling Inventory(1)

(1) As of end 2Q17 pro forma for recently executed acreage trades; Location counts rounded to the nearest ten; (2) Assumes current annual ~130 completion run rate; (3) 16 wells per section reflects two landing zones (4) Reflects an average of two landing zones

  • Extensive inventory of premium drilling

locations provides visibility to years of high- return production growth

  • Operate 93% of net inventory
  • 12+ drilling years of long-lateral, high

working interest, operated inventory in Development Zones(2)

  • Minimum 90% working interest
  • Minimum 7,500’ lateral length
  • Abundant inventory upside through

increased development density and new target possibilities, including the Jo Mill and Woodford intervals

  • Nearly 600 net Wolfcamp locations in the

Southern Delaware Basin with a low average royalty burden of 15%

GROSS NET WELLS PER SECTION Development Zones Midland Basin Lower Spraberry 1,490 870 8 Wolfcamp A 1,850 1,060 8 Wolfcamp B 3,170 1,890 8 / 16(3) Wolfcamp C 1,460 920 8 Delaware Basin Wolfcamp 610 570 16(4) Development Total 8,580 5,310 Delineation Zones Midland Basin Middle Spraberry 1,050 600 5 / 6 Cline 1,900 1,140 8 Atoka 1,450 870 8 Delaware Basin 2nd Bone Spring 160 150 4 3rd Bone Spring 160 150 4 Delineation Total 4,720 2,910 Total 13,300 8,220

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Robust Well Economics

20 $40 WTI $60 WTI $50 WTI

$0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 $3.0 $3.5 $4.0 $4.5 $5.0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% $5.5 MM D&C $6.0 MM D&C $6.5 MM D&C ROR NPV $0.0 $1.0 $2.0 $3.0 $4.0 $5.0 $6.0 $7.0 $8.0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% $5.5 MM D&C $6.0 MM D&C $6.5 MM D&C ROR NPV $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% $5.5 MM D&C $6.0 MM D&C $6.5 MM D&C ROR NPV

Current D&C Costs(1)

Type curve-implied returns are strong across oil price spectrum Actual results are outpacing type curve, translating to even stronger returns on development program

Midland Basin ROR and NPV Sensitivities

Note: Economics based on 1 MMBoe type curve; NGL price 40% of WTI; Gas $3/Mcf; (1) Based on 7,000’ stimulated lateral

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Efficient Reserve Growth

21

  • YE16 proved reserves up 80% Y/Y (oil

up 85% Y/Y) despite writing off remaining ~18 MMBoe of vertical PUD reserves

  • Strong organic reserve replacement

ratio of approximately 680%(2)

  • PD F&D down 70% Y/Y to $8.04/Boe(3)

Strong Growth in Proved Reserves

Total Proved Reserves (MMBoe) Oil (MMBbl) Gas (Bcf) NGL (MMBbl) Total (MMBoe) PDP 59.3 121.8 23.7 103.3 PDNP 1.9 2.2 0.6 2.8 PUD 75.4 99.7 24.2 116.2

Total Proved 136.6 223.7 48.5 222.3

124

  • 14
  • 4
  • 7

24 99 222

  • 50

50 100 150 200 250

YE15 Prod. Rev. Divest. Acq. Adds YE16

(1) Source: SGS E&P Comp Sheets – Week Ending June 23, 2017. Companies include APA, APC, AR, BBG, CDEV, CHK, CLR, COG, CPE, CRK, CRZO, CXO, DNR, DVN, ECA, ECR, EGN, EOG, EPE, EQT, FANG, GPOR, HES, HK, JAG, JONE, LPI, MRO, MTDR, NBL, NFX, NOG, OAS, OXY, PDCE, PE, PXD, QEP, REN, RICE, RRC, RSPP, SD, SGY, SM, SN, SRCI, SWN, SWTF, UNT, WLL, WPX, WTI, XCO, XEC, and XOG. Oily E&P Companies are defined as companies with 2016 percent oil of 40% or greater, and Gassy E&P Companies are defined as companies with 2016 percent

  • il of less than 40%; (2) Organic reserve replacement ratio calculated as total 2016 reserves additions and revisions (technical and pricing) divided by total 2016 production; excludes

acquisitions and divestitures; (3) PD F&D calculated as total 2016 Capex (including Infrastructure and Other) divided by total 2016 proved developed reserves additions and revisions (technical and pricing); excludes acquisitions and divestitures; (4) Reserve summary as of 12/31/2016 and audited by NSAI; Data for Parsley only; not pro forma for pending acquisitions

Proved Reserves Summary(4)

+80%

$0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40

PD F&D ($/Boe) Ranks Highly among Oily E&Ps(1)

Oily E&P Companies Gassy E&P Companies Parsley Energy

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Substantial Oil Hedge Position

22

Hedge positions as of 8/1/2017; (1) When the NYMEX price is above the put price, Parsley receives the NYMEX price. When the NYMEX price is between the put price and the short put price, Parsley receives the put price. When the NYMEX price is below the short put price, Parsley receives the NYMEX price plus the difference between the short put price and the put price; (2) Functions similarly to put spreads except that when the index price is at or above the call price, Parsley receives the call price; (3) Premium realizations represent net premiums paid (including deferred premiums), which are recognized as income or loss in the period of settlement; (4) When the NYMEX price is above the call price, Parsley receives the call price. When the NYMEX is below the put price, Parsley receives the put price. When the NYMEX price is between the call and put prices, Parsley receives the NYMEX price; (5) Parsley receives the strike price; (6) Parsley receives the swap price

3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 4Q18 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 Put Spreads (MBbls/d)1 35.7 45.5 26.7 26.4 26.1 26.1 6.7 6.6 Put Price ($/Bbl) $51.23 $50.96 $52.81 $51.88 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 Short Put Price ($/Bbl) $41.14 $41.43 $41.88 $41.88 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 Three Way Collars (MBbls/d)2 21.7 28.0 31.0 31.0 8.3 8.2 8.2 8.2 Short Call Price ($/Bbl) $68.85 $70.79 $75.65 $75.65 $80.40 $80.40 $80.40 $80.40 Put Price ($/Bbl) $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 Short Put Price ($/Bbl) $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 Premium Realization ($MM)3 ($12.5) ($14.6) ($16.1) ($14.5) ($13.7) ($13.7) ($4.2) ($4.2) ($1.5) ($1.5) Collars (MBbls/d)4 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Short Call Price ($/Bbl) $59.73 $59.98 $61.31 $61.31 $61.31 $61.31 Put Price ($/Bbl) $46.75 $46.75 $45.67 $45.67 $45.67 $45.67 Swaps (MBbls/d)5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Strike Price ($/Bbl) $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 Total MBbls/d Hedged 40.2 50.0 51.8 57.9 60.6 60.6 15.0 14.8 8.2 8.2 Mid-Cush Basis Swaps (MBbls/d)6 16.7 16.7 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Swap Price ($/Bbl) ($1.00) ($1.00) ($0.91) ($0.91) ($0.91) ($0.91)