SLIDE 36
- COMPARE TO NORMAL RESIDENCES:
- Use for reducing the density and improving
the living standard
- Suitable in small sites with high densely
populated
- Time for constructing project is just more or
less than 1 year.
- Small funding investment. Local people and
the city can together contribute money for constructing.
- Don’t have to improve the infrastructural
system, and do not put much pressure on the old infrastructure.
- Use for reducing the density, improving the
living standard, and widening the city
- Suitable in large and new sites in new
developing urban areas
- Time for constructing project is normally
more than 2 years
- Large funding investment. Investors are the
city, the country, banks, companies, or individuals … ( depends
how to contribute funds )
infrastructural system has to be improved before
parallel with the
- project. This makes time of the project
come longer than constructing step.
- Totally new area and population
- Investors
do not care much about traditional element, not only because of the different context, but also of the economical benefits.
- People can resettle.
- Easy to keep the tradition because of the
small scale and the same population after the project.