Investor Presentation oriented E&P company focused on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

investor presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Investor Presentation oriented E&P company focused on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Energy Corporation Resolute Energy is a regionally diversified growth Investor Presentation oriented E&P company focused on long-lived September 1, 2016 domestic oil producing assets (NYSE: REN) Cautionary statements Statements in this


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Energy Corporation Resolute Energy is a regionally diversified growth

  • riented E&P company

focused on long-lived domestic oil producing assets

Investor Presentation

(NYSE: REN) September 1, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Cautionary statements

2

Statements in this presentation, other than statements of historical fact, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Words such as “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “budget,” “forecast,” “target”, “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “poised”, “believes,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements; however the absence of these words does not mean the statements are not forward-looking. Such forward looking statements include statements regarding our production and cost guidance for 2016; anticipated capital expenditures in 2016 and the sources of such funding; the anticipated drilling program for the remainder of 2016 and for 2017 and 2018; our projected outstanding debt balance under our revolving credit facility as of year end 2016; our projected future debt ratios; our anticipated lease operating expenses, production taxes, general and administrative expenses, and depletion, depreciation and amortization rates; type curves, anticipated reserve additions, rates of return (IRRs), cash margins, net asset values, F&D costs and PV-10 values associated with our projects; management of the Company in the current commodity price environment; future liquidity and capital availability; future financial and operating results; future production, production exit rates, reserve growth and decline rates; future revenues by product; estimates of original oil in place, resource potential, decline rates and estimated ultimate recoveries of oil and gas (EUR); our plans and expectations regarding our development activities including drilling, deepening, recompleting, fracing and refracing wells, the number of such potential projects, locations and productive intervals, and the drilling costs associated with such projects; and the prospectivity of our properties and acreage. Forward-looking statements in this presentation include matters that involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from results expressed or implied by this presentation. Such risk factors include, among others: currently depressed commodity prices; the volatility of oil and gas prices including the price realized by Resolute; inaccuracy in reserve estimates and expected production rates; potential write downs of the carrying value and volumes of reserves as a result of low commodity prices; the discovery, estimation, development and replacement by Resolute of

  • il and gas reserves; the future cash flow, liquidity and financial position of Resolute; Resolute’s level of indebtedness and our ability to fulfill our obligations under the senior notes, our credit

facility, our second lien facility and any additional indebtedness that we may incur; potential borrowing base reductions under our revolving credit facility; the success of the business and financial strategy, hedging strategies and plans of Resolute; the amount, nature and timing of capital expenditures of Resolute, including future development costs; the availability of additional capital and financing, including the capital needed to pursue our drilling and development plans for our properties, on terms acceptable to us or at all; the effectiveness of Resolute’s CO2 flood program; uncertainty surrounding timing of identifying drilling locations and necessary capital to drill such locations; the potential for downspacing, infill or multi-lateral drilling in the Permian Basin or

  • bstacles thereto; the timing of issuance of permits and rights of way; the timing and amount of future production of oil and gas; availability of drilling, completion and production personnel, supplies

and equipment; the completion and success of exploratory drilling on our properties; potential delays in the completion, commissioning and optimization schedule of Resolute’s facilities construction projects or any potential breakdown of such facilities; operating costs and other expenses of Resolute; the success of prospect development and property acquisition of Resolute; timing of installation of gathering and processing infrastructure in new areas of development, including Resolute’s dependence on third parties for such items; the success of Resolute in marketing

  • il and gas; competition in the oil and gas industry; the impact of weather and the occurrence of disasters, such as fires, floods and other events and natural disasters; environmental liabilities;

anticipated supply of CO2 for our Aneth Field projects; potential power supply limitations or delays; operational problems or uninsured or underinsured losses affecting Resolute’s operations or financial results; adverse changes in government regulation and taxation of the oil and gas industry, including the potential for increased regulation of underground injection, fracing operations and venting/flaring; potential climate related change regulations; risks and uncertainties associated with horizontal drilling and completion techniques; the availability of water and our ability to adequately treat and dispose of water during and after drilling and completing wells; changes in derivatives regulation; developments in oil-producing and gas-producing countries; Resolute’s relationship with the Navajo Nation and the local communities in the areas in which Resolute operates; cyber security risks; and the risks associated with potential NYSE delisting. Actual results may differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements in this presentation. Resolute undertakes no obligation and does not intend to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this presentation. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as

  • f the date of this presentation. You are encouraged to review Item 1A. - Risk Factors and all other disclosures appearing in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and

subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for further information on risks and uncertainties that could affect the Company’s businesses, financial condition and results of

  • perations. All forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") prohibits oil and gas

companies, in their filings with the SEC, from disclosing estimates of oil or gas resources other than “reserves,” as that term is defined by the SEC. In this presentation, Resolute includes estimates

  • f quantities of oil and gas using certain terms, such as “resource,” “resource potential,” “EUR,” “oil in place,” or other descriptions of volumes of reserves, which terms include quantities of oil and

gas that may not meet the SEC definitions of proved, probable and possible reserves, and which the SEC guidelines strictly prohibit Resolute from including in filings with the SEC. These estimates are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved reserves and accordingly are subject to substantially greater risk of being recovered by Resolute. Finally, reserve estimates mentioned in this presentation were prepared internally using price and cost assumptions and methodologies that are different from what would be required if prepared in accordance with guidelines established by the Securities and Exchange Commission for the estimation of proved reserves, and such reserve estimates do not include probable and possible reserves. Such reserve estimates have not been audited by our independent reserves auditor. Production rates, including 24-hour, 30-day peak IP rates and 90-day peak IP rates, for both our wells and for wells that are

  • perated by others are limited data points in each well’s productive history. Also, different operators have different operating philosophies, particularly early in the life of a well. The way we

calculate and report peak IP rates and the methodologies used by others may not be consistent, thus the values reported may not be directly and meaningfully comparable. As a result, these metrics may not be indicative or predictive of future production rates, EUR or economic rates of return from such wells and should not be relied upon for such purpose. Lateral lengths described in this presentation are indicative only. Actual completed lateral lengths depend on various considerations such as lease-line offsets. Non-GAAP financial measures: This presentation includes certain non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure is presented in the Appendix.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Resolute Energy overview

3

Aneth Field properties Permian Basin properties

Aneth Field Delaware Basin

  • Large EOR asset in Paradox Basin
  • 2Q16 Aneth Field production of 6,250 Boe

per day (96% oil)

  • 44,400 gross (28,300 net) acres
  • 1.5 billion barrels original oil in place
  • 22,400 gross (12,900 net) acres in core
  • f Reeves County Wolfcamp play
  • Development program targeting long

laterals in Wolfcamp A and B (7,500’ to 10,000’)

  • 320+ Wolfcamp A and B locations; total

potential inventory of 650+

  • Average August 2016 Delaware Basin

production of approximately 9,500 Boe per day

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Company highlights

4

Operational

  • Continuing Delaware Basin development; 2016 drilling program

extended to 14 Wolfcamp laterals

  • Type curves increased; Wolfcamp A 10,000 foot laterals show EUR
  • f 2.3 million Boe; realized IPs of more than 3,000 Boe per day
  • Four most recent wells have established a peak 90-day rate that is

more than 90% of the peak 30-day rate Financial Strategic

  • Completed sale of Delaware Basin midstream assets; proceeds

allocated to 2016 drilling program

  • Drilling results de-risking the Company's inventory of more than

320 Wolfcamp A and B locations

  • Goal is to increase drilling activity in 2017 – potential for a two rig,

20+ well program

  • First 5 gross (4.0 net) wells of 2016 drilling program added 14.5

MMBoe of reserves and $122 million of PV10

1

  • Zero balance on revolver as of August 31, 2016 – $100 million of

availability

  • Shift to Delaware Basin should drive higher cash margins

1. Full cycle evaluation used actual revenue through the end of the second quarter and the June 30 NYMEX strip pricing thereafter; captures drilling, completion and facilities costs; incorporates eight PUDs associated with drilling

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Wolfcamp acreage position delivering

superior results

  • Recent IPs exceeded 3,000 Boe per day
  • EUR of more than 2 MMBoe per well
  • F&D cost approximately $4.00 per Boe
  • Highly concentrated acreage ideally suited

to drilling longer laterals

  • Two-thirds of locations support either

7,500 or 10,000 foot laterals

  • Extensive existing infrastructure
  • Strong midstream partner to stay ahead
  • f new completions; reduces Resolute’s

capital needs

  • Shortens cycle time from completion to

sales

Delaware Basin – Reeves County

5

Delaware Basin map

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Resolute South Elephant 1004H IP30: 2,907 Boepd

Mustang and Appaloosa

6

Outstanding well results Reeves County

Wolfcamp C Wolfcamp A Wolfcamp B Resolute acreage Energen Tisdale 56-8 1H IP30: 1,804 Boepd Resolute Jolly 1201BH IP30: 1,552 Boepd EOG Phillips State 56 301H IP24: 2,056 Boepd EOG Harrison Ranch 56 1002H IP24: 1,629 Boepd Resolute Flying Dog 1401BH IP30: 1,475 Boepd EOG Apache State 57 1114H IP24: 2,659 Boepd Cimarex Marmot 55-14 1H IP30: 856 Boepd Energen Langley 2-36 1H IP30: 1,380 Boepd Resolute North Elephant 1001H IP24: 2,449 Boepd Resolute North Goat 2201H IP30: 2,116 Boepd Cimarex Greathouse C21-6 1H IP30: 1,792 Boepd Resolute North Mitre 2101H IP30: 3,131 Boepd Resolute Thunder Canyon 0204H IP24: 2,272 Boepd

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Wolfcamp A horizontal well results

7

  • The first ten of the fourteen wells planned for 2016
  • Evaluating different completion techniques
  • Increasing frac stages
  • Increasing total proppant load

1. Planned lateral length, frac stages and proppant

2016 Wolfcamp A horizontal wells

Well information Name Status Lateral length (feet) Frac stages Proppant (million lbs) Peak day rate (Boe) Peak 30 day rate (Boe) Peak 60 day rate (Boe) Peak 90 day rate (Boe) Peak 120 day rate (Boe) Peak 30 % oil Jolly 1201BH Producing 7,519 24 10.9 1,820 1,552 1,514 1,501 1,478 47% Flying Dog 1401BH Producing 7,602 27 13.0 1,573 1,475 1,469 1,447 1,386 43% North Goat 02 2201H Producing 9,001 30 13.8 2,304 2,116 2,054 1,992 1,937 60% North Mitre 02 2101H Producing 9,495 36 14.9 3,330 3,131 3,066 3,001 53% South Elephant 02 1004H Producing 9,049 36 14.7 3,329 2,907 2,776 56% North Elephant 02 1001H Producing 9,470 37 15.3 2,449 Thunder Canyon 0204H Producing 7,324 29 12.1 2,272 South Goat 02 2204H Flowing back 9,519 40 16.9 South Mitre 02 2102H1 Completing 9,400 40 17.0 Boucher 2-3H1 Drilling 7,400 30 13.3 Drilling and completion data Production data

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Superior well results

8

  • Consistently strong results
  • First 5 gross (4.0 net) wells of 2016 drilling program added 14.5 MMBoe
  • f reserves and $122 million of PV10

1

IRR at June 30, 2016 strip vs. capex and EUR

1. Full cycle evaluation used actual revenue through the end of the second quarter and the June 30 NYMEX strip pricing thereafter; captures drilling, completion and facilities costs; incorporates eight PUDs associated with drilling

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Supplemental 2016 drilling program

9

Five additional wells to be drilled

Note: Specific well locations subject to change

Mustang and Appaloosa

Mustang Appaloosa

80 acre Wolfcamp stack pilot

Wolfcamp A Resolute acreage Supplemental program

  • Supplemental drilling program will include two spacing pilots
  • 80 acre Wolfcamp A pilot
  • 80 acre Wolfcamp stack pilot

80 acre Wolfcamp A pilot

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • 575 – 675 feet of reservoir section in Wolfcamp

A and Wolfcamp B across acreage block

  • Excellent results to date in multiple Wolfcamp A

landing zones support the opportunity to drill multiple A wells per location

  • Resolute will test 80 acre Wolfcamp A and

Wolfcamp stack spacing in 2016 / early 2017

  • Likely to see 16 to 20 wells per section; may

ultimately see 24 or more wells per section

Wolfcamp A – B development

10

Effective resource recovery

160 acre established 80 acre infill

8 wells per section 16 wells per section 20 wells per section 24 wells per section

Gross potential inventory

Wolfcamp A Wolfcamp B

20 wells/sec

Wolfcamp A Wolfcamp B

24 wells/sec

1 mile

Development model inventory growth

Established Spacing pilot

Wolfcamp A Wolfcamp B

16 wells/sec

Wolfcamp A Wolfcamp B

8 wells/sec

Stack pilot Potential

160 acre 80 acre

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Wolfcamp X/Y sands are productive east
  • f our Appaloosa acreage
  • Matador, Apache and WPX all

active in this play

  • Activity is moving west toward our

acreage

  • Successful Wolfcamp C completions

close to our acreage

  • Cimarex and EOG have successful

wells northeast and southwest of

  • ur acreage
  • Current completion techniques

should enhance results

  • Wolfcamp D is productive in northeast

Culberson County

  • Additional potential in Bone Spring

Expanding asset inventory

11

Significant potential beyond Wolfcamp A and B

Base development Development upside Additional upside

Wolfcamp B Wolfcamp D

Wolfcamp horizontal target opportunities

Development

Upper Wolfcamp C Lower Wolfcamp C Upper Wolfcamp A Wolfcamp “A”/”Y” Wolfcamp “A”/”X”

160 acre

Lower Wolfcamp A

80 acre

1 mile Reeves County zones

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Expanding asset inventory

12

Significant potential beyond Wolfcamp A and B Reeves County Wolfcamp gross inventory

  • Wolfcamp A and B derisked and producing
  • Wolfcamp X/Y sands are productive east of our Appaloosa acreage
  • Wolfcamp C and D productive in the Delaware Basin
  • Additional potential in Bone Spring
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Concentrated acreage, longer laterals

13

  • Not all locations are created equal
  • Concentrated acreage position yields longer lateral opportunities
  • Two-thirds of our locations have potential for 7,500 – 10,000 foot lateral lengths
  • 10,000 foot laterals provide 12% more perforated coverage than two 5,000 foot

laterals due to eliminating setbacks and operational offsets Standard section

1 mile 1 mile

80 acre spacing

5,000 foot laterals 2,500 extra feet

>90% Mustang locations

1 mile 1.5 miles 7,500 foot laterals

~40% Appaloosa locations

10,000 foot laterals 1 mile 2 miles 5,000 extra feet

80 acre spacing 80 acre spacing

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Type curve economics – 10,000 foot lateral

14

  • Actual performance of 10,000 foot

lateral wells in Appaloosa is exceeding type curve

  • Type curve IRR of approximately 80%

and PV10 of more than $15.0 million using June 30 strip pricing

  • Strong production supports early well

payout

Peak 30-day rate (Boe per day)

  • N. Goat 02 2201H (WCA)

2,116

  • N. Mitre 02 2101H (WCA)

3,131

  • S. Elephant 02 1004H (WCA)

2,907 Development type well Wolfcamp A Peak 30-day (gross, Boe) 2,024 EUR (gross, MBoe)1 2,338 AFE ($ million) 8.8

1. 3-stream, without economic limit 2. Revised from version included in August 15, 2016 investor presentation

IRR – D&C cost, product price Cumulative production2

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Actual production v. type curve

15

Wolfcamp A – Appaloosa 10,000 foot lateral

  • North Goat 02 2201H
  • North Mitre 02 2101H
  • South Elephant 02 1004H
  • North Elephant 02 1001H
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Type curve economics – 7,500 foot lateral

16

  • Minimal decline between 30-day and

90-day peak rates

  • Jolly and Flying Dog EURs exceeding

type curve

  • Type curve IRR of more than 45% and

PV10 of $8.2 million using June 30 strip pricing

1. 3-stream, without economic limit 2. Revised from version included in August 15, 2016 investor presentation

IRR – D&C cost, product price Peak 30-day rate (Boe per day) Jolly 1201BH (WCA) 1,552 Flying Dog 1401BH (WCA) 1,475 Development type well Wolfcamp A Peak 30-day (gross, Boe) 1,688 EUR (gross, MBoe)1 2,014 AFE ($ million) 8.2 Cumulative production2

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Actual production v. type curve

17

Wolfcamp A – Mustang 7,500 foot lateral

  • Jolly 1201BH
  • Flying Dog 1401BH
  • Thunder Canyon 0204H
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Organic production growth1

18

  • In the conservative outlook of one rig in 2017 and two rigs in 2018 we almost

double company production in two years

  • Running two rigs in 2017 and assuming two rigs in 2018, 2018 average daily

production would approach 30,000 Boe

Total company production

10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 2016 2017 2018 Boe per day 1 rig 2017, 2 rigs 2018 2 rigs 2017, 2 rigs 2018

Midpoint of guidance 12,500 Boe per day

  • 1. Estimated total company production based on drilling scenarios and utilizing current type curves
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Aneth Field overview

19

Foundation asset

  • 1.5 billion barrels OOIP
  • Produced 442 MMBbl of oil through

2015 (30% recovery)

  • Ongoing successful CO2 flood
  • Aneth and McElmo Creek units

predict an average recovery of 40%

  • f OOIP with CO2 flood
  • CO2 flood opportunities remain in

substantial portions of the field

  • Gross field oil production up 26% since

acquisition

Aneth Field

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Aneth Field performance

20

  • Aneth Field production has remained essentially flat over the past two years

despite lease operating expense per Boe declining an average of more than 3% per quarter, and more than 25% overall

Boe per day vs. LOE per Boe, net Aneth Field – Production vs. LOE (net)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Aneth Field performance

21

  • Similar to lease operating expense, total capital expenditures have also

averaged a decline of more than 6% per quarter, or more than 51% overall

Boe per day vs. capital expenditures, net Aneth Field – Production vs. capital expenditures (net)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Capitalization and improving credit metrics

22

Deleveraging graphic

  • Assumes two rigs in 2017 and two

rigs in 2018

  • Pro forma for the closing of the

midstream transaction, we had approximately $100 million of availability under the revolving credit facility

  • 1. Estimated total company debt and EBITDA based on drilling scenarios and utilizing current type curves

Pro forma as of 6/30/16 Revolving credit facility

  • $

Secured term loan facililty 128.3 8.5% Senior unsecured notes due 2020 400.0 Total debt 528.3 $ Less: cash (4.6) Net debt 523.7 $ Availability under revolving credit facility Borrowing base 105.0 $ Less letters of credit (3.6) Availability 101.4 $ Capitalization table ($ million)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Revised guidance

23

  • At the mid-point, production would be approximately 13% higher than our
  • riginal guidance and up 32% from aggregate 2015 production1
  • At the mid-point, LOE would be approximately 10% lower than our prior

guidance and 18% below our 2015 expenditures

1. Pro forma for the asset divestitures in Texas and Wyoming

Original Updated guidance August 2016 Projected production Annual MBoe 3,730 – 4,350 4,246 – 4,904 Boe per day 10,200 – 11,900 11,600 – 13,400 Midpoint (Boe per day) 11,050 12,500 Projected costs Lease operating expense ($ million) $67 – $77 $60 – $70 General and administrative ($ million) $23 – $27 $23 – $27 Production ad related taxes (% of production revenue) 12% – 14% 12% – 14% Depletion, depreciation and amortization ($ per Boe) $11.00 – $13.00 $11.00 – $13.00 Projected capital expenditures ($ million) $115 – $135 $115 – $135 2016 Guidance update

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Investment highlights

24

World class asset base

  • Core of the core Delaware Basin acreage position
  • More than 320 operated Wolfcamp A and B drilling locations on

concentrated acreage Excellent drilling economics

  • 10,000 foot Wolfcamp A wells average rates of return exceed 100%1
  • First 5 gross (4.0 net) 2016 Wolfcamp A wells added 14.5 MMBoe of

estimated reserves and $122 million of PV10

1

Superior execution

  • At the mid-point, production up 32% from 2015 production, pro forma

for the asset divestitures in Texas and Wyoming

  • 2016 drilling program expanded to a total of fourteen wells

Cost control and capital discipline

  • 2Q16 LOE per Boe was a record low for Company
  • Drilling and completion costs continue to decrease

Financial flexibility

  • Closed midstream transaction with net proceeds of $36 million, plus

future performance payments

  • Availability of $100 million; undrawn revolver as August 31, 2016

1. Full cycle evaluation used actual revenue through the end of the second quarter and the June 30 NYMEX strip pricing thereafter; captures drilling, completion and facilities costs; incorporates eight PUDs associated with drilling

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Appendix

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Pricing assumptions

26

June 30, 2016 strip Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Oil ($/Bbl) 49.54 52.17 53.69 54.60 55.43 56.22 Gas ($/MMBtu) 3.04 3.18 3.02 3.00 3.06 3.19

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Current hedge positions

27

As of August 31, 2016

Current oil derivative positons Bbl/day % Hedged utilizing Swap Collars Options Term hedged Swaps Collars Options strike Sold put Floor Cap Sold Call 2016 8,526 77% 23% 0% $80.11

  • $45.00

$51.68

  • 2017

4,594 33% 67% 0% $51.10

  • $46.15

$57.80

  • 2018

1,100 0% 0% 100%

  • $50.00

Current gas derivative positions MMBtu/day % Hedged utilizing Swap Collars Options Term hedged Swaps Collars Options strike Sold put Floor Cap Sold Put 2016 7,123 72% 28% 0% $2.98

  • $2.73

$2.84

  • 2017

9,349 21% 79% 0% $2.81

  • $2.52

$3.39

  • Current NGL derivative positions

Bbl/day % Hedged utilizing Swap Collars Options Term hedged Swaps Collars Options strike Sold put Floor Cap Sold Put 2016 300 100% 0% 0% $19.53

  • 2017

300 100% 0% 0% $19.53

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Margin and cost structure

28

Non-GAAP reconciliation

1. Includes workover and excludes non-cash charges. 2. Net of Copas reimbursements. Excludes non-cash charges.

($ in millions, except as noted) 2015 2016 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Full year Q1 Q2 YTD

Sales volumes Total MBoe 1,215 1,231 1,144 946 4,536 820 1,080 1,900 Revenue $ 41.1 $ 48.4 $ 36.6 $ 28.5 $ 154.6 $ 19.0 $ 35.4 $ 54.4 Realized derivative gains 24.2 18.0 24.4 26.6 93.2 27.8 20.5 48.3 Revenue including hedging $ 65.3 $ 66.4 $ 61.0 $ 55.1 $ 247.8 $ 46.8 $ 55.9 $ 102.7 Expenses Operating expenses 1 20.2 19.2 20.3 19.0 78.7 13.7 15.6 29.3 Taxes 5.9 6.4 5.4 2.3 20.0 3.1 4.3 7.4 G&A 2 4.4 4.9 4.4 6.0 19.7 6.8 6.2 13.0 Cash-settled incentive awards

  • 0.3

0.4 0.5 1.2 0.8 1.4 2.2 Other expense

  • 0.1
  • 0.1
  • Total expenses

30.5 30.9 30.5 27.8 119.7 24.4 27.5 51.9

Adjusted EBITDA $ 34.8 $ 35.5 $ 30.5 $ 27.3 $ 128.1 $ 22.4 $ 28.4 $ 50.8

Capital expenditures Non-CO2 capital $ 25.0 $ 7.1 $ 5.4 $ 13.5 $ 51.0 $ 27.7 $ 33.4 $ 61.1 CO2 purchases 2.1 2.4 2.2 2.2 8.9 1.6 1.7 3.3 Total 27.1 9.5 7.6 15.7 59.9 29.3 35.1 64.4 Divestitures (0.5) (43.6) 0.4 (239.8) (283.5) (0.2) 0.2

  • Total capital expenditures

$ 26.6 $ (34.1) $ 8.0 $ (224.1) $ (223.6) $ 29.1 $ 35.3 $ 64.4

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Margin and cost structure per Boe

29

Non-GAAP reconciliation

1. Includes workover and excludes non-cash charges. 2. Net of Copas reimbursements. Excludes non-cash charges. ($ per Boe) 2015 2016 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Full year Q1 Q2 YTD Revenue $ 33.86 $ 39.32 $ 32.00 $ 30.14 $ 34.09 $ 23.16 $ 32.78 $ 28.62 Realized derivative gains 19.91 14.61 21.31 28.11 20.54 33.82 19.03 25.41 Adjusted revenue $ 53.77 $ 53.93 $ 53.31 $ 58.25 $ 54.63 $ 56.98 $ 51.81 $ 54.04 Expenses Operating expenses 1 16.59 15.64 17.75 20.08 17.35 16.70 14.46 15.42 Taxes 4.85 5.20 4.75 2.40 4.41 3.83 3.93 3.89 G&A 2 3.68 3.87 3.91 6.39 4.36 8.24 5.74 6.82 Cash-settled incentive awards

  • 0.28

0.31 0.51 0.26 0.97 1.33 1.18 Other expense (0.01) 0.07 (0.01) (0.02) 0.01 (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) Total expenses 25.11 25.06 26.71 29.37 26.39 29.73 25.46 27.30 Adjusted EBITDA $ 28.65 $ 28.86 $ 26.60 $ 28.88 $ 28.24 $ 27.25 $ 26.35 $ 26.74

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Adjusted EBITDA

30

Non-GAAP reconciliation

($ in millions) 2015 2016 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Full year Q1 Q2 YTD Net income (loss) $ (208.2) $ (259.1) $ (182.8) $ (92.2) $ (742.3) $ (85.3) $ (36.9) $ (122.2) Adjustments: Interest $ 11.2 $ 15.8 $ 16.3 $ 21.1 $ 64.4 $ 13.1 $ 13.0 $ 26.1 Taxes (22.4)

  • (22.4)
  • Depletion, depreciation and amortization

31.9 26.6 21.9 13.9 94.3 10.4 10.8 21.2 Ceiling test impairment 220.0 210.0 198.0 77.0 705.0 58.0

  • 58.0

Stock-based compensation 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.4 12.4 2.3 1.4 3.7 Mark-to-market loss (gain) on derivatives (0.7) 39.2 (25.9) 4.1 16.7 23.9 40.1 64.0 Total adjustments $ 243.0 $ 294.6 $ 213.3 $ 119.5 $ 870.4 $ 107.7 $ 65.3 $ 173.0 Adjusted EBITDA $ 34.8 $ 35.5 $ 30.5 $ 27.3 $ 128.1 $ 22.4 $ 28.4 $ 50.8

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Quarterly prices and volumes

31

2015 2016 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Full year Q1 Q2 YTD

Average prices: Oil ($ per Bbl) $ 41.47 $ 50.54 $ 40.04 $ 35.46 $ 42.16 $ 26.63 $ 39.75 $ 33.95 NGL ($ per Bbl) 10.02 12.19 8.72 9.99 10.32 4.30 7.64 6.41 Gas ($ per Mcf) 2.64 2.27 2.56 2.15 2.43 1.64 1.38 1.49 Production volumes: Oil (MBbl) 876 861 800 733 3,271 668 842 1,510 NGL (MBbl) 97 118 105 80 400 53 91 144 Gas (MMcf) 1,447 1,508 1,439 800 5,194 594 877 1,472 MBoe 1,215 1,231 1,144 946 4,536 820 1,080 1,900