B Y : C A S S A N D R A R I V A S , O P H E L I A W A N G , A N D B O S T E V E N S N O R T H E R N A R I Z O N A U N I V E R S I T Y
Land Use Classification and Deforestation Detection in Southwestern - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Land Use Classification and Deforestation Detection in Southwestern - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Land Use Classification and Deforestation Detection in Southwestern Nicaragua B Y : C A S S A N D R A R I V A S , O P H E L I A W A N G , A N D B O S T E V E N S N O R T H E R N A R I Z O N A U N I V E R S I T Y Introduction/Background
Introduction/Background
Rapid land use change in the tropics
Deforestation Fragmentation Environmental degradation
Determining current land use and temporal change
is important
Sustainable conservation and restoration planning
Research Objectives and Questions
Objective: To delineate areas of vulnerability to
change in SW Nicaragua, specifically areas of deforestation and natural regeneration between the years of 2000-2009 in order to inform future conservation and restoration efforts in the region.
What are the land use patterns revealed in the land
use/cover classification?
How have the land use patterns changed since the
year 2000?
What are the current vulnerable areas of change?
Methods: Study Area
Rivas Isthmus Paso del Istmo Ecosystems include:
Dry-tropical forests, moist forested areas, and coastal mangroves
Other land cover types
include: Pasture, plantation, crops, and urban
(Map sources: ArcMap 10.1; Paso Pacifico.org)
Methods: Field Data Collection & Classification
Ground Referencing Data
Collection
Digitize roads and access
points
398 data points collected;
assessed cover data at each point
Imagery SPOT, collected Jan-Feb 2009 Classification Manual training polygons ENVI 4.7 RuleGen (Quest) Final Classes:
- Wetland
- Urban
- Crop
- Pasture
- Plantation
- Young Regrowth
- Old Regrowth
- Young Secondary Forest
- Old Secondary Forest
Accuracies and Kappa statistics
Methods: Change Detection & Cluster Analysis
Land-use/cover classification
2000 (Sesnie et al. 2008)
Post-classification change
detection in ENVI
Classification preparation for
change detection analysis
Plantation
Hotspots/cold spots of change
Cluster and Outlier Analysis
using Moran’s I
Neighborhood clustering score
Final 2009 Classification
- Over all accuracy is 87.68%
- Producers accuracies range
76.16-95.63%
- Users accuracies range
76.34 - 95.52 %
- Khat scores– overall and all
individual classes except for wetland-mixed and old regrowth are in strong agreement
Forest Change (2000-2009)
10 20 30 40 50 60 Crop Pasture Regrowth Plantation Forest Change (%) Class Type
Forest Change
No Change
Forest to Pasture
- Hotspots of change occur in the
Northcentral part of the isthmus
- Also in the southern region where
last large tracks of forest occur despite rugged terrain
- Cold spots occur throughout region
Forest to Regrowth
- Hot spots occur in pockets along
the rugged Pacific mountains
- Cold spots occur in throughout
the intense topography
- At some point this forest was
converted into another class and now regrowing
Forest to Plantation
- Hotspots occur in a few pockets to
the north and in the agricultural lake side area
- Cold spots occur in the southern
area where old secondary forest remain*
Regrowth Change (2000-2009)
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Crop Pasture Regrowth Plantation Forest Change (%) Class Type
Regrowth Change
No Change
Regrowth to Pasture
- Change is scattered throughout
and is prolific
- Reveals the strong influence of
this class in the area
- Hot spots are specifically located
in the north central region
Regrowth to Forest
- Hotspots are taking place in the
southern part of the isthmus
- Important for increasing forest
near other older forest
- Reveals the change in the area
despite rugged topography
Discussion
Change Detection
50% of the secondary forest was converted into other classes Deforestation is still occurring at a high rate approximately
5.6% per year
Regrowth is converted mainly to pasture (prevailing force) However, is also maturing into secondary forest (23%)
Conclusions
Future conservation efforts should utilize this data for a more
comprehensive conservation assessment
Deforestation and rapid land use change is continuing to
- ccur throughout this dynamic landscape
Conservation and restoration efforts must be efficient given
limitations
Cluster (hotspot/coldspot) analysis helped in defining specific areas of
change